Deep Cover (1992) Poster

(1992)

User Reviews

Review this title
77 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A smart, dark, socially conscious thriller
ALauff15 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Artfully presented and blunt in its social critique, there is something deliciously honest about the undercover cop film, this being an ideal example of no-bullshit brio, starring "Larry" Fishburne as a dour L.A. agent who goes undercover to take down a Colombian drug syndicate. When he was a boy, Fishburne witnessed his father gunned down in a bungled liquor store bust; as an adult, he abstains from alcohol and drugs, and wears an impassive mien to keep the world at a safe distance. He's rigid, uncompromising, resentful of authority—he's the perfect mole, as his boss says (a squirrelly, race-baiting Charles Martin Smith), "because he fits the profile of a criminal."

Once under, the plot provocatively centers on the agonizing moral compromises Fishburne must make and his realization that right and wrong is relative to the power of the almighty dollar. Deeply cynical about the government's purported "War on Drugs"—at one point even implicating the president by name—the film sees it as just another white power structure profiting from, and fueling, a largely minority industry; honest cops and citizens pay the price for this malfeasance, an imbalance Fishburne eventually exploits with aplomb. But as much as it takes authoritarian corruption for granted, Deep Cover's attitude toward interracial sexual relations is at once fresh and unpretentious: As Jeff Goldblum's sleazy lawyer emerges from a black mistress's apartment quipping to Fishburne about the allure of exotic flesh, the film both confirms and renders ridiculous the sexual legend that, furtively, white men desire black women (and vice-versa). Instead of giggling around the issue, the film promotes this coupling as a reality, thereby reveling in the adolescent quest for exoticism and proving it a ridiculous affectation; in other words, "Get off your ass, white boy. It's no big deal." Deep Cover is also a showcase for Fishburne to prove his mettle as a leading man. He's consistently captivating, evincing the inner torment, sensitivity, and moral indecision so rare for protagonists in this sub-genre—this should have been the role that made him one of America's leading men.

Only toward the end does this hot-wire ride start to become cluttered with self-conscious gravity—Fishburne's voice-over starts to ring false when he drops stilted religious analogies—but this is for the most part a smart, dark, socially conscious thriller with the persuasive feel of noir.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
cool & hard, 'Deep Cover' takes cop story beyond the usual boundaries.
thomasw-529 December 2006
Hard-hitting and stylish, this film quickly moves beyond the usual notion of 'undercover drug work' into an altogether more practical & unpleasant understanding...

The film is well-paced and, most appropriately for this year, introduces a female art-gallery owner as it develops a relationship subplot. As the story progresses, the film breaks boundaries further & demonstrates an exceptionally sharp sensibility -- but fairly much returns to the standards for the climactic scene.

While not a Scorsese or Tarantino masterpiece, this film is very highly recommended.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Remarkable deconstruction of the war on drugs
cinematicus31 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This film is up there, indeed at times exceeds the Hollywood remake of the BBC miniseries, Traffic, as a no-holds barred merciless look at the medium echelons of the drug trade and the so-called war on drugs in the United States during its time. I only gave it only an 8 because it is not exactly classic cinema material, although it is a valuable addition to any film library.

Technically, the film is remarkable for a strong performance from the lead and support cast - look out for a chilling performance by Gregory Sierra as Felix Barbosa. Charles Martin Smith, playing Laurence Fishburne's DEA handler, has got the federal bureaucrat part down pat - I'm afraid to say , as always since he tends to get typecast in only this kind of role. Lawrence Fishburne turned in a stoic yet raging performance that was believable and easy to root for. Only problem, is that he too ended up being type cast in largely the same persona. Jeff Goldblum, mercurial and sharp as always added a lot of the flair of the film. Also hats off to the woman who played Fishburne's single mother/drug addict neighbor (I didn't catch her name). The rest of the supporting cast really enriched the story.

The cinematography and editing were very effective and innovative for their time. Choppy editing with successive close ups was soon picked up by many future copycat films. This film was one of the original ones to use that editing idiom. The soundtrack also worked well , reflecting much of the cynicism and despair that pervades the movie ; at some moments the score enhanced chilling situations audibly, as it were.

All this means that Bill Duke (and the producers) did a very good job.

===== WARNING: SPOILERS - Possible spoilers ahead =====

Now story-wise, this has got to be one of the grimmest scripts to make it to production at the time. After seeing a film like the Player, I was surprised how that script ever made it to the big screen. Kudos for letting this film be made, really.

I won't repeat the outlines of the plot - you can read the plot summary for that. The story could sound as a cliché along the lines of "all i wanted was to do good as a cop but they turned me into a drug dealer." But it is not cliché at all. The script is so well paced that the stakes are periodically raised higher and higher, and the key moments of the film are timed such that they exert their full dramatic effect. The stakes are raised as high as they can be in the context of the story and the twists do not insult this viewer's intelligence. There were probably plot holes, but I missed them - I was busy enjoying the movie.

--- end spoilers --- This film is too dark for children and even early teens, but for the rest of the world it is a thought-inducing and worthy film, as a drama, a social/political critique and as a thriller/action/cop flick.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A lot better than I was expecting, very good.
Brad K.30 October 1998
Going into seeing this movie, I wasn't sure about what I was going to see. I was expecting something kind of good (because of Roger Ebert's review), but not great (because of some other reviews). But I was not expecting such a good film. Laurence Fishburne (Boyz in the Hood, What's Love Got To Do With It) stars as a cop who has avoided drugs and the crime life because of his father's involvement and death in it. Soon he is offered a job going undercover as a drug dealer. He accepts it. After a little while he gets himself deep into it. He forms partnerships with high ranked drug dealers, which includes Jeff Goldblum (Jurassic Park, Nine Monthes). Soon he becomes less of an undercover cop, but more of a drug dealer. He soon realizes that he is betraying his cause and joining up with them. This presents a problem for him, because he likes the power as a drug dealer and the money, but he also vowed he would never become like his dad. This is a very well done movie, with a great script. Laurence Fishburne is excellent in the lead role. Jeff Goldblum (who I have never seen in such a deep role) is also strong delivering a surprisingly good performance. A good, but violent film.
33 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun '90s thriller with plenty of style
Leofwine_draca30 September 2015
DEEP COVER is a pretty predictable film about a cop going undercover to take down some drug lords, but in execution it turns out to be a fun little film and more entertaining than it has any right to be from that premise. The underrated Laurence Fishburne is a fine choice for lead, playing a guy who must come to terms with what makes him a man while exploring the moral quandaries in which he finds himself.

This is a film packed with that inimitable early '90s style, with lots of hard-edged violence and even a little humour thrown into the mix. The narrative, although familiar, is very fast paced which makes for a nice viewing experience. Plus there's a big supporting role from a typically kooky Jeff Goldblum, who brings plenty of his trademark charm to the part. The only thing I wasn't keen on was the ending, which sees Goldblum acting out of character for plot necessity; otherwise, this is solid entertainment.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One of the greatest over the top performances ever
jhillenb15 April 2007
This highly stylized pulp thriller from the early 90's remains quite an entertaining movie so long as one doesn't look too deeply into it. What sets it apart from similar movies of its ilk is the performance from Jeff Goldblum as a greedy, crazed Yuppie drug dealer. He steals scenes left and right from other cast members with a manic, over the top energy that is easily the highlight of the film. Unfortunately, he gets handed some of the worst lines in the movie, uproariously funny with his dead pan delivery however. Laurence Fishburne deserves honorable mention here as well for his scene where he begins to spontaneously rap pseudo-Beat street poetry to another character in the film.

Entertaining, but as previously mentioned, don't look too deeply into it.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Standard double cross stuff
helpless_dancer9 April 2002
Good film, but the same old government cover-up of important V.I.P. drug dealers; double cross of the field cop by his friends; danger from street punks; gunplay and overdoses; good guy cop doesn't know who to trust or where to turn so starts playing both ends to the middle. Nothing new, but go ahead and watch....it was still fun.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bill Duke's masterpiece
lee39938 January 2007
In what is probably his best role to date, with apologies to his turns as Ike Turner in the classic "What's Love Got to Do With It", and Morpheus in the "Matrix" series, Laurence Fishburne plays undercover cop Russell Stevens, who poses as drug dealer John Hull to apprehend a notorious drug kingpin. This role is played in a way that only he could, with the zeal that makes him one of Hollywood's most sought after actors. From the moment that he tells the D.E.A. agent that "the n****** the one that would even answer that question" you know that this role was made for him. Also Jeff Goldblum is at his best as a not-so-honest defense attorney. And let's not forget Gregory Sierra as a sadistic crime lord and one of the best character actors of our time, Clarence Williams III as an honest cop. Add the soundtrack and "Deep Cover" is a bona fide 10 in the urban drama genre, a true masterpiece.
38 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cuz it's 1-8-7 on an undercover cop
view_and_review23 August 2018
Deep Cover will still be more popular for the hit song "Deep Cover" which featured the young and new Snoop Dogg.

The movie wasn't too bad either. Russell Stevens Jr. (Laurence Fishburne) was an ambitious police officer that wanted to help clean up the streets from its drug problem. He was assigned to Los Angeles where he was supposed to make one connection after another and work his way up the food chain. Due to the nature of the job he was given he had to do a lot more than he should've as a sworn officer of the law. At some point it becomes unclear if he still had sight of the goal: get drugs off the street by taking down the head honchos.

The movie was good for the most part and I really liked Jeff Goldblum who played lawyer/dealer David Jason. His quirkiness that can be seen in all of his movies is so unique to him and so offbeat that you have to laugh. I think there was one critical flaw towards the end of the movie with the final drug deal. Another officer put himself in a preposterous position that made no sense. It looked more like something to help move the plot along than a reasonable and sensible action that should be part of the story. There were a lot of names to keep track of as is the case with many drug movies with multiple levels of dealers, rivals, and detectives. Still, the story was tight and well played out. Deep Cover won't make my list of top drug movies but it is entertaining to watch.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best films I have ever seen
Veleka5 February 2005
Like "The Crossing Guard," this film, "Deep Cover," kept me on the edge of my seat. The scenes between Larry Fishburne and Charles Martin Smith are superb, the writing is virtually flawless, the action is exciting and fresh, and the topic is so relevant it's hard to believe it came out fifteen years ago. It could be released today, it's that topical. I love political action thrillers such as the original "The Manchurian Candidate," but that film, as exciting as it was, left me cold. This film has so much heart and love in it on top of all the thrills that I found myself astonished by the virtuosity of the artists that composed this gem. I'm already a huge fan of the actors. I will now be searching IMDb for the subsequent work of the writers, directors, and producers of this masterpiece. Bravo, "Deep Cover"! I'm telling all my friends about you.
47 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This isn't the best drug trafficking movie in the world, or as good as New Jack City, but it is entertaining and worth a viewing
kevin_robbins7 February 2022
Deep Cover (1992) is a movie I recently watched for the first time in a long time on HBOMAX. The storyline follows a Los Angeles Detective who is assigned an under cover mission to bring down a drug cartel. He quickly discovers he may be a better drug dealer than police officer, he's definitely more accepted as one. As leadership changes within his division the police officer becomes torn on his next steps on if he should stay undercover or quit.

This movie is directed by Bill Duke (Hoodlum) and stars Laurence Fishburne (The Matrix), Jeff Goldblum (Jurassic Park), Lira Angel (Tales from the Hood), Victoria Dillard (Ali), Jaime Cardriche (A Different World) and Anna Berger (The Taking of Pelham One Two Three).

The narration and back story is very well delivered. The sound track is excellent as is the acting. Goldblum was fun and Fishburne was perfect for this role. Fishburne was excellent in this movie and his character and the storyline evolves well and is very entertaining.

Overall this isn't the best drug trafficking movie in the world, or as good as New Jack City, but it is entertaining and worth a viewing. I would score this a 6.5-7/10 and strongly recommend seeing it once.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Intelligent filmmaking that is hard to find in today's films
idolone19 March 2004
Deep Cover stands out as a great example of how to make a good film and has something that is often missing from modern cinema. The cinematography, editing, and music are all outstanding. What's even better is how all those elements tie-in to a well thought out and communicated theme of duality. The two main characters Russel/John (Fishburne) and David (Goldblum) parallel each other nicely, and reinforce the theme perfectly.

On the one hand, there's Russel, the cop determined to make a difference in his community who is then taken advantage of by his superiors and used like a tool. Russel begins demonstrating more and more criminal traits as the film goes on, eventually "becoming" his undercover alter ego John. As a criminal, John is able to do exactly what he set out to do, all while commanding respect and receiving tons of money without any of the red tape he had as a cop. In the end, he has to make a choice, cop or criminal. Work with society and be dishonest to yourself, or work outside of society and be dishonest to "the system".

On the other hand, there's David, a lawyer with a nice wife, house, and kid, but also happens to be a major drug dealer. He too must make the same difficult choice, even stating in the film, "I want my cake and eat it too", which truthfully shows that it is a hard decision.

While Deep Cover is labeled by most as a "hood movie", it is quite different in it's themes from most films in that genre. Instead of simply presenting the inner cities' problems, the filmmakers here try to answer the question of why. Why do young people feel the need to become criminals? Perhaps it's because of the bureaucratic nature of a society that turns it's back on those with strong uncompromising individuality coupled with low income. Maybe not. But unlike most films that answer all the questions they present for their audiences, Deep Cover simply asks the questions, and leaves the answers up to its audience.

The filmmaking here is intelligent, the subject matter is interesting, and the audience is treated with an amount of respect that isn't easy to find in modern film. No, the film isn't perfect, but at least in my eyes, it's very close to being so.
31 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Smells like Hollywood.
=G=26 January 2003
"Deep Cover" is all about a cop (Fishburn) who goes undercover as a narc and pretty much manages to help a little kid and rescue a babe while single handedly solving all of the West Coast drug trafficking problems. If this sounds like so much B.S., well, it is and "Deep Cover" is pretty much your garden variety Hollywood three star B.S. flick. On the short side the characters are all stereotypes from bygone days; the film's too melodramatic and silly in places; and the production was journeyman level stuff. Nonetheless, the "Deep Cover" did have an interesting noir moodiness with some philosophical narration by Fishburn and should make an enjoyable couch potato watch for those who are into gritty crime dramas. (B-)
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Really odd this one
davidsaid24 March 2021
I thought it was quite badly miscast. Goldblum? Totally wrong surely? I didnt buy his performance one bit. Plus Sydney Lassick, ha, I love the guy, Cheswickkkkk, however he just sticks out like a sore thumb. The film's ok, actually its not really. Far too cartoon for its own good in my opinion.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good thriller with a jaded, subversive edge
bob the moo14 April 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Having witnessed his junkie father killed Russell Stevens grows up to become a policeman and make a difference. When he is offered an undercover job by Gerald Carver he accepts and begins to build a relationship with David Jason in order to get to the main dealers. However as he is forced to deal drugs and kill to keep his cover he finds the lines between cop and criminal being lost - is he a cop pretending to be a dealer or a dealer pretending to be a cop?

Larry (as he was then) Fishburne's first lead role was a typically dark vehicle. The story is the usual one of cop losing himself when undercover, however it manages to be more than that for most of the time. Co-written by Tolkin, who wrote The Player, this naturally has a nice cynical edge to it when it looks at the US's hypocritical approach to drug control and the political links between the street hustlers and the political high rollers who court respectability. The story does eventually settle into a traditional setting but even then it works well as a thriller.

The multi-talented Bill Duke directs well with a gritty feel and a few nice touches. However several things are a bit iffy. For most of the film Fishburne's narration/voice over is a bit like a cross between Apocalypse Now and Blade Runner - it comes across as a little too dark and heavy and also explains things like we can't figure it out ourselves. However once you get into the film it's not as big a deal. My main problem lies with the characters.

Fishburne is excellent, a real model of underlying anger and violence, Goldblum is good but perhaps a little OTT on the yuppie/violence thing, but there's good support from Smith and Spin City's beautiful (and often underused - but not here) Victoria Dillard. However the two main white characters (Goldblum and Smith) are both smeared with racist insinuations - Smith appears to insult his black officers and doesn't care about the junkies, while Goldblum is fascinated about all things black and talks about them as wild beautiful beasts and loves having sex with "black'. These things aren't a major problem, but with basically only two white characters in it, it's a little worrying that both are given that edge.

However these are minor complaints that get lost with a good thriller. Fishburne excels and Duke delivers a story that is a good thriller but also has a jaded, subversive edge.
29 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strong Performances by Fishburne, Goldblum
jhclues15 September 2000
Warning: Spoilers
**Possible Spoilers** Strong performances by Laurence Fishburne and Jeff Goldblum dominate this story of a cop who goes undercover as a drug dealer, in order to `Do some good,' in `Deep Cover,' directed by Bill Duke. When he is ten years old, Russell Stevens Jr. witnesses the killing of his drug addicted father, who is shot as he attempts to rob a liquor store, while his son waits in the car. Twenty years later, Russell (Fishburne) is a cop, making good on the promise he made to himself the day he watched his father die; he wasn't going to end up like that. And he was going to make a difference. When Gerald Carver (Charles Martin Smith), an agent with the DEA, approaches him with the offer of an assignment to go under cover as a drug dealer, to help them dismantle the South American pipeline supplying most of the West Coast, and ultimately bring those individuals responsible to justice, Russell accepts; but only after coming to terms with his initial misgivings about taking on such a role. He'll be in so deep, he'll actually have to become another person; he'll be living the life full time, and it may take a year or more to accomplish what they set out to do. He takes the name John Hull, and goes in. This is a decent action film with a pretty good story, but there isn't much here that hasn't been done before; what sets this one apart from many others like it, however, are the two stars. Fishburne, especially (still billed here as `Larry'), takes a fairly routine character and gives him substance. He has such a commanding screen presence that it makes everything that goes down seem credible; he seemingly has the innate ability to know his character from the inside out, and what a difference that can make, especially to a movie like this. Goldblum, as well, takes his character of attorney David Jason to the limit. He lends a smarmy edginess to him, as he gradually takes his initial cool resolve to the brink of reason, then on past to the point of no return. Smith is not nearly as effective as the Princeton educated agent with clean hands, who drives Russell to depths from which he may never return, but Fishburne is such a good actor that it lifts Smith's performance to a higher level, too. Clarence Williams III, as Taft, the cop with the penchant for scripture, is believable enough, but there is something disquieting about watching him; he never blinks, which can be distracting at times. The supporting cast includes Victoria Dillard (Betty), Sydney Lassick (Gopher), Gregory Sierra (Felix), Roger Guenveur Smith (Eddie), Rene Assa (Guzman), and Arthur Mendoza (Gallegos). Duke gives a brisk pace to the film, and maintains it throughout, but keeps it all rather routine and unimaginative. `Deep Cover' then, is a reasonably satisfying movie, due mainly to the aforementioned performances, which really make it seem more substantial than it is. I rate this one 6/10.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Saw it as a 'Secret Movie for £1' in a cinema. Highly enjoyable in a daft way, but with great music, and an Amazing Goldblum performance. He was hilarious.
GenoWashingline29 March 2019
I saw it at one of those screenings in London where no one knows what the movie is going to be until it starts up. When the words "Deep Cover" came up on the screen the packed cinema let out a notable "wha ?"...seemed, like me, no one else had ever heard of this.

Usually at such showings you expect to see a movie that is something of a classic one way or another, so you could sense the genuine disappointment in the crowd.

As a few folk began to get their coats and make to leave, the start up credits rolled, and the words "Larry Fishburne" appeared and the audience let out another "Wha... ?", And then Jeff Goldblum... And the audience settled down again.... Here was a movie with 2 great actors, this might be good.

Well it started off ok, with Larry getting his story setup, and had some interesting scenes. The early "interview" with the question about the N word certainly caused some odd reactions in my audience, with a kind of embarrassed laugh from.some corners... What the heck were we watching. Was this a comedy ?... Well as it proceeded it seems maybe not as it just started to follow similar undercover cop stories. For a while.

And then Jeff Goldblum appeared. Wow what an incredible performance, so funny. So so funny.

I don't think I have ever seen anything like what he does in this movie which was probably meant to be a kind of 'Scarface' for the 90s, but he just saunters away doing this own thing for much of it. It's completely out of step with the rest of the movie...

But it really does work

I think my audience laughed almost as much as watching say Blazing Saddles (well, nah... Buy close).

Deffo worth a watch. If you get a chance to see it in a busy cinema screen, do it.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Deeply engaging
Mr-Fusion29 April 2019
A thrilling hard-boiled take on the urban drug trade, and an idealistic officer's plunge into the murky depths thereof. Fishburne is fantastic here, and he really shows the weathering effects of the case on his character. Loved his weary narration, and he plays well off of Jeff Goldblum, who goes somewhat against type here.

Can't go wrong with this movie; it's raw, bitter and doesn't fail to upset. I walked into this expecting something like "Ricochet" or "New Jack City", but the noir flavor gives this movie a serious edge.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A perfect movie for this Genre of film
rjfilms11 September 2005
This was really a perfect movie for this genre of film. The understated quality acting of Lawrence Fishburne is superb. I really enjoyed seeing the main character's downward spiral. There is excellent character development through the plot which is not the usual cliché. The acting all around is very high caliber, and the tone and pace of the film (directing) is spot on. Highly recommended, highly watchable, one of my top ten favorite films. Films are always better when there is dramatic conflict, and seeing the main character torn apart slowly provides compelling cinema. More films should be made like this! (with less explosions / body counts etc...) As a frame of reference - I am a huge fan of the early James Bond (connery) films, and can't stand the new ones...
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Style but bad pacing.
Zucco16 October 1998
I must admit that I wasn't with the critics on this one. This movie was so boring that I fell asleep twice and still didn't care how it turned out. I liked seeing Jeff Golblum in the heavy role, but the movie did nothing for me. It was very dark and moody but the characters were ultimately very boring. Don't waste your time.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Two Masks.
hitchcockthelegend15 August 2015
Deep Cover is directed by Bill Duke and written by Michael Tolkin and Henry Bean. It stars Larry Fishburne, Jeff Goldblum, Charles Martin Smith, Victoria Dillard and Gregory Sierra. Music is by Michel Colombier and cinematography by Bojan Bazelli.

Traumatised as a youngster by the death of his junkie father, Russell Stevens (Fishburne) becomes a police officer. Passing an interview with DEA Agent Gerald Carver (Smith), Stevens goes undercover to bust a major drug gang that has links to high places. But the closer he gets in with the targets, the deeper he gets involved - emotionally and psychologically.

A splendid slice of gritty neo-noir, Deep Cover follows a classic film noir theme of a man descending into a world he really shouldn't be part of. This is a shifty and grungy Los Angeles, awash with blood money, single parents prepared to sell their kids, where kids in their early teens mule for the dealers and get killed in the process. A place of dimly lighted bars and pool halls, of dank streets and scrap yards, and of course of violence and misery.

The look and tone of the picture is as intense as the characterisations on show. Duke (A Rage in Harlem) knows some tricks to imbue psychological distortion, canted angles, step-print framing, slow angled lensing, jump cuts and sweaty close ups. Bazelli photographs with a deliberate urban feel, making red prominent and black a lurking menace. While the musical accompaniments flit in between hip-hop thunder and jazzy blues lightning.

Fishburne provides a narration that works exceptionally well, harking back to classic noirs of yesteryear. As this grim tale unfolds, his distressingly down-beat tone goes hand in hand with the narrative's sharp edges. The screenplay is always smart and cutting, mixing political hog-wash and social commentary with the harsh realities of lives dominated by drugs - the users - the sellers - the cartel, and the cop going deeper underground...

Great performances from the leading players seal the deal here (Goldblum is not miscast he's the perfect opposite foil for Fishburne's broody fire), and while some clichés are within the play, the production as mounted, with the narrative devices of identification destruction (hello 2 masks) and that violence begets violence, marks this out as one the neo-noir crowd should note down as a must see. 8/10
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A honest review...
bdunnit25 August 2021
This movie could have been a classic. However, it steps out of it's own realm of reality with stupid plot "twists" that don't make any sense. It starts out taking the story seriously, then becomes a bad graphic novel. Too many unrealistic situations that lead to a completely un-plausible, and stupid ending. Fishburnes acting is really good, but other cast members are directed poorly and the acting is off. This is evident with Jeff Goldblums character. Goldblum is awesome, but he was a victim of bad direction here, as were some other characters, like Charles Martin Smith. Very unfortunate. A tad better script and better direction would have done it. 6 out of 10 at best.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Deep Cover & the Emerging Black Aesthetic
Satchmos_Chillun19 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Where to begin in commenting about this film? Deep Cover - the low-budget motion picture that captivated moviegoers on its release in 1992 and thereafter with its multifarious blur of conventions - has become irreplaceable in this cineaste's film-loving career.

It seemed indistinct enough at the time of its release. Like so many other films about cops and bad guys, Deep Cover promised little else from what we were used to. Since movie culture primed filmgoers for stories about police who kill to attempt justice, we expected little else from it. Actor Laurence Fishburne, perhaps best known for his roles in School Daze (1988) and Boyz N the Hood (1991), didn't seem out of place here (in his first lead role), while actor Jeff Goldblum definitely did.

I missed the film in theaters.

The film's storyline owes its uniqueness to the subversions it pulls off. Deep Cover builds into the mythical from what seems like a simple cop story, while laying the psychology of its protagonist Russell Stevens, Jr. (Fishburne) bare with its madcap plotting. A proper reading of it is facilitated by the words of a passing character early in the film: "That's the problem these days. People have no imagination." Imagination is exactly what is needed to absorb the narrative of a cop pretending to be a drug dealer, who eventually realizes he's a drug dealer pretending to be a cop. Russell, renamed John by DEA agent Gerald Carver (Charles Martin Smith) to engage his undercover operation, braves misadventure and danger to work his way into the mid-level drug operation of David Jason (Jeff Goldblum). The idea explained by Carver is to work through and ascend a pyramid topped by a high-level cocaine supplier and take him down via the operation. But John must brave Hell to reach his goal, which is introduced to him by the superior agent Carver who says he's "God." A truly fascinating scene in the film comes due to masculine grudgery between Jason and drug dealer Felix Barbosa (Gregory Sierra). It is the birthday party of Barbosa's aide Gopher (Sydney Lassick) and Felix is more than ready to question David's criminal toughness. Before the eyes of the assemblage gathered around a table, Felix taunts David until he loses his cool. Felix then requests that David play a "game" of hand-slapping with him. John's vocal objection falls upon deaf ears. David goes along with the brutal sport until he is injured and humiliated. As John and David leave the small gathering, John notes by voice-over that one of the men will eventually kill the other.

John is brought aboard Jason's operation. While John argues that Jason needs a partner, Jason says he wants him as a courier. Jason explains his goal to John of introducing a practical synthetic cocaine to the market - a fitting ambition for a white husband who habitually lusts after younger black women and learns to murder for vindication. (The issue of interracial sex is given no short shrift in Duke's theatrical sci-fi film, by the way.) John finds a trustworthy friend in African art dealer Betty (Victoria Dillard), but only travels further along the path of righteous outrage. David's path to Nirvana is paved with black and Latino bodies. It should seem that John's moment of realization of killing a man with impunity might serve as a wake-up call. It doesn't. Only when John's neatly constructed role collapses before him, at Carver's behest, comes his awakening. Out-powered and frustrated, John realizes that he's acted as a puppet to the Feds. Fishburne rocks the screen with this mercurial persona of his creation. John takes his very first drink and leaves the sputtering Carver behind. Russell/John's rebirth is soon to come.

The best term to describe John's resolution of the conflict between social hierarchical manipulation and spiritual salvation is vigilante justice. John must rewrite the rules of the game and reclaim Russell before it is too late. And he must do it while dealing with high-level drug suppliers and the Feds.

Probably the most compelling aspect of Duke's film on its 1992 release and to date is its avant-garde form and content. David Jason's worldview could best be described as forcedly Edenic, whereas John Hull's plot at the film's end shows thought of Utopian character. The confusion that the John/Russell character suffers toward the film's climax is reminiscent of Ralph Ellison's 1952 novel Invisible Man. In each work, a black male protagonist struggles against a disturbingly fluid identity put upon him by society. This perhaps intentional "homage" to Ellison's classic waxes especially rhapsodic when John delivers free verse poetry on the spot and quotes crime writer Iceberg Slim when his luck runs out.

Jeff Goldblum's David Jason is a product of genius, a brilliantly crafted greed warrior similar to, and better than, the one limned by Al Pacino's Satan in The Devil's Advocate. This is white liberalism gone psychotic. And as for Bill Duke's direction, it was never better realized as it is during Deep Cover's macho dog-fights, stark realizations, and camera tricks (the shot wherein a man walks across a frame and wipes it away to the next one has since become standard in black film), and it may never be again. Deep Cover ushered in the fragments of an emerging black film aesthetic. Maybe some day it will receive the critical overview it deserves.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
fine crime drama but dislike the narration
SnoopyStyle28 April 2015
It's 1972 Cleveland. As a child, Russell Stevens Jr. witnesses his drug addicted father get killed. He vows never to touch drugs. 20 years later, he (Laurence Fishburne) is a beat cop in Cincinnati. He is recruited into going undercover for the DEA by Special Agent Gerald Carver. In L.A., he is going after importer Anton Gallegos and his uncle south American politician Hector Gúzman. He connects with street dealer Eddie Dudley who gets him arrested. Drug lawyer David Jason (Jeff Goldblum) takes his case and introduces him to Gallegos.

Laurence Fishburne and Jeff Goldblum are good. However I don't like Fishburne's narration which drains the movie of its tension and thrills. I don't think the story or the characters are anything original. Maybe the narration kept me from enjoying this more and finding that specialness.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing, unrealistic, forgettable .................
merklekranz10 October 2019
See a Jef Goldblum total transformation from meek family man to a total nasty. See Laurence Fishburne drive a limo like a Lamborgini and outrun a flotilla of police cars. Hear Fishburne describe what you are seeing on screen, because of the weak script. Now make the photography as grimy as possible, and throw realism out the window. Let's not forget Charles Martin Smith, who sits in one room for most of the film, with occasional visits from Fishburne. If all this sounds pretty boring, you would be correct. Eventually as the nonsense is piled on, I couldn't take any more, and hit the fast forward button. Everything in a movie should attempt to make at least a little bit of sense. Unfortunately "Deep Cover" misses the sense meter by a wide margin. - MERK
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed