Like Dietrich (Dishonored) and Garbo (Mata Hari) before her, Constance Bennett finally got a chance to play a fascinating spy in "After Tonight". This was Constance's last picture under her RKO contract. At the time of it's release the film was a failure and RKO laid the blame at the feet of Constance Bennett. Isn't it always better to lay the blame at the feet of the departing star? However, looking at it now, Miss Bennett is one of the saving graces of the picture. Her performance is actually quite good and the production is well put together. The direction is a little sluggish at times and Gilbert Roland (who would marry Constance in 1940) is a little wooden. The ending comes as no surprise, but it was exactly what female audiences of the time expected from "women's pictures". They would attend a matinée, watch the heroine suffer through six or seven reels and then be presented with a happy ending. (How things have changed.) While not great, this movie is not that bad. The movie belongs to Constance Bennett and anyone who is a fan of hers should add this to their watch list if they have not already done so.
13 Reviews
worth seeing for Bennett alone
pyamada1 November 2002
This is not a great film by any means, but is certainly worth seeing for the fine performance by Constance Bennett. The camera loves her and all the romance scenes play very well. Most viewers will find the ending kind of phoney but one has to assume that so much war time sex, romance and spying was more than the Code would allow, so a "wonderful coincidence" of an ending was almost a given!
In Pursuit of K-14
WeatherViolet4 September 2010
This tale of espionage and high risk romance begins at a Paris railroad depot as Karen Schöntag, the Austrian alias of the Russian Carla Vanirska (Constance Bennett) attempts to board an overbooked train for Vienna.
Well, as good fortune, perhaps, would have it, Captain Rudolph "Rudy" Ritter (Gilbert Roland), en route to Vienna himself, to his newly-promoted position as Captain of an Austrian intelligence agency, enables Karen/Carla to accompany him because he instantly succumbs to her charms and graces.
Now, the balance of the film transpires in Vienna, as Rudy and Major Lieber (Edward Ellis) lead the search for the capture of the dangerous enemy agent "K-14," who cleverly delivers coded messages to comrades of a Russian insurgency movement to attempt to overthrow the government in Austria. (Well, keep in mind that this is a 1933 release, and before the period of WWII German occupation.)
So, you may pretty well guess the identity of K-14 from the list of IMDb cast credits, but what a clever operator K-14 turns out to be, writing those secret coded messages in invisible ink, folding them into the pages of books, entering the secret rendezvous locations, tapping the steps of a staircase by the shoe, and delivering the set of books to a fellow agent, who hides beneath the staircase to slide a secret panel to receive them.
Fans of the Classics may find many elements of manners, glamor and suspense, with the lovely leading lady carrying the film, all reasons to tune into vintage films. "After Tonight," well staged with excellent cinematography, does, however, seem to have a screen-story of conflicting allegiance for fans to wonder whom or what we're supposed to be rooting for here.
According to IMDb, "The film lost $100,000 at the box office, which made the studio (RKO Radio Pictures) consider firing Miss Bennett," making her the scapegoat in an awkwardly scripted outing, which seems to loose its direction and climax in a rather somewhat implausible finale.
But Constance Bennett does carry the film well, as its prime attraction, and she handles the material to cause even the more irate critics to care about her character--especially after bodies begin to fall victim to conflicts between the caucuses.
So, in addition to Miss Bennett, Mr. Roland and Mr. Ellis, you may also recognize Sam Godfrey as Franz, Lucien Prival as Lieutenant Erlich, Mischa Auer as Agent Lehan, and Virginia Weidler in the role of Olga, Carla's Niece.
And it would also be nice to score with half-points here and there.
Edit 03/24/16 -- "...first sentence saying it begins in a Paris railroad station. It actually begins in Luxembourg, which is a different country and 250 miles away." -- (Thanks for correction, IMDb Member blakedw.)
Well, as good fortune, perhaps, would have it, Captain Rudolph "Rudy" Ritter (Gilbert Roland), en route to Vienna himself, to his newly-promoted position as Captain of an Austrian intelligence agency, enables Karen/Carla to accompany him because he instantly succumbs to her charms and graces.
Now, the balance of the film transpires in Vienna, as Rudy and Major Lieber (Edward Ellis) lead the search for the capture of the dangerous enemy agent "K-14," who cleverly delivers coded messages to comrades of a Russian insurgency movement to attempt to overthrow the government in Austria. (Well, keep in mind that this is a 1933 release, and before the period of WWII German occupation.)
So, you may pretty well guess the identity of K-14 from the list of IMDb cast credits, but what a clever operator K-14 turns out to be, writing those secret coded messages in invisible ink, folding them into the pages of books, entering the secret rendezvous locations, tapping the steps of a staircase by the shoe, and delivering the set of books to a fellow agent, who hides beneath the staircase to slide a secret panel to receive them.
Fans of the Classics may find many elements of manners, glamor and suspense, with the lovely leading lady carrying the film, all reasons to tune into vintage films. "After Tonight," well staged with excellent cinematography, does, however, seem to have a screen-story of conflicting allegiance for fans to wonder whom or what we're supposed to be rooting for here.
According to IMDb, "The film lost $100,000 at the box office, which made the studio (RKO Radio Pictures) consider firing Miss Bennett," making her the scapegoat in an awkwardly scripted outing, which seems to loose its direction and climax in a rather somewhat implausible finale.
But Constance Bennett does carry the film well, as its prime attraction, and she handles the material to cause even the more irate critics to care about her character--especially after bodies begin to fall victim to conflicts between the caucuses.
So, in addition to Miss Bennett, Mr. Roland and Mr. Ellis, you may also recognize Sam Godfrey as Franz, Lucien Prival as Lieutenant Erlich, Mischa Auer as Agent Lehan, and Virginia Weidler in the role of Olga, Carla's Niece.
And it would also be nice to score with half-points here and there.
Edit 03/24/16 -- "...first sentence saying it begins in a Paris railroad station. It actually begins in Luxembourg, which is a different country and 250 miles away." -- (Thanks for correction, IMDb Member blakedw.)
I take Gilbert Roland any way I can get him
blanche-26 February 2013
"After Tonight" was gorgeous Constance Bennett's last film under her RKO contract. She didn't exactly leave on a high note; the film lost money. But the film has its compensations.
It's the old spy falling in love with the enemy story. This one has Karen Schontag (translation: Pretty Day) (Bennett) at the railroad trying to get to Vienna from Paris during World War I. It's there she meets Captain Rudolph Ritter, the new Captain of Austrian Intelligence. No surprise that each finds the other mighty attractive, and, since the train is overbooked, he helps Karen get to Vienna. And who is she really? A Russian, Carla Vanirska, and she's a spy.
Once in Vienna, we see Karen singing in a club and then working as a nurse. Rudolph and his associates are trying to find a dangerous enemy spy, R-14, who is delivering coded messages to the Russians as they try to overthrow the government in Austria.
Well, we all know who R-14 is, with her coded messages in invisible ink that she carries in her books and leaves in a staircase panel. The question is, will Rudolph find out? And if he does, will he have her shot? I love the atmosphere of the European sets and whether or not we think we know what will happen, the film is still suspenseful. Bennett and Roland, who married some years later, are a beautiful couple. So he's an Austrian with a Mexican accent. You can't have everything. What a career - 60 years that began in the silents.
A definite must-see for fans of the lovely Bennett.
It's the old spy falling in love with the enemy story. This one has Karen Schontag (translation: Pretty Day) (Bennett) at the railroad trying to get to Vienna from Paris during World War I. It's there she meets Captain Rudolph Ritter, the new Captain of Austrian Intelligence. No surprise that each finds the other mighty attractive, and, since the train is overbooked, he helps Karen get to Vienna. And who is she really? A Russian, Carla Vanirska, and she's a spy.
Once in Vienna, we see Karen singing in a club and then working as a nurse. Rudolph and his associates are trying to find a dangerous enemy spy, R-14, who is delivering coded messages to the Russians as they try to overthrow the government in Austria.
Well, we all know who R-14 is, with her coded messages in invisible ink that she carries in her books and leaves in a staircase panel. The question is, will Rudolph find out? And if he does, will he have her shot? I love the atmosphere of the European sets and whether or not we think we know what will happen, the film is still suspenseful. Bennett and Roland, who married some years later, are a beautiful couple. So he's an Austrian with a Mexican accent. You can't have everything. What a career - 60 years that began in the silents.
A definite must-see for fans of the lovely Bennett.
well done, considering
lshelhamer30 January 2013
The idea of a spy falling in love with one of the enemy is a literary cliché and has been used in the movies since the silent era. It is full of dramatic possibilities, but always faces the difficulty of resolving in the end the contest between loyalty and love. In this film, the problems are compounded by having Mexican-American Gilbert Roland portraying the Austrian counterintelligence agent with his Spanish accent intact, up against the all-American Constance Bennett as a Russian spy during what appears to be WW1. The two gradually fall in love without knowing each other's true identity. Despite the obvious drawbacks, all involved carry it off very well.
There are really two ending. The first, when they finally confront each other and reveal their true identities is dramatic, exciting and with a final surprising twist. The second is far-fetched and less satisfying. If you eliminate the final 5 minutes, the film is well-worth watching.
There are really two ending. The first, when they finally confront each other and reveal their true identities is dramatic, exciting and with a final surprising twist. The second is far-fetched and less satisfying. If you eliminate the final 5 minutes, the film is well-worth watching.
She knows all there is to know about the spying game.
mark.waltz24 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Love is not a many splendored thing, especially when she's a Russian spy and he's an
Austrian intelligence officer. Constance Bennett is absolutely gorgeous as the talented Russian spy who can do anything, whether sing or be a surgical nurse, while retrieving information for the Russians. Gilbert Roland is the suave Australian intelligence officer who meets her when they are forced to leave Luxembourg as World War 1 begins to make all of Europe a dangerous place. he goes to find a car for 5 minutes after they are removed from their train, and she mysteriously disappears. Later on, they encounter each other and fall in love, but how will it be for Roland when he finds out the truth about her, considering that he has ordered his own intelligence people to turn in their own family if they should be revealed to be spies.
Beautiful and atmospheric, this only has a few periods where the pacing become slow and the story slightly tedious. However, there are many beautiful photographic shots that are perfectly set up for film stills, and then it and Roland have sensational chemistry, hence them ending up being married in real life. In spite of brief moments where his accent slips out more obviously than the rest of the film, he is excellent. In spite of her deception, the audience can't help but root for Bennett. This has much in common with Garbo's "Mata Hari" and Dietrich's "Dishonored" except for the ending. And it's very interesting that Bennett never reveals her name to Roland on screen.
Beautiful and atmospheric, this only has a few periods where the pacing become slow and the story slightly tedious. However, there are many beautiful photographic shots that are perfectly set up for film stills, and then it and Roland have sensational chemistry, hence them ending up being married in real life. In spite of brief moments where his accent slips out more obviously than the rest of the film, he is excellent. In spite of her deception, the audience can't help but root for Bennett. This has much in common with Garbo's "Mata Hari" and Dietrich's "Dishonored" except for the ending. And it's very interesting that Bennett never reveals her name to Roland on screen.
A well-spent night of spy vs spy
ArtVandelayImporterExporter23 September 2022
This is a fairly gripping spy thriller. Believably plotted and well acted.
Constance Bennett is new to me but I can see why she was a star in the 30s. She strikes no false notes throughout this movie. And as a character, her WWI Russian spy is surprisingly strong. Most of the dames in the 30s were such pushovers.
Gilbert Roland was just so dashing it's really unfair to the rest of the world's men. He successfully puts across how torn he is, having to choose love or country.
Had they ended the movie with the second-last scene, this probably would be regarded as a close-to-classic of the genre. Unfortunately - and I'm gonna blame studio meddling here - they tack on one final scene, whereupon the air really comes out of the balloon.
Nevertheless, I'll watch it again when TCM programs it.
Constance Bennett is new to me but I can see why she was a star in the 30s. She strikes no false notes throughout this movie. And as a character, her WWI Russian spy is surprisingly strong. Most of the dames in the 30s were such pushovers.
Gilbert Roland was just so dashing it's really unfair to the rest of the world's men. He successfully puts across how torn he is, having to choose love or country.
Had they ended the movie with the second-last scene, this probably would be regarded as a close-to-classic of the genre. Unfortunately - and I'm gonna blame studio meddling here - they tack on one final scene, whereupon the air really comes out of the balloon.
Nevertheless, I'll watch it again when TCM programs it.
not bad
mukava9917 November 2006
I would rate this film as a competent time killer, something that Depression audiences went to see to forget about their troubles for an hour or so and which we small screen home viewers can watch to slip out of contemporary reality and give our brains a break. Constance Bennett occupies space attractively and goes through the motions of "acting" in her role as a coolheaded (and well dressed) spy operating behind Austro-Hungarian lines for the Russians in World War I. It's fun and intriguing to watch her collect and pass on her secret messages, all the while growing ever closer romantically to a spy-hunting Austrian military official (Gilbert Roland). An extremely contrived ending perfectly suits this confection.
it's fine
SnoopyStyle22 September 2023
WWI has broken out. Everybody is desperate to buy train tickets out of Luxembourg, but they are only accepting gold or silver. A woman (Constance Bennett) is trying to get to Vienna, but she can't even change her money. Capt. Rudolf 'Rudy' Ritter (Gilbert Roland) comes to her rescue. The train is stopped short and she disappears before they even exchange names. Rudy is in the Austrian Ministry of War which is desperate to find Russian spies. His mystery lady turns out to be a spy pretending to be a nurse. Rudy is sent to root out persistent leaks in her sector.
This is fine. I like the premise of Rudy falling for a mystery lady on a train who turns out to be his target. I like less the coincidence of Rudy being sent to her location. If he's a good detective, I want him to search her specifically. He's in love and he should go look for her. Both actors are doing fine for their roles. I would like more intensity as it nears the climax. The ending turns into a funny bit about her name. I'm not looking for that, but it's fine.
This is fine. I like the premise of Rudy falling for a mystery lady on a train who turns out to be his target. I like less the coincidence of Rudy being sent to her location. If he's a good detective, I want him to search her specifically. He's in love and he should go look for her. Both actors are doing fine for their roles. I would like more intensity as it nears the climax. The ending turns into a funny bit about her name. I'm not looking for that, but it's fine.
Come spy with me
jamesjustice-9229 April 2023
There's positively no place for love during the war but there are always exceptions. Sometimes love is that strong that even a five minute affection can turn into it and years apart could never wipe off this greatest feeling.
After tonight is a small little movie about a spy during World War I and an enemy officer on the lookout for spies who happen to meet and fall in love, without knowing what the other does for a living. The concept isn't new so there's really no surprises while watching, also for a short 70 minute movie it is burdened with tons of unnecessary dialogues and therefore it seems too long and crumpled ending doesn't help it either. The acting is somewhat average with no truly standout performances observed throughout the movie.
Overall After tonight is a solid piece of spy drama blended with romance but it lacks cohesive, more well-structured narrative, a better ending and more alive characters to empathize with, only then it could be considered good.
After tonight is a small little movie about a spy during World War I and an enemy officer on the lookout for spies who happen to meet and fall in love, without knowing what the other does for a living. The concept isn't new so there's really no surprises while watching, also for a short 70 minute movie it is burdened with tons of unnecessary dialogues and therefore it seems too long and crumpled ending doesn't help it either. The acting is somewhat average with no truly standout performances observed throughout the movie.
Overall After tonight is a solid piece of spy drama blended with romance but it lacks cohesive, more well-structured narrative, a better ending and more alive characters to empathize with, only then it could be considered good.
Made me a fan
beyondtheforest30 December 2006
Constance Bennett was sublime in this. This film, unlike some others in which she starred, made it easy to see why she was a star. The plot is intriguing, if not overwhelmingly original, and the film is made very well. The theme song of the film, which Bennett sings (well), is memorable and sweet. Bennett is a glamour queen throughout and acts skillfully and pleasingly. The direction is overall excellent, the film moves at a brisk pace, and the sets and situations are not too stagy. It compares remarkably well to another spy melodrama of the period, Garbo's MATA HARI, and of the two, Bennett surprisingly comes out the winner (no disservice to the great Garbo intended, just some praise to the underrated and forgotten Bennett).
Spies At Work And Love
boblipton21 September 2023
In Vienna during the Great War, Lieutenant Gilbert Roland runs an operation to capture the wily and deadly enemy spy K-14, while he also romances the beautiful nurse Constance Bennett. He doesn't know they are one and the same.
For a pre-code spy drama, this is a rather sedate affair if you ignore the constant cannon fire and armed soldiery. Also the leads are rather subdued, with Edward Ellis as Roland's superior officer offering a more animated performance. I believe Roland is sizing his performance down to Miss Bennett's, and Miss Bennett is portraying someone who is very good at revealing nothing. This makes the performances uninteresting, alas, and RKO lost money at the box office with this one.... although given that it was 1933, that may not have been a knock on this movie. Charles Rosher's camerawork is excellent.
For a pre-code spy drama, this is a rather sedate affair if you ignore the constant cannon fire and armed soldiery. Also the leads are rather subdued, with Edward Ellis as Roland's superior officer offering a more animated performance. I believe Roland is sizing his performance down to Miss Bennett's, and Miss Bennett is portraying someone who is very good at revealing nothing. This makes the performances uninteresting, alas, and RKO lost money at the box office with this one.... although given that it was 1933, that may not have been a knock on this movie. Charles Rosher's camerawork is excellent.
Pretty sappy....especially at the end.
planktonrules3 February 2013
"After Tonight" is a rather heavy-handed and sappy love story--the type that, thankfully, died off a long time ago. Constance Bennett plays a Mata Hari-type woman. She's spying for the Russians during WWI and is posing as an Austrian nurse. Gilbert Roland plays an Austrian spy smasher--a guy whose job is to locate and liquidate spies like her. However, two VERY mismatched pair ends up falling in love. Now this is all a bit hard to believe and melodramatic, but it COULD have worked. However, at the end, when she is discovered, the film degenerates into a juvenile mess--where a silly tacked on happy ending occurs even though it defies logic and ruins the film with sickening sentimentality. Even if Bennett and Roland gave it their best, this poorly written film was destined to be a silly mess...which it is. If it sounds like I really, really hated the film, you are right--mostly because the ending left me feeling like I'd wasted my time.
Incidentally, about a decade after this film, Bennett and Roland married. They didn't stay married, but they married.
Incidentally, about a decade after this film, Bennett and Roland married. They didn't stay married, but they married.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
