This is really a review of some of the other reviews...This movie is based on actual historical events that happened in Tennessee in 1946...It might be sappy or banally written, but it is taken from actual history...Of course creative license is taken with the story, but basically it is a true story. If you want action and adventure with award winning kudos, this may not be for you...But if you are interested in what actually happened/happens in our history, this is a good story. I really enjoyed it myself..I was going to provide a link to more historical information about the actual incident, but this software won't accept the link...It say's the spelling is wrong....So, just use your search engine and search for "Battle of Athens"...It actually happened in 1946 in the state of Tennessee...I hope you enjoy the movie and find the information interesting.
8 Reviews
Good underdog story
thebestwebguy6 April 2002
Great movie. Well worth watching and for all you history buffs, this is based on a true story.
mrmikeymike143-307-19071117 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This excellent movie is based on a true story. The story of the Battle of Athens.
GI's come home from World War 2 and find their town has been taken over by a corrupt politician who controls the police force. The soldiers decide to run for office to clean up the corruption and are faced with violence and intimidation by the police and the entrenched political powers. What happens next is the stuff legends are made of.
Here is a historical link that describes the real life battle this movie is based on. But if you read this you will know how the movie concludes. http://constitution.org/mil/tn/batathen.htm
GI's come home from World War 2 and find their town has been taken over by a corrupt politician who controls the police force. The soldiers decide to run for office to clean up the corruption and are faced with violence and intimidation by the police and the entrenched political powers. What happens next is the stuff legends are made of.
Here is a historical link that describes the real life battle this movie is based on. But if you read this you will know how the movie concludes. http://constitution.org/mil/tn/batathen.htm
"Battle of Athens" - in detail
wernerpd-361-77774 May 2012
While it is true that one of the key themes of the movie is the 2d Amendment protections that are afforded to all other aspects of our Constitutional government, it occupies only the last 10-15 minutes of the entire movie.
Much of the movie is devoted to several other themes that were as important in 1946 as they are today. This involved reintegration of veterans back into a society that largely misunderstood what the veterans had to do to win the war. It also covers the time honored tradition of never leaving a Soldier behind. One truism that comes to light is that the friendships and loyalties that are gained in war are meant to last a lifetime. This concept gets put to the test repeatedly in the movie. The first time involved when Jesse Meadows (Tom Sizemore) made his political debate with Tom Cantrell (G.W. Bailey) in the town square. Cantrell knew that Meadows was a wounded veteran and sought to exploit this and mock Meadows in front of the town citizens. When it was apparent that Meadows was not working from a full deck and was being humiliated by Cantrell, it was at that point that George Meade (Brad Johnson) was shamed into recovering his comrade Jesse meadows and he pulled him from the podium. It was a defining moment in the film for Meade and it was then that he knew he would have to run for mayor.
The other instance about war friendships involved Juan Medina. George Meade took the lead of his father who addressed the political reality that his ticket would not get elected with a "Mexican" on the ticket. That was a reality in 1940s Tennessee, but not a reality on the battlefield. On the battlefield, color and race does not matter. All, are brothers in arms. The society that these veterans reintegrated into had not changed, but the veterans had changed. This topic resurfaces at the very end when Medina comes to the aid of the veterans in their time of need to lay the charges to blow the doors off of the jail.
Another topic was addressed very well, particularly for the WWII setting. As most able bodied men were sent off to war, most of the women had to manage affairs at the home front. This was displayed very well when Jesse Meadows returned home to find his wife Becky Meadows (Lisa Blount), had not only kept their business alive, but actually made it thrive during a war time economy. This set up a lot of tension between husband and wife, but was ultimately resolved at the end.
An underlying theme throughout all of the interactions of the veterans and their return home was the deep, underlying corruption that had metastasized in the county. It was pervasive and everywhere. Not only was Tom Cantrell the chief architect who led war profiteering by squeezing the citizens of the town, but he used sheriff McMillan (John M. Jackson) to do his dirty work and keep his hands clean and not have any corruption directly traceable back to him.
The acting was fairly good and Brad Johnson played a credible role as the coming of age reluctant war hero. Sometimes a hero is thrust into the limelight whether they want it or not. Patricia Clarkson played a superb role as the conniving, manipulative wife who was engineering her husband's career to success. Once Brad Johnson made a principled stand, she broke ranks with him and left him to his own devices. Her line about "not standing by a loser" was a classic. Tom Sizemore did a pretty credible job as the wounded war veteran returning home to a life he did not expect. It was tough to not see SFC Horvath (Of Saving Private Ryan fame) in the character of Jesse meadows, albeit from the perspective of a war wounded veteran. Josef Sommer also put in a credible performance as George Meade's father. Kathleen Quinlan always saw the world from the way she wanted it to be, and reluctantly refused to acknowledge the way that it truly was. The best example of this was her dressing down of George Meade regarding the town's racism of the war hero, Juan Medina.
Probably one of the most disappointing elements of the movie was the ending. The denouement was virtually nonexistent and that was a big disappointment. I think most of the viewers of the movie would have liked to have known the answers to any of these questions: 1) Did George actually get elected as mayor (it is hinted, but not confirmed; 2) Did Juan Medina stay and raise his family in the town?; 3) Was Tom Cantrell and Sheriff McMillan ever arrested?; 4) Did Jesse Meadows ultimately concede running of the business to his wife?; 5) Did George ultimately dump his wife when he realized her true colors...and so on. I think the directors/producers could have wrapped those details up in a 5-8 minute additional post climax segment.
So you might be wondering, why is this movie not readily available on NetFlix or Hulu? One of the overarching themes in this movie is that the 2d Amendment is the ultimate guarantor of all other rights found in the Constitution. This concept does not fit the leftist/Utopian world view and as such, is not permitted to be known or shown. Because of this, it is somewhat of a modern miracle this true life story of the "Battle of Athens" Tennessee was ever made. Given the current political climate today and the undercurrent of election stealing and voter fraud that is being addressed with nearly 35+ states passing voter ID laws, this movie is very timely and topical. It is well worth the viewing just to reinforce the importance of the need for the 2d Amendment, but all of the other themes of the movie, definitely makes it worthwhile.
Much of the movie is devoted to several other themes that were as important in 1946 as they are today. This involved reintegration of veterans back into a society that largely misunderstood what the veterans had to do to win the war. It also covers the time honored tradition of never leaving a Soldier behind. One truism that comes to light is that the friendships and loyalties that are gained in war are meant to last a lifetime. This concept gets put to the test repeatedly in the movie. The first time involved when Jesse Meadows (Tom Sizemore) made his political debate with Tom Cantrell (G.W. Bailey) in the town square. Cantrell knew that Meadows was a wounded veteran and sought to exploit this and mock Meadows in front of the town citizens. When it was apparent that Meadows was not working from a full deck and was being humiliated by Cantrell, it was at that point that George Meade (Brad Johnson) was shamed into recovering his comrade Jesse meadows and he pulled him from the podium. It was a defining moment in the film for Meade and it was then that he knew he would have to run for mayor.
The other instance about war friendships involved Juan Medina. George Meade took the lead of his father who addressed the political reality that his ticket would not get elected with a "Mexican" on the ticket. That was a reality in 1940s Tennessee, but not a reality on the battlefield. On the battlefield, color and race does not matter. All, are brothers in arms. The society that these veterans reintegrated into had not changed, but the veterans had changed. This topic resurfaces at the very end when Medina comes to the aid of the veterans in their time of need to lay the charges to blow the doors off of the jail.
Another topic was addressed very well, particularly for the WWII setting. As most able bodied men were sent off to war, most of the women had to manage affairs at the home front. This was displayed very well when Jesse Meadows returned home to find his wife Becky Meadows (Lisa Blount), had not only kept their business alive, but actually made it thrive during a war time economy. This set up a lot of tension between husband and wife, but was ultimately resolved at the end.
An underlying theme throughout all of the interactions of the veterans and their return home was the deep, underlying corruption that had metastasized in the county. It was pervasive and everywhere. Not only was Tom Cantrell the chief architect who led war profiteering by squeezing the citizens of the town, but he used sheriff McMillan (John M. Jackson) to do his dirty work and keep his hands clean and not have any corruption directly traceable back to him.
The acting was fairly good and Brad Johnson played a credible role as the coming of age reluctant war hero. Sometimes a hero is thrust into the limelight whether they want it or not. Patricia Clarkson played a superb role as the conniving, manipulative wife who was engineering her husband's career to success. Once Brad Johnson made a principled stand, she broke ranks with him and left him to his own devices. Her line about "not standing by a loser" was a classic. Tom Sizemore did a pretty credible job as the wounded war veteran returning home to a life he did not expect. It was tough to not see SFC Horvath (Of Saving Private Ryan fame) in the character of Jesse meadows, albeit from the perspective of a war wounded veteran. Josef Sommer also put in a credible performance as George Meade's father. Kathleen Quinlan always saw the world from the way she wanted it to be, and reluctantly refused to acknowledge the way that it truly was. The best example of this was her dressing down of George Meade regarding the town's racism of the war hero, Juan Medina.
Probably one of the most disappointing elements of the movie was the ending. The denouement was virtually nonexistent and that was a big disappointment. I think most of the viewers of the movie would have liked to have known the answers to any of these questions: 1) Did George actually get elected as mayor (it is hinted, but not confirmed; 2) Did Juan Medina stay and raise his family in the town?; 3) Was Tom Cantrell and Sheriff McMillan ever arrested?; 4) Did Jesse Meadows ultimately concede running of the business to his wife?; 5) Did George ultimately dump his wife when he realized her true colors...and so on. I think the directors/producers could have wrapped those details up in a 5-8 minute additional post climax segment.
So you might be wondering, why is this movie not readily available on NetFlix or Hulu? One of the overarching themes in this movie is that the 2d Amendment is the ultimate guarantor of all other rights found in the Constitution. This concept does not fit the leftist/Utopian world view and as such, is not permitted to be known or shown. Because of this, it is somewhat of a modern miracle this true life story of the "Battle of Athens" Tennessee was ever made. Given the current political climate today and the undercurrent of election stealing and voter fraud that is being addressed with nearly 35+ states passing voter ID laws, this movie is very timely and topical. It is well worth the viewing just to reinforce the importance of the need for the 2d Amendment, but all of the other themes of the movie, definitely makes it worthwhile.
Right Story Wrong Town
holder86528 January 2013
This story actually took place in Athens Tennessee in 1946. A true story called the "Battle of Athens". There was corruption with the sheriff in AThens and in the surrounding towns. People were arrested without cause, election ballot boxes were not counted properly. There were deputies that were doing the Sheriff's bidding. One of the men overseeing the ballot counting on the day of the conflict was actually picked up on a traffic stop and was given the option to pay a fine or participate in the fraudulent election. The polling places were closed early that day to keep additional votes from being placed. Athens is a great place to visit and get this history. I have lived in east TN my whole life and I have just become aware that this issue had happened so close to home.
An American Story - The Battle of Athens
lobogss111 August 2020
This is the TRUE story of what happened in Athens, Tennessee in 1946. It's not just a good underdog story, it's about the Constitution Of the United States of America and the Bill of Rights and what it affords us as citizens. These veterans employed their rights to take back the right of the populace and their freedom from the Democrat controlled area and law enforcement. Truly a lesson for all in what our founding fathers had set down to protect us citizens.
Interesting plot, but sappily rendered
Leofish5 February 2003
Rented this Hallmark movie a while back, was intrigued by the plot. The story is about a group of American soldiers who saw heavy combat in Europe during World War II returning to their small Texas town in 1945. They then realize that a corrupt administration has taken over the city and that the mayor and other on-the-take officials are lining their pockets with war contracts and otherwise robbing those who served the country. It's true enough, for it was a legitimate post-war problem and returning vets did demand many changes from civil rights to reform government, but this film has too much banality to really make it work, from predictability involving the big climax to a sappy homecoming dialogue with a war widow. ("He said he was cold...and he loved you.") However there were some things to like, such as the mayor coming across not as a snarling villain but more of an overly friendly, ultra-politically minded good ol' boy who knows how to make the town run. There is also a nice montage with a homecoming parade set to the Pied Pipers song "Dream" which is one of the most bittersweet songs of World War II. So I give it about 6 stars. You may like it.
Untold American history
vonhoffmangunther30 March 2013
This movie is talks about the hidden, untold story of American history that is never mention in our American history books. It is one of these films that right wing conservatives don't want the rest of the country to see because it shows that we still had all sorts of corruption after the war.
One of the other reviewers stated that this movie show that the 2nd Amendment is the ultimate guarantee of our rights. If that was the case, it would have not taken another 20 years for the Afro-Americans to get their civil rights after World War II. In addition, we still have problems with police even today with violating civil rights from the 1920s all the way up today. If Americans took the 2nd Amendment seriously, police and business corruption, plus organized crime would have been wiped out a long time ago.
One of the other reviewers stated that this movie show that the 2nd Amendment is the ultimate guarantee of our rights. If that was the case, it would have not taken another 20 years for the Afro-Americans to get their civil rights after World War II. In addition, we still have problems with police even today with violating civil rights from the 1920s all the way up today. If Americans took the 2nd Amendment seriously, police and business corruption, plus organized crime would have been wiped out a long time ago.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
