Far from the Madding Crowd (1967) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
106 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Shepherd in Sheep's Clothing...
Xstal6 May 2023
There's a man or two who've taken quite a shine, they want to be your love, eternally entwine, one's a shepherd who has nowt, the t'other carries lots of clout, but desires from your side fail to align. Then a soldier takes a glance and your enraptured, he's taken all you have to give, and you've been captured, you're in love, and now so happy, you get married, it's rather snappy, that's when the ties begin to weaken, becoming fractured. Soon the man who you have loved leaves you in tears, as he vanishes, dissolves and disappears, leaves a door for a rich neighbour, who wants to offer you his sabre, he's prepared to wait a while, long as six years.

Fabulous performances by some rather splendid actors in a tale that engages and engulfs.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Underrated
kenjha2 August 2009
In this sprawling adaptation of the Hardy novel, a beautiful woman in 19th century English countryside must select a suitor among three men. It has become fashionable to bash this film but it is quite an impressive production. Although she may not be exactly what Hardy had in mind, Christie is radiant as the heroine. The men pursuing her are well played by Finch as a rich landowner, Stamp as a cad, and especially Bates as a poor sheep farmer. Schlesinger's direction is leisurely and meticulous but he sustains interest despite the nearly three-hour length. The cinematography by Roeg is breathtaking and Bennett's score adds a haunting quality to the film.
31 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I really liked this
TheLittleSongbird16 August 2012
The cast and the fact that I love the book(possibly my personal favourite of Thomas Hardy's work) were what drove me into seeing this Far From the Madding Crowd. And I personally really liked it, though I can see why people might not. It does have a couple of cliché moments and the film is overlong. On the other hand, the film looks gorgeous, the scenery is evocative and the cinematography positively shimmers. The music is hauntingly beautiful, the script is literate and thoughtful and the complex story unfolds slowly and deliberately, is faithful in detail and spirit to the book(in the film's favour rather than against it) and several scenes such as the scene in the graveyard have their impact. The direction from John Schlesinger is fine, I can see where some are coming from when they say his personality doesn't come through as it does in his other work but considering how different the story and his directing style is that's understandable, while the characters still have credibility and complexity if even more so in the book. Julie Christie is an affecting and spirited Bathsheba, Terence Stamp is appropriately soldierly and crusty, Alan Bates does down-to-earth very effectively and Peter Finch devastates as the tragic Boldwood. In conclusion, maybe not for everybody but I really liked it for mainly the cast, visuals and music. 8/10 Bethany Cox
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This contains my favourite scene in cinema history
simon-11822 April 2000
I have never read a good word about this film in any movie guide, which frankly baffles me. I think it's a masterpiece, and despite Hardy being one of my favourite authors, I think this is actually better than the novel. It also contains two absolutely perfect moments. But first some general comments. The photography is gorgeous, actually looking more realistic than idyllic, beautiful but sometimes cold and forboding, brooding over the tragic proceedings. Secondly, the remarkable soundtrack by Richard Rodney Bennett lends the movie a good deal of its emotiveness. The use of English folk songs to comment on the proceedings is ingenious, sometimes impressively reflective of the situations, and at points extremely unsettling.

Julie Christie is beautiful and I found her Bathsheba the precise mixture of headstrong independence and vulnerability. Terence Stamp's repulsive Troy is a triumph of casting and Alan Bates is wonderful as the simpliest of her suitors. The film is stolen for me though by Peter Finch, who begins a hat trick of devastating performances, here, in The Trials of Oscar Wilde and Sunday Bloody Sunday. His Boldwood is a remarkable creation, so eligible, so tragic, so lost and helpless. His scene with Bathsheba when she suggests Christmas to be a time when she will make a decision on their future is heartbreaking. "Christmas," he smiles. "I'm happier now." But the scene that should surely secure this movie a place in film history is that in the graveyard. Without spoling the plot for those who have yet to see it, the gargoyle spewing rainwater over the graves as the sound of "The Bold Grenadier" plays is as affecting an image as one is ever likely to see on screen. The Boldwood plot has a darker outcome here than in the book, which I'm sure Hardy would have approved of. This is a beautiful and disturbing movie that does not shy away from Hardy's bleak view of existence, and adds to the mix a strong sense of gritty 60s honesty. Beautiful, devastating and unforgettable.
160 out of 171 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Distant, Depressing but Good
Rodrigo_Amaro13 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
John Schlesinger's film "Far From the Madding Crowd" is another good and almost epic story about a woman divided for the love of three men. Here Julie Christie plays a woman owner of a farm who gets involved (in one way or another) with a rich farmer (Peter Finch), a rustic and quite gentle countrymen (Alan Bates) and a playful heroic sergeant (Terence Stamp). What makes this story interesting is that she's a woman who most of the time is playing with these men not knowing what love really is and the audience is caught in the middle of her personal choice and their own choice of who's the perfect man for her.

My perspective is that she always makes the wrong choice. First she ignores the countrymen who works with her saying she's not in love with him despite his speech of why she must marry him is very convincingly. He gets out of her life but then he realizes he can't go very far but still keeps working for her. The rich farmer also sounds an excellent choice and he's devoted to her when she tells about her motives of why she won't marry him but if he waits she'll accept him. At last we got the military man, who despite their brief and careless meeting she falls in love with him right away. And just like the sheep that went downhill in the beginning of the movie (by the way terrible and almost pointless scene) their marriage seems to go nowhere, he only wants her money and plus he has a girlfriend. But that powerful woman still loves him: "You're my husband" she cries after he sees the corpse of his girlfriend and she sees that he wasn't interested in her at all.

Not a romantic film but it has some clichés and non original things of a similar flick; it's more like a study of how the perception of love is mistaken, confusing and that's why we make some unfortunately choices and some happy and good choices of the person we want to be close. Love? That's another and complex story.

If wasn't for some of the melodramatic clichés in many moments (The military faking his death to escape his wife then his dreadful return to her); the problems involving animals in some depressing parts; and the timing of the movie (it was way too long), it could be a better movie. I don't find the screenplay so complete and intriguing, most of the dialogs are so distant from the public and from the characters that there were times when I thought that characters weren't showing what they really felt at some climatic moments because the text didn't worked well. It is very distant.

At least the ensemble casting is fine (Alan Bates and Peter Finch notably), the editing was an enjoyable training exercise of what John Schlesinger would do in "Midnight Cowboy" and the locations are very delightful. Not much of a memorable moment in the career of anyone involved with it but still a good movie that you can watch if you had nothing better to do or just to pass the time. 6/10
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Alan Bates is just fantastic
FlorenceLawrence19 July 2005
What a treat to see an adaption of this marvellous but hard going book, of course it's always worth the effort to read Hardy, but it takes getting into, you have to be in the right mind frame, so dramatisations of his wonderfully rich characters are always wonderful to watch, and open up his work to a wider audience I should imagine.

This film in particular was pretty true to the script, if a little condensed, in places. I felt Alan Bates was just fantastic on screen, but probably had the right amount of charm and screen magnetism for the box office, but a little too much to be a true Farmer Oak as described by Hardy, what women in her right mind would ever turn him down,being so sweet and looking like that, I must watch more of his films.

Everyone else was just brilliant as well, and it was lovely to see the beautiful Dorset I visit often so on the big screen and note it really hasn't changed that much at all since the filming in the 60's.

An excellent film, don't miss it !!!
45 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bland But Alright
gavin694225 August 2017
Bathsheba Everdene (Julie Christie), a willful, flirtatious, young woman, unexpectedly inherits a large farm and is romantically pursued by three very different men.

Roger Ebert wrote, "Thomas Hardy's novel told of a 19th century rural England in which class distinctions and unyielding social codes surrounded his characters. They were far from the madding crowd whether they liked it or not, and got tangled in each other's problems because there was nowhere else to turn. It's not simply that Bathsheba (Julie Christie) was courted by the three men in her life, but that she was courted by ALL three men in her life." This is an interesting point. What he is essentially saying is that this upper class does not have to deal with the lower classes, but due in part to their limited numbers, they are forced to deal with each other. One supposes this could be said of the royal families in ages past -- marriages could be based on love, but it would be a limited love due to its bracketing of certain options.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Julie Is Luminous
donwc199620 June 2013
This is a brilliant film from beginning to end and Julie Christie delivers one of the great female performances in movies. She is enchanting and utterly charming dominating every scene she's in because she is just so incredibly beautiful. Her three male co-stars, however, shine just as well and it's difficult to say which one is the best because they are all so good. It's the director, of course, who is responsible for creating this incredible ensemble of acting and John Schlesinger is one of the great directors who reigns at the peak of his field. But ultimately the film belongs to Julie Christie who is in virtually every scene. The promise she showed in Darling for which she won the Oscar is more than demonstrated here where she is so great she can only be compared with Garbo, Hepburn, Crawford or Davis. I am a Julie Christie fan forever.
29 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ravishing and dreamy
shakercoola26 August 2018
A British period drama; A story about a beautiful woman who arouses the ardour of three rival suitors in 19th-century rural Dorset. Headstrong, and having flirted and toyed with their affections, she chooses to marry one that leads to trouble. John Schlesinger's adaptation of Thomas Hardy's classic novel is a superbly photographed production thanks to cinematographer Nicolas Roeg. The screenplay is faithful to the original story whilst maintaining the wit necessary for it to be engaging. Richard Rodney Bennett's wistful score works very well. Julie Christie is a fascinating presence. She is convincing as one, under whose spell, many a man could fall.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Under-rated version of the Hardy classic.
Carl Halling25 December 2001
For many the casting of sixties beauty Julie Christie as the vulnerable heartbreaker Bathsheba Everdene was erroneous, but Christie does a fine job, and makes the role her own. Schlesinger remains faithful to the romantic spirit of Hardy, drenching the magnificent cinematography in the exquisite pastoral music of Richard Rodney Bennett, who clearly wrote under the influence of Vaughan Williams and Delius, while interpreting the story for the cinema very much in his own way. The film is long; but craftmanlike, and characterised by superb performances, with Peter Finch as the tormented Boldwood, and Alan Bates as Gabriel, who is the moral force within the story, particularly excellent. The film's climax is one of the most hauntingly poignant in sixties cinema.

I like to see it as an oblique commentary on the essentially tragical (and doomed) nature of selfish or sensual or possessive love; and the innate nobility of the marriage state buttressed by genuine mutual respect, with Gabriel as the agent of reason and decency amid so much unbridled passionateness....
32 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
overinflated but still good
mukava99120 February 2009
This adaptation of the Thomas Hardy novel condenses the source material into a mostly sedate, contemplative panorama of mid-19th century English rural life. Of the two hours and forty minutes it takes to unspool, one hour and twenty minutes are occupied with sweeping landscape shots (frequently from the sky so that the human subjects below are reduced to specks), varied views of daily farm labor, the bustle of a town market, an extensive tour of a traveling circus, a cockfight, a summer storm; we take the time to follow a little boy as he walks across a meadow repeating parts of his school assignment; we witness the procedure whereby sheep are saved from bloat; the plot pauses at three separate moments to allow various characters to sing folk songs that last several minutes each. Scattered amidst these atmospheric bits and the full measure of big-budget and authentic-looking production values we get, in measured doses, a love story, but with plot mechanics replaced by a pileup of fatalistic occurrences. A stolid shepherd (Alan Bates) declares his love for a beautiful girl (Julie Christie); she spurns him politely. Suddenly and unexpectedly she inherits a farm and he loses his sheep when his herd dog chases the flock over a cliff. She impulsively teases a neighboring landowner (Peter Finch) into thinking she may be interested in marrying him. When he proposes, she apologizes for her bad behavior and politely turns him down. While making her nighttime rounds of the farm, she suddenly and unexpectedly encounters a dashing soldier (Terence Stamp) when her dress catches on his spur. She quickly falls in love with him and marries him. Things go badly from there.

After Bates nobly saves the hay stacks from the rain by covering them with tarps, the thunder cracks, the wind effects expand, the music swells and "intermission" is declared, at which point it feels as if the makers of the film are trying to overinflate this essentially intimate, quiet and meandering tale to the dimensions of a grand blockbuster like "Gone with the Wind" or "Doctor Zhivago," and in fact, this was precisely the wrongheaded advertising hook used to promote the film, and it failed disastrously with the 1967 movie- going public. But its good points count for much, from the exceptionally watchable lead actors to a gallery of extraordinary supporting players, (many of whom look like time- machine transplants from the 1860s), to the stunning evocation of the era via costumes, settings and the very accents of the rural folk. Period music is also used with intelligence.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Slow, deliberately paced but exceptionally well made
planktonrules12 July 2021
"Far from the Madding Crowd" is a very long movie. Not only does it clock in at nearly three hours, but its slow, deliberate pace makes it seem longer. Now this might sound like I disliked the movie....well, I didn't. But I am warning you, as not everyone is like me and willing to watch something this long.

