The Glass Virgin (TV Mini Series 1995– ) Poster

(1995– )

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
a tender and affectionate story of true love based on true friendship
thor61028 December 1999
Having never read the book, I don't know if this is a faithful adaptation of Catherine Cookson's novel, but as a film itself it does quite well. The storyline was interesting - watching two main characters develop and change over time through different circumstances. And the continuity held up, something that I have a problem with in many British films. The backdrop of 19th century England was beautiful as usual.

The casting was well done and the acting is superbly accomplished. Emily Mortimer plays Annabella beginning at age 17 and manages to pick up the innocence and charm of Samantha Glenn who plays Annabella as a child. Emily successfully develops the character from a slightly spoiled privileged girl into a woman capable of facing a cruel world, overcoming obstacles and learning lessons about life along the way. Brendan Coyle is excellent and plays Manuel Mendoza, the hired groom, as naturally as if he were born into the part.

Foreshadowing in the movie plays quite well. When Annabella is ten years old, she tells Mendoza that she considers him a friend and hopes that she might be his friend. His reply turns out to be prophetic and is echoed in slightly different forms as their relationship develops through the film.

Also in one scene we see Annabella as a little girl and Mendoza playfully tossing leaves into a brook. We watch as the leaves land in the water and together float away downstream. This foreshadowing of their life is repeated slightly in a scene where Annabella is bathing in a stream and we watch her soap bubbles float downstream to Mendoza.

One problem with the film, and I have found this to be typical of many British productions, is sound quality. The background music is very uneven and goes up and down often, causing unnecessary distraction.

Although as a whole the film is quite good, a weak part of the film that should have been better portrayed was the increasing love between the two main characters. As portrayed, it is difficult to tell just exactly where they each begin to realize their love for each other, and the mixed emotions that are occurring in each, causing so much difficulty for Annabella.

I would also have liked to know a little more about the background of Mendoza. Basically we know all about Annabella, because we have seen her grow up, but Mendoza's background remains somewhat of an enigma with just a few sentences here and there to suggest his background.

Sarah Hellings, the director, accomplished a delightful film, a tender and affectionate story of true love based on true friendship. Set in the background of 1800s England with beautiful scenery of the outdoors, we see the joy and tragedy of both sides of life - the privileged class and the working class. It tells us life is not always pretty or easy, but we can still make it good wherever we are.
55 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brendan Coyle eye candy
angiebirch-966-4386716 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Decent love story haunted by narcissistic & abusive family, brightened by half-naked Brendan Coyle.

Story tells of a girl, Annabella, in the 1870s who's family members could've come straight from forums on narcissistic & abusive parents'. Each family member has a fault that makes you want to protect the little girl they have failed. Upon her 17th birthday, a family secret comes to light, and Annabella's only source of true security comes from her family's former stable hand, Manuel.

When Annabella and Manuel find themselves forced to flee, Annabella's coming of age begins, and she finds the true definitions of love, family, and happiness.

The story plods along at certain points a little slow. The sound and video quality/sharpness could be better. There are some points that are very predictable, but entertaining, nonetheless. There is a very specific part towards the end of the miniseries that parallels Brendan Coyle's character in Downton Abbey, down to the clothes he wears. It made me laugh, thinking he'd prepared for John Bates for years. Overall, the story was good, and left a nice feeling in my heart. I look forward to re-watching it & fast forwarding through the more dull points.

Bottom line: watch for the love story or if you're searching for something to make your toxic family seem normal. OK, let's face it: most will watch to see grainy views of Brendan Coyle shirtless...and then some.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not the best one, but well worth watching
davyd-0223723 February 2021
For me, Nigel Havers (acting toff!) is unsuitable to play a very mean landowner. Whilst the landowners had a very privileged lifestyle this one is quite vile but not of the family are really that decent, given how the story develops between the two leads who go through all sorts of highs and lows, including a season in prison and rejection by family, for their love for each other to stand against all others. Watch it, enjoy it. Where Mendoza comes from isn't really explained in full within the film but there is much here to enjoy
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Painfully melodramatic schmaltz
aobrien-830 January 2012
The only reason to watch this is to see a pre-North and South, pre-Downton Abbey Brendan Coyle. The usually lovely Nigel Havers is painful as a stereotypical villain, and though Coyle too is slumming it, we at least see his charm. Catherine Cookson's characters are two-dimensional, her plots plodding and unlikely, her portrayal of period social mores and class conflict ridiculously exaggerated. The film's so-called foreshadowing is heavy-handed and so is the acting. Not even otherwise talented, well-trained British actors can really rise above the crummy script. There are better historical fiction writers out there worth dramatising, I'm sure, but somehow Cookson's style melodrama and tin ear (for both dialogue and period setting) finds an audience. The discerning Masterpiece/BBC/ITV period drama fan will stay away. I give a 2 only for Coyle and glimpses of Havers.
15 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dull, slow, and insipid
juliroo21 March 2012
Baby-faced Brendan Coyle does about as well as can be expected with the terrible writing. And that's the high point of the film. Seriously. Even the wigs are bad, much less the writing, directing, and acting. It's almost impossible to care what happens to these characters, because they are boring and stupid. Emily Mortimer in particular is beyond irritating in the ingénue role. Only worth watching if you want to feel old and tired by the end, because this movie drags on so painfully, you'll think the run time is at least twice as long as it actually is. Although, I suppose you could make a drinking game out of it, by, say, taking a shot every time the weather changes to match the character's moods, or every time a character completely overreacts to something, or every time there's an awkward attempt at a beefcake shot featuring Mr. Coyle, or every time you find yourself wondering why Ms. Mortimer has such ridiculously over-sized hair, etc.
8 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't watch it. It's sad and bad.
kristinbauer118 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
It's so awful! Everyone is weak or despicable or both! It's just not realistic that every single person from the cook, the maid, her real mom, her dad, her grandmother are ALL so so so mean. The only person to like is Annabelle - and even the horseman who's nice to her - gets a terrible turn by this writer. It's just...awful! Shindlers list has more redeemable characters. They are all so cookie cutter "evil". I don't know why anyone would write this, or film it or watch it. I made it half way through episode two thinking it had to get better and then the Horseman throws one punch and the guy instantly dies so he's now a murderer. It's all so stupid. Is she a tacky soap opera writer? I finally turned it off and came in here to write a review. It's rare something is bad enough to be angry at the 90 minutes of your life you just lost. Unredeemable.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed