The Manipulator (1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Mickey Rooney gives a tour de force performance in a weird little horror film that is difficult to watch because he's so out there
dbborroughs19 April 2006
Mickey Rooney lets loose in a strange little film. Rooney plays a deranged makeup man who kidnaps a young woman and then holds her in an old warehouse full of props, forcing her to act in his movie while he drifts in and out of reality.

To say that this two person film is strange is an understatement. Its clear why Rooney agreed to do the film since it lets him do things that he never got to do with Judy Garland or as Andy Hardy. Whats not so clear is why we'd want to watch it since its 90 minutes trapped with a psycho. This isn't to knock Rooney's performance, rather its to praise it since this clearly isn't a guy we want to have over for dinner.

I'm on the fence about this film. I can't really recommend it for any reason other than being able to see Mickey Rooney let go. However if you want to see what else Rooney could do beyond the typical see this movie. Everyone else stay away.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"I'm hungry Mr Lang!"
Bezenby5 November 2013
Weird doesn't being to describe this one. Even if you're a fan of bizarre films you're going to have trouble with The Manipulator. Mickey Rooney plays B. J. Lang, a psychopath who is making a film in his own head in an abandoned theatre. He talks to people who aren't there, sees people who aren't there but has a very real woman held captive, whom he forces to play Roxanne in his imaginary film of Cyrano De Bergerac. At some point Keenan Wynn turns up as a tramp. That's the plot.

So, how do you stretch that out to feature length? Well, Rooney basically babbles, screams, dances, sings, rolls about the floor, stares into space, drools, wears a fake nose, wears make up, whispers, talks to dummies, sweeps the floor and plays forward for Manchester Unitied while the film passes by in slow motion, speeded up, flashes subliminal images, changes perspective and even location several times.

There's a ten minute stretch that takes place entirely under a strobe light, which caused me to put off the film for a while to have a break, and another ten minute stretch of people laughing in slow motion while Rooney walks around saying 'love' and holding a baby. Or how about the bit where Rooney rolls about the floor saying 'pills' over and over again? Or the jungle noises? Or the bit where someone goes mental with a moog while Rooney chases that woman about. For about ten minutes. In slow motion.

This film is an endurance test for the viewer and although I'm not sure what the point of it all was, I'd pretty much reserve this film for folks who think they've seen it all, just to see their jaws drop. It's by no means a good film, but it's too weird to hate either. I wonder what Rooney thinks of it (yep, he's still alive…189 years young).
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"Alright everybody, let's make pictures!"
classicsoncall10 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Well it strikes me that if you hold your index finger strategically placed on the fast forward button, you'll suffer no loss of coherence or continuity while watching this thing. Now I would have done that, except then I'd lose some integrity in writing a review, so I forced myself to suffer through it. Which is not to say that there wasn't a single redeeming factor here, that being Mickey Rooney's insanely delivered performance as a mad film director and erstwhile performer in his own twisted production. He barks orders to imaginary crew and cameraman while the imaginary applause of worshipful fans appeal to his artistic sensibilities. Luana Anders is at the same time his leading actress in bondage and almost willing co-conspirator in the madness. What you wind up with is a pretentious art house film, the product of a writer and director with no vision other than to get something down on celluloid and call it art.

Throughout this twisted nightmare, there were moments when Rooney actually looked like he might have been having fun in between his misgivings about taking on the assignment. Those inspired renditions of Chatanooga Choo-Choo were pure Cyrano de Rooneyac. What I'd really like to know is if Rooney ever discussed this film role as a guest on Carson's 'Tonight Show'. Can you picture that - with Rickles sitting on one side, and Dean Martin on the other. Now that's something I would really want to see.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Highly successful acting exercise; miserably failed film
gimhoff1 March 2007
Everyone who has commented on this film to date has been right. It is a terrible, nearly unwatchable movie, directed by someone who has seen too many avant-garde short films by Stan Brakhage and Maya Derren and who mistakenly believed that a 90-minute commercial movie could be made using their techniques.

But it is also a filmed actors exercise, an extended acting class in which someone said to Mickey Rooney, "Let's test your chops, and explore the limits of your acting range." Viewing the movie that way, it is a triumph for Rooney. His acting talent is incredible, and in two- or three-minute bites his performance can be mesmerizing. He takes a mess of a script, an insane and unsympathetic character, and crazy lines, and comes off not just as believable but as affecting. You really don't want to see this movie, but if someone showed you a few short clips from it you would gain a new appreciation for Rooney's abilities.

Luana Anders holds her own as Rooney's captive, but it is Rooney's show.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I Was Manipulated!!!
BaronBl00d19 June 2001
Cinematic travesty is right! This film is rancid and putrid and boring and so God awful! Mickey Rooney plays some mental case that thinks he is making movies back in 1947 in an old props room where he instructs his "actress" Luana Anders in Cyrano De Bergerac. All 90 minutes basically takes place in this "loft" that really looks like nothing more than the backstage of a small theater. Watching this film was excrutiating torture as we get to see Mickey Rooney give the worst performance of his career, as well as Luana Anders! Rooney is barking out orders to stagehands that aren't there one moment, then he is dancing around and singing "Pardon Me Boys, Is That the Chattanooga Choochoo." He is painful to watch as in one scene he wears make-up and looks like a cheap hooker on the Vegas Strip(based on his looks...one real CHEAP hooker to boot!). Most of the time he looks like some maniacal gnome. Some of the scenes even have speeded scenes so we can see him dance about in fast motion no less. Anders is just as bad(at least looks good) as we never really can tell what her motivation is or what she really feels. This is just one real reel bad film. Director Yabo Yablinsky deserves most of the blame as he forfeits plot structure, characterization, pacing, motivation, and all those things that are a part of a good film for nonsense, halluciatory dream sequences that mean absolutely nothing, and odd, repetitive camera angles. Whew! What a stinker! Yabo is one yahoo!!!
16 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Twisted and awful!! (spoilers)
lthseldy13 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
"Do you hear it, BJ? Do you hear me throw this piece of junk against my bedroom wall and hear it shatter?" This movie is not only the most awful movie that I have ever seen, it makes no sense at all whatsoever!! Why in the world is a Hollywood legend like Mickey Rooney even playing such a senseless character as BJ Lang? And playing Carlotta is an anorexic strung out washed out actress that he keeps as his prisoner hidden in his dorm of props. The whole movie is just hilariously funny and makes me wonder why in the world did anybody even make this movie at all? Was he that desperate that he had nothing else to do with his life and no more roles to play that he had to play this god awful character? The whole movie centers on BJ Lang a hopeless Hollywood makeup artist (and judging from his own makeup artwork on his own face I fear what the people looked like that he made up)kidnaps an actress and ties her to a wheelchair and starves her as he makes her recite lines from different plays that he directs. He goes through the movie barking out orders to an unseen crew, mops the floor as he sings "The Chatanooga Choo-Choo" (oh God that was hilarious!!), puts on fake heart attacks and chases his prisoner through the theater through rooms of costumes, mannequins and props. The movie dragged on as he endlessly recites poems and rehearsals with Carlotta, the camera zooms in and out as crazy 60's acid trip music plays on and on throughout the movie, flashbacks keep coming back as Carlotta stares at the only sane guy in the movie which is the janitor that ends up being the only death in this movie. And it just gets worse. But I guess that there is something to think about in this movie, as awful as it is, it makes you think of people that act like something that their not and the manipulation that they place upon people in order to gain the approval of who they want to be.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not Rooney's most unlikeable role
rokcomx4 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I've been awfully curious about the The Manipulator, a 1971 flick with Mickey Rooney as a has-been movie makeup guy who kidnaps an actress and forces her to reinact movie scenes. That's what it says on the box, anyway. Rooney did some wacky evil roles, in Night Gallery (as a mob boss) and Twilight Zone (the jockey who wished to be "a big man"), so I decided to checkitout ---

Since I found it on one of those dicey Mill Creek "50 Movie" multipacks, I should have known I'd be falling waaaaayyyy down the rabbit hole....

There are almost no words to describe The Manipulator -- could be the trippiest movie I've ever seen. More trippy than The Trip! Somewhere between the psychedelic non-sequiturs of Wonderwall and crazed movie geek Eric Binford in Fade to Black -- it's mostly just Rooney, imagining stuff and people, all distorted with psychedelic sound FX and insane soliloquies.

Sometimes, Rooney is seen in slowmo, sometimes speeded up, and frequently surrounded by pulsating hallucinations...this movie just seemed drenched in LSD. And BiPolar disorder ----

Just...wow...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Why, Mickey? Why?
ShawnMichael871518 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
***THIS COMMENT DEFINITELY HAS SPOILERS***

Mickey Rooney is one of my favorite actors, so of course I was thrilled to watch this movie. It would be a different movie for him to do. Well, I will say this for him, it was definitely a different role for him, but the movie was a huge let down. It was twisted, strange, and the plot seemed to be going nowhere. I just can't for the life of me figure out why Mickey Rooney would do a movie like this. The only reason I can come up with is maybe he wanted to do a different role. Something he doesn't usually do. But he could've done something better than this mess of a movie. I just remember after watching the film, saying to myself, "Why on Earth did you do this movie, Mickey. Why?"

What the movie is basically about is, Mickey Rooney plays B.J. Lang, a crazed old man who believes he's the greatest director of all time, while in actuality he's just a deluded has-been stumbling through an abandoned building. Looking particularly haggard and sporting a scraggly beard. He's also keeping a young woman (Luana Anders) captive in his warehouse, and keeps referring to her as "Carlotta", his personal starlet. Tied to a wheelchair and pleading for food. ("I'm hungry, Mr. Lang," she begs repeatedly, until he finally spoons her some baby food) It's basically a two-person movie, except for Keenan Wynn's 5-minute cameo. He plays Old Charlie, an old man who lives in the warehouse. Luana Anders bumps into him while he's napping, while attempting to escape the crazed Mickey Rooney. Mickey Rooney finds the two of them together and he rehearses a line from a play maniacally, and kills Old Charlie with a sword.

Later on, Mickey Rooney lets Luana Anders try to escape. She managed to get out of the warehouse, in the pouring rain, and climbs into a vacant car. She locks herself in (stupidly) and Mickey Rooney finds her, smashes the car windows with a garbage can and he gets her out of the car. He brings her back into the warehouse, which he begins to express his love for her. He kisses her, and she begins to laugh at him, which doesn't go over too well. He starts to go crazy, screaming "Stop laughing at me!" and starts talking about dying. He then plunges a sword into his stomach, ultimately killing himself. (Using the same sword in which he kills Keenan Wynn's character).

This movie was just totally ridiculous though. At one point in the movie, he puts on some lipstick and eye shadow, and begins talking about the days he used to put makeup on Marilyn Monroe. It was obvious he was trying to be like Marilyn in that scene. And Mickey also spends the second half of the movie with a fake Cyrano nose.

The only credit I can give this movie, is it was interesting seeing Mickey Rooney play a much different role than he usually plays. Other than that, the movie really isn't worth watching. I was looking forward to seeing it so much and it let me down. I give this movie a 4/10. The 4 is for Mickey Rooney's role in the movie.

~Shawn~
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Rubbish and forgettable trash
The_Void6 March 2008
Well...from the plot description, you would certainly be forgiven for thinking this one sounds promising, and indeed it does; but what we have here is a very turgid movie that doesn't make good use of any of it's positive elements. The base of the plot is not particularly original as it had been used in previous (and superior) films such as The Collector in 1965 and focuses on a man who takes a girl hostage. In this case he is the insane makeup man B.J. Lang and he keeps the girl in his prop room. Former child star Mickey Rooney takes the lead role and succeeds only in making a fool of himself. The film really lacks direction and the characters' motivations are never really made clear, which often made me question why I was actually watching it. Director Yabo Yablonsky clearly doesn't have a clue and it's not surprising that he didn't direct anything else after this film as his direction adds nothing and he obviously didn't know where to go with his own story and doesn't get the best out of his central performers. Overall, this film certainly doesn't come recommended. See The Collector instead!
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A hallucinogenic nightmare with Mickey Rooney and mannequins.
HumanoidOfFlesh13 July 2009
"The Manipulator" is truly one of its kind.Supremely bizarre,surreal and acid inspired horror film set in an abandoned warehouse filled with plastic mannequins,cobwebs and dusty movie props.Mickey Rooney plays bearded B.J Lang,a madman who keeps a young woman played by Luana Anders captive in his building and keeps referring to her as Carlotta,his acting star.She is tied to a wheelchair and begs for food.Rooney torments Carlotta and forces her to act out scenes for his theatre piece."The Manipulator" may come across as obnoxious and boring,but I found it somewhat fascinating in its uncompromising portrayal of insanity.Mickey Rooney is certainly unforgettable as a completely deranged B.J Lang.The shots of mannequins are creepy and there are some brilliant scenes of dementia.6 out of 10 for manipulating of my consciousness.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Well, at least they didn't have to spend much money to pay the actors!!
planktonrules15 May 2023
"The Manipulator" is a strange film in that it only has three actors listed in the cast! I've seen a few films with small casts...but only three?! That's just amazing.

Mickey Rooney plays a man who clearly is out of his mind and has a VERY limited grasp of reality. He kidnaps a woman and forces her to act in his 'film'...a mess he's making in his warehouse where he keeps all his props and makeup since he is, when not insane, a Hollywood makeup man. Much of the film consists of the character talking to himself and his imaginary friends and co-workers...a difficult role for any actor.

Rooney's character makes Rupert Pupkin in "The King of Comedy" seem like the epitome of normalcy! Rooney rambles mostly in the movie and trying to follow his thinking is tough, since he clearly is playing a man suffering from schizophrenia. It certainly IS a most unusual character and is probably the weirdest and most daring of his very long career.

So is this any good? Well, perhaps...if you are on LSD or some other intoxicant! Otherwise it's very tough going and it's a film that certainly isn't for most viewers. To me, it felt too bizarre and slow...and a bit embarrassing when I saw Rooney wearing women's makeup. Rooney actually did a good job...but who wants to see a film like this one? Not many people, that's for sure!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Truly bizarre nightmare character study
Bloodwank24 November 2011
There's a not insignificant realm of cinema where art unbound roams raging into madness. But less in number are the films that cross into this maelstrom and there not only find meaning but grasp quintessence, and The Manipulator is one of these films. As uncompromising a study of madness as I've ever seen, it tells the story of ageing film-maker BJ Lang and his captive Carlotta who he forces to play Roxanne to his Cyrano in scenes from the Rostand play. The story is barely skeletal, mostly a two handed piece with a short appearance from a wino, its flesh is its dialogue and technique and the two entwine remarkably well, not that you would guess from the average reviewer here, most of whom seem to be hung up on not understanding (nor even attempting to) what they were seeing. Essentially The Manipulator looks at the processes of art in abstraction, removed from their connection to the creation of a cohesive work, and treats them as means of psyche infection, a force that has entirely infested poor BJ Lang, breaking down all the structures that hold him together. In his shadowy and cobwebbed studio he acts the role of director, talks to mannequins as his crew, adopts their voices to talk to himself, plays Cyrano, plays actor, even self aware mad old man. With nothing to hold his notions separate he skips wildly between fiction and reality, artifice and insanity, self knowledge and deceit, even touching on legitimate insights along the way. And in the process slowly but surely a picture of art run to its terrible potential emerges, the manipulations of creating fiction, the manipulations of crafting an actual artwork, these processes of one wielding control over many, we see that complete control, to some the loftiest goal, means the collapse of the individual and rebuilding as collective consciousness, consciousness oh so difficult to hold in any kind of check once developed. It is as you might guess, not exactly an easy film. That it works so well is to a great extent down to Mickey Rooney as BJ Lang, giving an extraordinarily uninhibited performance. Every shade of pathos and mania, even strange grandeur, singing, dancing, physical comedy, there are scarce few other turns in film so free and wild. He is utterly, bizarrely compelling, hateful at times and sympathetic at others, simply superb. Luana Anders does a good job as his foil Carlotta, she mostly has to react, growing steadily more and more desperate and unhinged herself, not quite as showy a turn but still playing very well of Rooney, rather chilling in her plight. Keenan Wynn is good too as a wino, though he has really to do except shifting the plot and sense of reality for a spell. The technique matches the acting in outlandishness, deploying all manner of unbalanced angles, close ups, speedy edits, colored lenses, strobe lighting, hallucinatory sound design, hazy phantasms, all this piled on relentlessly to disturb the viewer as much as the characters on screen. The terrific art direction (by Larry Cohen) goes well with the directorial flourishes too, all manner of mannequins, both whole and in parts alone, free standing or hanging, and an array of beasts as well. And not surprisingly the score is unusual too, ranging from piano and sawing strings to strange noisy burbles. So altogether its a dense film, by the end almost an exhausting one, and most certainly not to all tastes. But for those interested in the intersection of madness and art, of truly bizarre art-house horror or just of unfettered acting exercises this is most certainly a worthy watch. 8/10
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cyrano meets Andy Hardy-cum Phantom of the Opera
Chase_Witherspoon27 May 2013
Essentially a two-person stage play with the fatally unhinged former make-up man Rooney recreating his favourite motion pictures on an old, abandoned sound stage using abducted actress Anders as his muse. The film conveys her attempts to escape, and Rooney's lunacy as he flits between vague coherency and outright mania. Larry Cohen's impressive set design is eye-catching, although the music tempo is at times so frantic as to become irritating.

I've read a lot of reviews concerning this movie, and the majority seem to charge it with a contempt normally reserved for those films so pathetic, they even fail on cult status. Sure, it's probably a little too avant garde for the average punter (myself included), and yet, it's strangely compelling with a truly maniacal performance by Rooney. If you'd been accustomed to the Mickey Rooney of the 1940's, then you're in for a shock; his turn is quite raw, maybe somewhat self-indulgent (in showcasing his range), but certainly remarkable.

Anders certainly isn't the acting dwarf some have painted, though her dialogue is scarce by comparison, while the once-ubiquitous Keenan Wynn has a brief but memorable cameo, and there are a host of extras that form Rooney's heyday hallucinations (and who look like a theatrical company) - many of them sans costumes in full-frontal glory just to underline the point that Rooney has totally flipped his switch. I almost fell asleep after just ten or so minutes, but persevered and while not a masterpiece, found the overall result intense if at times uneven and probably unfairly maligned as a turkey.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
On The Fence...
dickson913 March 2006
Mickey! Mickey, Mickey, Mickey. What was it that inspired you to act in this movie? Money? Or was it a need to demonstrate how bizarre you can get? This is Andy Hardy on Acid....in itself a treat to see a multi dimensional character played by someone who Uncle Walt Disney named That famous Rat after....sorry, a mouse.

So if you are interested in trying to figure out what was really being said in a early 70's Avent Garde Drugged Out Movie dealing with the effects of Acid, either taken by the Audience or the Actors...then go and see it.

As for me, I am still sitting on the fence as one of Mickey Rooney Most Bizarre Movies....sort of like William Shatner's singing...Bizare and Way Out.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Rooney Performance in an Awful Film
Michael_Elliott10 October 2017
The Manipulator (1971)

* (out of 4)

B.J. Lang (Mickey Rooney) is a former make-up man who has finally snapped. He kidnaps actress Carlotta (Luana Anders) and holds her hostage so that she can view his bizarre rants and attempts at acting.

THE MANIPULATOR is a really, really awful movie. There are countless awful things about it and in fact there are so many that I'm really shocked that the movie isn't better known by the Bad Cinema Crowd. When I say this film is awful it's probably an understatement because this is mind-numbing bad at times but I must also admit that there's one terrific thing in the film and that's Rooney. He gives such a wonderful performance here that it's really rather sad that it's lost in such a bad movie.

If you go through Rooney's career then you know that he had a major dry spot in it and there's no question that the 1970s really weren't a great decade for the once "A" list actor. He was taking various roles for the money and quite often he would appear in films that paid for a day's work. That's not the case here because he's clearly the star and there's not a frame of the film that doesn't have him in it. This character is truly a crazy, raving and rating nut that gives the actor a great chance to show his range and he does a terrific job with it. It's really a tour-de-force performance that has the actor showing off a variety of ranges and he nails them. Anders is also decent in her role as is Keenan Wynn in his brief part.

With that said, all of the performances are wasted in this horrid mess of a movie. For starters, the direction by Yabo Yablonsky is among the very worst that you're ever going to see because there's absolutely no style here. In fact, there's no comedy, there's no drama, there's no suspense and there's really nothing at all. This is about as ugly and as flat of a movie that you're ever going to see and even the greatness of Rooney's performance pretty much gets sucked dry of any major power because of how poorly it's filmed. Even worse is the fact that the story just never makes a bit of sense as there's nothing going on but rants and performances.

THE MANIPULATOR is a film that should be better seen and known. By those who enjoy bad movies.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Garbage
TBoanz300011 September 2011
One of the worst pieces of poop I have ever witnessed in my entire life. I fell asleep while watching it and never saw the ending, nor do I want to waste time watching it again. It's pretty boring, because most of the movie takes place in the dressing room. It only has three characters which also makes it torture to sit through. I found Mickey Rooney pretty annoying throughout. Not to mention,the movie stinks so bad, all the Oust in the world won't get rid of the stench. I'd rather watch paint dry. Avoid all all costs, unless you need something to help you fall asleep. This was included in Mill Creek's "Drive In Classics" 50 pack. This being one of the worst in the entire set.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why Mickey? Why?
jery-tillotson-114 March 2020
While trying to make sense of this horrible mess of a movie, I tried to understand why the once Hollywood legend, Mickey Rooney, had gotten mixed up in this atrocity? He was 93 when he passed away and had once been a top star for that Tiffany of old movie studios, MGM, since the silent era. World War II changed his golden status since he had out-grown his Andy Hardy period where he was the wired up, dynamo who always wanted to put on a big how, usually with the help of Judy Garland. But watching "The Manipulator" was like watching a nightmare of what happens when you're no longer the golden boy of MGM, you lost your millions several times from gambling and declared bankruptcy over and over again. The plot of this dismal production has something to do about a mad movie maker who...oh, who knows? I tried watching 30 minutes as Mickey goes into a secretive room where a woman is tied up and she keeps shrieking; "I'm hungry." He then feeds her baby food and then he screams and runs around and shoves his face close to the camera. And then he dreams of an orgy or something although there's no sex or skin shone. The movie actually begins impressively with a nicely filmed scene of Mickey preparing to enter his den of madness. But after that, it's downhill. Mickey looks as if he's near death throughout as we see countless shots of his sweaty, unshaven face and then he begins to scream and grovel. What he was trying to convey isn't known so if you want to waste two hours of your life trying to figure out this ungodly mess, welcome to "The Manipulator."
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What did I just watch?
camcost15 March 2019
Truthfully this film is totally hallucinogenic trash, perhaps one of the worst films I've ever watched. It is 90 minutes long but very easily could have been a much much better five minute film. I am a film, video, and print editor and intentionally try very hard to make things interesting and to the point and avoid those things which to the average viewer are unnecessary and pointless. Pointless pretty much describes what the entire film is about.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Bizarre Gem
Rainey-Dawn29 October 2015
WOW a blast from the past - and a pleasant surprise. I got this gem in the Drive-in 50-pack collection. I remember this one from quite a few years ago. I am glad to have this one in the 50-pack. It's definitely one of the better films in the Drive-in 50-pack.

This is a very bizarre film where Mickey Rooney plays B.J. Lang a psycho that is holding Carlotta hostage in his basement. He is creating a movie in his mind and forces Carlotta to participate. Mr. Lang gives us quite a show while "teaching" Carlotta all about the theater. To add to the weirdness, we have Old Charlie in the basement who is dead.

It's not the greatest horror film but it is one of the better one's from the 1970s and in the Drive-in collection.

6/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mickey Rooney really cuts loose in this stunningly strange and twisted early 70's psycho horror oddity
Woodyanders19 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The legendary Mickey Rooney gives an incredibly wild, hammy and over-the-top full-tilt insane, inspired and uninhibited performance as B.J. Lang, a deranged and delusional psychotic washed-up Hollywood has-been who thinks he's a great successful big-time film director ala Orson Welles. Lang relentlessly torments and terrorizes hapless lovely aspiring actress Carlotta (the beautiful Luana Anders) on a dingy and decrepit abandoned studio back lot: he rants and raves to himself with rip-snorting gonzo aplomb, spoon feeds her baby food, impersonates an effeminate make-up artist (Rooney sports bright red lipstick and gaudy blue eye shadow!), pretends to have a fatal massive heart attack, and occasionally breaks into these astounding impromptu a cappella renditions of "Chattanooga Choo Choo" which he heartily belts out in this pained hoarse'n'wheezy croak of a voice.

Writer/director Yabo Yablonsky whips up one awesomely aberrant and idiosyncratic marvel of an outré indie avant garde experimental cinematic meditation on dreams, delusions, dementia and the fine line between unattainable fantasy and bitter reality. Yablonsky deftly creates and maintains a clammy, creepy and claustrophobic weirded-out mood that sucks the viewer into the stunningly surreal and suffocating anything-goes nightmarish atmosphere which proves to be both jarring and riveting in comparable measure. Baird Bryant's garishly stylized cinematography uses every fancy artsy trick in the book: crazily tilted camera angles, distorted fish-eye lens, strenuous slow motion, artificially sped up film, wonky zoom-in close-ups and startling freeze frames. Gil Melle's groovy, droning, atonal psychedelic acid jazz score constitutes as another significant asset. Keenan Wynn briefly pops up in an embarrassingly thankless bit part as a mumbling drunken bum who Rooney runs through with a rapier. While Rooney clearly dominates the picture with his bracingly berserk and bravura acting, Anders still nonetheless holds her own quite well and gets to perform a major crack-up scene where she really cranks up the astonishing eye-rolling histrionics to 10 plus. A splendidly screwy and singular one-of-a-kind piece of sheer celluloid lunacy.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Liquid defecation.
kpietrangeli4 August 2000
I would simply state that this movie was less than horrible, but I feel that would be too nice. Basically, I would rather consume rancid lobster than endure this cinematic travesty again. I respect Mickey Rooney as a great American actor and I have enjoyed many of his films but he should definitely abstain himself from any experimentations with abstract art and hallucinogens. I wouldn't recommend this film to the devil himself.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An actor's movie that failed
Hans-5620 July 2011
This movie actually is a true actor's movie. In true actor movies it is all about the actors. They (or at least one of them) are the only interesting aspects of the movie. Usually the story is written for the actors, the direction only helps the actors to make the most out of it. Everything else is of no real importance.

Watching this movie I thought about another actor's movie and a very good one: "Sleuth". Even Rooney doing his make up thing remembers one of Michael Caine doing the same in "Sleuth". And I was very impressed by Rooney's acting in this movie. Actually I think his acting was as good as Caine's in "Sleuth".

So it is obvious something went wrong, terribly wrong. I think first of all that horror is never a good genre for an experiment like this. Horror always depends on special effects. And you do not want those in an actor's movie. It's all about the actors, remember? And because it is all about the actors, you do not want any experimental camera-work. There is no need to shake the camera, put weird lenses on it or use it off color. The actors do those tricks and the camera puts their performance on film, that is all. And in this case the story itself stinks. It is a story intended for a sleazy B-movie. And even though Luana Anders performed quite well, her acting was not good enough to confront Mickey Rooney. Unlike the great interaction between Michael Caine and Laurence Olivier.

So what we are left with is a stinker. The only thing worth watching is Rooney's acting. But with nothing else to keep you going, this is almost impossible to keep up for more then 30 minutes.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed