Christmas Lilies of the Field (TV Movie 1979) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Some of that is lillies. Some of that is stinkweed.
mark.waltz25 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The last minutes of "Lilies of the Field" are convincingly recreated here with Billy Dee Williams stepping in for Sidney Poitier and doing a convincing job. Maria Schell takes over the Lilia Skala role of the Mother Superior, and is equally as passive aggressive in a way that is sometimes frustrating and other times hysterically funny. But she is easily manipulated too on the rare occasion, especially by the children she truly loves and by Williams' Homer who also knows how to keep her in line when she goes too far.

The simple story of the first film goes into Frank a territory by introducing an officious social worker played by say Hauser who is obviously written in to give Williams a potential love interest. She does a good job, but for the first half of the film is rather stark and darkly unlikable. She is out to find foster homes for the orphans that the Mother Superior has taken in. Among the orphans are a pregnant teenage girl (who looks a bit older than that) whom a local do-gooder (Jean Jenkins) coldly judges, removing her financial backing for building a dormitory for the orphans and a proper school.

The mother superior's heart is in the right place, and while her coldness toward Smith when he threatens to leave is obviously a ploy, her motives are sincere and she's easy to forgive for stringing everybody along to get her own way. "She's not rich. She's very poor", Schell wisely comments on Jenkins' character, and that's when you see what is behind the way she deals with issues. It's easy to see why she's able to through the help of some divine intervention change the minds of those who stand in the way of her reaching her goals.

Part of the problem with this is that the action goes out of the missionary that the nuns had built, opening it up to a world of red tape thanks to the presence of Hauser's boss (Bob Hastings), a hysterically nervous beaureaucrat who provides ridiculous explanations of refusal when Mother Maria attempts to get further funding. These plot twists are frequently maddening, and that takes away the charm that was prevalent in the first movie. The Christmas element comes in with the goal of Mother Maria to have all the construction done on the school and dormitory as well as the addition of bells before the holidays. Mother Maria does seem beaten when she is ordered to return to her original order back in Austria, but her secret prayers do seem to have power with the almighty whom she refers to humorously as the holy smoke.

Still, the cast does a great job with the material they have, and the children are adorable. Their support of a little natives orphan taken away by her tribe is touching. Another funny elements has Homer able to deal with the lack of funds by getting a local construction supply dealer drunk in an effort to get additional supplies, but ultimately so much stands in the way of the Mother Superiors efforts to keep the orphans with her and the school being completed. Ultimately, it's the Native Americans who end up lending a hand to help resolve everything in a positive way. Some derogatory terms to the natives by the Mexican-American construction company team shows a bit of the social bigotry of the area in which this takes place. So much to like here with some nice twists, but there's a lot of frustration along the way.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent Christmas Special But A Horrible Sequel (Rant)
Heres_Johny6 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
*Minor Spoilers For Sequel, Major Spoilers For Original* There's this film called Lilies Of The Field you may have heard of. It wasn't a very big deal, except that it explored old themes of pride and isolation with a fresh innovation, wrapped in an enthralling plot, adapted from a novel of the rarest literary value, written about a legendary but purportedly true story... and oh, its star won an Academy Award, and that star just happened to be Sidney Poitier, the first African American ever to take home the prestigious Best Actor award for his leading role, and all this happened while Dr. Martin Luther King was alive and fighting tooth and nail for black rights.

So yeah, it's kind of a big deal. Lilies of the Field broke ground.

And then there's Christmas Lilies Of The Field, it's made-for-TV Christmas special sequel.

I'm not saying that it couldn't be done. That it was impossible to craft a followup which would ever be anything more than an amazing film's sorta-dumb tagalong little-brother. But as moving and groundbreaking as the original was, they probably shouldn't have tried.

If you haven't seen the original, stop. Right now. Go watch the original Lilies before I call you uncultured swine. I try not to reveal any more than the inciting event in any review, but considering this one's a sequel, I can't be held responsible for spoiling anything the original.

If I ruin an American classic that you've never seen before, that's on you, buddy.

The OG Lilies introduces Homer Smith, a vagrant laborer who dreams of becoming an architect. It's a tale of a self-generating destiny overtaking the man. In the middle of the desert he encounters a group of German nuns who, we learn in due time, have hurdled monstrous adversity to escape Soviet-controlled parts of Europe and immigrate to Arizona, where they manage a meager living pulling the proverbial water from the rock and farming the barren desert. Smith stops to help them mend a fence on the hopes he'll be paid, only to meet his match in the iron-willed Mother Superior: they quote a few scriptures, Smith's scripture hinting that he ought to be paid and Mother Superior's suggesting the opposite. Mother Superior gets the upper hand and manages to convince Smith to stay on for another odd-job the next day.

Thus shanghaied, Smith finds himself all but obligated to continue his work. It's a case of worlds colliding when Smith (a Baptist) is immersed in their Catholic world, but an undeniable bond is building. Smith's growing friendship with the nuns culminates in admitting his dream of being an architect and agreeing to construct a chapel so that they and their parishioners don't have to walk miles to the next town's chapel, and despite Smith's obstinate insistence that he alone build it, the nuns and community band together to assist in the mammoth project. Eventually – here comes in the self-generating destiny – they come to believe Smith was sent by God on a mission to help them.

The bittersweet ending revolves around these two indomitable wills, Mother Superior and Smith, who've butted heads throughout the film. Smith completes the chapel, and Mother Superior finally gives thanks to him directly (whereas before she's been careful to thank only God). They and the nuns sing one last Baptist riff together, and Smith quietly departs onto fates unknown, supposedly forever. Mother Superior, knowing he's leaving, makes no further efforts to twist his arm or dominate his choice with any quoted scripture.

You're satisfied with this ending. It isn't 100% happily-ever-after, but it's good enough. After a long struggle these two have finally come to understand each other.

Which brings me at last to why this sequel should not have been made: it's a *freaking Christmas special*.

Lando Calrissian/Apollo Creed (known as Billy Dee Williams to some people) takes over the leading role in Christmas Lilies Of The Field, and I have no complaints there. He's a versatile enough actor to work with what he's given. But let me give you the (somewhat mocking) rundown of exactly what they gave him to work with.

Homer Smith is back! He's been reunited with the nuns after coming to reinspect his work on the chapel and ensure it's still up to spec. But wait; what's this? A busload of adorable children? Not just children- orphans. Thanks for the chapel, Lando, but we need an orphanage now, and it's got to be done before Christmas or the Big Bad State is going to send them all to foster homes.

Oh, and one of the orphans is pregnant. Will the baby be born healthy, and on Christmas Eve? I have a feeling I know the answer to that! Basically, it's a But-The-Children! plot, and it's totally lame.

OG Lilies is a like a five-course meal engineered by a nutritional scientist. It's everything you want out of this sort of drama. It's the porterhouse steak; it's the salad; it's expert wine-pairings; it's a delicious desert you don't feel guilty about.

Christmas Lilies? Christmas Lilies demands a happily-ever-after by its very nature. Christmas Lilies is rock-candy dipped in chocolate, drizzled with caramel, and liberally coated with sugar.

I enjoyed the movie for what it was. I had no delusions going into it. This was a light-hearted sequel which never aimed to break new ground.

But after OG Lilies, that just wasn't enough. OG Lilies deserves better.

My message to filmmakers? If a sequel can't at least match its original, don't bother.

My message to viewers? If you're the kind of person who likes Christmas Specials, have at it. If you're here for that same fulfillment you found in OG Lilies, though, you're barking up the wrong tree.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This is a fun, heartfelt film that is is definitely worth a viewing
kevin_robbins28 December 2021
Christmas Lilies of the Field (1979) is a movie I recently watched for the first time on Tubi. The storyline follows a handyman that once worked for a covenant of Nuns who focused on helping orphaned children by educating them. When he returns to see how they're doing he discovers they need a new school and the government is trying to shut them down. He will need to decide if he wants to drop everything and help them build a new school as well as thwart the government's attempts to take their orphanage.

This movie is directed by Ralph Nelson (Once a Thief) and stars Billy Dee Williams (Star Wars), Maria Schell (Superman), Fay Hauser (Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh), Hanna Landy (Rosemary's Baby) and Bob Hastings (McHale's Navy).

It was really fun to see Billy Dee Williams in this picture. He delivered a great performance. The storyline is unique and was fun to watch unfold and the songs throughout the picture were well done and fairly clever in terms of how they were tied into the scene. This movie contains really good characters throughout that are easy to root for. Even the children deliver great performances. The movie has a triumphant conclusion that makes you smile and appreciate the journey.

Overall this is a fun, heartfelt film that is is definitely worth a viewing. I would score this a 6.5/10 and recommend seeing it once.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Comforting Movie
WindWoman317 December 2004
I just finished watching this film on our local UPN station. They stuck it on the schedule in the middle of a weeknight - 'filler', of course. We don't have (or want) cable or satellite TV, so I'm always happy to find something a little different - even if it is aired at 2:00 a.m.

What really kind of hooked me about this movie in the first few minutes was not Billy Dee Williams, but the actress who plays "Mother Maria." She's one of those women who have a seemingly effortless moral authority and strength. She also has mesmerizing green(?) eyes. (Ostensibly, Williams is supposed to be the main draw here - but I've always found him to be an actor of limited appeal. Very handsome, of course - but not a great talent.) She was totally believable in the role of a head nun who is committed to providing a home for a bunch of abandoned and neglected kids.

The southwest location is a nice change from the stereotypical snowy Christmas-movie locations.

I also liked the multi-ethnic cast, although the character of the black social worker was a gratuitous, obvious (and highly unlikely, given the setting) romantic interest for Billy Dee.

The movie's low-key, matter-of-fact atmosphere makes for a realistic portrayal of everyday struggles. No supernatural miracles here - just a bunch of people trying to better the lives of unwanted kids.

Anyway, I really enjoyed this quiet little gem. Especially at this time of the year, when I've seen the same holiday films over and over again. Like "A Christmas Story", I'll add this to my roster of under-rated and 'forgotten' holiday movies.

If you run across "Christmas Lillies of the Field" on some lower-rung channel in the middle of the night (like I did) - give it a chance. It's a charming, heartwarming little film that really grows on you.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Imitation is NOT the best form of flattery in this case.
kielhofer6 July 2002
While I enjoyed this film, I feel that there were a couple of problems with it.

The first is that it was shot in color. Having seen the original Lilies of the Field in black & white, there was a certain "feeling" about seeing it in b/w, and somehow seeing the sequel in color just didn't do it for me.

The second is with the role of Homer Smith. While I had no problem with Billy Dee Williams playing the role, I have a big problem with him mimicking the voice inflections, hand motions, and movments of Sidney Poitier. I felt that it was too contrived.

Sidney Poitier was the perfect actor in the original Lillies of the Field back in '63, he has certain mannerisms and vocal inflections that make him who he is.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Lifelong Classic
lafillefolle29 December 2003
I grew up watching this movie every year at Christmas, without fail, since my mother found it at a local independent video bar, and bought it for three dollars, and so I am probably more than a little biased. However, I think this is a really sincere and heartwarming movie. The color is a little extraneous at times, especially in the face of the original Sidney Poitier version, but I don't think it takes away much in the grand scheme of things. The story is simple, like the original, and the actors play it out just as simply (although "Question Lady" does have a little bit of indulging going on sometimes). Again, the Southwest U.S. setting makes for a visually beautiful film, and the multiracial cast enhances it. This movie might be seen as trite and insipid, but I think it's a classic that has never been fully appreciated for its value, sentimental and otherwise.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved it!!!
iukijh131 January 2011
Loved this movie, saw it in 1979 on TV and have caught it once since then, how can I get a station to play it? I was already a Billy Dee Williams fan so I was already intending to watch it. I had seen the 1963 version with Sidney Poitier and loved it also. I believe it was arguably was the Best Movie of the year in 1963. I have Googled "Ralph Nelson" to find the movie, but with no results. Mr Nelson died in 1987 and because this was a made for TV movie, the tapes have somehow disappeared.I am looking now online for some web address who sells old made for TV tapes. I will try to locate more information on the director.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed