Big Town (1946) User Reviews

Very good....but there are better films that cover the same material.

[planktonrules · 6/10 · 10 February 2021]

For a cheap B-movie, "Big Town" is very good. But I must warn you, this material might seem very similar as the film seems much like a reworking of the genius film, "Five Star Final" from 1931. And, since "Five Star Final" was first and better, there isn't a lot of reason to watch "Big Town"...whether a pleasant film or not.

The films is about the newspaper business and the seedy side. It seems that a big city paper is doing poorly, so the owner brings in a hot-shot editor to shake things up. This guy now is concerned with readership revenues first...whether the paper behaves ethically or not. Much of the film, the editor bangs heads with his reporters, particularly a lady reporter, over what is and what isn't ethical regarding their stories.

While I enjoyed the film, I do think the film gives a somewhat mixed message about yellow journalism. In some ways, it seems to condemn it and at other times it doesn't. And, as I mentioned before, it's not the most original plot. Still, it does show you that the ethics of newspaper headlines hasn't really changed that much over the years!

By the way, this film apparently did pretty well as it had two sequels...which, like this film, are currently posted on YouTube.

Big Town, Big Disappointment!

[JohnHowardReid · 6/10 · 24 July 2017]

I've always wanted to see one of Busby Berkeley's television assignments, and the "Big Town" DVD from Alpha Video managed to satisfy my curiosity. In addition to the somewhat static and dialog bound main feature, "Big Town", directed in a somewhat off-handed fashion by William C. Thomas in 1946, the Alpha DVD also gave me access to two of the 1955 television episodes starring Mark Stevens. One of these was directed by Busby Berkeley, but if you didn't bother to watch the credits, you would never guess in a million years that an extremely stylish director like Berkeley had anything whatever to do with it. There's nothing stylish about it at all. It's just a succession of big close-ups and dull delivery from a third-rate cast of desperate players like Mark Stevens. The only good thing about it is that the other TV episode on the disc, directed by George Waggner, is even less pleasing and much more of a waste of time!

Getting back to the 1946 theatrical entry, I'll admit that by the humble standards of "B"-grade supporting features, it's better than average, thanks to the strong performances delivered by Hillary Brooke, Phillip Reed, Robert Lowery and Veda Ann Borg. Yes, it holds the interest for about three quarters of its length, but then it falls into the trademark pattern of desperate writers and/or directors who have nothing to say, nothing to contribute, nothing to set the world on fire, let alone satisfy luckless viewers who are desperate for entertainment. It just flickers out. Miniscule production values don't help either.

Big Dump

[The_Dying_Flutchman · 4/10 · 24 August 2012]

While wandering down the dark streets trying to find something of value to pick up out of the gutter, I chanced to come upon a piece of detritus that was as lacklustre as one could ever hope to find sailing into any sewer drain in any "Big Town".

What we see in the opening is a mess of stock footage, balsa wood and cardboard sets and camera setups where the camera is as stationary as any 1950's TV show. It is as if the camera was nailed to the floor pointing straight ahead. Actually, it was nailed to the floor. However, there are a few familiar faces including the handsome mug of Phillip Reed, Hillary Brook and Robert Lowery. Reed plays the head of a great metropolitan newspaper, but he does it like he was auditioning for an ironing board commercial, completely wooden. I wonder why Bob Lowery wasn't given the lead as he was more than capable as a leading man. He once played Batman and was also the manager of a circus company in "Circus Boy". Hillary is the goto gal correspondent who co-starred in many mellers including, but not limited to, Universal's horror flicks and the Abbot and Costello TV show.

After the exciting opening comes a plot in which four different tales are trotted out, only one of which I shall talk about here, primarily because they are worthless. That story delineates the tale of something called "Vampire Murders". Since this flick revolves around a big town newspaper's stories and not a horror movie's segments, don't let anyone suspect blood drooling excitements; instead, expect a reporting team tracking down the story told as ineptly as possible. A young man is released from a mental hospital, but he seems completely innocent of hoary crimes. With nasties popping out of the woodwork to dog his every step, he decides the only way out is his suicide. When he is rearrested he takes that way out, but all of it is told lacking any kind of finesse or even mystery even though this thing is supposed to be a film noir.

Suffice it to say, if this ever turns up on your very early local cable outlet and you choose to watch it, it could only be for one of two possible reasons: one, you need something to view because you are a fanatic complete-ist or two, you need something to put you back to sleep. With me, it is a sure fire method of inducing coma.

He's not firing anybody....yet.

[mark.waltz · 2/10 · 18 September 2023]

It takes a strong individual to turn a failing newspaper around, and for new editor in chief Philip Reed, turning the low subscription second rate Illustrated Press around means getting the strong stories told no matter how it hurts others. Hillary Brooke is a young reporter he finds useful in getting the story even though she objects to his methods. But his ways end up creating a lot of issues, resulting in some very bizarre twists that I didn't find very realistic considering how the film began. A good supporting cast can't help the strangeness of the last part of the film that becomes outlandishly melodramatic and ultimately messy. I wish this had been a lot better because it could easily have become a journalism film related curio than yesterday's newspaper covered with the next day's rain.