The story is from a Thomas Hardy novel, his first successful one at that. But unlike most films based on novels, I was shocked to read a summary of Hardy's story...and it's pretty much the film! And, I really do appreciate that the filmmakers didn't change the plot or tack on a happy ending or the like!

The story is about a most unusual woman for the 1860s. Bathsheba (Julie Christie) is a single woman who has inherited a large farm in England. Back then, women just didn't run large farms...they either hired a man to do it or, more likely, they married a guy so he can run the place. But Bathsheba has unusual notions for the time...such as not wanting to marry anyone who she didn't love first. This means that she did have suitors but instead of trying to date her and get to know her and win her heart, two of them (Alan Bates and Peter Finch) just asked her to marry her without any sort of prelude! Seen back then, this wouldn't have been so unusual...but you can understand a pretty young lady being taken aback from proposals that lacked any sort of romance! Unfortunately, the only man who actively tried to woo her during the film was a complete ne'er do well (Terence Stamp)...a man completely unworthy of her love. Where does all this go and how does the story end? See the film...and be prepared for a few surprises!

The film is simply gorgeous. The cinematography is lovely and appropriately gray, the music is terrific and the acting far better than I expected. Overall, one of Christie's best, if not her best. Despite her winning an Oscar for "Darling" and the fame of her film "Dr. Zhivago", I think here she is at her best.

So, if you see this one...give it a chance. Yes, it's slow...but it's also Hardy's vision and a sad yet enjoyable story as well....with a somewhat happy ending as well.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far from the Crowded Theaters
wes-connors9 August 2010
In rural Victorian England, vain and beautiful Julie Christie (as Bathsheba Everdene) attracts three handsome marriage prospects - poor sheep herder Alan Bates (as Gabriel Oak), wealthy older Peter Finch (as William Boldwood), and sexy sergeant Terence Stamp (as Francis "Frank" Troy). Director John Schlesinger's "Far from the Madding Crowd" may be your finest way to see the English countryside, as it is expertly photographed by Nicholas Roeg. This is picturesque beauty at its finest, with an excellent cast.

Scenes are staged as if D.W. Griffith were filming a British "Gone with the Wind" (Ms. Christie doing "Scarlett O'Hara"). But, there is too little story. It takes a long time for something exciting to happen - the startling performance by Mr. Stamp as he shows Ms. Christie how he wields his sword - this livens the film up considerably. Another high point is the strong performance delivered by beautiful newcomer Prunella Ransome (as Fanny Robin). But, apart from Stamp's phallic symbolizing, the story seems castrated.

****** Far from the Madding Crowd (10/16/67) John Schlesinger ~ Julie Christie, Terence Stamp, Peter Finch, Alan Bates
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointing screen version of the Thomas Hardy novel...
Doylenf30 September 2006
The gorgeous location photography among the rolling hills of Wessex in Victorian England and all of the bucolic farmland scenes of peasants at work are vividly on display in FAR FROM THE MADDING CROWD. Not on display are the vivid characters Hardy wrote about in his famous novel.

Bathsheba Everdene is a complex female character, who treats the three men who love her with a rather perverse temperament, and we never get to understand why she behaves as she does. JULIE Christie is merely sullen in the role, affecting a number of poses but never really doing anything more than giving us a surface portrait of the woman around whom the whole tale spins.

The same flaws inhabit the dull male characters, about whom we have a hard time being even interested in, as played by TERENCE STAMP, ALAN BATES and PETER FINCH.

Furthermore, the whole tale takes almost three hours to tell, during which time we get a wonderful feel of the climate and texture of life in those times but rarely get a glimpse of what makes the characters tick. This is the film's fatal flaw. No film of this length can keep the viewer interested unless the characters come to life, and here they clearly do not.

Like all of Hardy's novel, the story depends heavily on coincidence and how it plays a part in the fate of its leading players. Here the plot seems like no more than a series of contrivances that can stir only a modest amount of interest.
13 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Never had Wessex been so beautifully filmed !!
nicholas.rhodes28 September 2004
I have watched this film many tens of times and never tire of its beauty. Each viewing has me finding it even more beautiful than on the previous occasion – it may seem slow to first-time viewers but they should make the effort to watch the thing a few more times !!!

This film is without any doubt that which perfectly renders the atmosphere of Thomas Hardy's Wessex ! The careful filming, lighting and attention to the changing moods of the Dorset countryside is absolutely PERFECT, and the music is perfectly suited to the atmosphere ! This Film has just been issued on DVD in the UK but I was very disappointed to find that little or no remastering of the picture had been carried out and that, although the picture quality is reasonable for the time, I had been expecting the full treatment for a work of art such as this to get rid of remaining compression artefacts, spots, grain etc.! Also there are no subtitles for the deaf, and no subtitles or languages for foreign viewers (inadmissible !!) nor special features which you would expect for such a great work of art as this. Other films of Thomas Hardy country, such as Tess and others, pale into insignificance beside this one though it must be said that Tess, although taking place in Dorset was actually filmed in Normandy ( Cherbourg Peninsula) which would explain why the atmosphere wasn't the same.

Each scene of this film has remained indelible in my mind, the sheep being pushed over the cliff by the mad sheepdog, the corn market ( actually filmed in Devizes, Wiltshire ), the water flowing down Gold Hill in Shaftesbury, Dorset where poor young Fanny Robbins painfully seeking to mount during her last few hours on earth, the cock-fight, the beautiful views of the Dorset Coast with Durdle Door and the chalk cliffs, the romantic dalliance of Troy and Bathsheba doubtlessly filmed in one of those prehistoric burial mounds so common in Wiltshire. Truly, 'tis one of the most beautiful areas on earth. When I was at university in Bath, Avon, U.K. during the seventies, I made a point of visiting the Thomas Hardy country, and in particular the sites used in this film, as it was not too far away. I found a sense of timelessness there and the area has to be visited to 'feel' the atmosphere that the film exudes !

Above and beyond the magnificent sets and music, we have the actors' performance, which I seem to appreciate even more on each successive viewing of the film. Each character is very well developed and the performances are masterly even those of the minor characters. There is also a significant number of traditional songs of the day which are sung most convincingly by the actors. There is something quintessentially English about this film not to be found anywhere else, for this reason alone it should not be missed. I can only hope that one it will be remastered for picture and soundtrack and will then be truly appreciated on a home cinema.
71 out of 81 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beautiful to look at and superbly acted, but half-an-hour too long
dr_clarke_226 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Having made three urban-set contemporary feature films, director John Schlesinger tried his hand at something rather different for his fourth, with an adaptation of Thomas Hardy's much-loved novel Far from the Madding Crowd. A period drama that closely follows the source text, the resulting film is beautiful to look at and superbly acted, but it does rather drag at times. Set in Victorian "Wessex" (like all of Hardy's novels), Far from the Madding Crowd follows the life of Julie Christie's Bathsheba Everdene, an independent young woman who inherits a farm and decides to run it herself. She is the object of desire of three men: Alan Bates' Gabriel Oak; Peter Finch's William Boldwood; and Terence Stamp's Frank Troy. Oak is a simple farmer who declares his desire to marry Bathsheba at the start of the film; he's honest, steadfast and hard-working and Bathsheba employs him when she decides to run her own farm and after he has lost his. Boldwood by contrast is a wealthy gentleman farmer, but lonely and reserved, whilst Troy is a charismatic, if occasionally brooding, army Sergeant. It doesn't take familiarity with the novel to guess quite early on which of these men Bathsheba will ultimately end up with, but the plot revolves around how she gets to that point and how two of them ultimately meet a tragic end. Christie, famed for her beauty at the time, was well chosen to play Bathesheba, a woman with whom every man she meets falls in love. Hardy often wrote strong female characters - relatively unusually for a male writer at the time - and Bathsheba is arguably his best known example; she translates well to the screen, as do her three would-be suitors. Bates plays the honest, working class Oak entirely convincingly, whilst Finch is equally good as the emotional restraint Boldwood and conveys his growing obsession with Bathsheba - and desperate desire to be noble - effortlessly. Stamp brings charm, charisma and arrogance to the role of Troy, but also displays the man's bitterness at having lost his true love, Prunella Ransome's endearing but doomed servant Fanny Robin. This study in fine acting is a key element of the success of Far from the Madding Crowd, but is far from the only one. Schlesinger proves adept at handling rural costume drama and the film is extremely pretty to look at it. Shot on location in Dorset and Wiltshire (including Devizes), it looks gorgeous, in no small part thanks to the cinematography of Nicholas Roeg, who makes much use of panoramic, aerial, long and wide-angle shots to show off the countryside to maximum effect and demonstrates that it is often beautiful and bleak at the same time. Whether or not rural farm life in Victorian England was quite like it is depicted in the film, Schlesinger nevertheless manages to make it look wholly convincing, and his typical gift for visuals is evident: the famous scene of Troy showing Bathsheba his swordplay is superbly shot and intercut with images of Troy on horseback riding into battle, whilst the death of Oak's sheep - followed by his shooting of the sheepdog that caused it - is shot with all the stark unpleasantness of a folk horror film. Sir Richard Rodney Bennett's elegant incidental score - nominated for an Academy Award - completes the visuals nicely. As beautiful as the film is however, writer Frederic Raphael's desire to adhere closely to the plot of the novel means that at one hundred and sixty minutes it is rather long and painfully slow at times. The circus scene to cite but one example is impressively staged but goes on for far longer than is necessary for the narrative. Often in cinema less is more and the film could have had half-an-hour trimmed, improving the pace without compromising the story. But that aside, Far from the Madding Crowd remains a enjoyable and well-made film that demonstrated early on the versatility that Schlesinger was capable of.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An excellent film with a haunting soundtrack.
MrOllie16 May 2011
If you are wanting fast action and thrills then this film is not for you, however, if you enjoy a good drama with a haunting score then look no further. Bathsheba Everdine (Christie)has three suitors in the form of the dashing Troy(Stamp) the dependable Oak (Bates) and the brooding/obsessed Boldwood (Finch). The story revolves around her relationship with each of these three men with rural Victorian England as the backdrop. I particularly enjoyed Terrence Stamp's performance as Sergeant Troy whose real love is Fanny Robbin and not Bathsheba. Richard Rodney Bennett creates a lovely haunting soundtrack which conjures up the English countryside. A smashing film!!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Far from the Madding Crowd
Prismark108 February 2021
Director John Schlesinger comes of age as a director in Far from the Madding Crowd. He moves away from the northern based kitchen sink dramas.

It gave him the confidence to take a crack at America. His next movie, Midnight Cowboy will get him a Best Director Oscar.

Running at just under 3 hours. This is still a condensed version of Thomas Hardy's sprawling novel.

In 19th century rural Dorset. Beautiful Bathsheba Everdene (Julie Christie) is managing a farm that she has inherited. She is romanced by three very different men.

William Boldwood (Peter Finch) is a wealthy older neighbouring farmer who has become mesmerised by Bathsheba.

Gabriel Oak a decent dependable shepherd who is rejected by Bathsheba and has a run of bad luck when his sheepdog drives all his sheep off a cliff. He ends up working as a farmhand for the woman he hoped to marry.

Then there is the dashing cavalryman Sergeant Troy (Terence Stamp) who cockily wins her affections but turns out ot be an unsuitable husband with his caddish behaviour.

It is clear that Bathsheba is confused by the men in her life and becomes a poor judge of character. She falls for the wrong man. Everyone is trapped somewhat by the conventions of the time especially Bathsheba who strives to be independent but is trapped by her beauty.

The film is beautifully photographed. It has evocative music. Christie is great in this movie, you can see why the men fall for her. Finch has the most difficult role and does seem slightly awkward.

Bates and Stamp though have no issues with their characters.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perfect! Just perfect!
JohnHowardReid30 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Copyright 18 October 1967 by Vic Films/Appia Films/Joseph Janni Productions. New York opening at the Capitol: 18 October 1967. U.S. release: September 1967. U.K. general release: 27 October 1968 (sic). Australian release: 22 February 1968. Original running time: 175 minutes. In the U.S. the running time was reduced firstly to 169 minutes for premiere engagements, then to 143 minutes for second- runs at "popular prices". The U.K. general release version clocked in at 168 minutes.

COMMENT: I am not a fan of director John Schlesinger who delighted critics with such films as "A Kind of Loving" (1962), "Billy Liar" (1963), "Darling: (1965), "Midnight Cowboy" (1969), and "Sunday, Bloody Sunday: (1972). The only one of these movies I found even modestly entertaining was "Billy Liar". Schlesinger no doubt would place himself firmly in the contemporary realism-at-all-costs school. So "Far From the Madding Crowd" is for him, something of an exception. A period romantic drama, which he has brought vividly, vibrantly and realistically to life, abetted by a fine cast and brilliant technicians.

A no-expense-spared movie, this Hardy adaptation gains more than it stood to lose by what was touted as Schlesinger's uncompromisingly realistic approach. In point of fact, the director has yielded to some of the Romanticism inherent in the novel. This is good, because the picture now has a perfect balance between the Realistic and the Romantic.

Julie Christie's portrayal also comes as something of a pleasant surprise. She is astonishingly effective as a Romantic heroine. I would class this Bathsheba as her most memorable performance. Although she rightly dominates the film, she receives brilliant support from Alan Bates and Terence Stamp. Our own Peter Finch is more than merely adequate, though he does seem a bit uncomfortable. Whereas the other players wear their period clothes as if to the raiment born, Finch seems to me slightly miscast. But this is just a personal impression. I'm relying on memory, because of course the film hasn't been seen for thirty years. It is certainly overdue for a revival and re- assessment.

Nick Roeg's brilliantly evocative cinematography was rightly praised by contemporary critics, who also singled out the marvelous sets and costumes, as well as Richard Rodney Bennett's wonderful score, with its inspired use of provincial folk songs.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
needs to be shortened
servo24601-221 March 1999
This movie featured a terrific cast, great acting, beautiful scenery and was an entertaining movie....but they needed to hire an editor. It could have been an hour shorter and had the exact same effect.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best version!
naillon-229 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I'm baffled as to why viewers are so upset that Julie Christie didn't look like the character described in the book. Why not focus on her excellent acting? Others claim that she was too old to play Bathsheba. Wrong. She was 25 at the time, only a year or two older than the character by the end of the book.

Bathsheba Everdene is strong-willed, vain, hard-working, loyal, stubborn, committed, obsessed, capricious, dedicated, and intelligent, among many other things. Christie truly nails the character. She shows all the sides of Bathsheba's personality. You don't have to like her. Often, you don't. Often, you sympathize with her, too. Christie's performance shows Bathsheba's development, from silly and impetuous young girl to a far more mature and wiser woman.

Alan Bates is the other true star here, as Gabriel Oak. Some viewers regard his performance as stuffy or boring. I don't. Look more closely at his face; Oak is constantly playing a part before other people, lest they discover his love for Bathsheba, and Bates uses a quick look, a slight change in facial expression, to convey Oak's state of mind. He's not just good; he's perfect. I believed him completely as Oak. Bates was one of the screen's greatest actors, but sadly underrated and under-appreciated, even today. It's time for him to receive the recognition he so richly deserves.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The treachery of the teasing female
moonspinner5529 July 2007
Thomas Hardy's romance of tragedy comes to the screen handsomely produced, with a fine cast and carefully interwoven human dramas, yet it is somewhat embalmed, lacking an inner-fire we in the audience can latch onto. The film might have been more exciting intrinsically had it not been preconceived as a tableaux picture--an awards-grabber; it looks quite beautiful, yet it's too steady, too smooth and slow. Julie Christie is lovely but somewhat monotonous as a fickle lass in Victorian-age Wessex who leads on three different men. The trouble with the film is, we are never sure if she's aware of the damage she's doing (if so, is she ashamed, is she ultimately a masochist who enjoys the game-playing or, if not, is she so guileless she's unaware of her treachery?). Perhaps Hardy's book makes the young woman's behavior more clear, but here we are never allowed to get inside her head--she's an enigma. Supporting performances are very fine, but unfortunately the screenplay leaves them all stranded by the final third, where the picture goes awry, leading to a cold finish. Terrific cinematography by Nicolas Roeg, and Alan Bates in particular is heartbreaking, but the movie is too low-keyed to make a big impact. **1/2 from ****
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A country affair
tomsview19 May 2017
Although "Far from the Madding Crowd" had some of the qualities of the more successful "Doctor Zhivago" - a lavish period setting, sweeping photography and a luminous Julie Christie - "Zhivago" suited the 60's more with its story set against a period of upheaval and massive change. "Far from the Madding Crowd" is subtler; the turmoil is personal, the pace more sedate - a forerunner of the Merchant Ivory productions of the 1980's.

Although the film has held up well, few now are likely to see it the way we did back then in all its stunning 70mm glory with Richard Rodney Bennett's overture sweeping you up before the curtains even opened. And it took its time to unfold with an intermission to give extended bladders a break.

Set along the Dorset coast around 1870, Julie Christie plays Bathsheba Everdene, a woman who turns the heads of three men: one who loves her too much, one who doesn't love her enough and one who loves her about right. The three are William Boldwood (Peter Finch), Francis Troy (Terrence Stamp) and Gabriel Oak (Alan Bates).

They represent different classes: William Boldwood the landed gentry, Gabriel Oak the poor, but dependable farmer while Frank Troy is a soldier, the bad boy Bathsheba falls for.

Along with storms, barn fires and haywaining, the passions run deep, all masked behind Victorian propriety. When you see pictures of dour-looking old Thomas Hardy, it's hard to believe he penned this tale of unrequited love, obsession and jealously, and also created the strong-willed and free-spirited character of Bathsheba Everdene.

Director John Schlesinger built on that independent spirit. Critics thought Christie's Bathsheba too modern, but they probably still had "Darling" in mind. These days we can appreciate the film in isolation. Julie Christie gave a nuanced performance; confident when warding off the advances of those she felt less passionate about, but vulnerable when the tables are turned.

Peter Finch just got better with age; he quietly delivers the proud gentleman who is humiliated by his obsession for Bathsheba. Terrence Stamp and Alan Bates also deliver powerfully realised characters.

A highlight of the film is Richard Rodney Bennett's score, which gives Vaughan Williams a run for his money with its haunting flutes and lyrical sense of folksong.

There are other versions. The expanded 1998 one starring Paloma Beaza as a flightier Bathsheba and the condensed 2015 one with angelic-looking Carey Mulligan had their moments, but it's still the 1967 version that stays with me.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not Top-Notch Schlesinger, But Interesting!
shepardjessica13 July 2004
Based on Thomas Hardy's novel, this version is a bit long with beautiful cinematography and locale, but doesn't quite pull together. Not one of Schlesinger's very best. Julie Christie is beautiful, Terence Stamp is dashing, Alan Bates is reliable, and Peter Finch is overwrought. The script was too disjointed for the sweep of this piece.

A 6 out of 10 for a good effort, but I can believe it flopped. Schlesinger made better films with Midnight Cowboy, Darling, A Kind of Loving, and Billy Liar, but this beats Marathon Man and Honky Tonk Freeway. The casting was impeccable. Best performance = Terence Stamp. A nice try, but fails to hit the mark.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I thought I'd give this a second chance...
Lady X29 March 2004
...so I rented and watched this again -- and I was every bit as bored and unimpressed as I remembered feeling after having watched it the first time!

Having read this book more than once (it is my favorite Thomas Hardy book, and one of my favorite books of all time), and having seen both filmed versions, I have to say that this version (with Alan Bates, Julie Christie and Peter Finch) cannot hold a candle to the BBC remake, released in 1998, with Nathaniel Parker, Paloma Baeza and Nigel Terry.

This Bates/Christie version was a great disappointment to me. Julie Christie was too old for the part of Bathsheba, did not fit Hardy's description of her at all, and has never impressed me as much of an actress -- an opinion which has only been substantiated by her high-school-calibre performance in this film -- a MAJOR casting faux pas! (and a slap on the hand to the makeup artist who made this supposed 19th-century character even more farcical by piling on the makeup until she looked like a Vogue cover girl, rather than the mistress of Weatherbury Farm).

Peter Finch's performance, as Boldwood, was admirable (actually the best of the film, in my opinion), but just did not elicit the strong feeling of empathy from me, as Nigel Terry did in the BBC version. In all fairness, Finch did not seem to have as much screen time, so character development was lacking.

The greatest surprise to me, in regard to this film, was that I also felt the same about Alan Bates' performance as Gabriel Oak -- he just did not convey the emotions and the quality of Oak's character, as described by Hardy in the book, and I found his portrayal to be PAINFULLY bland and boring. He seemed as though he was reading his lines straight off a teleprompter -- emotion and warmth were virtually non-existent! (a STRIKING contrast to Nathaniel Parker's sensitive, powerful, heart-wrenching portrayal of Oak in the 1998 film).

Part of the blame would have to be shared by the director of this version -- the actors APPEARED to be acting, and neither they, nor the director, seemed to have a firm grasp or understanding of the explicit emotions and personalities of the characters, which Hardy had gone to great effort and detail to describe in the book.

I highly recommend to anyone who has seen only this version -- or to anyone who has never seen either version -- that you rent or buy the 1998 BBC film, which is truer to Hardy's book (although some changes were made in that adaptation also, due to time constraints, it wasn't nearly as "choppy" as this one), and is a quality production in every way, and brilliantly acted, from the main players right down through the supporting cast.
14 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed