Child's Play (1972) Poster

(1972)

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Suspense in the Schoolroom
Trouble is brewing at St. Charles, a Catholic Boy's School. Random acts of violence break out between the students nearly every week, seemingly escalating in intensity. Joe Dobbs, the popular, easy-going English teacher, and Paul Reis, the new gym teacher, aim to find out what's causing the brutality. Meanwhile, Jerome Malley, the grievous Latin teacher who despises Dobbs, begins receiving strange, obscene messages and packages at his home. Will Dobbs, Reis and Malley be able to discover the reason behind the violence at St. Charles, or will the savagery continue?

Directed by Sidney Lumet, and based on Robert Marasco's play of the same name, 'Child's Play' is an intriguing thriller that starts well and has many commendable elements, though fumbles its landing. Leon Prochnik's screenplay- like the source material- examines some interesting themes, such as the psychology of group dynamics, the nature of evil and the power structures within educational institutions. The film deftly navigates these complex ideas through its tight-knit narrative, though it occasionally loses momentum in its latter half, and the ambiguous ending- where nothing at all is concluded- is underwhelming.

However, the principal characters are believable and multifaceted; watching them wade through the seedy, intriguing plot is engaging. The idealistic Reis- an ex-student of St. Charles- serves as a conduit for the audience, taking us on a trip into the macabre. Dobbs seems to be the ideal teacher, warm and kind- though might have darkness beneath his light exterior. Malley, meanwhile, is fascinating, stern and severe with his students, yet he treasures it when ex-pupils send him letters, and always keeps clippings of them if they make the papers. He is, to quote Kris Kristofferson, "a walking contradiction," and a compelling character.

The dichotomy between Malley and Dobbs is the driving force of the film's tension. Malley's severity and isolation are contrasted sharply with Dobbs' affability and popularity, creating a dynamic that is as much a clash of ideologies as it is of personalities. The film uses these characters to explore the impact of authority figures on young minds, and how their differing approaches to education and discipline influence the students' behaviour.

Reis is a relatable character, whose journey back to St. Charles is a poignant reflection on the loss of innocence and the realization that the institutions one once revered may have dark underbellies. The students themselves, though less prominently featured, are essential to the narrative. They are not merely victims or perpetrators of violence; they are shown as complex individuals, shaped by the environment they are in. Their actions, though extreme, are presented not as anomalies but as symptoms of a deeper malaise within the school's culture.

The film's portrayal of these characters is subtle yet powerful, leaving the audience to ponder the nature of evil: is it inherent, or is it fostered by circumstance? Easy answers are not provided- in fact, no answers are provided at all- instead, the film offers a mirror to society's own struggles with these questions. Perhaps, considering the rumination it inspires and the interest it engenders, a more conclusive ending would have made it even better.

On the other hand, Gerald Hirschfeld's atmospheric cinematography cannot be faulted. His expert use of close-ups brings an intimacy to the characters, allowing the audience to see the subtle nuances of their emotions. His utilisation of shadows, meanwhile, creates a sense of foreboding, visually representing the darkness that lurks within the school and its inhabitants. Moreover, Hirschfeld's interplay between light and darkness not only sets the mood but also serves as a metaphor for the film's central themes. The way shadows creep across the walls of St. Charles reflects the insidious nature of the violence pervading the school.

The film's use of space is also noteworthy. The claustrophobic corridors of St. Charles mirror the oppressive nature of the institution and the entrapment felt by both teachers and students. The visuals are complemented by the sound design and Michael Small's eerie score. The echoes in the hallways, the murmurs of the students and the silence that punctuates the violence all contribute to an unsettling auditory experience, heightening the tension and underscoring the film's themes. Small's work, meanwhile, full of demonic-sounding chants, is evocative, stirring and unsettling.

Beau Bridges stars as Reis, alongside Robert Preston as Dobbs and James Mason as Malley. Bridges does fine work, astutely displaying the emotions felt by one who sees the truth behind the curtain, as it were. Preston is brilliant as Dobbs, making him congenial and likable; though not without a certain seediness. Mason, however, steals the show as the pathetic, mentally disturbed Malley. Delivering a beautifully realized, complex performance; he has rarely been better. Furthermore, David Rounds excels in the smaller role as the disillusioned Father Penny, bringing a touch of levity to an otherwise tense situation.

Engaging and intriguing, though ultimately a little underwhelming, Sidney Lumet's adaptation of Robert Marasco's 'Child's Play' has a lot going for it. The narrative touches on some interesting themes, while Gerald Hirschfeld's cinematography and the excellent sound design are atmospheric and evocative. The cast all give strong performances, especially James Mason, but the ending is anticlimactic. Turns out, unfortunately, it wasn't child's play adapting 'Child's Play' for the cinema.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not that bad!
annalbin-12 July 2007
Chances are you will never have an opportunity to see this film as it hasn't been on TV for ages. However, I wouldn't say it is as bad as some of the comments. I thought it was well acted, but the ending left the viewer confused about exactly what had happened with the boys. The fates of two of the three major characters are also left to the viewer's imagination. Robert Preston and James Mason made interesting foils. Mason managed to make his character a man to be despised and pitied. Preston was also quite capable in his role - all sweetness and light with increasingly malevolent undertones.

If it had been as dull as described in some of the other comments, I probably wouldn't have been able to stay awake since I watched it in the wee hours of the AM.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Harold Hill meets Mr. Chips
bkoganbing8 November 2012
Apparently at this exclusive Catholic prep school even the civilian teachers have to be officially celibate. In Child's Play the focus of the film is on an intense rivalry between a pair of civilian teachers who have no outside attachments, save for James Mason and his dying mother. So they indulge in this rivalry for the approval of the students. And Robert Preston who dusts off a bit of his Harold Hill persona from The Music Man is winning hands down.

Child's Play, a David Merrick Production on stage ran 342 performances during the 1970 season and starred Pat Hingle and Fritz Weaver in the roles that Preston and Mason essay here. Preston is a charmer as Professor Harold Hill was, but his charm is laced with malevolence. For reasons I'm not sure whether for money or prestige Preston turns the students against Mason, he wants Mason out to move up in some kind of seniority system.

Mason makes it real easy. A stiff demanding pedagogue he's Mr. Chips before Robert Donat's marriage to Greer Garson humanized him. He's way past the age of retirement, but other than a terminally ill mother this guy has no life. Going to teach gives him an excuse to get up in the morning.

Both these guys are a pair of real closet cases. Both are obsessed with the young male preppy kids they teach, Mason just does not know how to relate to them. Preston does and he uses his influence with them to produce some terrible consequences.

Caught in the middle of all this is new gym teacher Beau Bridges who once went to this school. He knows both men from his years there, but learns a whole lot more once he becomes a faculty member and learns disturbing stuff about both.

Child's Play is smartly directed and photographed by Sidney Lumet. Pay attention to some of the deep focus cinematography involving all three of the players I've named in joint scenes. All three register facial expressions that help move the story along immensely.

I think a lot was left out of the play coming over from Broadway, but still Child's Play is a fine film with great performances from the leads.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The prime of Mister Paul Reis
dbdumonteil6 November 2010
Among Lumet' s monumental filmography ,"child's play" must be ,even more than the overlooked "the group" ,the movie nobody knows or loves to hate .

Personally, I have always thought that Lumet is particularly at ease when he directs films the action of which takes place in an enclosed space: a tribunal in "12 angry men" ,a bank in "dog day afternoon" a train in "murder on the orient express" a house in "deathtrap" or "long day's journey into night" the Strategic Air Command in "fail safe" ,a prisoners camp in "the hill".....

"Child's play " happens entirely in a boys high school but the students are not often on the screen ;unlike some naive works such as "dead poets society" ,the nice modern beloved teacher (Robert Preston) is not the one you think he is ;he is a distant relative of the "good" teacher Miss Brodie in "the prime of miss Jean Brodie ";whereas the old maid was urging her students to fight for "noble " causes such as Spanish fascism,her

colleague uses them to put his old "pal" James Mason down,to drive him crazy;his motives are very obscure (the fact that he wants to teach the twelfth graders is not really convincing and one could write that "some people who do not fit get the only fun they get by putting people down ",as John Prine sings ."So cold ,sometimes it looks so cold" .Women (apart from a nurse) are completely absent and no one among the secular staff has a girlfriend or a wife ,even the young naive gym teacher.Beau Bridges is a bit clumsy and as a sports teacher ,well...besides he lacks charisma and his dramatic range is ineffective in the scene when he blames his colleague (just compare with young Pamela Franklin playing opposite Maggie Smith in a similar scene at the end of "Miss Jean Brodie").

All in all,when you cannot mention it in the same breath as Lumet's works I mention above ,if you like this director,you should catch it :James Mason is excellent in his part of a fallen pitiful Latin teacher (you can also notice his subject had already begun to lose the prestige it used to have in ancient times) and Robert Preston is all the more scary since he remains cheerful or straight-faced.A flawed but nonetheless worthy work .

Like this ? try these.....

"Unman,Wittering and Zigo" (McKenzie,1971)

"The prime of miss Jean Brodie (Neame,1970)
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good 70's mystery
a.north1 June 2000
Sidney Lumet manages to engender great tension in this curious tale about a group of satan like kids and one of their masters. Reasonable acting with an intelligent script produces satisfactory results.

The only thing missing here is a lack of focus on the mechanics of how the boys behaviour is merely down to a local cult or if something more sinister is at work; however it may have been the writers intention to leave us in two minds regarding this aspect.

Definitely worth watching
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nonsense but with a great central performance.
MOscarbradley18 October 2020
There's evil afoot in one of those boy's schools were the boys are all played by actors in their early twenties. It makes you wonder at what age pupils graduated from American high-schools. "Child's Play" was adpated from a successful Tony-award winning Broadway play and was directed by Sidney Lumet. It's certainly not one of his better films but it's a nice grisly entertainment nevertheless about the feud between two senior masters, (James Mason and Robert Preston, both terrific), and a seemingly inexplicable eruption of violence amongst the boys.

Basically, it's a high-class horror film with possible demonology lurking in the chapel and would be more effective if the 'boys' weren't so clearly young men. Beau Bridges is the new young gym teacher and former pupil torn between loyalty to Preston and sympathy for Mason and David Rounds is good as a fairly liberal young priest. It's nonsense, of course, but the cast give it a real kick and Mason, in particular, might convince you that you're watching something serious. Understandly it isn't much revived.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
There's Always Been a Demon in the Box
TheFearmakers2 May 2019
In CHILD'S PLAY, from way back in 1972 and not involving a red-haired serial killer doll named Chucky, the development of the characters drives the suspense, and for today's standards, this could seem like a slow-moving, over-brooding, thrilless arthouse thriller, or a stage play adapted to the big screen. But what's really intriguing are the similarities with THE EXORCIST, which was being filmed when this hit theaters, but the book had been on the stands for several years...

So for anyone who hasn't seen or doesn't want to see William Friedkin's brilliant and timeless GODFATHER of horror flicks, that opened the door for a number of slowburn Catholic-centered horror-thrillers, there are three particular characters: an old priest, a younger priest, and a possessed young girl. Replace the girl with an entire Catholic School of mostly bullying boys who, as we witness their odd behavior, are in some sort of... spell, or something... adding Mystery to the myriad of genres...

We learn of everything through token white rabbit Beau Bridges, a former student who had returned as a teacher and greatly admired Robert Preston's vivacious, progressive English teaching priest, Joseph Dobbs, while immensely fearing a bitter old coot - Jerome Malley played by James Mason - who seems to be our primary antagonist, but as "the case" unfolds he could very well be a temperamental red herring...

Leading to the best scenes involving conversations between Beau's pivotal and, for the most part, eventually ambiguous Paul Reis with the polar opposite instructors while the kids are but a sporadic break that really need no escaping from...

For CHILD'S PLAY is more of a "Courtroom Drama" without a court and gavel. Bridges proceeds over the "testimonies" of both men although one is sold as being far more likable from the onset; yet this opinion remains more decided by the students than we, the hyper-alert audience, anticipating a twist to occur, especially with a character (Preston) so flawless.

Meanwhile, we're (through Bridges) the Jury being swayed, maneuvered from one side to the other: Preston is charming and understandable on a universal level as Mason has a tortuous life that can be pitied, even beyond the death of his mother. And the characters develop from there.

Director Sidney Lumet channels his signature New York gritty realism into the Gothic school where statues and cold walls keep that heated far-off reality as distant from the lens as it is the students, inhibiting a power, or perhaps merely channeling a hypnotic strength that needs no real explanations like, say, a ROSEMARY'S BABY.

Leading to a conclusion with so much buildup it begs for palpable closure. And yet, CHILD'S PLAY clings to words beyond action and an enigmatic dark aura over nail-biting suspense. In some strange way, there doesn't need to be any end at all. You can hear these two men speaking for days.

Sure there could have been scarier moments here and there, or even a dugout of fellow priest/teachers introduced to individually buy the farm when they wander off alone through the spooky campus. (Alright, that's very 1980's, but there are pockets of downtime when a few deaths would have livened the picture.) Hell, even THE EXORCIST had palpable "gotcha!" moments: cinematic caffeine never hurts.

But CHILD'S PLAY centers more on the dark hypnosis than what derives from it. Adding to one of several films using THREE main male leads to override a more conventional formula, intriguing enough to keep the viewer tuned in even after the purpose becomes all too clear.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Grueling actors' piece
moonspinner5530 October 2017
Idealistic new gym teacher at an all-boys Catholic boarding school, his alma mater after graduating there nine years ago, is warned by one of the priests on arrival that the students have changed over time, their attitudes towards each other have become malicious and their violent actions touched by evil. Overcooked melodrama from Robert Marasco's Tony-winning play is, at its core, a battle of wills between two veteran instructors: one, a sagging-faced, paranoid old taskmaster (James Mason) whom the students deplore and the other (Robert Preston) a gregarious, glinty-eyed teacher who has rallied the students to his side. When these men face-off, the material hints at something headier than what director Sidney Lumet and screenwriter Leon Prochnik really hope to present: the dehumanization of young men into soldiers of misfortune. Broadway showman David Merrick made an inauspicious debut here as movie producer, and his first mistake was to hire Lumet as director. Lumet, who specializes in his keeping his actors riled-up on-screen, wants to give us the shakes with bloody beatings, an eye-gouging and a desecration in the church (underlined by Michael Small's "scare music"), scenes which are nasty and unpleasant to sit through--and also time-consuming. The real drama, between Mason and Preston (with Beau Bridges caught in the middle), is nearly buried under the morass. Though ultimately too theatrical to feel honest, the performances by the principals are at least polished by the actors' professionalism, bringing substance to a picture caught in the balance between melodrama and its own horror-movie subtext. *1/2 from ****
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very slow building, tense, yet superb mysterious drama!
alan-nutter5 April 2018
If you're the type of movie watcher who prefers to be entertained without having to really invest in the film (and that's absolutely fine) then this movie is probably not for you.

I'm fortunate in that I enjoy all types of film from juvenile slapstick such as Top Secret to classic epics like The Godfather.

This particular film builds very slowly and although there's little "action" in the first third, it's well written and acted and the you can feel the tension build.

Without giving too much away, it's brilliant how convincing one of the main protagonists is due to the quality of the lines attributed to him in the screenplay.

Although I personally believe this movie deserves a wider audience, I fully understand that it will not appeal to a significant number of viewers.

Recommend if you appreciate slow paced, well acted drama.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The soul leaves and doesn't return...
JasparLamarCrabb28 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Sidney Lumet's fascinating, ambiguous fight between good and evil. Robert Preston and James Mason are teachers at a Catholic school for boys fighting for the collective soul of the student body. On the surface, Preston is the angelic one, while Mason is evil incarnate...that shifts as new teacher Beau Bridges slowly unravels what's really going on. The film is slow but never lethargic with terrific performances by Preston and Bridges and an absolutely brilliant turn by Mason (he hasn't been this neurotic and pathetic since LOLITA). Preston was reportedly a last minute replacement for Marlon Brando and, while he seems the least likely choice, he pulls off this dramatic role with ease.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Much Ado About Nothing!
jcorcova29 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I really wanted to like this one, but, alas, I didn't! This film definitely had a moodiness and strong sense of foreboding that was almost palpable, and which was very appealing and kept me engrossed. Was Dobbs the devil? A warlock? Why did he possess such a strong hold over the boys? The film never quite answers this. It implies that something supernatural is going on, but never explicitly states so. It felt like a really strong build up that ultimately went nowhere.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great film.
RHammann4225 August 2008
This is an excellent film. Unfortunately the word subtle, which applies to this film, is used as a negative by the only (at this date) other comment on "Child's Play." Subtle it is, and those who like character studies and evocative camera work, a sustained mood and a finely wrought battle between good and evil will be delighted. If you like the garbage that passes for horror in most of today's bloodfests and loud, non-stop, effects-driven films, well - don't bother.

Robert Preston and James Mason, two A-list actors, knew good material and both give performances that rank highly with the best of their careers. This film was directed by the great Sidney Lumet, and reveals what is usually best about Lumet's work: great acting, sustained mood, the ability to confine the action to one setting and exploit it for all it is worth, attention to detail and precise pacing that builds exactly as it should. This unheralded gem deserves a DVD release soon!
33 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An overly talky if well acted adaptation of Robert Marasco's play
vampire_hounddog1 November 2020
A new games master (Beau Bridges) goes back to his old boarding catholic school where he finds that bullying is rife while one of the head's (James Mason) does not have his priorities in order. Another master, (Robert Preston) has an unhealthy relationship with the boys.

Based off the play by Robert Marasco, Sidney Lumet's film is an at times over the top and expressive melodrama with some dangerous overtones. A little claustrophobic in places and overly talky, it is however well acted.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Right Here in River City...."
m_imdb-632-49513822 October 2018
When I was younger, this movie hit major cities but never made the small burg where I live. Beau Bridges was able to play young innocent roles then. I loved it most because the Catholic Church was playing host to., really, this wonderful horror movie. It was shot like many horror shows I've seen. Quality was as good as the Haunting of Hill House, a very high quality horror film of the early 60s. I was happy to see it just starting on Fox Movies channel when I arrived home tonight. I was riveted. Loved the give and take all the way to the end. But the end was a turnabout like a hundred similar turnabouts, with the obvious turned upside down by a revealing, riveting end piece. Yes, I wanted a surprise ending. But beyond that, as a lapsed Catholic since first grade, I enjoyed seeing the Church get what amounted to what in the seventies would've been an unfair bashing. I went to Catholic school for five years. I'd endured the enormous fear the Church sold then. Recent statements by Pope Francis and errant priest scandals in dioceses everywhere have brought home the realization that all Catholic dioceses in the world have been subject to priests taking up with children, men, women, anyone walking, really. The Church in America is taking a steep dive in members as we speak because of the new understanding. The Church was founded in the First Century. Priests at first married. The Church divided into different branches, the new branches not part of the Roman Church. By the 4th century celibacy was becoming mandatory in the surviving Roman Church. But it didn't become uniform until the 11th century. Given the nature of human beings I think one can assume a great many priests began violating the celibacy rule immediately. Covering up scandals has likely been part of the duty of Catholic dioceses for centuries. The backdrop of a boys school run by the Church is not accidental in Child's Play. Schools run by men in the priesthood have inherently had great potential for scandal, whether driven by sexual scandal or something else.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nice idea but poorly delivered
grybop15 October 2004
Warning: Spoilers
*minor spoiler*

Boring so-called thriller about a seemingly possessed bunch of students.

The direction is totally unimaginative, while most of the characters are paper-thin. The students are like muppets with no personality at all during the second half of the film, despite signs at the beginning that they would play a significant role in the story - which unfortunately never happens. Beau Bridges is at his most unconvincing, but then again, the script doesn't help him much.

I'd say you better avoid this.

3
8 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good, suspenseful, extremely atmospheric mood. Very effective Psychological Horror/Thriller by Sidney Lumet...
lathe-of-heaven27 June 2022
I confess, I've always loved this film since I first saw it decades ago. I was always amazed that with its strong pedigree, both behind and in front of the camera, that it seemed to be totally forgotten with no official release.

Needless to say, I was THRILLED when I heard that Olive was releasing the Blu-ray. I've had a fairly nice print that I got from television many years ago, but now it is awesome to have this unique film available on Blu-ray.

You pretty much have the general plot from the other reviewers here, so I won't waste your time on that. But, I will say that one of the primary things I really like about this movie, and that I like most about good Horror films, it is all about MOOD & ATMOSPHERE! Seriously, there is a very low-key but strongly oppressive mood over this film as these boys are mysteriously getting maimed. What is behind it...? Well, that is one of the things this movie (actually Sidney Lumet) does very well. And, that is really being vague and ambiguous about the source of the Evil that is happening. It is most definitely there and you feel it, you just don't quite know where it is coming from 😊

And THAT to me makes for a great film! I'll just leave it at that and say that if you are the kind of person who enjoys mood and atmosphere most in Horror movies like this, and appreciate an oppressive slowly building Evil, and you don't mind a Slow-Burn, low-key build up, there is a good chance that you may very well like it...
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Shallow and pointless exercise disguised as frightening horror film
Rodrigo_Amaro20 February 2013
Not even heavy names like Sidney Lumet, James Mason and Beau Bridges can make of "Child's Play" everything that it should be. Halfway through a more experienced viewer like me will think of similar and better executed examples of the same story: the disturbance between the students of a boy's school after one dangerous incident after another involving injured students are deeply concerning among teachers who'll investigate the case to later find out things are not what they appear, and one of them might be the source of all this trouble.

In this grandfather of films like "The Faculty", we follow the rivalry between a tyrant teacher (James Mason) hated by everyone versus a more likable guy (Robert Preston), and in the middle of this is the new PE teacher (Beau Bridges) former student of the place, now trying to uncover the mystery involving the students and their deadly beatings on some of their classmates, and also the threatening letters given to the menacing master.

A movie with such divided line of classes shouldn't keep distant at one of them and focus mainly on the other. This should be like "Gosford Park", following from the top of the pyramid to the lowest level. But no. The frightening students are given one horrific scene here and there, most of the time they're in the background of the whole action and let's face it, they suck as actors with those emotionless expressions that doesn't cause anything after a while. One dimensional at its worst. And while we have time to see the teachers and the headmaster dealing with the case everything is incredibly slow, sickening and overplayed. Bridges gets sympathy from us because like him we're entering into a new thing, wanting to get answers on events that seem unexplainable; Mason gets more credit than he ever deserved it, not only from the titles giving him as a lead when he's not but also credit from many critics who praise his performance. Not only his character isn't sympathetic (even when he should be after getting more and more death threats, we should feel something for him but we don't due to its emotional overreactions) but we sense that he is too performatic, representing on a play and never being the character. He's a trained dictator and not the dictator, lack of embodiment ruined his acting in this film. If "Child's Play" deserves a little of recognition is because of Robert Preston playing the cool teacher. The more the film develops, the more he changes into something he's not, a part rarely played that grows on you. Probably the good remembrances after watching this film is because of him.

I disliked this yet it was almost enjoyable. First of all there's no lesson learned in here. Movies with teachers in the main roles commonly features some rewarding (or not but they do try) lesson or a useful teaching. By those standards, what do we get? There's little devils in the school working for a great devil with a noble purpose? Quite alright. Unappealing drama, stiff horror with few pleasant and thrilling moments but it doesn't go too far with a predictable plot underworked ruined by its lack of action. This proved to be a wrong project for Lumet, he's good in conducting filmic play adaptations but this one adds almost nothing to his resume. He didn't had the touch for the horror and it's a meaningless play so why do it. Might have been successful on Broadway (as it was played at one time) but as a film doesn't deliver much. Doesn't deliver at all. Just leaves a sour taste in the mouth. 5/10
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Trust, like the soul, never returns when it goes"
richardchatten12 September 2022
One of the few films James Mason latterly made during the seventies worthy of his talent was this gothic adaptation by Sidney Lumet of Robert Marasco's Broadway hit which recalls Hugh Walpole's 'Mr Perrin and Mr Traill', Alf Sjoberg's 'Frenzy' and Giles Cooper's 'Unman, Wittering and Zigo'

Heavy with menace with an ominous score by Michel Small and naturally set in a Catholic institution; it's probably not mere chance that the tormented Mason teaches Latin while the subject taught by his charismatic rival Robert Preston who engages Mason in a rather one-sided battle of the wills (while Beau Bridges looks on aghast) is English.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Subtle and not very good
preppy-36 July 2006
I haven't seen this in years but here's what I remember.

Dull horror film about the strange behavior of students at an all boys school. James Mason as a teacher thinks Robert Preston (another teacher) is trying to drive him out (or crazy). Beau Bridges tries to figure it all out.

You think that a film which has young students attacked (one is blinded, another is tied up and hung from a statue) might at least be disturbing...but it's not. It's dull, slow and it's pretty obvious who the villain is (he's always lit to look evil). Also, for a PG film, this is pretty grim stuff. It all leads to an unsatisfying ending which never truly explains what's going on. Also Preston, Mason and Bridges are at their worst. I caught this on TV years ago and had trouble staying awake! A rightfully forgotten horror film. Skip it.
8 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Boys Town
writers_reign30 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is one for the hybridologists. James Mason coming on like Rattigan's Andrew Crocker Harris, the Himmler of the Lower Fifth and Beau Bridges as Taplow. There's even A Leif Ericson figure from Tea And Sympathy in the shape of Robert Preston, it's all terribly overwrought with agonising all over the place. Just about watchable.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Confession is good for the soul
jarrodmcdonald-12 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
CHILD'S PLAY, directed by Sidney Lumet, is a somewhat obscure motion picture. It is based on a hit Broadway play that ran for 342 performances. Playwright Robert Marasco had worked at a Catholic school and he knew the ins and outs of such an environment.

The Broadway production featured Fritz Weaver and Pat Hingle. Neither were box office draws, so Paramount's feature film version has James Mason and Robert Preston in the lead roles. Two very different actors with unique approaches to the material. The characters they play experience an undercurrent of hostility towards one other and a mutual distrust of each other's motives-- despite perfunctory niceties exhibited in front of their students and coworkers.

Mason is great at playing Jerome Malley, a longtime Latin instructor who is unravelling. His downfall is spurred by the abuses of the teen boys in his classroom. He is also dealing with the grave illness of his mother. To say he's miserable is an understatement. His life is devoid of joy or any real pleasure.

Preston plays Joseph Dobbs a well-liked English instructor, a man who seems to be the complete opposite. Dobbs is a sadist who is orchestrating the attacks on Malley, using the boys to wage a psychological and spiritual war. His motives are unclear at first, but gradually we learn he is jealous and insecure. Dobbs covets Malley's top spot on staff and he likes to lord control over the boys.

Into this unholy atmosphere we have Beau Bridges as Paul Reis (played on Broadway by Ken Howard). Reis is a former pupil of both men, now graduated from college. Reis returns to the high school to take a position as a gym instructor. There are some shocking moments where he learns how violent and twisted some of the boys are.

Reis is caught in the middle between Malley and Dobbs. He'd studied under both of them in his youth and must now function alongside them in a professional capacity. Some scenes imply that his own soul is a battleground between Dobbs and Malley.

I enjoy the slower parts of the film and am glad that Lumet is not in a hurry to get to the bigger turning points. We are given plenty of time to think about how these characters co-exist, how they bring out the best and worst in each other. Of course we suspect early on that Dobbs is gaslighting Malley, setting him up as a deviant (which he might well be). Malley does confess his sins during a pivotal scene. Then abruptly he takes his own life.

Dobbs wins. But he excoriates the boys, since it is not a victory without recriminations. However, the boys turn on Dobbs. The final few minutes inside the church lead to Dobbs' own confession-- and it is spectacular. At the end, a symbolic candle goes out. We are left to ponder Dobbs' fate and fate of the boys. What will become of them? Can Reis save them?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A lesson not learned.
adamjohns-4257524 September 2023
Child's Play (1972) -

This film was everything I hate, bravado, machismo, fighting, toxic masculinity and bully's. I'm also not a huge fan of James Mason.

And despite being set at a boarding school, it didn't even seem to have the subtle undertones of homoeroticism that usually keep me interested enough to continue watching it.

Unfortunately, the story didn't appear to be that exciting either and the actors weren't exactly wowing me with their performances. Add to that the fact that the bedding/incidental music was odd and distracting and I couldn't find anything to like about it.

As a result I didn't watch it to the end. It really wasn't my sort of thing. Violence for the sake of it, as depicted here, does nothing for me and the mystery of why it was happening just wasn't enough to keep me watching.

Unscored as unfinished.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed