Last Embrace (1979) Poster

(1979)

User Reviews

Review this title
46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Surprisingly Good,Cultish Hitchcockian Thriller
BJJManchester2 June 2006
A very decent effort from director Jonathan Demme before he went on to better things,LAST EMBRACE is inevitably compared to the works of Alfred Hitchcock,with many scenes derivative from many of the master's most famous works(VERTIGO,THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH,STRANGERS ON A TRAIN,etc.),but this is actually an effective suspenser in it's own right,with an intriguing plot,good performances and an exciting finale.Roy Scheider plays a Secret Agent just released from care after suffering a breakdown after his wife was killed in a shootout in a restaurant.After finding a woman(Janet Margolin)who has moved into his flat,he begins to suspect someone is trying to kill him after sinister messages in Amharic keep turning up.

The film would've been more superior with more humour and better pacing,but nevertheless this isn't at all a bad Hitch imitation,with the bird imagery(a motif Hitchcock used frequently in his films)and a fine musical score by Miklos Rozsa(who had himself worked with Hitchcock on SPELLBOUND)adding to the atmosphere.The performances are fine,especially Ms Margolin,an undervalued and lovely actress who never quite made it to the top,making her character quite pitiable despite her actions.Her early death at the age of 50 in 1993 was indeed a sad loss for a film performer who deserved better.

LAST EMBRACE was made shortly before Hitchcock's death in 1980;one wonders did he ever see this film? If so,I think he would have quite enjoyed the homage on view,not great,but fairly respectful and entertaining.
26 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable
rmax30482310 June 2002
I don't know exactly why I find this film interesting. The plot is pretty thick and often hard to follow and sometimes the story moves at a glacial pace. Still, it's rather neat. Roy Scheider always looks kewl when carefully groomed in up to date wardrobes. And the nose, that nose, pointing in half a dozen different directions at the same time. Janet Margolin was so beautiful. It's difficult to take your eyes from her when she in on screen. She projects a sort of pathos, a winsome helplessness, even after is is revealed that she can be a pretty cold-blooded babe underneath all that vulnerability, a primordial fatale monstrum. She has one or two sexy scenes that almost in themselves justify watching the movie. And I've always found John Glover a magnetic actor. He's never quite able to mask that Maryland accent. Here he plays a snobbish Princeton professor in seersucker, jealous of Margolin's attraction to Scheider. And when we first see Sam Levene's face, as a stranger on a train, there is the shock of recognition on our part. What a long absence, Sam! Nice shots of Princeton's campus. There's a shoot-out (the only one) in the empty quad and campanile producing enough ringing bells to drive you mad, which Miklos Roszas score does not to. It's unmistakably his own and evokes other earlier black and white noirs. The climactic scene was shot at Niagara Falls.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mystery thriller full of intrigue and suspense , in which an intelligence man finds someone's attempting to kill him
ma-cortes30 April 2013
Enjoyable mystery movie involves a guilt-ridden agent , and her new friend who attempt to locate a strange murderer who leaves Jewish signals ; as it begins with an ancient warning and it ends at the edge of Niagara Falls . A feverish thriller in the Hitch style containing several iconographic elements and dealing with an ex-secret serviceman called Harry Hannan (a tremendous Roy Scheider) and his wife being attacked by hoodlums (Joe Spinell) when they find on holiday . The government agent barely recovered from nervous breakdown after seeing his spouse shot by bullets and he then becomes involved into a criminal intrigue . As someone attempts to push him under a train , other people pursues to him . Later on , he receives a mysterious death threat in Aramean language . There happens five murders , Harry must solve the or die trying . Meanwhile , an anthropologist (a non box-office actress named Janet Margolin , here excellent , though sadly died a bit later on) unintentionally shares Scheider's flat . Scheider has his old colleagues (Christopher Walken) and his brother-in-law (Demme frequently casts Charles Napier) out to get him .

Entertaining mystery movie packs thrills , action , suspense , pounding soundtrack and breathtaking outdoors from Niagara . This agreeable picture has a number of elements and iconography from Alfred Hitchcock : vertiginous heights , innocent men wrongfully accused , gorgeous bombshells , voyeurism , long non-dialogue sequences , among others . Demme's tribute to Hitch includes various street scenes from ¨Marnie¨ , the bell-tower from ¨Vertigo¨ and the final climax straight from ¨Saboteur¨ transferred from the Statue of Liberty to Niagara Falls . Furthermore , ¨Niagara¨ by Henry Hathaway , in which there is also a Femme Fatale played by Marilyn Monroe who spells a deranged man performed by Joseph Cotten and of course the breathtaking Niagara Falls with people fighting next to viewpoint similarly to ¨The last embrace¨. However , the film achieved limited success and in some countries was shunned by its distributors . Good acting by Roy Scheider as a secret agent becomes involved in a deep nightmare and Janet Margolin as a strange woman who has taken possession of his flat . Ample support cast formed by notorious secondaries such as John Glover , Sam Levene , David Margulies , Jacqueline Brookes , and Charles Napier . And brief acting from Christopher Walken , Max Wright and Mandy Patinkin . Colorful and evocative cinematography by Tak Fujimoto ; director Demme frequently uses Tak Fujimoto as his director of photography . Thrilling and intriguing musical score by the classic Miklos Rozsa in Bernard Herrmann style . The motion picture was well directed by Jonathan Demme who was voted the 45th Greatest Director of all time . Here includes his ordinary touches such as characters looking directly into the camera and heavy use of steadicam interspersed with shots of hand-held shots .
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Even "poor mans' Hitchcock" is worth watching in this case.
Hey_Sweden2 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"Last Embrace" is one of the better suspense-thrillers to be made in the mold established by The Master. The plot could be seen as a little convoluted, but Jonathan Demmes' direction is masterful, the use of locations is excellent, the cast is amazing, and the finale is quite gripping. Even if the viewer figures out where the story is headed, getting to the conclusion is an enjoyable journey.

Making a difference is the ever personable Roy Scheider, playing Harry Hannan, a CIA agent who has to watch while his wife is assassinated in a cantina. (One of the goons is played by Joe Spinell in a very brief cameo.) He becomes paranoid, and spends the balance of the film wondering if he will die next. Certainly it seems that somebody has marked him, as he is receiving cryptic death streets printed in Aramaic.

Scheider is extremely well supported by a lovely young actress, Janet Margolin, who plays the role of Ellie Fabian. Ellie is an anthropologist who through circumstance comes to stay in Harry's residence. Watching her, one will likely regret the fact that she didn't have a more visible film career, and mourn her untimely passing. John Glover as always is a real hoot as the uppity professor who is dating Ellie. The endearing Sam Levene makes the most of his screen time as private investigator Sam Urdell. Demme regular Charles Napier is good as Dave Quittle, the brother of Harry's late wife. Christopher Walken, like Glover, is typically fun in an amusing turn as Harry's weaselly young superior. Other familiar faces appear in the supporting cast: Jacqueline Brookes, David Margulies (the mayor from "Ghost Busters"), Andrew Duncan, and Marcia Rodd. Look for Mandy Patinkin and Max Wright in bits as commuters, and for Demme himself in an uncredited blink-and-you-might-miss-it part as a man on a train. Scheider has one particularly fine monologue scene.

The score by Miklos Rozsa is absolutely perfect, and the story (based on a novel by Murray Teigh Bloom) is well told and reasonably absorbing. Niagara Falls provides a stunning backdrop for the climactic action. While there's no epilogue, one feels a certain sadness at the outcome.

This is a good film to check out, so it's appreciated that Kino Lorber finally released it to Blu- ray.

Seven out of 10.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
GREATNESS PREVIEW
mibailiff29 December 2001
This small pic was a preview of great things to come from Jonathan Demme, who went onto MELVIN & HOWARD, SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, STOP MAKING SENSE, to name a few other notable works. This was a decent 100 minute time waster that you either got or you didn't, liked or hated. Roy Scheider turned in his always good performance and I didn't mind looking at Janet Margolin in the bathtub.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Good & Bad Of 'The Last Embrace'
ccthemovieman-126 December 2007
This film certainly had a memorable scene with a man clinging for his life with Niagara Falls below! It's always stuck with me, even though it has been a long time since I've seen the movie. I've been waiting for this to be released on DVD so I can see it again, but as of now it's only available in Region 2.

It might be fun again just to see veteran actors Christopher Walken, Mandy Patinkin and John Glover in a film made 30 years ago. Director Jonathan Demme has done some interesting films since then, too.

Most of the story involves "mysterious" people chasing others and if I went into it in any detail it would ruin things for anyone who hasn't seen it. That's especially true because there are so many twists and turns in this story. However, to be frank, I think Hollywood has overdone "conspiracy theory" movies, of which this is one. I also think the profanity could have been lowered in here, especially by Roy Scheider's character "Harry," and the film would still have been just as intense.

What I really appreciated, more than the actors or story, frankly, was the photography and Demme's direction. There were a lot of really interesting camera angles, shots that zoomed in an out and other gimmicks that I usually fall for. There were enough of them to carry the first hour, at least. Living not too far from Niagara Falls, I was glad to see that in the climactic finale.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Who wouldn't want to kill Harry Hannan?
Coventry2 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Like so many other great directors, Jonathan Demme (world famous for his superior thriller "Silence of the Lambs" but originally started as an exploitation filmmaker) is a huge fan of the almighty master of suspense Alfred Hitchcock and made the ultimate homage in the shape of a full-length tribute thriller. "Last Embrace" is chock-full of references, obvious ones as well as subtle ones, towards Hitchock's repertoire but also stands on itself as a convoluted and intensely paranoid conspiracy thriller. The screenplay is often quite flawed and none of the main characters are identifiable and/or likable, but the basic plot is definitely compelling and the film contains a few impressively staged moments of suspense. CIA agent Harry Hannan spent a few months in a mental institution because he tragically lost his wife in a work related incident. When he returns to New York with the intention to carry on with his life, he immediately suspects that he's targeted for assassination. Harry's former employers seemingly want to get rid of him, but there's also a mysterious Hebraic organization after him for some unknown reason. Ellie, a cute laboratory assistant who occupied Harry apartment while he was away, offers her help. The primary plot involving the Jewish murders is terrific, but sadly unfolds slow and often tediously. Just when the all the pieces of the puzzle begin to fit into their place, Demme sadly too soon reveals an essential aspect of the denouement. The sub plot with Harry's agency stalking him is rather inferior, with a meaningless cameo appearance by Christopher Walken and a couple of over-the-top ludicrous sequences with an incompetent Charles Napier clumsily following Harry around in the cemetery and a bell tower. Roy Scheider's performance as Harry Hannan is admirably bitter and integer, but his character is repellent and I'm pretty sure I would also want to kill him. Spotting the Hitchcock references is the most fun part of "Last Embrace", whether it's in the plot elements, the genius camera-work of Demme's regular cinematographer Tak Fujimoto or the impeccable soundtrack by Miklós Rózsa. The grand finale at Niagara Falls is excellent as well.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A homage to Hitchcock
paul2001sw-12 June 2006
Many films are called "Hitchcockian", usually because they merely have a twisty, psychologically-motivated plot. But Jonathon Demme's 'Last Embrace' is far more than that, as much a piece of homage as Peter Jackson's recent 'King Kong' remake was to its predecessor. The natures of the characters, and the style of acting, dialogue and music all resemble Hitchcock's own work. A number of elements even pay more direct tribute: there's a shower scene (a la 'Psycho', albeit less bloody), while the scene in the tower, and the ambiguous heroine who isn't what she seems, bring 'Vertigo' to mind. The ending, in fact, resembles aspects of both the start and end of that latter film, while the use of an American landmark (the Niagra Falls) also recalls the use of Mount Rushmore to similar effect in the conclusion of 'North by Northwest'. But for those of us who don't in fact adore Hitchcock, and who find his movies stiff, badly acted and contrived, is a carbon copy such a welcome thought? In fact, Demme, a director I often think of as clunky, proves himself well up to the art of sympathetic pastiche, and I actually found this movie a little more engrossing than many of Hitchcock's own, although the plot is still holey and the overall feeling is that of an early 1960s movie, unusually well done, rather than a real late 1970s film. You'll probably enjoy it if you're more partial to Hitchcock than I am.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A confusing mess ..........
merklekranz16 November 2010
"Last Embrace", directed by Jonathan Demme, takes itself way too seriously, for such a shallow film. The whole thing smacks of audience manipulation, and the exciting conclusion above Niagara Falls, in no way redeems what has preceded it. Someone is trying to kill Roy Scheider, and fine actors Christopher Walken, John Glover, and Charles Napier are essentially wasted as "red herrings". The story is far from tight, and leaves plenty of loose ends dangling uncomfortably. Once you witness the highly unlikely tub scene, you will better understand the lack of logic in this film. Everything about "Last Embrace" is disjointed, confusing, and really never comes together as entertainment. - MERK
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unsatisfying in the end
eelko7420 February 2001
Some Hitchcockian thrillers are quite rightly considered to be `homages' to the master of suspense like DePalma's Sisters. Although The Last embrace is charming in paying tribute to one of the greatest directors so obviously, there is even a dramatic finale in a large crowded arena, it doesn't belong in that category. The beginning was promising though. I imagined it to go in all directions. Is Roy Scheider a nut, or is he really a possible victim of a mysterious organization, represented by a sinister Christopher Walken. Or perhaps both? Roy Scheider looked like exploding every second! It kept me guessing until the `girl' entered the play. From that moment on i got the feeling i have seen it all before, and better. Clearly she's the femme fatale who isn't the person she appears to be. Of course Roy, after a rough start, falls under her spells. A champion of paranoia at first and now a lovesick guy, blind for the danger that she is. I didn't buy it. And no 'suspension of disbelief' to save it. Because of the sometimes badly written dialogues between the main characters and an ultimately uninteresting B-movieplot, jammed with twists an turns never leading anywhere, underneath it all. The acting is o.k., but not outstanding. And that would have been necessary to make a mediocre script come alive.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Thoroughly lackluster mystery-thriller...
moonspinner5512 March 2008
Roy Scheider stars as a retired secret agent mourning the murder of his wife, now busy dodging the bad guys who are out to kill him. Director Jonathan Demme is so character-oriented a storyteller that to see him attempting an Alfred Hitchcock-type suspense drama, with the accent on narrative and action, is almost predictably disastrous. Screenwriter David Shaber, adapting Murray Teigh Bloom's novel "The 13th Man", wants to stir up paranoia and intrigue, but either he or Demme dropped the ball after an OK start. For those who stick with it, there's a visually impressive climax at Niagara Falls, but Demme gets next-to-nothing out of his cast, and even less out of this tepid story. *1/2 from ****
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Something you didn't know about Jewish immigrants
myschrec11 August 2003
This is an engrossing thriller -- clearly in the vein established by Hitchcock -- and very much like Brian De Palma's carefully structured style. This is the first Jonathan Demme film I saw and I expected him to work more in this genre. Fortunately, he directed a cornucopeia of film in various styles that vary between intriguing and amazing: including "Melvin and Howard," "Stop Making Sense," "Philadelphia," and one of the best films for repeat viewing, "The Silence of the Lambs." This film stands out from the standard murder mystery in that it presents a non-standard view of Jews who immigrated to the US. To divulge more would spoil the film. Roy Scheider is perfect and Janet Margolin is beautiful. In addition , now -- nearly 25 years later -- it is fun watching Chris Walken, John Glover and Mandy Patinkin early in their careers. It is funny to realize that Margolin, Walken and Glover were all in "Annie Hall" two years earlier.
27 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Hitchcock....
MarieGabrielle16 May 2006
But Jonathan Demme deserves some credit. After having read many of the earlier reviews, however, I tend to agree that a lot of the theme is convoluted, and even the untrained eye will see familiar, much too familiar cinematography.

If one thinks of "Niagara", "Vertigo" and "The Man Who Knew Too Much", you will have a pastiche of ideas similar to this film.

Roy Scheider is very good, and underplays his role as a CIA/secret agent. Janet Margolin is attractive, but there is way too much melodrama when they first meet; too scripted. John Glover portrays an elitist professor, there are some interesting scenes at Princeton University. The shooting at the bell tower is similar to "Vertigo", right down to the winding staircase.

There is an interesting back story about the Jewish immigrants in New York, and David Margulies portrays a Rabbi who deciphers Aramaic messages. Perhaps this part of the story could have been more central, so we would not have wound up with a Hitchcock copycat film.

That aside, there are some unique camera shots, the backdrop of Niagara Falls is an interesting choice, and if you are at all interested in Demme's work, this film is worth viewing.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hitchcock wannabe
LW-0885424 December 2023
I wasn't too impressed with this film to start with. I felt it was trying too hard to be a 1940s tough guy detective with a cast never really suited to it, our main character is meant to be some kind of special agent or something but I wasn't sold. It's the 1979 on this picture and that old act and scripted dialogue won't work with the dry sardonic tough guy lead man, it's a real throwback. The Creamy course and white suits just adds to the confusion. Where the story does start to work though is as an effective mystery with our lead character now jumpy and paranoid after the death of his partner.

The mystery Notes, the strong adult elements all worked for me, it clearly tries to pay Homage to Hitchcock too as does the music, right down to its ending. The cinematography is also quite well. A mixed review.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reminds me how I miss Janet Margolin
dphelan-113 June 2005
This is one of Janet Margolin's best performances and I am reminded of how I miss seeing her in films. She certainly plays a complex character here. Her metamorphosis in one scene in particular is dramatic. Reuniting her with John Glover was great too. Even though they shared no real scenes in Annie Hall, I remember them both in that and was pleased to see each in Last Embrace. Glover is still going strong. The plot of this Hitchcockian thriller is multidimensional and fresh. I think Demme ( not one of my favorites) did a great job and the famous finale at Niagara Falls is reminiscent of NIAGARA without really aping it. This is the film that made want to ride the Maid of the Mist. And the one I always remember when I miss Janet Margolin.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intense thriller with overtones of Hitchcock throughout...
Doylenf30 August 2006
There are so many similarities between this relatively obscure thriller directed by Jonathan Demme and the works of either Alfred Hitchcock or Brian dePalma, that it's hard to know where to begin. Even the plot outline suggests a Hitchcock film with someone like James Stewart carrying the lead.

But here it's ROY SCHEIDER, a very intense Scheider (even more so than in JAWS), because he never recovered from a nervous breakdown after his wife's sudden demise. And little does he know that he's a part of a plan of vengeance when he starts receiving threatening notes--nor does he know who to trust, and when. Naturally, in a story of this sort, we have to have a femme fatale and in this case it's JANET MARGOLIN as someone who tells him she wants to help solve his dilemma.

There are some tricky camera shots, odd angled and always interesting, and Scheider really does carry the film with an extra intense portrayal of a hunted man who doesn't know who his enemies are.

Add to this the somber score fashioned by none other than Miklos Rozsa (who did that wonderful SPELLBOUND score for Hitch), and you have all the elements of a first-rate crime story.

Unfortunately, there are a couple of drawbacks. The tale is a bit too leisurely in building up to the suspenseful moments--and only Scheider and Margolin are seen to advantage. CHRISTOPHER WALKEN has what amounts to a cameo role and most of the other members of the cast are unfamiliar faces.

But it is suspenseful in a calculated, contrived sort of way and does build to a terrific climax at Niagara Falls.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A moment of reverence, please: fifty years ago, this was the very place I lost my cherry.
lastliberal-853-25370831 March 2012
The Silence of the Lambs, Philadelphia, The Manchurian Candidate, Rachel Getting Married; all films by Jonathan Demme. While this film is not in the category of those listed, it shows the promise of a great director.

Roy Scheider, who won Oscars for All That Jazz and The French Connection, and who is probably best know for his role as the sheriff in Jaws, plays a man who has become a target after his wife's murder. He certainly gives action lovers a film that will please.

So, why is a Jewish fanatic running after Harry (Scheider)? And, why is a graduate student (Janet Margolin) living in his apartment when he returns home? Finally, is this a true homage to Hitchcock?
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Last Embrace
jboothmillard5 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I can see what the critics say about the Hitchcock aspects, and it it similar to the Marilyn Monroe film, Niagara (towards the end), but this is quite a good film from director Jonathan Demme (The Silence of the Lambs). When his wife and a cop are killed, Harry Hannan (Roy Scheider) has a breakdown, and the department he works for don't want him back. He knows someone is trying to kill him, but other suspicious deaths suggest there is more to it. His only help seems to be from the mousy Ellie Fabian (Janet Margolin) living in New York. She turns out to be a key suspect though (somehow), and there are great chase sequences that lead to Niagara Falls, where she dies. Also starring John Glover as Richard Peabody, Sam Levene as Sam Urdell, Charles Napier as Dave Quittle and Christopher Walken as Eckart. To be honest, all I was interested in was the good music by Miklós Rózsa, the big stars, the violence, and the great chases, but besides that, there is not much in my opinion. Good!
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The trouble with Harry (spoilers).
vertigo_1425 April 2004
Last Embrace is a thriller in the style of Hitchcock. So much so, that everything from the structure of the story, to the music, to costume, to scenery arrangements pay homage to Hitchcock movies such as Psycho, Vertigo, North by Northwest, Dial M for Murder, and Strangers on a Train.

This is the story of Harry Hanna, a government hit-man who's wife dies after a hit gone wrong. Following his absence from the job due to his wife's death, he comes back to the city expecting to start up work again. But Harry gets the cold shoulder from his employers who consider him out of work indefinitely. Harry doesn't like the brush off, and starts to suspect that he is next on the hit list. At first, Harry seems irrational, made paranoid because of the previous hit gone wrong. But, Harry is right when he starts to guys trailing him.

Harry's apartment is being sublet to a young woman who is a student at the university. At first, Harry feels alien, like his identity has been erased the way the company severed their ties to him while he is left to fend for himself. And he just wants the girl in his apartment to pack up and get out. But eventually, she starts to help Harry out figuring what the heck is going down. But things are not always as they appear...

This is a suspense movie told in the classic Hitchcock style. It's slow at parts as it bounces around to the endeavors of various characters, and some of Harry's moments of sentimental dialogue may've worked for a 50s era Hitchcock film, but it sure is ridiculous for a movie like this. In fact, Demme's movie could've just as well been made for the 50s (hold the language and nudity), given the style of the movie. The disappointment is the finale when the enemies reveal their reason for wanting Harry dead. In fact, it was down right stupid. But, the accompanying chase and suspense moments are enough to suffice. In the end, it's a pretty good movie. I was disappointed to see Christopher Walken in for only a short while. It's also fun to watch the movie and point out the parts resembling various Hitchcock classics. There's plenty of them in there, even subtle tributes.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Last Embrace
Prismark1028 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Last Embrace is an interesting film from Jonathan Demme as he works towards being a mainstream movie maker.

He has a starrier cast with Roy Scheider as a bereaved government agent Harry Hannan who lost his wife in a job that went wrong.

Christopher Walken fresh from an Oscar win plays his boss who has no further use for Hannan as an agent.

Hannan finds a young woman Ellie Fabian (Janet Margolin) has moved into his apartment as she was told that the Hannans have moved out indefinitely.

She also gives Hannan a mysterious note in Hebrew that she found left for him. The note Hannan discovers from a rabbi is something to do with an avenger of the Blood, a private revenge.

It all boils down to Hannan's ancestors being involved in women trafficking from Europe who were used as prostitutes once they arrived in the USA.

It is clear from the music by Miklós Rózsa and the direction style of Demme that this is a movie influenced by Hitchcock. The surprise is that this was not a movie made by Brian De Palma.

In fact Last Embrace needed the visual flair of De Palma. Demme tries too hard to reference past movies from Hitchcock and forgets to do his own thing.

The story was choppy and a pivotal scene in a hotel room in Niagara Falls gives the game away. Then again I remember the original poster of this movie when it was released in the cinemas. There was no way out for one of those characters in the climax.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Last Embrace: When Harry Met Ellie
dtb10 December 2010
Although Jonathan Demme's 1992 Oscar-winner THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS was his first major suspense thriller, it wasn't the first film he'd ever made in that genre. That honor goes to Demme's 1979 thriller LAST EMBRACE (LE), which I first saw and loved during its original theatrical run. At the time, LE was touted as a romantic Hitchcockian thriller. While LE definitely has strong elements of VERTIGO and other Hitchcock classics, I've always considered it to be more of a paranoia thriller with film noir touches, which I guess makes LE what might be called "film shachor." :-) Cool, craggy yet suave Roy Scheider had long been one of our family's favorite tough-guy actors; to many fans. At first glance, he might not seem vulnerable enough to be convincing as a beleaguered paranoia film hero. However, Scheider proved to be perfect casting as Harry Hannan, a government agent with more baggage than Louis Vuitton. Harry is still heartbroken and guilt-ridden about his beloved wife getting killed while she accompanied him as cover on one of his assignments. After he spends time in a Connecticut sanitarium recovering from his nervous breakdown, Harry has barely had a chance to lose his institutional pallor when he's almost shoved in front of an express train. When he returns to his spy agency in New York City, his slippery spymaster Eckart (Christopher Walken) keeps him at arm's length; maybe Eckart thinks Harry's sharp cream-colored suit makes him too conspicuous for undercover work. Worst of all, Harry discovers he's one of several Jewish men getting death threats written in Biblical Hebrew from an unknown "Avenger of Blood"…and so far, he's the only one still alive.

Everyone scoffs at poor Harry's jitters. Who can he trust? Certainly not his brother-in-law (Charles Napier), a fellow spook who blames Harry for his sister's violent death ("You're careless with people, Harry"). Our hero eventually joins forces with Ellie Fabian (Janet Margolin), a pretty New York graduate student who sublet his apartment while he was in the sanitarium. But the vulnerable Ellie seems to have her own issues and secrets. Will that spell doom for both Ellie and Harry? And how does a turn-of-the-20th-century Jewish brothel figure in the sinister fix Harry has found himself in? Scheider and Margolin had fine chemistry together; their characters' sensitivity and wariness made me feel for them, and they even had playful moments along the way. Ms. Margolin was at her loveliest, too. (Sadly, she died of ovarian cancer in 1993 at the age of 50. Janet, we hardly knew ye.) Scheider, Margolin, and Walken are aided and abetted by a rogues' gallery of stellar New York character actors, including John Glover as Ellie's insecure professor boyfriend; Marcia Rodd as Harry's nervous agency contact; David Margulies as a rabbi with connections; Joe Spinell and Jim McBride as thugs; Captain Arthur Haggerty as a bouncer waiting to use the phone; Mandy Patinkin and Max Wright in bit parts as commuters who may or may not have some 'splainin' to do; scene-stealer Sam Levene as the crotchety but likable head of a secret Jewish society; and director Demme himself cameo-ing as a stranger on a train.

Some critics complained that despite Demme's obvious affection for the Hitchcockian material, LE could have used more of The Master of Suspense's zest and verve. I won't deny that the pace slows down at times, but with Roy Scheider at his peak and Janet Margolin's touching, multifaceted performance, I was willing to be patient. Demme and screenwriter David Shaber (adapting Murray Teigh Bloom's novel The 13th Man) make up for the film's flaws with plenty of appealingly quirky Demme-style characterization. Judaism's key role in LE's plot was fresh and intriguing, as well as making excellent use of an elaborate, well-crafted red herring. The settings contribute to the film's Demme-ness; his ace Director of Photography Tak Fujimoto really makes the New York City and Princeton, NJ locations integral to the plot and its Hitchcockian motifs, especially the bell tower sequence and an exciting climax at Niagara Falls (I can hear you making lewd jokes :-)). The film brims with only-in-New-York characters and situations; for instance, the competition for living space in Manhattan provides amusing undertones to Harry's first awkward encounters with Ellie. Miklos Rozsa's swooningly romantic yet foreboding score pulls together the film's emotional undercurrents beautifully. Between LAST EMBRACE and STILL OF THE NIGHT, if I'd been Roy Scheider, I'd have stayed out of Central Park and environs for fear of elusive assailants! LAST EMBRACE is also available on DVD: http://www.mgm.com/view/movie/1084/Last-Embrace/
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Last Embrace" copied Hitchcock's style so much that one starts wondering why not watch a real Hitchcock classic instead?
imseeg12 August 2018
Why watch "Last Embrace" if everything in it is so obviously copied from Hitchcock? Why not watch a good Hitchcock classic instead? Well, for those who just long to see a more modern movie, "Last Embrace" might be a good compromis. Some folks just cant stand to watch the old movies anymore, because they look old and dont connect to the modern world anymore.

The story and the acting in itself is rather good and full of great suspense. The movie is about a man who fears for his life. Somebody is out trying to kill him, but he doesnt know wny. He tries to decipher a mysterious letter that is sent to him, written in an unknown language, in the hope to find out who is trying to kill him.

Sometimes the acting by the supporting actors is somewhat overdramatic, deliberatedly done to again copy the original Hitchcock style in which characters often performed with large gestures. Nowadays that is unheard of and it would look a bit silly, but it was one of those Hitchcock characteristics that was (badly) copied into "Last Embrace" as well.

As a soundtrack fan I must admit that I disliked the use of a fake old soundtrack score (in MONO). The score in itself was beautiful, but it didnt blend well with this modern version of a hitchcock story. I dont mind remakes of good movies, but at least make them in a modern way. Now the deliberatedly old sounding, music score constantly clashes with the modern settings. But most people probably wont mind this at all, this is just a personal irritant of mine, because I like music so much in movies...

To conclude: if you never have seen a Hitchcock movie and even if you dont know Roy Scheider either, "Last Embrace" is still a good suspense thriller. It has stood the test of time nicely. It could have been better, but I have watched it several times over the years and I still get thrilled by it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This time Demme, not De Palma, decides to rip-off Hitchcock.
fedor85 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I wish it were "Last Dumb Thriller". But thrillers are like that. They are like children: numerous, illogical, and often annoying. They want so desperately to be taken seriously but what is there to take seriously about a child's behaviour or a thriller's plot? Having seen this particular child - I mean... thriller - I understand why reviewers refer to it as "a hitchcockian thriller"; they might as well have called it "idiotic" for that's what "hitchcockian" means in the movie dictionary (look it up, if you don't believe me). Even the soundtrack is old-school Hollywood which is a mistake: it doesn't fit a late 70s film and makes it look phony. Besides, how dare they steal De Palma's idea of stealing from Hitchcock?! The story is absurd. Scheider's wife is killed, and her killers are never an issue. Instead, first his former employers follow him around, and later decide to kill him. Why do they decide to kill him? No explanation. Perhaps because the FBI is a dark, dark organization ("X-Files") which is very trigger-happy about knocking off its former employees for pension-funds reasons. Or perhaps because it's fashionable to want to kill Scheider in this movie; everyone seems to be after him. And while the poor unsuspecting viewer is trying to figure out the mystery by logically assuming that there is a major conspiracy, in reality the killer is... Janet Margolin! Yes, the woman occupying Scheider's living quarters; the one that briefly hinted she was "depraved". Why does she go after Scheider at precisely a time when his wife was murdered and he is feeling paranoid - and followed by his own ex-employers - and not a few years earlier or few years after the wife's murder? A pure hitchcockian (look it up again in the dictionary, in case you forgot what it means) coincidence. And how about that brilliant motive of hers...! Her grandmother was forced into prostitution when she was a fresh-off-the-boat 15 year-old virgin in NY, and then syphilisized by a bunch of horny Jewish men, one of whom - tah-dah! - is Scheider's grandfather. As a result, Margolin has been playing a hooker in her spare time (among other things) in order to kill off all the descendants of the men who so cruelly syphilisized her once-virginal grandmother. How hitchcockian (look it up) is that? The finale then shamelessly rips off the Mount Rushmore scene from "North By Northwest", except that the love-interest is a killer and she doesn't get saved.

The movie also offers some dubious/off-kilter dialog and some not-so great acting. Check out the silly and obvious way in which Napier follows Scheider at the cemetery. Let's also not forget the moronic plot-device of Napier reaching for his jacket and holding his hand very suspiciously - but it wasn't a gun! How brilliant! Napier in the tower: now, there's another string of illogical behavioural patterns. J. Demme was, is, and always will be a director without style, without flair, and the man who directed "Philadelphia". Let's give him another Oscar!
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A doomed romance
HarlequeenStudio27 December 2018
Can we throw out the whole murder-mystery plot and just watch Ellie and her landlord getting it on in their lovely apartment? The chemistry between Roy Scheider and Janet Margolin is so good, it's a real shame this movie wasn't conceived as a romcom: he even adopts her cat. Roy Scheider in black speedos is a sight to see! And right after that there's a closeup of his long monologue, without any cuts. This man was gold. The film is enjoyable, with beautifully shot interiors and exteriors and interesting characters played by John Glover and Christopher Walken. It's interesting how the movie transforms from cold cop thriller to warm, romantic, mysterious love story. It's a change of genre that should have been complete.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
First half is routine, the second half is clearly DePalma than Hitchcock
jordondave-280854 June 2023
(1979) Last Embrace THRILLER/ MYSTERY

Adapted from the novel by Murray Teigh Bloom that has Harry Hannan (Roy Schneider) attempting to get over his wife's shooting death when some perpetrators were attempting to gun him down while he was having some quiet time with his wife Dorothy at a restaurant, by coming back to the the firm. The next thing we know because of his long absence, the firm that he works for does not want him back anymore. And at that point he begins to get paranoid thoughts once someone tries to push him on front of a train. And upon coming back to his apartment, he then meets an anthropologist student, Ellie Fabian (Janet Margolin) who claims that it's been rented out to her. And before he leaves, he opens one of his letters written in Hebrew Aramiac that marked him as to be selected to die.

The first half of this movie appear to be generic with Harry (Roy Schneider) having paranoid thoughts about is trying to kill him, until he comes across more revelations regarding the current girl he is living with. It went from that before it geared toward Brian De Palma mode from "Sisters" to "Obsession" for there's a psychological aspect.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed