Time Lock (1957) Poster

(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
This could well be remade one day!
Skint1115 April 2004
This is actually a pretty good thriller that benefits from the no-nonsense, fact-based dialogue and avoids sentimentality for the most part. Technically it's nothing remarkable and yes, the actors are largely undistinguished, but the story is developed in a pleasing and suspenseful way. Another reviewer's remark on this page that the film doesn't work because the child is unappealing is somewhat bizarre. The kid is on screen for all of two minutes and has but a few words of dialogue. And he's actually a cute little fella too, making you root for his rescue.

In summary then, this is a movie which had the likes of Hitchcock or another of the greats directed it, have been a classic. Instead it's an enjoyable way to spend an hour and a bit in front of the telly - especially if you, say, find yourself off work ill one afternoon.
26 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Time-Critical Race To Save A Child. Simple But Enjoyable.
P3n-E-W1s310 February 2018
This is a simple story of a boy who finds himself trapped in the vault at the bank where his father works and the race to get him out alive. It's Friday and the Bank is getting ready to close for the weekend. Stephen Walker (Winter) has just turned six and as a treat, his mom, Lucille (McDowall), takes him to meet his father, Colin (Patterson), out of work. His dad just has to close up the vault and then they can go and celebrate. However, while Colin and his boss, George Foster (Gifford), lock up the vault there's an automobile accident just outside the window, which takes their attention away for a couple of seconds. When they finally close the door and the time lock kicks in it's the teller, Evelyn (Francis), who alerts them to the child's predicament... now the race is on...

What I really liked about this was the simplicity of both the story and the location. You get a few outside shots, which only take up a couple of minutes, at most, and then the rest of the movie is set in two rooms. Though you never really notice as the Director, Thomas, keeps you involved in the unfolding story. As time passes, the question, "Will they be quick enough?" becomes more and more imperative... while the outlook grows bleaker and bleaker. Thomas uses the limited space well, moving the camera around to its best advantage.

Then there's the acting, which is above par. Every person involved in rescuing the boy has an urgency in their voice and in their movements. Robert Beatty really sells the self-assured and strong-minded Pete Dawson, the mind who is responsible for the banks' security. He is quick with a plan and quicker to rally the troops. Whereas, Gifford as the Bank Manager Foster hits all the right notes in portraying a man who feels accountable for the accident and the possible death of a child. One thing which got under my skin was how little the parents appeared in the film. It would have been better if these two characters had been stronger, then you would have had a near-perfect cast.

I'd recommend this film to all. It's a nice way to spend an afternoon on these cold winter days, while the central heating keeps you nice and cosy.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Missing Character
andrew-119222 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Just about everyone imaginable plays a part in this film - bank manager, accountant, doctor, anaesthetist, police inspector, police (x several), ambulance crew, bank vault specialist, welders, big guys wielding hammers, jack hammer operatives, even a helicopter pilot gets 15 seconds of fame! I guess the one 'professional' I expected to see but who didn't make an appearance was a safe-cracker. For some reason I was expecting that as the film drew to a close a guy would roll up wearing a black band eye patch and horizontally hooped shirt, carrying a bag marked 'swag', and he'd save the kids life by breaking into the uncrackable safe. But, I was slightly disappointed that this character didn't appear to save the day. A bit of a pity in that respect.

I enjoyed the film nonetheless. This is a low budget movie, but these can often be better than the multi-gazillion dollar blockbuster because everything about the film is created by professionals doing their job, rather than some whizz-bang computer program producing special effects. Most of the role players in this film didn't go on to become household names, so good for them that they got their chance for 15 seconds to put their mark on a piece of cinema history.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One for Peter Rogers' fans!
JohnHowardReid13 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Generally speaking, British "B" films are far outshone by their Hollywood counterparts. But this one, produced by Peter Rogers and directed (of course) by Gerald Thomas, was based on a reasonably exciting TV script by Arthur "Airport" Hailey. It was screenplayed by Rogers himself and rates with me as one of his best. In addition to his admirably taut script, Rogers has assembled a first-rate cast led by Robert Beatty, Betty McDowall, Vincent Winter, and of course, Lee Patterson. The large variety of camera set-ups and well edited inserts divert one's attention from the cramped, hole-in-the-wall set and other limited production values. There has to be a worthwhile quota quickie in there somewhere, and Time Lock is it!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
From the Man Who Brought You the Carry On Films....
boblipton2 October 2017
Before he directed what seemed like thirty-five billion "Carry On" burlesques, Gerald Thomas directed this film, a simple drama about what happens when a small boy gets locked in a bank vault with a time lock set for over sixty hours -- and about ten hours' worth of air. It's from a play written by Arthur Hailey, and considering what the director would do, and Hailey's admiration of the AIRPLANE! burlesques of AIRPORT, based on his novel, it makes you wonder what a Carry On this would have made.

As a straight drama, it's a pretty good, if minor picture, filled with the sort of situations and characters that would populate Hailey's big novels, the movies made from them and the Disaster Movie genre. Allen Gifford is particularly good as the bank manager who works hard to get the child out, and constantly blames himself.

If I had any complaint, it is that it is too focused. Everyone is too focused, everyone is too polite. This, however, is not THE BIG CARNIVAL, nor AIRPORT nor CARRY ON, KID STUCK IN A BANK VAULT. For the story it tries to tell, it tells it well.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The premise has potential but the delivery mainly squashes it
bob the moo25 October 2006
Six year old Steven Walker is in the bank with his father near closing time he is in a playful mood and slips into the vault unseen just as it is shut. The problem is that for security reasons the vault is on a time lock and has been set to remain closed until after the weekend. With no more than half a day's air in the vault the race is on to try and get the boy out. The local vault expert is out of town for the weekend but, with no guarantee that he can be found in time, the parents are frantic to get him out.

The plot was more than enough to hook me into it because it sounded like one of those setups that will be tight and tense, set in a single location and, given the race against time, effortlessly engaging. Although there were no guarantees for this, I was surprised by just how flat the whole thing was and how much it failed to grip me. In terms of actions and narrative flow things are fine; the story follows a solid path that makes sense and isn't contrived or forced for the sake of falsely producing tension. However it is the delivery where it takes this and does nothing of interest with it. The main problem is with the script; where it is shouting urgently then things are fine but it regularly has horridly flat scenes of dialogue while the cutting etc is going on and none of them really work. Of course it doesn't help that the performances mostly put me in mind of my last time I was in a forest. Thomas does manage to produce some tension when the action is the focus but he totally undercuts this by his flaccid inability to bring out this tension in his characters and his actors – after all, if they don't seem bothered by the whole thing, why should I the viewer be?

As another review has stated the worst performance is mercifully the shortest – that of the boy Winter. Christ but he could not be less convincing, natural or sympathetic. It is rare for me to be shocked by the ineptitude of a performance but Winter achieved that with very few lines. I know he was a child but are you telling me he was the best child available to the casting director? Of the rest of the cast only Beatty stands out and that is mostly because his dialogue consists of being in charge and tough. Conversely all those blessed with flat lines give bland performances; the list is long but includes Patterson, Mannering, McDowall, Ayres and so on. Connery is only memorable for who he is rather than anything else.

Overall a semi-engaging film that sadly has more weakness than strength. The simple premise should have allowed for great tension but the script and delivery let this fall down badly. Deserves a low-budget but intense remake – perhaps not of the detail but certainly using a similar premise.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
My brief review of the film
sol-22 April 2005
Although the plot feels rather forced and awfully predictable, this is a surprisingly quite intense film that is able to keep one always interested all the time, due to the presentation of all the scientific evidence in an interesting manner, as well as an appropriately short running time. It feels well researched, the music used is applied well, and for Sean Connery fans it has the bonus of his presence in a brief supporting role as a welder. Still, the film does have quite a tendency for unnecessary melodrama; in particular McDowall overacts whenever she is on screen. But in spite of the film's flaws, the overall picture stands strong, and while it might not be everyone's cup of tea, I would highly recommend it if the film has even the slightest appeal to one's taste.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Predicable, but quite entertaining.
nzpedals2 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Almost all the action takes place in a bank where the manager has to set a time-lock on a Friday night at 6pm that keeps the vault securely locked until 9am the following Monday.

But then the accountant's wife and six-year-old son arrive. It is the boy's birthday and he has been given a torch (flash-light) as a present. Of course he wants to try it out, and the dark unlit vault is a perfect place. A car crash outside distracts the manager and he doesn't see the boy go into the vault. When he comes away from the window he doesn't check inside the vault, just locks it up.

When they realise the boy must be inside, they try to unlock the vault. But can't. So they try to contact Head Office and the expert who knows about vaults. But he has already left for a fishing trip.

We all know that eventually they will rescue the boy, so "spoilers" don't apply, unless someone makes a disaster movie where the the heroes fail and everyone dies? Na.

It is hard to recognise Sean Connery at age 27.

Good acting, good story, not very demanding, so I liked it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bell 47 helicopter appearance
sharpe0416 October 2010
I remember seeing this movie on TV in the USA in 1961 when I was a nipper, it's always stuck in my mind, I have no idea why. Watched it again recently on TV, probably in the small hours, must've had insomnia. Not the worst 1950s B feature I've ever seen.

Reference the helicopter, as the film was made in the UK I'm pretty sure it was G-AKFB, with the registration crudely altered to a Canadian one. There were only 3 Bell 47s around in the forties/fifties according to the UK register, the only one apparently airworthy in 1957 was this one, which was then owned by BEA Helicopters. It was built in 1947 and was finally withdrawn from use in 1967, not a bad age for an early helicopter. I must get out more!
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Efficient B-thriller from the Carry On guys
Leofwine_draca6 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
TIME LOCK is a decent little thriller made by the British team of Gerald Thomas and Peter Rogers before they became almost exclusively linked to the Carry On series of films. This is an adroit B-picture with a short running time and fast pace. The story is a simple one but keeps you gripped thanks to the solid writing and suspense inherent in the premise.

The tale is set in Canada for no good reason and involves a kid accidentally being locked in a bank vault with a time lock which means it can't be opened until after the weekend. Unfortunately, the boy has only 10 hours of air left inside the vault. The rest of the story chronicles the efforts of those outside to rescue him, and involves the usual engineering problems and races against time.

I like the fact that this film is grounded in reality and thus feels realistic throughout. There isn't one lead actor of sorts but those at the forefront put in solid and believable turns, like Robert Beatty as the no-nonsense rescuer and Lee Patterson as the distraught father. Sean Connery notably features in support as one of the workmen and doesn't have much dialogue but hangs around in the background a lot. TIME LOCK is no classic and was never meant to be, but for a B-feature it does its job nicely.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"... like a tomb."
The_Movie_Cat30 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Hilariously stilted would-be thriller where a six year old boy spends an hour locked inside an impenetrable vault. The bank staff are concerned about the dead air inside, but the real problem is dead air outside, with flat lines and minimal chemistry.

Guessing what year Time Lock was made is an almost impossible task... the film is so charmingly quaint that assembled crowds politely leave scenes when their time is over, and everyone addresses each other in clipped, semi-staccato tones. It's like a bygone relic of the 1940s, a time when men in their fifties could place their hands on a young child's backside without anyone batting an eyelid or thinking it inappropriate. Such impossible innocence actually comes far later than expected, it being filmed during the birth of rock and roll and on the cusp of the 1960s.

Director Gerald Thomas is most famous for helming every single entry in the "Carry On" series, so possibly his skills weren't in drama. While Time Lock has a considerable charm, it's weighed down by all the unwieldy exposition and static blocking. Characters stand around uttering lines of plot advancement at one another without warmth or realistic body language and the whole thing steers towards the conclusion without any real tension.

Shots of the boy inside the vault - he's unseen on screen for over forty minutes during the break-in scenes - may have added to the tension. It's arguable that his absence is to increase the sense that he may not be alive, but the end result is that you spend forty minutes watching men in trilby hats speaking to each other in an antiquated manner.

It's not a bad film by any means, and is likable, but it wastes stars like Betty McDowall in nothing roles and fails to maximise its potential.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Carry On Sweating!
ShadeGrenade5 October 2006
One type of movie we Brits used to do really well was the 'B' movie. In the '50's and '60's, British studios churned out dozens of supporting features, inexpensively produced, often featuring actors of whom no-one had ever heard, and while being far from masterpieces they proved very enjoyable. 'Time Lock' was one such picture. Based on a play by Arthur Hailey ( author of 'Airport' ), it tells the story of a little boy who accidentally gets trapped in a bank vault, and of the numerous attempts to rescue him. Robert Beatty heads the cast, which features a young Sean Connery as one of the would-be rescuers. What's surprising is that the picture was directed by Gerald Thomas, future 'Carry On' director. He brings a Hitchcock-like feel to the story, and one wishes he'd made a few more films in this vein. 'Time Lock' is above average, and worth catching if it comes round on television. The person who likened the film to 'Plan 9 From Outer Space' deserves to be locked in a vault himself. The only thing they have in common is they are both in black and white!
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Canadian/British Atmospheric Thriller
Nigelsr7112 September 2006
Economically shot on a low budget by Beaconsfield Studios this film has curiosity value for two small reasons; it was the first speaking role by Sean Connery and one of the earliest films to feature a helicopter (Bell 47 CF-AKL). Interestingly one of the stars of the film (Robert Beatty) also shared a plot featuring a later version of the same helicopter type in the film "Where Eagles Dare".

It is a mildly atmospheric B movie which due to it's venerable age (it reaches it's half centenary in 2007) provides an interesting and nostalgic look at Canadian/British class values and aside from the aforementioned flying object is refreshingly free of UFO's, little green men or giant spiders as was the fashion in 1950 b-movies.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't forget to ask Bob to check your hands!
last-picture-show10 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Made in Great Britain by Peter Rogers and Gerald Thomas (the team best known for their Carry On comedies) this film is set in Canada but for no obvious reason. A simple race-against-time drama about a little boy getting stuck in a bank vault, it could just as easily be set in Britain and could have been made more convincing without the constraints bought on by the lack of location filming.

The film is more-or-less made on one set, and while there are many successful films made this way including Sleuth, Wait Until Dark and Deathtrap, here it simply doesn't work. The script is flat, the acting is questionable and the whole concept difficult to believe in.

There are several unintentionally funny parts which are worth waiting for if you've nothing else to do. My favourite is where the bank manager (whose hair gets more and more disheveled as the time goes on) makes reference to the bank vault having 14 inch thick walls and being like a 'tomb', saying it loud enough for the worried parents to hear in an almost sadistic way.

Then in an effort to speak to the boy the local cop (who's just too loud and bossy) orders some sound equipment and they set up what must be the largest megaphone in the world against the vault door. The boy's dad (the totally unconvincing Lee Patterson) nervously talks into a mike in the hope that the little brat will hear him. The problem here is that the sound emitting from the speaker just isn't loud enough. In reality everyone's ears would be bleeding and when he puts the mike down on the counter it would cause a sound loud enough to cause an earthquake.

Later supposed safe 'expert' Robert Beatty takes over, although the only thing he's expert at is being louder and bossier than the cop. He keeps telling everyone to hurry up all the time even though they're all going as fast as is humanly possible. And he seems totally unconcerned about anyone helping being injured, tiered or burnt in the process, as long as he gets the chance to stick his arm in a hole at the end and undo the time lock mechanism to free the kid. Meanwhile he stands around doing very little (don't you just wanna punch him!).

He demands the services of seven strong men from the crowd to help break through the wall with picks and hammers. This scene is very strange, almost camp, and I particularly love the way he goes to the trouble of checking the men's hands to make sure they were up to the job like a mum checking her kid's mits at meal times. Clock the look of disappointment on the priest's face when bossy Bob tells him that he can't take part. When else is he going to get the chance to be among six burly men with rough hands!

To top it all 'second welder' Sean Connery has but a few lines and delivers them in an accent of uncertain origin. Part American, but mainly Scottish, it sounds like he wasn't even trying to disguise his real voice and his skill as an actor is questionable. Curiuosly this was after his part in the successful action drama Helldrivers and I'm surprised he accepted such a small part in what is an average, forgettable film.

For those who like this type of story I would recommend the far superior Emergency Call which has a similar race against time theme but more action and a better script.
0 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I'be Got Got Got Got No Time!
cutterccbaxter6 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I've stayed at The Bond Hotel in Toronto a few times and now I've seen a real Bond (Sean Connery) in Toronto, thanks to Time Lock.

Raise your hand if you thought the kid was going to suffocate? Well, I didn't think he was gonna die either, but I was engrossed in the movie despite acting that was flatter than the Prarie Provinces. The story clipped along at brisk pace with the suspense continually building until they rescued and revived the little bugger.

Time Lock is no Ace In The Hole. It doesn't have a British Pound's worth of Billy Wilder's cynic charm. But It does have a lot of the Canadian can do spirit.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
First speaking role for Connery in minor "B" movie.
alexanderdavies-993828 September 2019
I didn't expect Sean Connery to have any dialogue for this little known "B" picture but to my surprise, he does have quite a few lines to act with. His character has no depth or significance however and isn't even given a name. He is one of many cast members involved in a simple story about a young boy who's accidentally locked inside a bank vault. The usual scenario follows: a race against time, the need to find a particular person who can help with the situation in hand, panicking characters etc. No one in the cast is well known apart from Connery and he hadn't appeared in many films before this one. The production moves along at a reasonable pace, dialogue is standard but the last few minutes includes a tense moment or two.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entirely watchable but dated
donaldagont8 November 2008
I remember seeing this film on TV when I was a teenager. I have just seen it again 20 years on and like me it has aged. As one reviewer says the characters are a microcosm of society and it is a world I wouldn't want to live in. The cop, the expert, the bank manager are unbelievably rude, bullying, and cruelly insensitive. The acting is poor and hardly credible. Even Sean Connery chews his dialogue (on this showing it seems a marvel that he reinvented himself as James Bond only four years later). The boy is as wooden as a barn door with his repeated "Yes, Daddy." He even grins at the camera at one point. Surely they could have found someone of Dean Stockwell's or Pamela Franklin's abilities. The parents are predictably bland, the mother plays the hysterical part as usual. Beatty is OK as the main star and dominates as he should but his bullying of the volunteers is over the top and uncalled for. Someone ought to have given him a bloody nose after all the fuss was over. As for the bank manager his forelock was hanging down more or less from the start.

The situation was promising and there is no doubt that the film is exciting, especially the use of statistics to heighten the tension. Unfortunately the performances let it down and the dialogue is at times laughable (perhaps the future "Carry On" director was getting some practice in). Also it doesn't seem credible that when the radio man said he wanted to put the story on the news that it didn't occur to the cop or the bank manager to tell him to use the stations to locate the expert. Instead this idea came from the journalist about three minutes later. Again the cop calculates the car journey time for the expert to get to the bank when my first thought would have been to get him on a helicopter. Again someone else suggested this. The selection for the hammering is like something out of the keystone cops. When the priest turned up, I thought, who next, the one-armed bandit? Why is the film based in North America, when it was made at Beaconsfield? The time bomb plot is usually handled better and the director makes a real mess of the tension. The film has sadly dated - but it is always watchable, even allowing for the shoddy direction and acting.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Watchable, entertaining thriller
Miles-104 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is an entertaining thriller despite its dated-ness. The efforts to rescue a trapped boy make for edge-of-your-seat drama. The story covers every angle from frazzled nerves as time expires to anguished self-recriminations when there is nothing for some of the characters to do but wait. All of this is predictable yet compelling. Mr. Dawson, the vault expert, reminds me of Mr. Wolf in "Pulp Fiction" in that he's the guy who finally comes in and lays out what they have to do to solve the problem and rescue the boy. He has a straight forward but labor intensive plan and directs everybody to get it done.

As a bonus, we get to see Sean Connery in a pre-fame bit part. He is cast as Welder #1 (although his boss calls him "Bill" at one point) and is the only character who has a British Isles accent, even though he is not the only cast member who seems to be British. Indeed, the production is interesting in that while this movie seems to have been made in the UK, it is based on a television play that was originally done on Canadian TV. The cast is international in that it includes British, Irish, Canadian and American actors. (It is a sad note that Irish actor Victor Wood, who plays Mr. Zeeder, died less than a year after this movie's release.)

The dated portrayal of technical details is telling. For example, Welder #2 gets hit in the face with hot metal because he is not wearing a welder's mask. I can understand that maybe they are careless because they are hurrying to rescue a trapped child, and it looks as if, even then, they know better because once this accident happens the boss tells Connery's character to go get a mask before taking over the job.

I think I might be able to solve the mystery of the cloth over the registration numbers of the helicopter. (See Goofs.) The movie is set in Canada but was filmed in the UK. Aircraft registration numbers include a letter that designates the country. The filmmakers did not want to show a British helicopter flying over Canada.

The medical anomalies got to me particularly when the two doctors finally have access to the unconscious victim. They wait until he is taken out to the ambulance before they do anything to check his vitals let alone try to resuscitate him. Today, EMTs and doctors would immediately start working on the patient as soon as they got their hands on him. Way too slow.

(I once asked a retired nurse when she first heard of "ABC", the emergency medicine acronym for prompting immediate attention to "airways, breathing, and circulation", and she said it wasn't until the late '60s, so maybe doctors really were slower to do things in 1957, which would have made them lose a lot more patients than they would a decade later. Worse, back in the 1950s and maybe even into the 1960s, ambulance drivers were often not certified EMTs! I don't recall encountering EMTs until the '70s.)

On some personal notes: This movie was released in late summer 1957 and the boy in the story says that he has just turned six that day (though the actor is actually closer to ten). I myself turned six in September 1957, so I might have identified more with the boy if I had thought about that while watching, but it didn't occur to me until after the film ended.

Victor Winter, who plays the boy, was Scottish and a successful child actor as well as an assistant director and production manager in adulthood. He worked on a film where I was an extra in the early 1980s, "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom", although he worked in Macau, China whereas I worked in California, USA.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Time Lock review
JoeytheBrit13 May 2020
A British movie that tries very hard to fool its audience into believing it's American with decidedly mixed results. For a start, the film feels neither British or American, and the writing of Peter Rogers (who would go on to produce the quintessentially British Carry On movies) fails to take the difference in national characters into account, so that the American characters display typically British reserve. In fact, the reactions of all involved are incredibly subdued even for a British movie - as if, like us, they can't believe it's all such an anti-climax.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Let Me Out, Daddy. I'll Be A Good Boy.
rmax3048235 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A six-year-old boy is accidentally sealed in a bank vault that has a time lock protecting it. All the stops are pulled out to rescue the little tyke.

I wish I could recommend it because it sounds like a terrifically suspenseful narrative. I mean, the kid is in darkness except for his flashlight. He's using up the oxygen. His parents on the other side of the door are in a frenzy.

But it falls flat, mostly because the acting is generally poor and sometimes plain awful. You or I could handle some of the roles better. Nor does the dialog have much to be admired.

This would have made a fine episode of "The Twilight Zone" or "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" and almost certainly would have had more polish.

Sorry.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Simpe but gripping story
hsmith20075 March 2007
A very simple story of a young boy accidentally locked in a bank vault with no way of getting out until the time lock is released some 60 hours later, well after the air will have run out. No way except, of course, breaking in. And that's it. Together with an average cast and fairly wooden performances from some of them this should, by rights, have been no more than an average fifties film. Its strength, however, is its script. This kept the story very tight with very little embellishment and a great deal of intelligence. Usually with this type of story there are many gaps where one cannot help but feel that a truck could be driven through the errors made or the ridiculous twists. With Time Lock, however, the script covers virtually everything that the viewer would consider. Details such as the thinking and methodology of how to get into the vault, organising the people required and even such items as the possible medical effects on the boy and how to calculate the amount of air left to breathe. All this had a great effect on building the tension and I had to watch it until the end. One of the most enjoyable films that I have seen in a while.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Avoid this carry-on
glyntreharne-15 April 2003
An out of the ordinary plot by Arthur Hailey is turned into a tedious 'b' film by the Carry on team of Peter Rogers and Gerald Thomas. The actors are second rate, apart from Sean Connery in an early role, and can only offer below standard histrionics. The scenario is a small boy is locked in a bank safe, will he be rescued before he suffocates? The problem is that child actor Vincent Winter is such an unappealing performer that you don't care about him, thus ruining any suspense that the film attempts to create. Even if you are stuck in Warrington on a wet weekend, this is one to steer clear of.
4 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Let me out!
JAYLBEE2 April 2004
Happened to (accidently) see this travesty on UK TV a few days ago. It might have been better if the audiences had been locked in the bank vault and the actors (I use the word actor in its loosest context) left outside to get on with it. This film can be bracketed with 'Plan B from outer space ' as the joint worst films of all time. Their is no aspect of this film (even allowing for its age) for which (search as I may) I can find any redeeming feature. Ghastly dialogue,, wooden acting and risible photography all vie with each other to win the prize of supreme awfulness. A story line which defies belief and a child 'star' of somewhat limited intelligence and mind-numbing mediocrity, not to mention a character which qualifies as an irritant of the first magnitude - see it at your peril, there is no known antidote !
3 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enjoyable 50's thriller
chris_gaskin12328 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Time Lock came on Channel 4 during the early hours one morning and I set the video to tape it and was pleased I did.

A bank in Toronto is just closing up for the week when the accountant's small boy decides to go into the safe to try out his new flash light he had as a birthday present. Just as they are about to lock up, the staff get distracted to something outside and then lock the safe, which has been timed to open the following Monday morning, not knowing the boy is in there. Several ways are then tried to rescue him, including a loud speaker, hammers and an acetylene torch. They eventually get in the safe to rescue the boy by banging a hole at the side wall and unlock it by accessing the time lock through that hole. Luckily, the boy is OK when rescued at the end.

This movie was rather enjoyable, despite its low budget. It was British made, despite the Canadian setting.

The movie stars Vincent Winter (Gorgo) as the boy, Steven and a young, pre James Bond Sean Connery. The boy's parents are played by Robert Beatty and Betty McDowall.

This movie is worth checking out if you get the chance, as it is rather obscure.

Rating: 3 and a half stars out of 5.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheap and Cheesy
goose_bird30 March 2004
Warning: Spoilers
At a bank in Toronto,Canada, the accountants six year old son gets locked in the vault. The police are called and use a variety of methods to get him out including a large microphone, drilling and smashing. Do they get him out alive? Yes!!! I'm sure in its day the movie was a hit but the acting is pathetic and the little boy keeps on begging his daddy to let him out of the vault which is something I found really ANNOYING! Do not watch this film! I'm surprised the usually high class Channel 4 actually showed this, it deserves the late night slot on Channel 5. This type of film should be hidden in a dusty old warehouse, never to see the light of day again! The movie is all in black and white and is set in Canada, but all the actors speak in a high-class British accent. Overall **** / **********.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed