Sinbad: Beyond the Veil of Mists (2000) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Disconcerting Animation
dbullock16 June 2001
Watching this was rather disconcerting. Some parts of it (like the water) are animated beautifully. Combined with some photographic backgrounds and the results are impressive.

However all the characters look like they're animated with a Nintendo 64 or a home PC with a mediocre graphics card. It really breaks the suspension of disbelief. Think Tombraider quality, not Quake III.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An awful attempt at using Computer game graphics on a movie.
bishoz8 August 2003
This movie is not only boring, it is also really badly done. The graphics are so bad, they are not even second rate - they are dreadful. The characters do not show any facial expresssions, the voice acting is empty and without any soul, and the plot absolutely lacks .... well... anything and everything. My 5 year old likes it - but thinks it's a bit boring. I agree with him.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Most cheese 3D you can find... made by 3D MOVERS
gonzor66612 December 2003
This thing is really awfull. There´s no charachter with weight, they´re all floating around in the BG´s. The Motion Capture is a fine toy, but this movie demostrates that you really need people who knows animation to do an animated film. THE MACHINE CAN´T DO ANYTHING WELL BY ITSELF. If you see it as a bizarre film, you´ll have fun finding mistakes of continuity... IN A 3D MOVIE!!! It´s funny to watch the princess dress move around like a thing with diferent phisics. You need animators and 3D animators, not data-entries whom know 3D programs. Note the junctions, like the elbows, how they lost volume and get deformed. The person who made the charachter design (a very good one) sufered for sure when he/she watched them move, ´cos you can´t say they come to life.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very pleasant viewing.
thelema1 December 2000
Although it doesn't reach the level of a great movie everything in it is well done. The script is good and the voices and reading of great quality. The human figures are well animated but, for my taste, too close to reality. That destroys a little the spirit of fantasy and creates a feeling of ambiguity. Nice backgrounds and fantastic architecture. Of interest to any age because of it's overall visual pleasantness and narrative quality.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
GOOD MOVIE(KINDA)
BlackFlames12 July 2002
In my own opinion, this was a great movie. But to tell the truth i only watched it for Brendan's voice. The plot was great, the story was well read, but the animation sucked. The way the charectors moved, it seemed like they were made of paper. In my opinion, the movie shouldnt have been animated, it should have been acted out. that would have made the movie more interesting and more real.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Only those who risk going too far will ever know how far they can go.
acearms30 November 2003
Great effort to create an animated movie in three D. The plot in this case was secondary to the effects of making animated characters jump out at you on the screen. It was easy to follow with the fantasy of Sinbad and the princess reaching the depths of the ocean to find the answer and antidote for breaking the spell cast by the nefarious bad guy. The art of animation has been pushed further along due to this effort and a new bench mark set. Only those who risk going too far will ever know how far they can go. Worth watching young or old. My grandchildren loved it.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ambitious attempt at 3D CGI Storytelling
redbeard_nv24 November 2001
Implementing the latest technology for special effects in a film has had it's hits and misses, never more so in full length animated motion pictures. The realization of 3D Computer Generated Images (CGI) have been restricted to companies like Pixar (Monsters, Inc., Toy Story) or PDI-Pacific Data Images (Antz, Shrek). But the images have been primarily of funny animals with cartoonesque rendering of humans. Game manufacturer SquareSoft tried with their technologically superior, but vapid tale "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within".

Now, an India based company, Pentafour, tries with a superior bend in their storytelling and artistic design with "Sinbad". Although their movement software isn't as smooth or as well rendered as "Final Fantasy", the story is much more engaging, making it another good entry in the myriad tales of the most famous sailor since Popeye.

Brendan Fraiser seems to have found his niche in these characters (along with his work in the Mummy films) giving voice to the adventurous young salt on another mission of danger, discovery and romance. The conceptual designs, especially in the undersea kingdom are excellent. You just have to get past the somewhat stilted animation style and renderings of the human characters and it makes for a pretty good entry into someone's animation film collection.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed