Broken Blossoms or the Yellow Man and the Girl (1919) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
112 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"With perhaps a whiff of the lilied pipe still in his brain"
Steffi_P17 September 2008
After Birth of a Nation and Intolerance, this is probably DW Griffith's third best-known feature. This is perhaps in part because it conveniently counters the appalling racism of Birth, with its positive of portrayal of mixed-race relationships and condemnation of xenophobia. It is also among his shorter features and therefore easier to digest than those earlier epics. Unfortunately though it is not of the same high calibre as his mid-1910s successes.

Although he had lead the way in the first half of the decade, by this point Griffith had been overtaken by younger talent, many of whom had been his students, and his work was already looking increasingly old-fashioned. However Griffith had not lost his own talent, and in its favour I will say Broken Blossoms has one of the most convincingly bleak portrayals of a setting in any film of this time. In the Spartan street scenes you can almost feel the cold and the sense of collective misery, while the cluttered interiors perfectly evoke poverty and squalor. Here and there he even adopts the low-key lighting patterns pioneered by Cecil B. DeMille. In contrast, when required Griffith will hit us with an image of great beauty and delicacy, such as his shot of Lillian Gish curled up on the shop floor. In this way he uses visual style to bring out the theme of the picture – rays of beauty amidst darkness and suffering.

Where Broken Blossoms looks particularly dated however is in the acting style of the three leads. In contrast to the realism of the sets and many of the extras, Gish, Bathelmess and Crisp are nothing but hammy stereotypes, grimacing and waving their arms about like the supporting cast of a Keystone comedy. These performances, along with daft little devices such as Gish holding her smile up with her fingers, completely rob the film of its dignity. In its defence, it is possible Griffith had some method in encouraging such overacting – Gish's performance is toned down in her scenes with Bathlemess, suggesting her character is only her natural self when she is with him. Crisp too is at his most exaggerated when his is with Gish, as if his outbursts of anger towards her make him an animal. Still, this isn't really enough to counter the three of them putting on a ridiculous pantomime show the rest of the time.

As a side note, it has been suggested that Griffith never used a point-of-view shot in his entire career. In fact, by 1919 they were fairly commonplace and while Griffith may have had trouble keeping up with the times there are a few of them in Broken Blossoms. When Bathelmess watches Gish from inside his shop, we see her framed in the window as he sees her, portrayed at her most beautiful and dignified. It is of great importance to the story that we experience his impression of her, and it shows again that in spite of everything Griffith was willing and able to utilise up-to-date cinematic technique.

Broken Blossoms is no exception to the tried-and-tested formula of Griffith features, and as can be expected finishes with a climactic ride-to-the-rescue. The actual "ride" itself is a bit lacklustre here, but Griffith instead concentrates on his other favourite suspense scenario – the "sealed room". The device of a young woman trapped inside a room while some menacing man threatens her from outside goes back to Griffith's earliest shorts, and the version here is one of his best. Rather than framing Gish in the usual three-quarters shot in a full-size room as he had done in many Biograph shorts, Griffith instead squeezes her and the camera into a cramped cupboard, involving the audience in the sense of claustrophobia. The only downside to this sequence is that Donald Crisp clearly doesn't know how to use an axe properly.

On balance, Broken Blossoms is not a terrible picture, but it is certainly among Griffith's weaker features. Some might say that it has to be considered a product of its time, but check out the sophistication of, say, DeMille's Male and Female, or Chaplin's First National shorts of the same year, and it's clear this is no valid defence. Broken Blossoms may have its moments, but it's no masterpiece.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Blossoms beautifully and far from broken
TheLittleSongbird17 April 2020
The more that has been seen of DW Griffith's (almost all of them seen being very good to masterpiece, caring not only for 'The Birth of a Nation'), the more interesting he and his work have become to me. He may not be one of my favourite ever directors, but he is one of the most innovative and influential silent film directors. Also have loved Lillian Gish more and more with each film seen of hers, again more to see but no other silent film actress was as expressive as her and so movingly.

'Broken Blossoms' has been hailed as one of Griffith's best by many. Personally don't quite agree and do slightly prefer 'Orphans of the Storm' and 'Intolerance' as far as his feature films go ('Way Down East' needs a re-watch but remember thinking highly of that too). 'Broken Blossoms' is still extremely good and almost is one of his best, considering how many good things it has and how brilliantly the film executes them. It is interesting for being his most expensive film, or at least one of them, and perhaps his most ambitious in terms of characterisation.

Despite there being so many fine things, there are drawbacks. 'Broken Blossoms' is a very rare case of Donald Crisp being the worst thing in any of his flms, when he usually is one of the best and a redeeming merits in his not so great films. Here he is made to uncharacteristically overact wildly and it jars with everything else, it was like watching a different Donald Crisp.

Also felt that the music didn't gel with the setting or the mood, the film needed a more understated score that one not as over-emphatic.

Conversely, it is truly hard to believe that 'Broken Blossoms' was only shot in eighteen days, when it looks so much better than a lot of films that took much longer to make (sorry if that sounds cliched, but it had to be said). It was an expensive production and it absolutely shows, especially in the quite stunning photography with inventive and quite advanced techniques not heavy on gimmicks, such as revolutionary use of tinted film stock. Griffith's direction is some of his most technically advanced and accomplished, while not having a "biting off more than he can chew" feel. The studio sets don't look like studio sets at all and the misty atmosphere and seediness can be felt, the expense obvious.

Story is a very poignant and human one, with one of 'Broken Blossoms' biggest selling points being the delicately handled and beautifully developed central relationship, that has so much heart and emotion. The characterisation is some of the most complex of any Griffith film, perrhaps the most ambitious, with two compellingly real lead characters. Despite the unintentionally bizarre way he's made up, which some have also found distasteful, that doesn't stop Richard Barthelmess from giving a nobly sensitive performance. Even better is the always wonderful Gish showing perfectly why she was a Griffith prolific leading lady for very good reason. Not many silent film stars at the time did pathos as expressively and movingly as Gish.

In summary, very good and very nearly great despite a disappointing Crisp and jarring score. 8/10
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Griffith Makes a Course Correction.
PCC09215 January 2021
D.W.Griffith returns for another one and it would appear that he was still fighting with the demons left over from A Birth of a Nation (1915). He again tried to deal with the fires of racism, but this time with a love story and another appearance by Lillian Gish, in Broken Blossoms (1919). This film's title is actually "Broken Blossoms or the Yellow Man and the Girl". "Yellow Man" refers to the Asian man, Cheng Huan, who falls in love with Gish's Lucy. Right off the bat we get exposed to old time racist terms. The "C" word makes an appearance too. But, Griffith does use this film as a tool to teach a lesson to those who are evil or just plain bad.

It covers a lot of domestic/controversial issues, such as, interracial relationships, child abuse, racism and bullying. It is a hope that this film was the first stepping stone to finding tolerance in the world. It also is a telling lesson about, no matter how civilized you are, you can still do a lot of wrong. Huan (Barthelmess), leaves his homeland to go to England to spread the wisdom of the Buddha to the West and the Anglo-Saxons. It is the biggest mistake he would make in his life. It is a telling story about how the good guy finishes last. The man who comes to the civilized world to try and help make those people better, finds out that he is in the wrong place at the wrong time and nothing but torment befalls him.

Huan assigns himself the job to look after a young woman (Gish), who is terrorized and beaten by her boxer father (Crisp), on a daily basis. Huan has to deal with snitches and liars who align themselves with the evil boxer and in the end finds himself falling into the same dark abyss that he tried to teach others to stay away from. This is an amazing story and has been told many times since, but being that this is a pioneering effort, makes it all the more powerful. True, there are parts that are slow and even boring, but it is that tense situation that starts to build and build until the terrifying and sad end.

8.1 (B MyGrade) = 8 IMDB
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Well-Acted, Memorable Story
Snow Leopard2 November 2004
With some excellent acting performances and an interesting, memorable story, "Broken Blossoms" is one of the better pictures of the late 1910s, and it has held up rather well despite a couple of obvious signs of age. It would be hard to top Lillian Gish's performance as Lucy in any era, and Richard Barthelmess turns in a purposefully restrained and surprisingly effective performance in a role that was far from easy.

The story ties together several weighty themes, and most of them are still pertinent. This is the kind of movie that is sometimes considered to be dated, yet in terms of the main conflicts and struggles that the characters face, there are probably fewer differences between 1919 and 2004 than many might wish there to be. With material like this, it is also easy to allow it to become labored or heavy-handed. As it is, the tone is somber and austere throughout, yet most of the time this is in a thoughtful way.

Since Griffith's work is still so well-known and meets with such widely varying responses, it can sometimes be hard to evaluate his movies individually, without reference to the rest of his filmography. The story here is unusual enough in itself, with the different races and religions of the characters and the implied images represented by each of them. Each character is rather quickly defined as good or bad - a common state of affairs in Griffith movies - and as a result the story is told in a way that reflects that presumption, for better or for worse.

What is hard to deny is that the story and characters will stick with you afterwards. The impression that it leaves is not an entirely happy one, but the movie successfully evokes the humanity of all involved, which is a not unworthy goal and a not insignificant achievement.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of film's first interracial love stories
gbill-748777 September 2019
Lillian Gish is pretty compelling playing a teenager in this film, with her angelic face and magnetic eyes showing such haunting fragility. The scenes of a brutal whipping she gets at the hands of her abusive father (Donald Crisp) and his taking an axe to the closet she's hiding in are horrifying. Director D.W. Griffith gives us such an atmosphere of squalor and fog in London that the scene of innocent tenderness with a Chinese immigrant (Richard Barthelmess, argh) comes as a nice contrast. He's protected her on the street and shown her some simple kindness, and the intertitle which reads "Blue and yellow silk caressing white skin - her beauty so long hidden shines out like a poem" is one of the few lovely moments in an otherwise rather depressing film.

Unfortunately the film has a few distasteful elements, not the least of which is casting Barthelmess in the role of Cheng Huan, and then referring to him as the Yellow Man, Chink, and Chinky. He also acts the part poorly, maybe giving us a portrait of a gentle soul, yes, but the way he moves around, emotes, and leans in to kiss Gish is generally weird and creepy. There were laws against interracial relations so it's understandable the film didn't go there, and the character could be justified in his hesitance for a lot of reasons: he knows the laws against miscegenation, he knows she's only 15 (he does give her a doll after all), he's been steeped in Buddhism, or he's just a kind person who doesn't want to take advantage of her. His love does seem on a higher plane, and it's pretty sweet. The worst moment was when he approaches her a second time, and Gish recoils with a look of disgust on her face that seems to mean only one thing. We also see Cheng Huan in an opium den while depressed early on.

While the film includes some of the stereotypes of the day, what it was telling mainstream audiences was something positive, that an Asian man may be living by a religious code with tenets similar to their own (the Buddhist quote early on being a variant of Christianity's Golden Rule), that he might fall in love just as anyone else might, and that he might act bravely and be a hero, rather than preying on a vulnerable white girl. I also loved the criticism of xenophobia in this intertitle: "Above all, Battling (the abusive father character) hates those not born in the same great country as himself." The film was among the first to show an interracial love story which was pretty daring for the fledgling United Artists, and it's interesting to think about it relative to films which would follow, e.g. Piccadilly (1929) and The Bitter Tea of General Yen (1933).
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Introduction to Silent Movies for those who only know Chaplin
drpax6 July 2005
"In this scarlet house of sin, does he ever hear the temple bells?" Broken Blossoms is the movie I use to introduce people to silent film who only know it from Chaplin shorts or Birth of a Nation. It is one of the most sensitive movies ever made, in my opinion, and is usually overlooked in any top 100 movie listing. I fear the oversight is due to the listers not having actually seen it.

The version I have--which is now sadly out of print--is the Thames Video version with Lillian Gish's introduction. It is also the one with the original Louis Gotshalk score, pieces of which are sometimes heard on other versions, but the impact of the full orchestral Gotshalk score is overwhelming on an already exquisite film. If you have a chance to see this version, by all means do so.

In answer to a question in another posting, the movie WAS originally tinted--it was part of the "epic poetry" attempt and was quite common with a lot of Griffith work--even back to "A Corner in Wheat".

While I am an immense Gish fan, a lot has already been said about Miss Lillian in the other comments, so I will concentrate on Dick Bartlemess as Chen Huan. The quote above accompanied by his sad look as he leans against the wall of his curio shop tell it all: wrecked youthful enthusiasm--his despair only temporarily abated by the "pipe" in the Limehouse opium dens. His dreams of youth, all packed away in his garret, are only brought out when the one thing that gives him hope that is goodness amidst all the squalor stumbles into his shop.

Only after Lucy arrives can Chen Huan allow himself to dream--to return to golden days of learning, beauty and goodness and ideals. He literally places his dreams of his lost youth on the trembling body of Lucy, but it such a pristine ideal he dare not "defame" it, or it too will disappear like all his other dreams. He must observe it from afar--almost ephemeral. He knows what Hell is like (even before he was shown the booklet by the Christian Brothers). His hell is his lost heart, his lost love. "Bits and pieces of his shattered life." Almost invariably when I find someone to share the movie with me, they are amazed how well it is made and how well it's core story stands up to today. The particulars of Chinese, Cockney and London are not the point; it is a story of hope and despair, of lovers and dreamers. A mature story for a mature audience.

I often wonder if it could be made today. As open as we think we are, I wonder if the basic story could be told again. No matter--it's been told--excellently
38 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
artistically beautiful but a horrid film nonetheless
planktonrules19 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The is one of the prettiest silent films ever made. The cameraman really knew his stuff and used a wide variety of cinematic tricks to enhance the movie and add an aura of magic to the film. However, despite this, the film is a horrid mess in the way it portrays the main male lead in the film. He is a Chinese man and is simply called "Chinky"--a name sure to irritate and offend all in the 21st century. It's sad, because at the time it was made, the film was meant to be a serious appeal for understanding and acceptance. But combining this name with a white actor that looks about as Asian as Mantan Moreland, the film is a sad relic of the past. However, for historical reasons, it is still an important film--particularly to film historians. It lets us see just how far we have grown as a nation in less than a century.
11 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Personally the best ever silent movie, completed in 1983
Spondonman26 March 2006
This has been one of my all-time favourite films since I taped it off UK Channel 4 1st October 1988 on its second showing, one to savour and revel in every few years. There really is no choice: the only version worth seeing is this one, the Brownlow & Gill UK remaster with Louis F. Gottchalk's themes lushly orchestrated by David Cullen and Carl Davis and the Thames Silents Orchestra. From a good silent film Broken Blossoms is beautifully transformed into a work of Art, the merger of the music and Billy Bitzer's visuals can be so striking. And the intelligent tinting was gorgeous too. Over the years I've even played it just for the music sometimes!

The story? Depressed Chinese ex-missionary in London falls under the spell of listless poverty-stricken beautiful white 15 yo daughter of violent boxer. The crafty and base whites think the worst, but we know that the yellow man's love remained pure - even his worst foe says this ... I know that most people today would hoot at the acting abilities displayed: Lillian Gish's pathetic submissiveness, Donald Crisp's over the top savage expressions and Richard Barthelmess's determinedly serious inscrutability, but appreciation of silent melodramas as a genre is really required rather than simply selecting just one film to watch, such as this. And then again some people have to get over a white man playing a Chinese man whilst simultaneously approving of miscegenation in these much more enlightened times! Would these same people be bothered if a Chinese played a white man? Along with Birth of a Nation and Intolerance, this was Griffiths' best work, pinnacles of the cinema.

Utterly spellbinding poetic stuff for the enlightened, dreadful if your favourites are cgi-riddled and no older than 6 months. And don't expect a remotely happy ending! The beauty that all the world missed smote him to the heart (paraphrase).
44 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Griffith stars Gish and Barthelmess in tragic tale of operatic excesses...
Doylenf15 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I have to preface my remarks by stating that BROKEN BLOSSOMS, for all of its worth, is suitable only for fans of silent films who can forgive all the excesses of silent melodrama.

I'm not an aficionado of silent films, but BROKEN BLOSSOMS is noteworthy for what Griffith was able to achieve on film as early as 1919. And surprisingly, the most over-the-top performance comes from an amazing character actor, DONALD CRISP, who went on to become an unforgettable player in "talkies" years later, notably as the father in films like NATIONAL VELVET and LASSIE COME HOME. Crisp gives a wild-eyed, mouth-twisting performance that has him gnashing his teeth and looking like he's Mr. Hyde in his angry close-ups.

Here, he's the meanest of the mean, a father who abuses his daughter and then becomes fiercely protective when she dares to seek shelter elsewhere from a Chinese man who wants to spread the peaceful message of Buddha to Anglo-Saxons when he travels to "the great nation across the sea".

The scene shifts to the Limehouse district of London where his dreams are tested by the sordid realities of life--like opium dens. Enter Battling Burrows (DONALD CRISP) as the gorilla-like prizefighter who is the villain of the piece, in full swaggering mode and chewing the scenery with relish. Forlorn looking and frail, LILLIAN GISH wanders into the story at this point and we're told she's been badly treated by her brute of a father. Since she's treated no better than a doormat, we can tell where the story is going.

Naturally, she ends up in a dead faint near the Chinaman's store and he takes her in, giving her shelter, warmth and kindness that she never had before. Truthfully, Gish never manages to look like the fifteen year old girl she's supposed to be playing and her wan performance seems rather one note. Looking forlorn seemed to be her staple.

As with most silent films, the pacing is very slow and it's a good thirty-five minutes before Gish and Barthelmess even meet and the story picks up more interest. And let me say that by today's standards, the scenes of mistreatment in "the house of suffering" are ludicrous before Gish retreats to the streets and is taken in by Barthelmess.

A tender moment in the film has a title card sure to provoke some chuckles when Gish says to Barthelmess: "What makes you so good to me, Chinky?" Close-ups of Gish are not the most flattering, as others here seem to think. Instead, her tiny mouth and pinched face give her a look much older than her years that cannot be softened by soft focus photography. Barthelmess, on the other hand, has the looks and bearing of a romantic star even in his Oriental make-up and gives the film's most natural performance--at least until the last fifteen minutes.

***** POSSIBLE SPOILERS AHEAD ***** The melodramatic ending has Battling Burrows seeking revenge, outraged that his daughter is living under the same roof with her Chinaman protector. Unfortunately, the last fifteen minutes of the film reek of unabashed melodramatic excesses as the story delves into even darker territory with Gish's death at the hands of her abusive father and the Chinaman's eventual suicide after killing the brute.

The excesses are so over-the-top that you almost expect the characters to sing an operatic aria before dying.

Summing up: If you're a silent film fan, you may find this one worth watching. Everyone else, beware. It's not for every taste.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The best of all Griffith films
Shelly_Servo300029 December 2002
Many people believe the best Griffith film is "Intolerance"; some stand by "Way Down East" and still others believe in "Birth of a Nation" despite all its problems. However, I think "Broken Blossoms" is the Griffith film which stands the test of time and still rings true today, over 83 years from its debut.

"Broken Blossoms" is the story of two wounded, abused, seemingly hopeless individuals who find comfort and strength in one another. The Chinaman (played by Richard Barthelmess) and little Lucy Burrows (played by Lillian Gish) are as different as night is to day, however they complement each other and give each other what the other needs; Lucy gives the Chinaman respect as a human being, he in turn gives Lucy affection and love.

What happens to the two souls is, in my opinion, one of the most heartbreaking turn of events ever filmed. The brutal treatment of Lucy by her father and the ultimate sadness of the Chinaman at the end of the film always reduce me to tears.

Those who believe that silent movies are inferior to today's craft really needs to see "Broken Blossoms" and open their hearts and minds to a world that is beyond beauty and beyond pain.
43 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Crescendo of Sadness
iquine1 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
(Flash Review)

This started off slow but ended better than expected as it was more emotionally deep or heavy for the era than was it visually impressive. The film opens with a scene in China with a Chinese man with honorable values who immigrates to London. Here we contrast the Chinese man with that of a brutal British boxer who not only uses his fists in the ring but also on his daughter Lucy!! He basically treats her as a slave. I imagine a touchy subject to portray in the 19-teens. While Lucy buys frequent groceries, the Chinese man has the eyes for her even though she has a disheveled appearance. He makes her acquaintance and tries to show her how humane people can act. Once Lucy's father finds out she has been spending time with an immigrant, there'll be hell to pay. What will the boxing father do? Will Lucy ever get happiness in her life? While not the most visually intriguing film, it hit hard emotionally on tough subjects for the time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Terror and Passion
lugonian26 September 2003
BROKEN BLOSSOMS (United Artists, 1919), directed by DW Griffith, is a little film that's not only quite melodramatic, but terribly, terribly sad. In fact, it's labeled as American cinema's first tragedy. Unlike Griffith's epic masterpieces as THE BIRTH OF A NATION (1915) and INTOLERANCE (1916), each running over two hours in length, BROKEN BLOSSOMS, is in fact a simple story focusing on three central characters (Richard Barthelmess, Donald Crisp and Lillian Gish, in order of their appearance) that deals with touchy subject matters ranging from racial prejudice to child abuse, topics that are still sensitive issues even today.

Based on Thomas Burke's "The Chink and the Child," the story begins in China where Cheng Haun, also known as The Yellow Man (Richard Barthelmess), a young idealist, coming to the London slums where he hopes to convert rude Westerners to the gospel of the gentle Buddha. Instead he makes his living by running a curio shop. Battling Burrows (Donald Crisp), a small-time prizefighter by which the title cards describes him as "an abysmal brute, a gorilla from the jungles of East London," living with his illegitimate daughter, Lucy (Lillian Gish), a tragic figure who waits on him hand and foot. So terrified of him, whenever her father commands her to smile, the frightful Lucy simply pushes up the corners of her mouth with her fingers. After one of her frequent beatings, one night Lucy stumbles out of the house, walking to the Chinese curio shop where she faints in front of Cheng Haun's door. Cheng Haun finds bruised girl and takes her in, tending to her wounds. While under his care, Lucy, called "White Blossom" by the Chinaman, is treated with the kindness and sensitivity she's never had. When Battling Burrows is told of his daughter's whereabouts, he sets out to get "the dirty Chink" and to "learn them both."

In spite of its old-fashioned screenplay with the use of a white actor (Barthelmess) in an Oriental role, BROKEN BLOSSOMS is still timely. Lillian Gish gives an Academy Award winning performance playing the 15-year-old Lucy Burrows. Academy Award meaning that if the best actress award had existed in 1919, Gish would definitely have been recognized with that honor for her achievement in handling a difficult assignment in a believable manner. For famous climatic "closet scene" in which Gish's character, Lucy, locks herself in to avoid another brutal whipping by her father, is as realistic as any performance could ever be. As Burrows breaks the door apart, piece by piece, with an ax, the terrified Lucy, with no place to run nor hide, goes into a frenzy like an trapped animal. Being a silent film, one can virtually hear the screaming coming through the screen. For this scene alone, Gish has proved her capability as one of the finest actresses in this history of film.

With such a depressing theme, BROKEN BLOSSOMS reportedly was a surprise hit upon its release. A very atypical Griffith production to say the least. The sole reason for its success is how Lucy is portrayed on screen, ranging from her tragically sad face and shoulder-length hair adding to the believability to her character, knowing full well that Gish was a young woman in her early twenties enacting the role of a 12 to 15 year-old child. Donald Crisp, the most unlikely candidate in getting any Father's Day cards after this performance, would appear as lovable fathers in numerous family films of the 1940s, as well as earning an Academy Award as Best Supporting Actor for HOW GREEN WAS MY VALLEY (20th-Fox, 1941). It was fortunate to Crisp's credit that his performance of the unsympathetic prizefighter with the colley-flower ear didn't ruin his future in films. Barthelmess, on the other hand, offers a sensitive portrayal of a caring and peaceful Chinaman against the wicked ways of the world. This is the film that elevated Barthelmess to the rank as top leading man through much of the 1920s, one opposite Gish again under Griffith's direction in another classic tale, WAY DOWN EAST (1920).

With a limited amount of actors listed in the cast, the supporting players consists of Arthur Howard as the fighting manager; Edward Piel as Evil Eye; Norman "Kid McCoy" Selby as a prizefighter; and George Nicholas as the Policeman. And was that Roscoe Karns as the reporter in the final portion of the story?

BROKEN BLOSSOMS was one of the twelve selected silent films that was broadcast on public television's 1975 presentation of THE SILENT YEARS, as hosted by Lillian Gish. Prior to its presentation, Gish discussed how the movie came about, and did so again practically word for word in the 1988 Thames video presentation prior to the feature presentation scored by Carl Davis. Over later years, BROKEN BLOSSOMS had been released under numerous video distributors with different music scores and different lengths. The Thames, Republic Home Video (organ scored) and KINO Video collections (with pleasing orchestration) comes closer to the original length of 90 to 95 minutes, restoring the opening segment and plot development (missing from "The Silent Years" broadcast) set in China involving Cheng before coming to the Limehouse district of England. The restored KINO version had been the print used for Turner Classic Movies' "Silent Sunday Nights" for quite some time before converting to new but inappropriate underscoring.

BROKEN BLOSSOMS has become the kind of movie in which success comes only once. This tragic tale was remade in England (with sound) in 1936, but little is known of it today, except for the fact that Griffith was originally slated to be the director. While the 1919 original may not be the sort of movie for all tastes, it's one that will be long remembered, thanks to the remarkable direction by the master, D.W. Griffith, and sensitive portrayals of Gish and Barthelmess combined. (***)
34 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Succinct in Sixteen
unclesamsavage18 April 2021
Rare forbidden love battles brutish British bondage. Phenomenal performances despite silence. Screenplay with a powerful message.

Screenplay...................................... 7 / 10 Acting............................................... 7 Visuals............................................ 7 Editing................................................ 6 Score...................................................... 8 Timeless Utility................................... 6 Total.................................................... 41 / 60 ~= 6.8 (rounded to 7) Verdict................................................. Recommended.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not as Good as I Hoped.
stasia_stasia27 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"It is a tale of temple bells, sounding at sunset before the image of Buddah; it is a tale of love and lovers; it is a tale of tears." Broken Blossoms is not a movie that you will see me recommending to all my friends and family. The entire beginning of this movie left you hanging with not being able to understand what is happening and hard to understand. During the beginning of the movie there are different time flips such as something happens some amount of years ago, then the present time, making it a little bit confusing.

Filmed in the early 1900's the editing of this movie were more then likely as high end as it can be. Broken Blossoms has different angle shots, many scenes, and a longer run time of 90 minutes. The only editing technique that I believe the film makers over used was the telescope focusing on people, and activities. Instead of giving notes on what the actors are saying to one another, the watchers are given poetic snippets of what is happening within the film, making some scenes a little more difficult to understand. Lillian Gish and Richard Barthelmess, the main actors in the film were not as talented as I would have hoped. A majority of them and other actors did not give the good affect of fear or love, but their faces ended up looking distorted and corny.

During the middle of the film when you are in better understand of what is going on, you can imagine how the ending will turn out. All in all Broken Blossoms is a moderate film, not intensely horrible to watch yet bearable. The ending wasn't one of a happy sense, but one of gloom showing us that not all stories end in happiness like we would hope.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Americanized London Story
tiedel29 December 2002
It is rather interesting to compare the silent D.W. Griffith BROKEN BLOSSOMS with its inspiration: the 1916 Thomas Burke short story The Chink And The Child, published in Limehouse Nights (Grant Richards Limited, London). Griffith has deliberately left out, added and changed parts of the story in his film. When Burke's collection of Limehouse stories was published it was feared that the book would be barred by the censor. Recently books by Vere Stacpoole (The Blue Lagoon) and D.H. Lawrence (The Rainbow) has been suppressed, as 'frankness in fiction was frowned upon...' (John Gawsworth - Foreword to: The Best Stories of Thomas Burke, Phoenix House, London, 1950). There were enough worrying themes in the story: its sadism, the utterly impossible interracial love affair and the girl's youth. In Burke's story Lucy is found in an opium joint, where a prostitute has taken her to make a profit out of the virgin. Cheng rescues the 'alabaster Cockney child' - she is only twelve - to bring her '...love and death.' Burke's poetic prose is not always graphic: «He took her hand and kissed it; repeated the kiss upon her cheek and lip and little bosom, twining his fingers in her hair. Docilely, and echoing the smile of his lemon lips in a way that thrilled him almost to laughter, she returned his kisses impetuously, gladly. ... And she was his; her sweet self and her prattle, and her birdlike ways were all his own. Oh, beautifully they loved. ...» Nevertheless elsewhere Burke clarifies the nature of their relation as « It may be that he forgot that he was in London and not in Tuan-tsen. It may be that he did not care. Of that nothing can be told. All that is known is that his love was a pure and holy thing.» Griffith's additions vary from Lucy's artificial smile to Cheng's religious mission. The Christian missionary is also Griffith's invention. He has a dig at Western Christian morality sending missionaries around the world while there's still enough to be done in Battling Burrows's own home town. Near the end Cheng kills Battling Burrows with a handgun as in any American western. In Burke's London Limehouse nights a snake deals with Battling Burrows. Was such a venomous revenge not personal enough to Griffith's American taste?
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Movie
b-gallagher215 March 2011
D.W. Griffith is a genius. A clear innovator to the art of motion photography. D.W. Griffith is probably one of the most important filmmakers in the history of film and this astonishing silent, Broken Blossoms is a clear indication of why. The style of acting portrays the young stages of conveying emotion and mood through a camera narrator. This film is by far one of Griffith's finest. The decor looks incredible, the costumes are superb and the mise-en-scene is very sophisticated, especially for it's time. This film really demonstrates the beginning of cinematography as well. Every shot from this wonderful picture if paused would look like a conventional photograph from that time period. But being played out as a film makes it that much more intriguing. This silent masterpiece was incredible to watch.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Yet Another Griffith/Gish Masterpiece
Ron Oliver31 March 2005
Like the BROKEN BLOSSOMS of a trampled rose, the pure affection between two unutterably lonely people is destroyed by evil & hatred.

Turning his back temporarily on the Silent epics of his past, movie master David Wark Griffith turned the laser beam of his talent on the tragic story of three pathetic individuals living in the slums of London's Limehouse: a fragile waif, her vicious father, and the gentle Chinese shopkeeper living nearby. No huge casts rampaging through innumerable subplots, no tremendous production values spent to illustrate the sweep & flow of a historical period. Just three people living increasingly desperate lives, brought together by a tidal wave of pure emotion.

Lillian Gish was right thinking she was too old to play the young girl, and she did so only at Griffith's insistence, but it is impossible to contemplate anyone else in the role. She is utterly luminous as the abused child who finds a few moments of glorious affection with the young foreigner from the East. Miss Gish's magically expressive face creates a classic cinema moment when she attempts to smile to save herself from a beating, pushing up the corners of her mouth with two fingers, while her tormented eyes reveal to the viewer her deep pain and fear. Later, in her celebrated closet scene, like a trapped animal she releases an explosion of frenzy which is still difficult to watch, as her attacker uses a hatchet to smash the barrier between them. Miss Lillian had started rehearsals while weakened from the Spanish Flu; she created a movie portrait which caught her genius forever.

Matching her in almost every particular is her costar Richard Barthelmess, who gives a most sensitive portrayal as the Chinese missionary who comes to England to proselytize for Buddha, but instead finds himself alone & friendless in the squalor of the great city. Barthelmess uses his eyes almost exclusively to express what's in his heart, bringing enormous dignity & repose to his role. It is too easy today to criticize a performer for playing an ethnic role, but once, to be able to do so convincingly, was considered the hallmark of a capable actor. Barthelmess does so with both conviction & distinction, bringing the film to a heartbreaking conclusion.

Rounding out the threesome is Englishman Donald Crisp. Although in reality the most gentle and affable of men, he nonetheless made a career during the Silent Era of playing violent brutes, never more despicable than here. His character glories in the terrors he inflicts on Miss Lillian, the viewer loathes him, and his eventual fate is most welcome & well deserved.

The film almost didn't get released. Paramount Pictures boss Adolph Zukor hated it; he thought it too morbid. Griffith raised the operating costs of $91,000 and purchased the film, releasing it through United Artists. Receptive audiences helped it make millions. As Miss Lillian said decades later, "Griffith put tragic poetry on the screen for the first time."
38 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
High-Class Pantomime
Otoboke20 July 2016
D.W. Griffith is known primarily for three of his biggest and most well-budgeted features and this is arguably the last of said trilogy. Poor Griffith. He came out with something rich in what he called patriotism and others simply tagged racist. So he decided to try something else, and then got slammed for being too lavish, ambitious and preachy. Finally along comes Broken Blossoms, a modest and earthly melodrama based for the most part within tiny, claustrophobic rooms where the weight of grief and suffering outnumber that of the bricks in the walls enclosing its victims. You couldn't be blamed for thinking it had a tenth of the budget of his first film, but you'd be wrong. In actuality his most expensive film to date, it's also perhaps his most ambitious in terms of characterisation and back-to-basics storytelling, albeit wrought with growing-pains as a result.

Set in what one could assume is Victorian-era London boiling over with strife and hard times, Broken Blossoms centres around hapless and sullen victim Lucy, daughter of professional boxer Burrows who often gets overly mad (for reasons never truly justified) before proceeding to take it out on his timid daughter in between beating people up for money and then spending said money on alcohol and women. Cue "The Yellow Man", a Chinese Buddhist who runs a shop, enjoys noodles and tea and has nothing to give but peace, love and a healthy dose of Eastern wisdom-slash-actually-it's-just-Confucius-speaking. He falls in love with Lucy, professes his "pure love" for her and Burrows goes pufferfish for a bit because he's a bit of a xenophobe.

In terms of film in the modern sense, it's all a bit of a saccharine, melodramatic mishap with very basic characterisation and drama more akin to a higher-class pantomime. However, considering its time and the films that came before, Griffith can't really be blamed for this one. And for the moments where the film does manage to tug on your heart strings through Lillian Gish's various degrees of insanity, desperation and endearing naivety, there's a charm here that many clamoured to see more of when they fell in love with Intolerance's modern-day segments. Various points do go overboard with the melodrama however, such as many moments where Lucy forces a smile whereupon she pushes up the corners of her lips in order to please those who obviously cannot see her tragic, wounded soul. It's this mundanely childish backdrop that spoils an otherwise forward-thinking and genuinely moving film. It's grating and sums up the movie well, however.

And yet, for every moment of wistful melancholia steeped in lukewarm, melodrama soup, there's always an overriding atmosphere that broods and overwhelms the movie's more irksome features. From the harsh, foggy London streets to the endlessly amusing fight scenes involving Burrows, Broken Blossoms is very much Intolerance without the historical sidestories or light-heartedness of its central love story, mixed with the character dynamics of Birth of a Nation. It's for this reason that those in the camp of finding Griffith's first major film a little too much to stomach, usually find at least either this film or his previous to be more to their liking. Personally I enjoy the more analytical and grander of the two to this one, but for those wanting more of said film's modern act, it should be no surprise if this is more up their alley. It can be a little broad at times, and often tries too hard to be frail and grim, but there's still plenty to love whether it's in Gish's wonderful performance or simply just in appreciating the stark change of pace from Griffith that favours tone and character over grand historical stories, huge elaborate sets and line-in-the-sand political statements.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
SMALL SCALE DOESN'T HALT GRIFFITH'S SUCCESS
Auburn66822 February 2004
Following the elaborate spectacles that were "The Birth of a Nation" and "Intolerance" D.W. Griffith seemed to have the formula intact for success. With broad sets, hundreds of extras, three hour epics, and tales told over years and even millenniums in the case of "Intolerance," the 90 minute "Broken Blossoms" would seem to have a handicap of sorts. It is but a simple morality tale involving three people that goes horribly awry. But true to Griffith form it works...and it works nearly perfect.

Gone are the visions of what formed countries, what creates intolerance, and the climaxes involving hundreds of people. "Broken Blossoms" is a mere story of forbidden love if such occurrences can actually be called "mere." And although the sets used to portray the foggy gloom and forbidding darkness of London's Limehouse district were indeed expensive, this was a film carried by its only three stars and one that relies totally on the telling of a story.

Richard Barthelmess plays Cheng Huan, a Buddhist missionary who now takes residence in Limehouse. His original intentions, to help the violent Anglo-Saxons understand pacifism, are subverted by his opium addiction. He runs a small shop in the fog of the city and it becomes his own depressed microcosmic world. The stunning Lilian Gish, who seemingly has no bounds as an actress or as an object of feminine beauty, plays Lucy, the daughter of an abusive alcoholic boxer. Donald Crisp plays this part so well that the lack of sound does not inhibit the volume of cruelty he enforces on his only daughter, nor our ability to feel her level of sheer pain and suffering.

Although all three of them may technically may be viewed as broken and products of their own respective worlds, when those worlds clash with each other and tragedy seems more likely, it is Gish who steals the show. Especially under Griffith's direction. And while Griffith may have already given the cinema more than its fair share of technological nuances with his first two features, he still manages to find subtle bits of direction that affect one's viewing of this sordid triangle: Gish's physical inability to smile and her seeking of solitude in something as simple as a flower cannot be emphasized enough as the film goes along.

Political historians may note that Griffith is up to his usual tricks of racism as it is portrayed in the Asian who is played by the white Barthelmess but this is unfounded. If anything, his character is uplifting, or at least attempts to be. One gets the feeling that his race does not impact the story's eventual ending despite what Crisp may bellow while drunk. Crisp's pleasure comes from Gish's pain and anyone, regardless of race, that tried to interfere would not have caused any sort of behavior change. Of course the Asian stereotypes of pacifism, opium addiction, and flowery imagery are played up to some degree but one can hardly argue over the degree of truth in them more than the story's beginning that sees drunken sailors duking it out at the shipyards over next to nothing. And it allows the film to have its ironic coda to boot.

In more detailed film classes, "Broken Blossoms" will get its share of time but overall Griffith will always have "Birth of a Nation" and "Intolerance" printed boldly next to his name with this film being more of a footnote. That is unfortunate because it stands up well for the time, involves excellent early character acting, and hits us closer to home...and to our heart.

The nutshell: I still believe this should be required viewing. The bigness of Griffith may be gone but he has aptly replaced it by creating atmosphere both in terms of environment and in people. The small story of insignificant lives trapped by their own measures suits Griffith, Gish, and Crisp extremely well...9/10.
26 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
white acting
SnoopyStyle5 September 2019
Cheng Huan (Richard Barthelmess) is sent to the uncivilized west to deliver the peaceful teachings of the Buddha. Once there, he falls prey to the vices and the disillusionment of the streets. He becomes a shopkeeper selling his Chinese trinkets. He is taken with young Lucy Burrows (Lillian Gish) who lives under her angry father Battling Burrows (Donald Crisp). Battling Burrows is a professional boxer who often whips his abused daughter. After one such beating, she finds refuge at Cheng Huan's shop.

While the filmmaker can have all the respect of the Chinese culture, it cannot avoid the white acting in the Chinese role. It is hard to overlook that bad visual in the lead character. Sometime I excuse it for being a different era but it's the squinty eyes acting that is so annoying. It also doesn't paint a terribly good picture of the man. There is something really creepy about him staring at Lucy all the time. I guess it's supposed to convey concern and protectiveness. It comes off as creepy. I can see this as a progressive story when people don't know better. It's horribly dated. Even the inserted music is bad. It's off-key to try to invoke Chinese music which only comes off as being off-key. I can see this as a compelling movie if redone with more modern eyes.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
D.W. Griffith shows cinema it's soul.
barhound7823 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Eschewing the epic grandeur of his previous works like Birth Of A Nation and Intolerance, Broken Blossoms is an exquisitely crafted tragedy from D.W. Griffith. Whilst perhaps not his most important film, it could very possibly be his most perfect.

Heartwarming and heartbreaking in equal measure, it is the story of an all too brief innocent love between two broken souls amongst unbearable poverty and brutality. Richard Barthelmess plays Chen (The Yellow Man), a noble soul full of peace and love who, as the film opens, leaves his homeland to spread the word of Buddha to "white barbarians" in England. However, the film cuts forward a few years and we find Chen living amidst the squalor of Londons docklands. His hope crushed by the drudgery and vice that surrounds him he flits between his small shop and an opium den where he loses himself in gambling and drugs.

There is, however, one ray of light. Lucy (Liilian Gish), an illegitimate fifteen year old girl who suffers daily abuse at the hands of her brutal, prizefighting father (Donald Crisp). Unable to smile after years of torment, she shuffles through the streets past Chens window everyday, stopping at the opposite shop to look at the flowers she longs to be able to afford. When she returns home she is treated like a slave in constant fear of her fathers wrath. One night he goes goes too far and beats her to within an inch of her life. She manages to crawl out of her hovel only to collapse inside Chens doorway. Their fate is now set. He treats her with the gentleness that she has never known whilst she reignites the innocence in his heart. Yet, tragedy inevitably looms.

Such was the power of the romantic partnership Richard Barthelmess and Lillian Gish, they were to be drawn together again by Griffith in the following years Way Down East. Although modern audiences may raise eyebrows at the thought of an American actor playing a Chinese immigrant, these things must be seen in the context of their day. Besides, Barthelmess, with his slender good looks and sad eyes, perfectly captures the starved yearnings of Chen whilst the tenderness of his character is captured in his slow, graceful movements.

Yet it is Lillian Gish who is the revelation. Already a well known star under the guidance of Griffith, she raised the bar for screen acting to extraordinary heights in Broken Blossoms and once and for all confirmed herself as the greatest actress of the silent era; light years ahead of her contemporaries. Just watching her in this film is like watching a lesson in screen acting. Not a gesture is wasted as she haunts the mazey alleyways of East London whilst in dreamlike soft focus close up she radiates beauty and charm through her grimy, downtrodden appearance. Her final screen moments capture perhaps the defining image of defiance in the face of adversity.

Besides the groundbreaking acting, I could recommend Broken Blossoms for so many different reasons. The soft camera-work gives procedures an ethereal, dream like quality whilst the framing of both close-ups and the interior sets is exemplary. Almost every frame drips with care and attention to detail. The film also riffs numerously on dark wit and irony. At one point a zealous minister tells Chen that his brother "leaves for China tomorrow to convert the heathen" whilst later a policeman talks of "only 40,000 casualties this week" in a reference to the Great War. On top of this there is the brave representation inter-racial love and subsequent all destroying racism. Similarly the brutal scenes of child abuse ("Please daddy, don't") are terrifying as Lucy cowers in the corner begging for mercy.

This film really is a complete work from one of the masters of American cinema at his very peak. If Birth Of A Nation showed the World the vast possibilities of this still new art form, then Broken Blossoms proved it could have a soul too.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Griffith scales down
mmmuconn3 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER BELOW

D.W. Griffith's tragedy `Broken Blossoms' is heartfelt but also exaggerated and calculated. The girl's dire situation may have earned more sympathy had Griffith and Lillian Gish less strongly emphasized the character's pitifulness. Griffith's plea for respect for the Chinese man may have drawn more praise had it not seemed so much like a defensive response to criticism of `The Birth Of A Nation'. Nevertheless, Griffith demonstrates good storytelling habits and an improved visual sense. The tale unfolds so simply, in just a few unglamorous sets, that when Burrows at last erupts into a violent rage, tearing apart the two apartment rooms, the images are powerful and lasting. I wonder if Stanley Kubrick consciously recalled Burrows' axe-wielding terror when he directed `The Shining', one of the most haunting films ever made.

Rating: 6.5
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Feminism, Masculism, Racism, All Dealt With In 'Blossoms'
clurge-22 April 2000
Beyond the weepy, sappy, tear-jerking qualities associated with this Griffith feature, it's actually a landmark film in the annals of feminist films. In a time when women were either out on the street turning tricks, or in the home raising children, this film looks at Lucy Burrows (Miss Gish) who seems to be caught in the middle. Of both the above characteristics of period women, and literally caught between an abusive parental figure, and a caring oriental shop keeper. The question is posed...should she sustain the abuse and stay in the home, or be a social reject by shacking up with this "lowly chinaman"? As in all of Griffith's films, the women are either virtuous or fallen, and the men are either lusting brutes, or effeminate sensitive males.

Many may look aghast at the legendary Barthelmess playing the chinaman, Cheng Huan, or any one of a number of races played by white actors. If not anything else, Blossoms is a great example of stereotypes that existed in the early years of cinema. Griffith successfully deals with the race issues, (even with the use of white actors in the various race roles), extreme masculinity issues, and the above stated femininity issues bluntly, and straight to the point. In a culture dominated by the MASTER NARRATIVE of patriarchal while heterosexual males (well, even still today), D.W. tries his best to put it into perspective. And does a pretty good job of it.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Victorian tragedy with strong "Romeo and Juliet" overtones.
irvingwarner14 January 2005
There is much scholarship on the importance of this D.W. Griffith masterpiece in American cinema. So, I basically second the motion for "Broken Blossoms", i.e. about what has been written about the cast, content and director. It is, of course, "out there" melodrama of the first water, but it is 1918/19, the absolute peak of melodrama on stage, screen and in vaudeville houses. But I feel a special note must be added about the musical score, about which no information is given. For what it accompanies, it is very effective thematically--especially the recurring "young girl" theme as done by a string quartet, and (I think) a coronet. There is, of course, also theater organ and orchestra. Listen for Ms. Gish's character's theme--it is a real heart thumper. This is, to me, a strange movie for D.W.G., intimate and in many places quite sensitive. The sets and casting of supernumeraries (they were Chinese!) is excellent. Opium isn't written on the title cards, but it is front and center. But not the case with interracial love--it plays an active part that is right out there. Even in the 1950's, it was against the law for a Caucasian to marry an Oriental in California. If you are at all interested in old cinema and have not seen "Broken Blossoms", please do.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dated and overdone
preppy-321 April 2007
A kind Chinese man (Richard Barthelmess--who's white) travels from China to London to teach peace and kindness to white men. Years later he lives in the Limehouse section of London--a real slum. He's depressed but not beaten down. He meets sweet, innocent Lucy (Lillian Gish) who is beaten and whipped by her cruel father (Donald Crisp). She finds friendship with Barthlemess--but her evil, racist father might find out...

For 1919 this must have been pretty racy. Even suggesting a friendship between a Chinese man and a white girl was pretty extreme. Today it's laughably dated and WAY overdone. It's also racist in itself--Barthelmess plays a Chinese man and is constantly referred to as "the Yellow Man" in the title cards. Still, for its era, this was pretty brave. Also this is, for director D.W. Griffith, a small quiet film--he was used to doing epics. It is well-directed and the color filters help.

Gish overacts a LOT as does Crisp--they're hard to take seriously. Barthelmess, on the other hand, underacts like he's afraid to show any emotion. So, for its time, it's daring but it just doesn't hold up. I give it a 5.
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed