By the Bluest of Seas (1936) User Reviews

Art transcending propaganda

[leoperu · 8/10 · 31 December 2012]

It's difficult for me to judge Rivette's statement about Boris Barnet having been the greatest of Soviet filmmakers after Eisenstein ; I definitely prefer his works to Eisenstein's or let's say Pudovkin's.

"U samogo sinyego morya" ("By the Bluest of Seas"), a cheerful poetic miniature capturing skirmishes between love and friendship, abounds in crystal clear simplicity and heartfelt humour. In addition to these, we get more than a couple of credible faces (the one of Yelena Kuzmina in particular), a lot of nice songs, and last but not least the most impressive shots of breakers which I have ever encountered on screen.

Some reviewers didn't see any Soviet propaganda in the movie. I must disagree : the scenery upon which the personal storyline unfolds evidently promotes period collectivism,a.o. No wonder, then. However, art in Barnet's rendering transcends everything else.

The transfer on Mr.Bongo's recent release seems quite good ; regrettably no extras were taken from the original Ruscico version.

Soviet Romantic Comedy

[TwinsWhoLikeMovies · 7/10 · 15 July 2022]

Compared to the works of Eisenstein and Alexander Dovzhenko, this film will probably seem quite unremarkable to many viewers - if you've watched enough early Hollywood romantic comedies, the characters will be familiar and the plot predictable. Nonetheless, it was an enjoyable enough watch set against the beautiful Caspian Sea, with gorgeous cinematography and sound. Recommended for hardcore film buffs but not for the average viewer, who would be better served viewing more well-known Russian classics or early Hollywood screwball comedies.

Cute Commies Sing, Play and Work on the Shore of the Caspian Sea

[vwild · 8/10 · 1 April 2015]

By the Bluest of Seas is a surprisingly warm and funny film from Soviet Russia. The story is rather slight. Two shipwrecked sailors wash up on an island in the Caspian Sea, set to work for the local fishing commune and vie for the affections of a local lass. There are jokes and songs, all handled with a light and joyful touch. Meanwhile the sun beats down, the wind blows and the waves roll, and this looks wonderful. You can almost feel the warmth and taste the salt. The small issue of who gets the girl brings the odd shadow, but all in all life on the commune is just grand. And that's about it apart from a tiresome communist moral at the end, which I suppose qualifies as propaganda, but is only as intrusive as the moral correctives at the end of Hollywood movies of the same period. By the Bluest of Seas is a tremendously warm hearted film that seems to come from a different world to the well known Soviet classics of the 20s and 30s.

Unfamiliar Russian thirties film proves endearing.

[Mozjoukine · 12 December 2003]

Boris Barnet's films are not the easiest to track, down so I have no idea how representative this one is of that lesser know celebrity of the Soviet Industry.

BY THE BLUEST OF SEAS however proves to be a pleasant surprise and pleasant is a surprise among these - no invaders driven back into the sea, now vicious landowners, no loving portrait of a national military leader.

Filmed in glowing sunshine, spaced by a menacing storm, it covers the two sailors banded up with the Caspian "Light of Communism" (well what to you expect?) fishing co-op who divide their time between making the boats run and competing for the lanky blond chair-lady of the board. The three leads are appealing, slim and unconventional and we enjoy our time with them. The storm is filmed with some ingenuity, with the cabin tilting in some sound stage machine and the ocean pounding the deck.

The story is pretty slight and finally propagandist, with the blond remaining faithful to her sailor fiancé off battling the nation's maritime enemies, but it never has the heavy handedness of the body of the Russian product which survives.

Things are helped by an excellent mid tone copy.

Light-Hearted Film Goes Against the Grain of Normal Soviet Dramas

[springfieldrental · 8/10 · 23 July 2023]

Ever since Vladimir Lenin and his cronies took over Russia in 1917, the country's film industry primarily concentrated on message movies that touted the communist form of government. Even though Russian filmmakers were masters of editing in the 1920s, most of their product was serious. Boris Barnet didn't fit into that mode. Somehow Stalin and his lieutenants allowed the Moscovite to make breezy, ofttimes funny movies, even though the dictator was generally displeased with Barnet's work. One prime example of his work is his March 1936 "By the Bluest of Seas," a musical rom-com Soviet style.

Barnet's second feature film shows the director's adept handling of merging the symbolic elements of nature with the human drama unfolding on the screen. 'By the Bluest of Seas" follows a pair of friends whose ship has sunk. The two are rescued by fishermen and taken to an island off the coast of Azerbaijan in the Caspian Sea. Blond-haired Yussuf (Lev Sverdin) and Alyoshia (Nikolai Kryuchkov) meet Mariya (Yelena Kuzmina), head of the local collective. Both seamen are infatuated by her, and each attempt to gain her interest. Film critic Jonathan Rosenbaum says Barnet's film is so brilliant because "We wind up feeling affection for the three leads, partly because of the affection they show for one another and partly because of the gusto with which they show it."

French film critic Bernard Eisenschitz unlocks the secret of Barnet's genius, one of the lesser known talented directors in Soviet cinema. "His films convey more than most the intensity of happiness, the physical pleasure of meeting and contact, the inevitable tragedy of relationships," Eisenschitz writes. Mariya, who's intrigued by the pair of energetic friends, is withholding information from the two that'll make all the difference in the world in their relationship.

Astute observers note "By the Bluest of Seas" contains a number of silent movie elements, with long, quiet sequences and inter-titles long since gone from cinema. Critic Anthony Nield drew parallels between Barnet and Jean Vigo's 1934 masterpiece "L'Atalante," while Australia's National Film and Sound Archive wrote Barnet's intention "was to carry the pleasures of silent cinema into the sound age. Barnet is always trying to return his cinema to a pure match between expressive image and a musical soundscape accompaniment, always emphasizing charming gesture, comic speed and music over spoken dialogue."

The power-elite of the Soviet government ripped into "By the Bluest of Seas," claiming the film failed to reflect the realities of the country's proletariat. That explains why the movie was so hard to view until 2012, when it became available to home media by a Russian company. Besides the rare screening, few got the opportunity to see it. Those that did placed it as one of 1,000 films making the prestigious list in 'TSPDY: They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?'

Not the masterpiece some claim it to be.

[MOscarbradley · 5/10 · 21 September 2015]

There isn't a great deal to the Russian 'classic' "By the Bluest of Seas" other than its remarkable use its location around the Caspian Sea and yet its reputation among cineastes is extremely high. Unlike the propaganda films of Eisenstein and Dovzhendo, this is a simple love story and a tale of friendship that owes more to Hollywood than to early Russian cinema.

Two sailors are washed up on an island where they both fall for the same girl, thus testing their friendship. It's a very simple-minded picture, luminously photographed by Mikhail Kirillov, charming enough in itself but hardly worth the critical plaudits that have been heaped on it.

It ain't all that...

[Leofwine_draca · 4/10 · 24 September 2015]

You know, I love watching early cinema. Those German Expressionist silents are still fantastic for the modern viewer to watch and the 1930s was a decade chock-full of excellence. Sadly, BY THE BLUEST OF SEAS is a rather dull affair, one of those art-house movies that's raved over by the critics but actually turns out to be pretty dull and insubstantial when it comes down to it.

The story is nothing more than a simple love triangle between a couple of fishermen and the girl they both fall in love with. The acting is so minimalist as to be non-existent and the story that plays out is simplistic so that there's barely enough material for the short running time. What the film does benefit from is some very nice cinematography that makes the best of the locations (this was filmed in Azerbaijan on the shores of the Caspian Sea) but of course given the title colour is necessary to make this a truly great-looking production. BY THE BLUEST OF SEAS is nothing special, I'm afraid.

Surprisingly Pleasant, Poetic Film from Soviet Russia

[JohnHowardReid · 26 October 2011]

This Russian film directed by Boris Barnet in 1935 seems to be available only on a Bach Films DVD with French sub-titles. Fortunately, there is not a great deal of dialogue, so even those with limited Russian and/or French should encounter little difficulty in relating to it. And it is a beautiful movie, with truly inspiring photography, that is worth relating to, despite the occasional adherence or lip service to the party line.

The story is a simple one. Two shipwrecked sailors, played by blond hero Nikolai Kryuchkov and clownish Lev Sverdlin, are washed up on an island in the Caspian Sea. Fortunately, it's not only inhabited but has a small fishing co-operative, headed by Semyon Svashenko, so our boys soon find work. But more importantly – at least so far as Nikolai and Lev are concerned – the island boasts a female doer and leader in the lovely form (at least to the eyes of two shipwrecked sailors) of Yelena Kuzmina.

But don't pay too much mind to the forever blustering hero, or the pitiable, self-pitying, droopy-eyed clown, or even the passably attractive but somewhat careworn (and definitely no glamour model) heroine. It's the photography that counts, the mise en scène, the surge of the waves, the tilting sky, the sunlit sands. If ever a movie was a visual poem, a constant but ever-changing delight to the eye, that movie is Au Bord de la Mer Bleue. And it runs just long enough not out-stay its welcome!