7 Rm., kit., ba... (1984) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Within narrative walls
chaos-rampant27 June 2015
An off-screen narrator ushers us in a house for rent, the camera shows us around while a mini-history is enacted. This is Varda constructing an entry to where we can have storytelling about life. Already it means that we enter life as a narrator's hearsay, story. At this point it's in territory Greenaway was mastering at the time using inspiration from Resnais, fiction about our place within walls of it.

We're told about the previous occupants, a doctor and his blonde wife and how something terrible befell them. This is an opportunity to have various vignettes around the house, nothing more, all pointing to the inanity, the small despairs and neglects of middle-class life. A daughter suffocates. None of it much interesting or ever less than obvious. Varda would carry some of these threads over to Vagabond.

So this is one of the two things Varda likes to do, narrative wandering. How well she does this depends on if she's able or lucky to anchor it on an image that has some resonant truth on its other side. It's the same thing Herzog sought in islands about to explode, ecstatic truth. She can do this in so many ways and each project is so much about where she finds that. Daguerrotypes, Documenteur and Ulysse show three different ways to anchor.

Patient viewers may pick up on her attempt to create one here and this is as revealing as if she had actually done it.

There are two nonactors here, old women both of them. One she places naked among a surrealistic piece so she just becomes part of a decor. But the other she interviews for a few seconds. It's not clear what the woman raves about wide-eyed and whether scripted or part of something Varda coaxed out of her. The vignettes have playacting, clear-cut sense. This would be a way for us to truly see loss and bewilderment. It doesn't work but you can see the glimmer. Varda perhaps couldn't make it work or was just content to sketch and move on.

But she does the other thing ever so well, which is haunt by what the image leaves open. She's so masterful at this always.

We travel around the house, eavesdrop on scenes, enter rooms, wander down empty halls while a wind roars outside the windows and makes the trees ripple, a more primordial nature outside the narrative walls. Our eye wanders, sense diffuses.

It becomes atmosphere without a stronger resonance to hold it, but it's never just atmosphere for Varda, any more than for Herzog or yes even Hooper. It's a meditative, tantric thing - a way to have a body in a way that humdrum life with its distractions doesn't let us.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Varda not getting the vibe
Horst_In_Translation14 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"7p., cuis., s. de b., ... à saisir" is a French live action short film from 1984 (great year!), so this one has its 35th anniversary now in 2019 already and it is one of many short films made by the recently deceased and also recent Oscar nominee Agnès Varda. This time, it is one of her non-documentary efforts, even if the beginning sounds a bit like one, but that is not unusual for her either. Saw the same phenomenon on one of her other works not too long ago. Anyway, here we have one of her not very early, but of course also not very recent works. It is about all kinds of people living in a big house with many rooms that was a hospice before. This is also what I found most interesting here. I liked the scenes when we see the spirits of old people (women) in these walls telling us they liked it there and they did not want to leave (in the sense of die, but also leave the place). Sadly, even this component, which was almost the only one I appreciated about this slightly after half-an-hour was not too convincing anymore when Varda went over the top by depicting one of these old ladies naked and not saying anything. Sometimes less is more. As for the people depicted in here, I hardly ended up caring for any of them. There is a couple with the woman always being pregnant, so there is five children already, but she sure does not look that way. A little jealousy. A little contrast between a girl saying she wants to go to Mexico and does not like the place and again an old lady saying she wished she could have stayed, but yeah overall, it is not enough for a quality watch. For that, the characters just weren't written well enough. Finally, two little additional snippets of information. Yoou can find the first film performance by Yolande Moreau in here, very late that was her I believe around the age of 30. Kinda funny, she plays the lowest element of the food chain in this film (no pun intended), but actually, she is the only cast member who made it really big. And also at the end, you will hear the names of the cast being spoken, which felt really unusual, but not wrong. Overall, I think you should skip this movie. watch something else instead. Not one of Varda's best moments, even if that is subjective perception too because the more I have seen from her in recent months, the less I like her efforts really unfortunately. Hopefully some works by her I will see in the future can change my perception again.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed