The Right of the People (TV Movie 1986) Poster

(1986 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Let's Get Political
view_and_review24 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
In 1981 Olivia Newton-John released the song "Let's Get Physical." So I say, "Let's Get Political," because that's what this movie is. It was almost serendipitous that I'd watch this movie a few days after the pro gun rally in Virginia. It was a peaceful rally by all accounts even if the protesters looked scary as hell. It wasn't enough to just carry a weapon, they had to wear fatigues, masks, sunglasses and other tactical gear. They were more heavily armed than the police!

These were the people Christopher Wells (Michael Ontkean) was preaching to when he advocated for all citizens being able to carry a weapon. District Attorney Christopher Wells' wife and daughter were shot and killed by a couple of robbers. They weren't the only ones killed, the two robbers shot up the entire restaurant, which is weird for an armed robbery but nevermind. It was already established that Chris was a liberal turned conservative presumably because he'd gotten older and lived long enough to become???? Realistic? Cynical? You decide. With the death of his wife and daughter he became a hard core second amendmenter. Suddenly, carrying a gun was a panacea for all of the problems in America.

He took that passion and turned it into a movement. That movement got the issue on the ballot as Prop G (G for gun get it) and overwhelmingly the people of St. Lawrence USA voted to allow open and concealed carry for all adults eighteen and older with no criminal record and no history of mental illness. As the saying goes: "The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."

I have several guns myself though I'm not beholden to them. I mean, I paid good money for them so I wouldn't be willing to just give them up, but I'm not a fanatic about them. As a gun owner I still would've voted against Prop G.

Firstly, Chris, the main proselytizer for the proposition, sounded like an angry victim every time he spoke on behalf of Prop G. Sure, that fires people up, but I don't know any good decisions that are made in anger.

Secondly, the Prop G rallies were a majority white men. To me, an auditorium full of angry white men screaming for guns scares the crap outta me. Somehow, even with full legal rights to carry, I fear I'd find myself on the wrong end of someone else's gun who didn't think I should be carrying a gun.

Throughout the movie Chris was this hate filled man full of bromides and fortune cookie lines. He even spit out, "Guns don't start revolutions, they finish them." I literally laughed out loud, like where did you get that one? Dude was a walking meme. They actually put that line on the "Yes for Prop G" posters that looked oddly similar to Nazi paraphanelia with the black gun sillouhette against the red background.

This movie was bad, even if it had some solid arguments for both sides. It was a T.V. movie which meant T.V. movie quality. In 1986 that meant low grade picture and sound. I think "Right of the People" tried to do the topic justice. They showed the positives and the negatives, even if they were a bit hyperbolized. As was mentioned in the movie, the second amendment has been argued over for 200 years, and it will probably be argued over for 200 more.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a bad topic, but so awfully made
searchanddestroy-18 September 2019
I don't argue about the topic, the message supposed to be brought here, I won't. I know that in the USA, the problem of fire arms is a real issue, bigger than anywhere in the civilized world. The ending is interesting too. But the directing and acting are terrible. Not terrific, TERRIBLE; Especially the action sequences, with slow motion and BLOODLESS, shooting scenes. Laughable, except that did not make me laugh at all. So lousy, this picture made for TV stinks the worst eighties fashion, as haircuts and music score. But not that bad either, if you consider the overall job. I repeat, the problem is the characters, acting and shooting scènes.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Morbid Fantasy of the Gun-Grabbing Lunatic Fringe
Jubal2829 June 2001
I recall watching this MOW when it was on originally, which may have been the only showing of it to a national audience. Even at my young age (IMDb calls this movie 1986; I seem to recall it was earlier), in my early teens, I distinctly recall thinking that people just don't act the way they were depicted in this movie.

The basic crux is this -- a grieving father never wants anyone else to lose a child to a gunman, so he pushes to have carry laws in his town liberalized so that all citizens may carry a gun. The idea is that armed citizens can fend off a criminal's attack.

Of course, what ends up happening is that every little verbal spat ends up in a shooting, and the town is in chaos. The POINT, as if no one can figure it out, is that guns turn otherwise rational people into mentally depraved, frothy murderous lunatics.

It was a silly display. Just because you CAN kill someone doesn't mean you'd try, no matter how flippant he's being about your fender-bender. Most people know the difference between a heated argument and lethal violence; even if they'd be inclined to throw a punch, they're not going to take it to the level of death.

Much to the producers' chagrin, of course, subsequent to the movie, many states liberalized their carry laws, and instead of this morass of carnage, crime in each of those states experienced an immediate, dramatic, and permanent drop in crime. The fender-bender shootings never materialized (with one notable exception of which I'm aware -- between two women. Draw your own conclusions). In fact, several municipalities throughout the country have gone the extra step of REQUIRING gun ownership, and they are among the most crime-free anywhere.

This movie was made as propaganda for an extremist political agenda, and nothing more. Thankfully, no one remembers it -- because that's all it's worth.
26 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
History has proved this movie false
swest-1512 May 2006
Since this movie was made, the majority of states have passed right to carry legislation and more people than ever now carry firearms. What is the result??? Crime continues to go down. Anti-gunners again missed their mark and history once again proves that firearms in the hands of citizens protect liberty and freedom as well as preventing crimes.

This movie was a typical example of the efforts of anti-gun leaning activists attempting to scare the non-gun owning public from gun owners. The idea that law abiding Americans will suddenly start killing each other in mass numbers just because they own a firearm is absurd. States with the highest percentage of gun ownership has the lowest amount of violent crime. Areas of the U.S. with very strict gun control laws (like New York, Washington DC, Maryland, Illinois, California) has the highest percentages of violent crime.
28 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Appalling, disgraceful snoozefest
jacobnunnally29 May 2023
This film is for a narrow segment of folks -- the "what about muh rights?" kind of cavemen who think any laws about anything infringe their right to do whatever they want. This film is a preachy, annoying 2A snoozefest, a Republican "pew pew!" fantasy on film. These are the same folks who forget to charge their Hoverrounds and say stuff like cIviL wAr iS coMinG then say "Cleetus, plug in muh oxygen!"

A neanderthal approach to society -- guns and Jesus. Everything else is bad. Healthcare, environment, education -- nah, we're good.

Whew, Michael Ontkean is tiresome in this one. He preaches and preaches and yells and yells. Grab your rocket launchers, folks! His smirky little tirade with the reporter is typical "don't trust the lib'rul mediuh". Pathetic. *eye roll*

What about a movie called "Well Regulated"? Oh yeah, that's in there, we forgot about that. We ignore the parts we don't like, like the slavery thing too. That's not in there, that's a lib'rul conspiracy. Them dang dems and their book learnin'!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed