Coffee, Tea or Me? (TV Movie 1973) Poster

(1973 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Two decades before nine eleven
safenoe21 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I remember seeing Coffee, Tea or Me? Ages ago and it was certainly made at an innocent time when air travel was a privilege, not a right, with budget airlines and all that now demanding the skies be open to everyone all and sundry believe it or not. Anyway, Coffee, Tea or Me? Definitely isn't Airplane! But perhaps it inspired Airplane! In a way.

Anyway, it's hard to see how the themes of Coffee, Tea or Me? Would resonate now with the me 2 movement, and how it would compare with United 93 directed by Paul Greengrass about the tragic and horrific events of nine eleven. Anyway, Coffee, Tea or Me? Is worth watching once.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"They're 6000 miles apart. They'll never meet. What's wrong with that?" Everything!
mark.waltz7 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Let's start with the script, work our way through the direction, the acting, the lack of realism, the bad 60's sex comedy structure and music to get a hangover by even without drinking. Karen Valentine is that annoying ancient metaphor "cute as a button" playing a stewardess who has residences in both London and Los Angeles (I guess she was too overwhelmed to have one in New York as well) who happens to have husbands in both places as well.

There's John Davidson in L. A. and Michael Anderson Jr. In London, and Valentine assures fellow stewardess Louise Lasser that they'll never meet. That's a jinx statement because no sooner has she said it than Anderson puts a fly in the ointment by planning to meet her in San Francisco, 5400 miles closer and 600 miles too close. Guess who soon shows up in San Francisco to see her as well.

This is immediately destroyed by credits that would have been cute a decade before. As co-written and directed by Norman Panama (a veteran of 50's and 60's comedy obviously past his prime here) it is immediately irritating, more in the style of those bad Bob Hope comedies that flopped immediately among release, at least with most critics. Even the worst seventies sitcom was miles better than this. The acting is so artificial that you just want to reach through the screen and slap the leads. Compared to the comic films being put out by Mel Brooks, Peter Bogdanovich, Woody Allen, Neil Simon and others, this can't even be referred to as dated. It simply should have just been non-existent.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fun romp about bigamy
tomreynolds20044 March 2004
Has there ever been a cuter bigamist than Karen Valentine? Or a ditzier best friend than Louise Lasser? And, dig the service level and the size of the planes offered on Global Airlines? How come I never fly on planes like that. Michael Anderson, Jr. is quite remarkable as Valentine's British husband. Lou Jacobi had fun as a beleaguered waiter who cannot believe his eyes. And John Davidson is very pretty and square.

The funny thing is the story is both utterly absurd and almost plausible at the same time given the psychological make-up of Valentine's character. Valentine, by-the-way. is a surprisingly adept farceur. It's a shame she got typecast as a sweet young thing, because her talent and range exhibited are revelations to me in this sexy romp made during a wonderful time before anybody knew about AIDS.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'd give almost anything to see this again
AlsExGal17 February 2015
My vote of 8/10 is that of a 15 year old girl - which was how old I was the last time I saw it, on its original air date in September 1973. There were no VHS recorders back then, so only if somebody picked it up on a repeat showing is there likely to be a copy floating around out there.

Karen Valentine of Room 222 fame - she played a high school teacher so young she was often mistaken as one of the students - stars as a woman who has two husbands. Probably nobody even remembers her today, but in 1973 she was like an American Sweetheart. The first husband is in the United States - I think Los Angeles. The second husband is in London. I remember husband number one as being a bit uptight (Craig Davidson) and an M.D.. I remember husband number two as being a bit more Bohemian. I think he was an artist. How does she manage it? She is a stewardess (that's what they called flight attendants in the 1970's) with a regular run between Los Angeles and London. She finally confesses to fellow stewardess Louise Lasser, years before she was Mary Hartmann. She is really planning to let husband number two down easy, she's just waiting for him to get on his feet with his career. Then something unexpected comes up - she's pregnant. In those days all they could do is check the baby's blood type and rule someone out as a father, so there is a chance that she might never be able to rule out either of the men as dad.

I'd like to see it again for what I didn't appreciate the first time - a look at Chelsea London the way Austin Powers would have recognized it, the stereotypes about "stewardesses", the different attitudes towards sex pre-HIV, and just the less hung-up less judgmental attitudes in general that were the norms 42 years ago. I'd also like a chance to notice what I didn't notice in 1973 just because I would have considered it normal back then.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Louise Lasser shines
ralphsampson7 July 2001
Louise Lasser shines fellow as Karen Valentine's fellow flight attendant and best friend. Karen's character, you see, is enjoying the ideal marriages with two men she loves and who love her devotedly --- one in Los Angeles (John Davidson) and one in London. Everything is going surprisingly well and she's feeling great until she gets pregnant. Then she needs the help and support of Louise's character. Louis's timing and reinvention of the scatterbrained stewardess takes over the film from Valentine. This says a lot because Valentine is also brilliant.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Go for it, Karen!
aromatic28 April 2001
My only complaint about this treasure of a time capsule from a bygone era is that I envy Karen Valentine's character her ability to enjoy bigamy so much. For the longest time, she gets to live my dream life, and be a wife to two hunks 6000 miles apart. Louise Lasser is a standout as her co-working stewardess and best friend. Lou Jacobi has a nice bit as a befuddled waiter. This movie reminds me of my early adulthood in the 70's, a pre-AIDS, pre-Reagan time when it was okay to enjoy life and enjoy sex. This is a superior vehicle for escape.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fly Away with Karen Valentine!
JLRMovieReviews15 February 2016
Karen Valentine is married to John Davidson in California and struggling artist Michael Anderson, Jr in Paris. (He was in "Dear Heart" with Glenn Ford as Angela Lansbury's son.) The story goes that he was going to jump and end it all, so she tries to help him, which in effect prompts them marrying, of course, despite the fact she's already married to John. This is a very flighty film, ironically described, didn't mean the pun, but by the way, Karen is a flight attendant and that's how she met Michael. Even when a friend tries to talk some sense into her, she admits she doesn't want to hurt either of them and why can't she keep both of them? "Just a little thing like there's a law against that," says her friend. "Besides they're never going to meet." Karen says. "No one will ever know." But then suddenly the artist has a sponsor putting on a show in San Francisco. What!! And, of course, despite the fact she tries to get John out of going with her to "her Aunt's funeral," he shows up at the same hotel. Pandemonium ensues with Lou Jacobi as a waiter serving dinner in two rooms across from each other, and the lady in both looks very much alike! What a crazy film this was! Pretty enjoyable, though. Far-fetched, yes. But the actors involved make this a nice time. Coffee, tea and a wacky time with Karen Valentine is in store for you here, so get ready for anything!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Bigamy Can Be Fun In An Early 70's Time Capsule
rollo_tomaso19 January 2001
Karen Valentine is the sweetest, most bubbly, most delightful bigamist you'd ever want to meet in this TV-movie which is an utterly perfect product of its era. She has such a good heart, she marries would-be suicide Michael Anderson Jr. to stop him from jumping even though she's already married to a medical student in LA. And, she has the most incredible point of view that only Karen Valentine could pull off -- making bigamy into a good deed. And, she discovers it is possible to be happily married to two men at the same time. Of course, since it's a TV-movie, she inevitably gets caught, and then it loses just a touch of its devil-may-care magic as it winds down in somewhat predictable fashion. Still, it's a fun romp while it lasts. 8/10.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Carefree enjoyment
aromatic-26 March 2001
I'd like to fly in a plane anywhere near as roomy as the planes pictured in this movie. But, that's part of this one's incredible charm. Everyone is having a blast -- and in the most eccentric ways. Louise Lasser is nothing short of brilliant as Karen Valentine's co-worker. The characters are perfectly natural even while their situations get more-and-more absurd. This is a 70's TV-movie that captures perfectly the essence of the screwball comedies of the 30's and 40's, and I think, compares favorably to Nothing Sacred. Watch and enjoy!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed