The Murders in the Rue Morgue (1986 TV Movie) User Reviews

Pretty decent adaptation

[Vomitron_G · 6/10 · 9 February 2009]

-- The Book:

An very involving read. An intelligent murder mystery (albeit not too complex, as it is a short story) in which the reader can't do anything but tag along for the ride. Lots of clever deductions and conclusions will have you both scratching your head and smiling when the killer's identity is finally revealed.

-- The Movie:

This made-for-TV adaptation does stay true to the nature of Poe's short. It's an adequate adaptation, both in look, feel and atmosphere. David Epstein, writer of the teleplay, did his best to give the characters more depth as well as adding a few. More than decent performances by George C. Scott and Rebecca De Mornay. Val Kilmer, at the time a rather inexperienced actor, gave it his best shot too, one can tell. My only grief is, that the movie was made for TV. In Poe's story, the two murders - or at least the aftermath - are described in gruesome detail. They had to be, because those murders are the core of the plot; the events that jump-start the whole mystery. Sadly, we don't get to see the bloody details in the movie, and we can only guess how brutal the murders were. Revealing the killer at the end, worked a little better in the book (due to the nature of the killer), but the effects were convincing enough. It's a good film, though horror enthusiasts searching for kicks and thrills might find it a bit disappointing.

A Fairly Faithful Adaptation of the Poe Tale

[gavin6942 · 7/10 · 30 October 2012]

A detective (George C. Scott) comes out of retirement to help his daughter's fiancé (Neil Dickson) prove that he did not commit a series of murders.

I really enjoyed this film, and was surprised to see it was the only attempt to adapt the Poe tale since the 1930s (the one in the 1970s hardly counts as being remotely close to the source material). While I think some liberties were taken (my memory of the story is not perfect), it follows the general feel and does its best to keep the mystery going as long as it can.

And, indeed, that is what I enjoyed most about the film -- the mystery! How did the killer get in and out of the house? What was the motive? Why did he not want the gold coins? Even though I already knew the story, they successfully brought me along for the ride.

Closest yet to Poe, but still not quite there

[FISHCAKE · 7/10 · 5 September 1999]

While the basic crime plot of Poe's story is the framework of this color film noir, we have tacked onto it a melange of elements not in the story, not the least of which is having Dupin as a cashiered, or maybe just retired, Inspector of Police. The "real" Dupin was often consulted by the Prefect of Police, but he was a private citizen, a recluse if you will, with marvelous powers of ratiocination. Furthermore, where did the writers get the idea that the Prefect hated Dupin. According to the stories he pretended a supercilious attitude, but knew that often without Dupin he was nowhere. In this film, we see Dupin at work but get no details about his "ratiocination". It's a good cast, though, and interesting seeing them at work. Give it an A+ for atmosphere, but a C- for classic tale telling.

Atmospheres

[andrei cretulescu · 28 October 2002]

I've been waiting to see this film for about 10 years. There never was and there NEVER will be a truly great screen adaptation of Edgar Allan Poe. Because it can't be done. Given that Poe is definitely one of my favourite writers, you probably would suggest that I shouldn't watch any movie (or TV movie) based on one of his writings. True. But I love movies, and one of the best I've seen is The Pit and the Pendulum, directed by the great Roger Corman, which is an adaptation of Poe's short story and has virtually NOTHING to do with it. But Corman is Corman and he did 5 or 6 movies based (inspired by...) on Poe, and they're all classics (if you love this kind of cinema), and Vincent Price is absolutely splendid and...enough about history. Therefore, you should never expect a brilliant(or even decent)adaptation of Poe, but if you agree with that and if you are prepared to swallow characters and facts that aren't present in Poe's story (Murders in the Rue Morgue, that is) then you're in for a treat. The lugubrious atmosphere, the fluid camerawork, the impressive production design and the magnificent location all add panache to a well told (by David Epstein) and well directed (by Jeannot "Somewhere in Time" Szwarc) tale. And let's not forget the great, late George C.Scott, whose presence alone makes the film worthwile. And listen closely...If you love Poe just on paper, better stay away! If you haven't read the story (and if you like Scott), stick with it! Just remember - if you want a gore movie, wait till Dario Argento makes his own version. If you want an intellectual/perverse/subversive flick, talk to Polanski or De Palma. This one is just a TV movie.

A solid cast brings the old story back to life

[Leofwine_draca · 6/10 · 29 August 2016]

An interesting adaptation of the Edgar Allan Poe short story, THE MURDERS IN THE RUE MORGUE concentrates heavily on costumes (which are admittedly classy) and scenery at the cost of atmosphere and suspense. That's not to say that it isn't a good film, but it does lack that necessary oomph needed to drive it into being something really good. The main reason I found the film had no suspense was that I had read the short story previously and so I already knew the identity of the killer (which is kept ambiguous throughout the film).

The acting here is superb, and much of the weight lies on the shoulders of the late, lamented George C. Scott, who is perfectly cast as the fussy and brilliant detective Dupin (a forerunner of Sherlock Holmes), and has all the mannerisms and intelligence down to a tee. He is given able support by the fresh-faced Val Kilmer in a supporting role, while Rebecca De Mornay, better known to audiences for her role as a psychotic nanny in THE HAND THAT ROCKS THE CRADLE, is the token female caught up in the danger. Also appearing is the comedy gent Ian McShane, star of TV's LOVEJOY! Sadly he is not flogging any antique paintings in this film.

The gore is light, with some blood splashed over the walls being the main highlight. One interesting aspect is the murder scenes in a park dotted through the film, which serve no real purpose and are a result of the '80s slasher craze, which don't really fit in with the rest of the murder mystery format. There are some great animatronics in the film too. If you're a fan of crime fiction or of Poe then this film is worth seeing as an above average adaptation. It's also a lot similar to a Sherlock Holmes story (with Scott as Holmes and Kilmer as Watson) so if you're anything at all a fan of this kind of classic locked-room murder story (like I am) then this one might be worth a look, even if only for Scott's presence.

Edgar Allan Sleuth!

[Coventry · 6/10 · 23 January 2024]

This modest but solid mid-80s TV thriller/horror is the third film version based on Edgar Allan Poe's short story with the same bone-chilling title, but they are all very different. The oldest one, released in 1932, is a delightful contemporary Mad-Scientist movie starring Bela Lugosi. The 1971 version, featuring names like Jason Robards and Herbert Lom, is also typical for its period of release, as it's a slasher set in a flamboyant Grand-Guignol theater. This version, starring the legendary George C. Scott and upcoming young talent Val Kilmer, is perhaps the least spectacular one of the bunch, but it is the adaptation that remains the most faithful to Poe's tale.

Poe's fictional character August Dupin, elegantly depicted by Scott, was actually the first super-intelligent detective. If, during "The Murders in the Rue Morgue", the character of Dupin reminds you of immortal sleuths like Sherlock Holmes or Hercule Poirot, do realize they were invented by their respective authors much later. At the beginning of the story, Dupin is embittered because he got forced to retire by the obnoxious Prefect of Police. Even a visit from his acolyte Philippe or the engagement of his beautiful daughter Claire can't cheer him up. When the whole of Paris is struck by fear and panic due to the indescribably gruesome murders of two women inside their house, Dupin finally considers focusing on something else than his chess board. Claire's fiancé is the police's only suspect, but Dupin quickly deducts the truth behind the murders is far more unusual.

If you read Poe's tale or seen the previous versions, the climax of "The Murders in the Rue Morgue" doesn't come as a surprise, of course, but the film nevertheless remains compelling thanks to the performances and the marvelous decors & scenery. Jeannot Szwarc, a more than competent genre director (and, moreover, French) clearly wanted the recreation of Paris at the turn of the century to be very detailed and accurate. Unfortunately, the pivotal murders occur off-screen. Probably because it's a TV-film production and/or because they are described in Poe's wicked imagination as ultimately savage. Poor us, horror fanatics, we don't get to see anything. Not even any short clips of the ripped apart corpses upon their discovery.

Just Didn't Deliver

[ccthemovieman-1 · 4/10 · 1 November 2006]

Considering the fine start in this film, the movie overall was a huge disappointment. Part of that great beginning was the cinematography, a real eye-grabber particularly in the first 5-10 minutes.

The story begins to drag after awhile and it wasn't worthwhile sticking with it all the way - even though I did - because the ending is very unsatisfying.

I didn't recognize Rebecca deMornay, she looked so young. Val Kilmer, too, must have been at the beginning of his career. Being a TV movie, the language was pretty tame, which was nice, but the story just didn't deliver. It's not something I would give a second look.

All brawn and no brains - good actors miscast, poor direction, poor script

[SteveSkafte · 6/10 · 25 September 2008]

When the basic story of a film is good, you naturally want to like it. But, sometimes, about half of the way through, you realize that it hasn't lived up to expectations. Edgar Allan Poe wrote a fantastic tale, no doubts there. But this film is sadly misguided.

Several factors contribute to this. First, David Epstein's screenplay effectively rips all the subtlety out of the source material. Second, director Jeannot Szwarc makes absolutely no attempt to film this in a way that takes advantage of its low budget and venue. Finally, the casting is utterly random. Accents and nationalities are thrown together with total abandon.

In spite of all that, some the cast members manage to put in good performances. George C. Scott (as Auguste Dupin) is really excellent, with great command of his dialogue. Naturally, he is miscast, but acts as if he is in a far better film. A very young Val Kilmer (as Phillipe) is good, but has almost nothing to work with. He too, is miscast, though the main reason I originally watched this. Ian McShane is certainly entertaining, but his character has no subtlety.

After the acting, there's little to say. The only quality the film has left it owes to its source material. This might have been acceptable for an original script, but as a badly adapted story, it is simply disappointing.

The editing seems haphazard at points, either that important scenes were removed, or never filmed. Dupin's realization of the culprit is never explained, nor the contents of his newspaper ad, or any of his deductive process for that matter. Phillipe's process of discovering Adolphe's unfaithfulness is also never explained.

Finally, the intelligence of the script dips considerably by the final scenes. I won't elaborate, but they have all the brains of a 1950s horror B movie. Really weak.

RATING: 6.2 out of 10

not good, in spite of the cast

[hbs · 4/10 · 1 October 2001]

It isn't terrible, but it's just another mediocre TV movie in spite of the cast and story (the Poe story is ridiculous, but it's fun). The story lurches along until the last 15 minutes, when it falls flat on its face. The ending is abrupt, leaving major story threads flapping in the breeze, and the clumsy attempt to surprise the 1 in 100 viewers that hasn't heard the plot of the Poe story is very distracting. There is also a subplot involving a feud between the detective and the police commissioner that is totally unnecessary. Finally, the cinematography is occasionally muddy. On the plus side there is the good cast and the locations are very attractive, so it's tolerable.

Very good...aside from the accents.

[planktonrules · 7/10 · 27 May 2023]

"The Murders in the Rue Morgue" is a story by Edgar Allan Poe and it's set in Paris. However, oddly, the accents of most of the actors are American...with a few Brits thrown in as well. In fact, no one sounded very French...and that is a problem with this TV movie. However, apart from that, it's closer to the original story than the more famous 1932 version and is well made.

Sort incredibly violent murders have taken place. Some folks have been ripped to pieces, another shoved up a chimney...and it took five people to pull the body out when the police discovered the murder scene. The local police are perplexed and when they arrest a man who obviously did NOT do it, retired Police Inspector August Dupin (George C. Scott) is awakened from his lethargy and he decides to investigate.

The acting, generally, is very good. Scott was a genius actor...and here he's, as expected, terrific. I thought Rebecca De Mornay was a bit weak (she seemed the least French-like of any of them) and Val Kilmer was fine. The best part of the film is the location shooting in Paris. Overall, a very good film version of the story.

"Nothing comes before chess, my dear".

[lost-in-limbo · 5/10 · 14 June 2014]

Edgar Allan Poe's story sees another adaptation in this 80s made-for-TV outing starring some names in George C Scott, Rebecca De Mornay and Val Kilmer. It's diverting, but very unexceptional and stagy in the details. In honesty it's the strong performances that really carry this one, especially a stalwart Scott and a headstrong De Mornay. How the cast worked of each other kept me glued. Some atmospherics are etched out nicely, with fitting period details of a turn of a century Paris and there's a dark, grim air lurking about. The deaths happen off screen, but there's something ghastly about them and that's mainly due to its effective use of sound. However the story is all about the investigation/mystery of two murdered women and it's somewhat stiff in its execution of it. Even with the script throwing around ideas, theories in its quest to uncover the motive of the puzzling deaths it just fared as a typical crime plot of outrageous circumstances. Still at least it didn't find itself getting distracted by certain sub-plots. Earnest entertainment.

Excellent TV movie

[Lamia7609 · 10/10 · 26 August 2002]

I checked this out last night from our Library. I was more than a little surprised by how good it was. I hadn't read Rue Morgue since I was in 6th grade, so I didn't remember the plot. This seems to have upset a few people, since apparently the movie didn't follow the plot of the original story. I truly enjoyed it and if hadn't been for the segways I wouldn't have known it was made for TV. It looked great and is by far one of the best made for TV movies I've ever seen...especially given that it was made in 1986. George C Scott is always such a presence on screen. If you get a chance please watch in on VHS instead of TV with all the commercial breaks. You could probably find it at a library..if you live in a metro area.

George C. Scott, Val Kilmer and Rebecca De Mornay in the Victorian Era

[Wuchakk · 6/10 · 25 April 2024]

In Paris, a recently-retired detective (Scott) is encouraged by his daughter (De Mornay) to investigate a shocking double murder in order to save her fiancé. Kilmer plays his associate godson while Ian McShane is on hand as the Prefect.

"The Murders in the Rue Morgue" (1986) is a fairly faithful adoption of Edgar Allan Poe's tale, published in 1841. This is in contrast to the 1971 film of the same name (with Jason Robards and Herbert Lom), which totally deviated from the original yarn and is more akin to "The Phantom of the Opera." Here, scriptwriter David Epstein wisely augmented Poe's story to spice it up a little and make it worthy of a feature length movie, albeit a TV production. (Poe's tale is only about 38 pages in modern form).

It's Victorian mystery/horror in the manner of Hammer's "The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll" (1960) and Klaus Kinski's "Jack the Ripper" (1976), as well as later films like "Edge of Sanity" (1989) and "From Hell" (2001). It lacks the colorful sensationalistic elements of those movies and focuses on the murder mystery but, remember, Poe's tale is famous for being the first fictional detective story and obviously influenced Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes, amongst others.

I first became aware of "Murders in the Rue Morgue" as a teen due to Iron Maiden's song on their (best) album KILLERS, but never read Poe's yarn and so wasn't familiar with the creative revelation of who the murderer is. As such, this kept my interest. No, it's not as colorfully entertaining as most of those other movies noted, but you can't beat the authentic French locales and the great cast. The special effects for the ending are surprisingly convincing and hold up.

The movie runs 1 hour, 40 minutes, and was shot in the Paris area, including Notre Dame Cathedral, the Place de l'Opéra and in Buttes-Chaumont, the latter standing-in for the Bois de Boulogne. Almost a third of it was filmed away from the city, such as the prison sequences, which were done in Corbeil, Marne, which is in the country 115 miles east of the city.

GRADE: B-

OK up until the end

[Pegasus-10 · 3/10 · 26 May 2023]

As did many viewers, I suspect, I knew the outcome and was curious how they would film it. What was most impressive was the period detail in the costuming -- even those extras on the street in long shots. And using sites within Paris that probably hadn't changed in the decades since the story is set was a nice touch.

I was ok with the acting, although the interplay between the police prefect and the inspector was a bit tiresome. What ruined the entire thing for me happens at the very end in the park scene where the police (who aren't spread out arm-to-arm) are searching for the culprit. Knowing there is such danger, Phillippe brings the young woman to the park, then walks off when she stops and doesn't turn around until he hears her screams. Totally preposterous and stupid writing. Watch this again? Nevermore.

Poe would have been so proud!!

[dtucker86 · 19 September 2003]

This is one of the classics truly brought to life. Edgar Allen Poe was one of my favorite authors and he was a true magician with the English language. This is a beautiful TV film that really did justice to one of his greatest works thanks to one of our finest American actors. George C. Scott was one of those rare breed of actors who could do everything and anything and did it!He was that good at what he did. He made any film that he was in excellent. He gave a masterful performance as the great detective Dupin in this film and Rebecca De Morney gave him excellent support as his daughter. This film really brought Paris to life and is beautiful to look at. There was an older version of this film starring Bela Lugosi that really took liberties with Poe's story and made it into a cheap horror film, they didn't do it here and that is what makes it worth watching. This was an early example of "psychological profiling" Dupin tried to match any individual into his profile of the murder and had to come up with the fact that it wasn't a human at all. It is far-fetched! but Scott makes it worth your while. Everything about this film from the musical score to the smallest supporting performances is A plus.

Good Cast in Above-Avg TV-Movie...Among the Adaptations...Handsome Production

[LeonLouisRicci · 7/10 · 21 July 2023]

George C. Scott, Rebecca De Mornay, Ian McShane, Val Kilmer are the Cast in this Lackluster and Somewhat Flat TV-Movie, another in the Many Versions of the Edgar Alan Poe Short Story, that is Usually Credited as the 1st Detective Story, and an Inspiration for Arthur Conan Doyle's "Sherlock Holmes".

Retired Private Detective (often consulted by Police), Aguste Dupin, is Reluctant to Engage in the Bizarre, Mysterious, and Brutal Double-Murder that has Authorities Baffled.

But After His Daughter's (De Mornay) Fiance is Arrested for the Murders, Dupin, Becomes Involved, and Brings Along His Protege (Kilmer).

The Film's Strengths are the Carefully Beautiful Sets and Costumes, Scott's Screen Presence, and a Faithful Rendering of Poe's Prose.

But the Glaring Weakness is the "On-Screen" Presentation of the Murderer that is Somewhat Amateurish and a Let-Down, and the Police Capt. (Ian McShane) Character is a Waste, and Untrue to Dupin's Ready and Appreciated Cooperation with the Authorities.

One More Negative, and this is for Horror-Fans, because it's a TV-Movie, Poe's Gory-Murder Story is Whitewashed and Shoved Off-Screen and Left to the Imagination, That's Not Poe.

Overall, Delivers a Watchable, if Toned-Down Version of the Classic Tale that Looks-Great, is Well Acted, but What's Missing is More than Felt, it is Wanting.

Flawed Poe adaption.

[mark.waltz · 5/10 · 22 October 2023]

While this has an interesting setting that correctly looks like late 19th century Paris, it's never as mesmerizing or as scary as it could be. That is outside the gruesome murder of a young woman and her very old mother, seen briefly. The old lady is for some reason obsessively counting coins while the daughter sits quietly by, their fate soon to come and calling attention by their brutal screams that wakes up an entire neighborhood.

When the fiancee (Val Kilmer) of young Rebecca De Mornay is accused of the murder, she basically badgers retired detective father George C. Scott to take the case, and even though she's doing the bulk of the talking, he easily outacts her. In fact, of the three major players, he's the one doing any emoting although none of them seem French. When someone appears who does speak French, they do so outrageously and it's unintentionally comic. Nice looking though, but a disappointment. The original 1932 version is much better since it plays more on the horror elements and focuses on the fiend which is a teeny aspect of the plot here.

Turning A Short Story Into A Feature Is Difficult

[boblipton · 5/10 · 26 May 2023]

There's a mad murder in Paris. On the fourth floor of an apartment building, two women are murdered in a brutal manner, one of them stuffed up a chimney. Forty gold francs are scattered on the floor. There is no exit from the room: the door is seen, and the windows in the room are nailed shut. When Rebecca de Mornay's fiance is arrested, she prevails on her father, C. August Dupin -- played by George C. Scott -- and his godson, Val Kilmer, to investigate, despite the opposition of the Prefect of Police, Ian McShane, who had Scott forcibly retired on a tiny pension as soon as he could.

Having read Edgar Allen Poe' classic short story, this soon became a drag to watch in terms of plot. Still, the camerawork around the fin-de-siecle architecture of Paris was quite good in this TV movie. Set in the early 20th century. Likewise, I thought the film makers played fairly with the mystery. On the other hand, the dialogue was written in that stilted and artificial style that some people think people talked like before they were born; only Miss De Mornay seems to be able to make most of her dialogue sound natural, and Scott seems to be phoning it in in most of his scenes.

I didn't think it was terribly successful. Like many movies that attempt to bring a short story up to 92 minutes, a great number of details have been invented that serve neither the mystery, nor do they particularly ornament the movie, save for the great number of location shots.

Scott is Great but the Film is a Disappointment

[Michael_Elliott · 5 September 2012]

The Murders in the Rue Morgue (1986)

** (out of 4)

Made-for-TV version of the Edgar Allan Poe story has Detective Auguste Dupin (George C. Scott) coming out of retirement after his daughter (Rebecca DeMornay) comes to him saying that her fiancé has been charged with the brutal murder of a group of people. There aren't any real clues and it appears the murderer just vanished from the scene of the crime and it doesn't take long for the veteran detective to realize something strange is going on. This version of the familiar story really comes across as a disappointment for a number of reasons, which is a real shame since we got such a good cast of actors. The screenplay is the real villain here because the entire thing is shown from the detective's point of view. I'm going to guess that if you were unfamiliar with the story then perhaps this approach would work but if you know who the killer is then the suspense is pretty much taken away from you. The entire film is built around who did the murders but those familiar with the story already know. I think a straight adaptation would have been much more effective had the film let us in on the "secret" and went from there. Another problem is that the music score gets quite annoying at times as it's constantly going into high gear to make you feel as if a scene is all the more dramatic than it really is. Director Jeannot Szwarc (JAWS 2) does a decent job with the material he has to work with. He does manage to build up a nice atmosphere and he also gets some good performances from his cast. Val Kilmer appears in a small role and does a nice job. DeMornay isn't too bad, although she isn't always believable playing the weak lady. She also has to deal with the screenplay giving her an incredibly annoying character. As for Scott, as you'd expect, he's terrific and really delivers a strong performance. It's really too bad he wasn't given a better screenplay because his performance does so much with little to work with. THE MURDERS IN THE RUE MORGUE is pretty flat all around, which is a shame because there's some good stuff scattered throughout.