A Map of the World (1999) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Outstanding Performance By Sigourney Weaver
sddavis6312 February 2001
Sigourney Weaver offers a marvellous performance in this film, playing mother and school nurse Alice Goodwin, whose world is torn apart after the death of a friend's child on her property, and the lodging of a sexual assault charge by the mother of one of the students she deals with on a regular basis.

This is most definitely NOT a light movie. It has adult themes, and some very troubling subject matter. As good as Weaver is, the supporting cast also offers some very powerful moments. David Strathairn portrays Howard Goodwin, Alice's husband, as he helplessly watches the community turn against the entire family, and as he struggles with the decisions that need to be made to free Alice. Julianna Moore (as Theresa Collins, the mother whose child died while being watched by Alice) is very believable as the grieving mother, struggling with her anger toward Alice over her daughter's death, and yet also convinced that the assault charges against her are ridiculous. The scenes between Strathairn and Collins, both playing vulnerable characters dealing with circumstances completely beyond their control, are raw with emotion. The only performance I found truly disappointing was that of Arliss Howard as attorney Paul Reverdy. I didn't find him believable in the role.

All in all, though, this is a strong movie, and well deserves an 8/10.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A film that should be applauded or at least admired for what it has to say
danielll_rs24 June 2000
"A Map of the World" is easily one of the most honest films I've ever seen. The merits go specially to a very fine cast and a clever, well written screenplay. Sigourney Weaver really shines here, in an Oscar caliber performance, as Alice Goodwin, a woman who is not afraid to show what she is feeling. She is married, has two young girls, lives in a farm and works at a school nursery. Her life seems calm, but happy, until a terrible accident happens, followed by a sad mistake, and her life falls apart.

"A Map of the World" had everything to be a bland and conventional film, but it is not. I have to say that I don't give any merit to the direction- this is indeed the main problem. The director doesn't captivate the audience, and doesn't seem to care about that. There are many slow moments and scenes that could have been cut. But "A Map of the World" is a rarity- a very good film with mediocre directing. Who is the miracle maker? Sigourney Weaver, surely. She shows passion for acting and an incredible strength as Alice Goodwin. I can't imagine anyone else playing Alice, because Sigourney is perfect building her character. The Oscar was gone, but I put Weaver on my list of snubbed stars this year. But she doesn't work alone- Julianne Moore is here, and when she is in you can expect much. I'm a fan of Ms. Moore since I've seen her in "Short Cuts", and now that I've seen "Magnolia" (if you've read some of my reviews you know how much I praise "Magnolia") I'm starting to adore this lady. She shines even in slapstick comedies as "Nine Months"... There's nothing she can't do!

Getting back to "A Map of the World", I have to say that I appreciated very much its screenplay. It was written with strength, trying to escape of the clichés even in courtroom scenes. There are many beautiful messages the film has to pass and it should be admired for this. It shows that everyone commits mistakes, more than one time, and that is why we are ordinary people, with qualities and flaws. We should learn with ourselves and with the others. We should believe in ourselves and try to cope with our mistakes. The film has messages like these to learn, and many others, resulting in a complex study of people in conflict.

I truly recommend "A Map of the World", despite its flaws. Watch it for Sigourney, Julianne and the messages and forget the weak directing. It is a worth seeing.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Challenging story for a debut director
marck-27 February 2000
Stage director Scott Elliott had his hands full with this story, and while it has its moments, overall his choices didn't really add up to a winner. Some people have sleighted this movie because of how "quickly" the trial is taken care of near the end, but in fact the book is the same way, and for good reason: the trial is not what the story is about. Unfortunately, as with so many book-to-film translations, the poetry of the prose and thus some of the deeper meanings are lost. Some of the changes between the film and the book work effectively to condense dozens of pages into one idea (the "wall of baby pictures" in the jail helps quickly convey Alice's changing relationship with her unit mates), but other changes only serve to hammer home a point that was made with much more subtlety in the book. (Did we really need angry graffiti on the side of the Goodwin's house? WE GET IT -- the town didn't like them!) Pat Metheny's original soundtrack was beautifully melodic, as he usually is, but it didn't fit in with the feel of the movie, and surprisingly, it didn't have much of the Midwest sensibilities one would expect from a composer from Missouri. Nonetheless, this movie will at least be worth a video rental, especially if you are a Sigourney Weaver fan and want to see her doing something other than an _Alien_ pic. While it took me awhile to warm to it, her portrayal of Alice in the end is stunning, and much more complex than anything else in this movie.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good story, weak directing
FlickJunkie-223 September 2000
When I finished this film, I was sure that it ran over two and a half hours. In reality, it was only 125 minutes. That reveals something about the pace. If you can imagine a worm burrowing through granite, you have the idea.

Actually, the story was a good one. The problem was the screenplay and the direction. This is a story of Alice Goodwin (Sigourney Weaver) a city girl who has moved to the country so her husband could try his hand at farming. However, this is no Green Acres. Alice is having difficulty coping with country life and her relationship with her two children. One day she is minding a friend's children and leaves them playing with her own children momentarily to put on her bathing suit. Upon returning, she discovers one of her friend's little girls missing and after a desperate search finds her face down in the pond. Subsequent to this tragic accident, Alice is accused of child abuse by another child who claims she molested him in her duties as school nurse. The two incidents together turn the whole town ugly as they assume she must be guilty. The story is an in-depth character study of Alice and her struggle to cope with both her guilt and innocence. The guilt is her feeling of responsibility for the little girl's drowning and the innocence is the knowledge that she is not a child abuser.

Usually I enjoy complex character studies with deep conflicting emotions, but this one left me exhausted. This is not because of the story, but because of the script and the presentation by Director Scott Elliot. Far too much time was spent on scenes that weren't really interesting or relevant. The dialogue often seemed inconsistent with the characters, especially in Howard's (David Straithairn) case. The lawyer was made to look like a buffoon. Having seen Arliss Howard in a number of other films, I know he is a capable dramatic actor so I have to assume this was the director's interpretation of the character.

Sigourney Weaver has received much critical acclaim for this performance, but I found it to be somewhat uneven. She was superb in parts, especially the parts where she was playing the strong woman trying to hold it all together. However, she seemed to struggle with the vulnerable parts, as if she wasn't comfortable with the character. I realize that part of the point was that Alice wasn't comfortable in her own skin and used a lot of defense mechanisms to cope, but Weaver seemed unnatural and forced in these scenes. She seems to have a lot tougher time playing weakness than strength. In that regard, Julianne Moore's performance was much better. Her breakdown scene in the woods was compelling and heartrending.

David Straithairn was well cast as the self-sacrificing and supportive husband, a role with which he is well familiar. However, he too seemed uncharacteristically tentative. When veteran actors have so much trouble giving confident performances, one has to wonder if there was a disconnect between the actors and the first time director.

Overall, despite some good performances and a solid story, the whole project just didn't come together and dragged ponderously from scene to scene. I rated it a 6/10. For patient viewers only.
21 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Really fine, thoughtful film, Sigourney Weaver's best performance to date.
TxMike17 January 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Here's how "A Map of the World" gets its title - Alice (Weaver) drew a child's colorful version of a map of the world, with a big rainbow, when she was young. The "map" makes a couple of appearances during the film, and is part of the last scene when Alice narrates using her map of the world and her family of four in an analogy.

I rate this film a solid "8" of 10. There are no special effects, character development is relatively deliberate, and the complete storyline unfolds gradually, much like "Lone Star" does. Weaver's and Strathairn's characters remind me of the two leads in "Limbo" - good people who are just barely holding things in their lives together. They are big-city folk who decide to buy a rural dairy farm and "work it" with their two small girls. A couple of tragedies enter, and their lives are forever changed. The film deals with relationships and the human resiliency that allows us to adapt.

CAUTION -- SPOILERS FOLLOW --

Things start to unravel when Alice, a grade-school nurse, allows a friend's (Theresa, Julianne Moore) little girl to wander off and drown in their farm pool. The girl actually dies a bit later in the hospital, only kept alive by machines. This happens about the time Alice is going half-crazy dealing with the brats at school, and especially the kid who seems to always be sick, and who once spit out medicine into her face, and she slapped him in angry reaction. Days after the girl dies, Alice is arrested, but for "sexual abuse" of the little brat at school. Two other children later join with complaints.

At first it seems that Alice looks at her imprisonment as a "vacation" from the daily grind of taking care of her kids and the farm. She asks Howard (husband David Strathairn) to bring her books, she reads a lot, stays to herself, hardly asks about the kids. It starts to look like she may really be guilty, and inside a very sick person. What's really going on, she feels that she has earned her "punishment" because of letting the girl die, but is not worried because she is innocent and will get out only in a matter of time.

Meanwhile, Howard is having a very difficult time on the farm, cannot raise the money to bail Alice out, all the friends and neighbors assume she is guilty and snub them. He eventually sells the farm, moves to a small apartment, gets Alice out of jail, they hire a good lawyer, they expose the hoax, clear Alice, Thresa become her ally again, and Howard ends up working at the state driver license office. The story ends with Alice, Howard, and their two girls sitting at a round table, and Alice's narration about the 'map of the world."

Weaver does a marvelous job, and her character is detestable at times. The DVD is clear but simple, no 5.1 soundtrack, very limited extras, but overall one of the better films that deals with life's difficulties and triumphs. A mature film for mature viewers.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fall from grace..
dbdumonteil19 January 2005
There are movies which are absorbing just because there are actors who are able to transcend an academic directing :Sigourney Weaver is part of them ,and she gets fine support from the whole cast (with the eventual exceptions of the two lawyers ,two cardboard characters,and some of the jail inmates).

"Crime and punishment" would be another apt title for "map" :that's the book the heroine claims (along with Laura Ingalls Wilder's "little house",a return to childhood's kingdom,"Walnut Grove" being another world like the one she drew on her map) when she's in jail.Sigourney Weaver portrays a woman with a strong guilty feeling because of two events in her life (one minor with a pupil,another one,quite tragic).When she's unfairly charged with abuse,she accepts the punishment.When she's in jail,she's beaming,and nobody really understands her.More,she still thinks it's not enough (the self-inflicted wounds are revealing).It takes all Weaver's talent to make this complex character credible .Moore's evolution makes sense as well.She too feels guilty and her behavior does not shock.

"Map" tells a story which concerns us all: Its core is responsibility. Recommended.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Yet more stereotypes of Wisconsin
smgelscheit16 August 2002
Set in Southern Wisconsin, the accents in this movie were so stereotypically Hollywood's idea of the way people in the mid west speak- the flattened vowels held just a little too long. I grew up in the Milwaukee area and these accents sounded false to my ears. I'm surprised cheese and beer didn't play larger parts in the plot (though there were cows).
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Get out your handkerchiefs.
rcraig624 June 2004
This movie could have been handled with a lot more depth. The first hour or so is well done, but then it becomes another B-movie tear-jerker, so much Hollywood fluff. A Map Of The World is the story of a married mother of two on a Wisconsin farm who suffers terribly when, while babysitting her best friend's two children, one of them wanders off and accidentally drowns in a pond on their property, after which she is charged with child abuse (in an unrelated incident) on her job as a school nurse and the confluence of events turn her quiet farm life upside down.

I thought Sig Weaver gave a generally good performance as the mom in trouble, considering the script she had to work with, which is mostly banal trash. David Straithairn is reliably good as usual as the put-upon husband. I guess Julianne Moore has the best moment in the film, after playing it brave-faced at the death of her daughter, she is found by Weaver in the woods having a private breakdown. It's a great piece of acting and very touching, but it's only great compared to the rest of the movie. Straight-up, it's not all that good.

The biggest problem here is the script. Some of the situations and dialogue are fraudulent, and characters aren't really developed. Chloe Sevigny plays basically a cardboard cut-out of a sleazy bimbo (she might as well have just had it stamped on her forehead for all the script gives her to do), and in one scene Julianne Moore's husband is overheard in an angry tantrum because Straithairn and his kids were in their house visiting, but then, I wondered, how did he feel about HER going over THERE. It isn't really explored. I also didn't get some of what Weaver's character was doing - the "let's let Oprah decide" speech, or one scene when Straithairn visits her in prison and she's making a lot of rambling small talk and doesn't ask about the kids - the insensitivity seems totally out of character. I didn't believe it for a second when the black women who were needling her in the cellblock "came around" at the end, the scene where Straithairn and Moore kiss I saw coming a mile away, and for the creme de la creme of tawdry Hollywood BS endings, when Moore's character turns up pregnant at the end of the movie, it is the ultimate in cheap, slapdash, feel-good garbage. Oh, well, drown one baby, make another. This is the sort of thing that screenwriters love because it provides a neat and happy resolution to everything, when, in fact, there is never a resolution to losing a child. If you remove Miss Weaver's occasional nudity, this thing could play forever on Lifetime channel. In spite of some strong efforts by the actors, A Map Of The World is junk, irredeemable junk. 2** out of 4
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Involving, Affecting Drama from Scott Elliott
jhclues11 July 2002
Strong performances by Sigourney Weaver and Julianne Moore highlight this involving and, at times emotionally draining film about the boundaries that are inherently a part of our lives, and the limits of those boundaries, both in how much we are able to give, as well as how much we can take. `A Map of the World,' directed by Scott Elliott, examines the confines of the parameters within which an individual must live, and the finite capacity of any one person to endure stress that exceeds the specific limitations established for that individual by nature. And it's not a matter of one knowing one's limitations; rather it is a matter of knowing how to cope with the results, once one has been driven past the breaking point into a world that can no longer be viewed in black and white, but only in shades of gray-- that point beyond right or wrong or what is politically correct; the point at which nothing matters but survival-- how to live in a world that can have so much to offer, while being so relentlessly unmerciful and decidedly unforgiving at the same time.

Transplanted from the big city to a farm in Wisconsin, Alice and Howard Goodwin (Sigourney Weaver, David Strathairn) are attempting to make a go of their own dairy business. But it isn't easy. Howard is immersed in his work, while Alice, in addition to taking on the full time responsibilities and pressures of raising their two daughters and maintaining the household, also works as a school nurse. And though Alice likes her life, the constant strain of keeping her own life on task, as well as seemingly everyone else within her sphere of existence, begins to take a toll on her.

With no respite from the daily grind, Alice becomes increasingly exhausted and exasperated. She finds some solace in her close friend, Theresa Collins (Julianne Moore), but what she really needs is some time to herself; some time to clear her head and regroup. Instead, an unexpected summer tragedy strikes the Goodwin and Collins households, which damages Alice's much needed relationship with Theresa. And as if that isn't enough, further trials and tribulations are about to descend upon Alice-- one of those curves life has a way of throwing at you when it's least expected, or needed. And it's something that will test the limits of Alice's capacity to endure, more than ever before.

Working from a remarkably insightful screenplay by Peter Hedges and Polly Platt (adapted from the novel by Jane Hamilton), director Elliott presents a genuinely honest film that takes an in-depth look at what it often takes just to `maintain' on a daily basis, and the very real issues and situations that a person like Alice is apt to encounter. From the very beginning, Elliott establishes the credibility of the film by creating an atmosphere and setting that is entirely real-- so real, in fact, it will be more than a bit disconcerting to many who will so readily be able to identify with Alice and relate to her situation. And, having effected such realism, Elliott then moves on to deliver a thoroughly engrossing, emotional drama, which he renders with great care and sensitivity.

Elliott achieves success with this film through an obviously keen understanding of the material, the story, and the characters and their corresponding attitudes and reactions to given situations. And he keeps it `real' throughout by eschewing any superfluous melodrama or sub-plots, the likes to which a film like this in lesser hands could easily lend itself. In the final analysis, Elliott knows what he wants to convey, and furthermore, knows how to do it by exacting the kind of performances from his actors that really sells it.

As often happens (too often, in fact), the extraordinary performances in this film were inexplicably overlooked (as well as the film itself) and/or ignored. Sigourney Weaver gives a commanding performance as Alice, arguably as affecting and effective as the work that earned Hillary Swank the Oscar this year for her portrayal of Brandon Teena in `Boys Don't Cry.' This is quite simply some of the best work Weaver has ever done, and it's a shame that she has not enjoyed the kind of acclaim that would accompany such an accomplishment in a perfect world. Which adds some irony to the whole thing, inasmuch as part of what this film is attempting to convey (and does so, successfully) is that we do not, in fact, live in a perfect world. All that aside, this is a memorable portrayal, in which Weaver exhibits a phenomenal depth and range of emotion.

The field was strong in the Supporting Actress category this year (Angelina Jolie received the gold for `Girl Interrupted'), but Julianne Moore's performance here stands alongside any of those honored with a nomination for their work. Like Weaver, Moore faced the challenge of creating a character that is so mainstream and `normal'-- one of those everybody's neighbor or the-clerk-at-the-store type of roles-- that the real difficulty lay in making it look so natural, which when successfully effected, makes it all look so `easy.' Which is exactly what Moore did with her portrayal of Theresa. And-- again, like Weaver-- it's a performance for which she has never received the deserved acknowledgement. Suffice to say, it's terrific work, and a big part of what makes this film so emotionally stirring.

Also effective is David Strathairn as Alice's self-absorbed husband, Howard, a man suffering from a terminal case of tunnel vision. How good he is here, in fact, can be measured by the feelings of disdain he manages to evoke toward his character, which at times, is quite substantial.

The supporting cast includes Arliss Howard (Reverdy), Louise Fletcher (Nellie), Sara Rue (Debbie) Nicole Parker (Sherry) and Aunjanue Ellis (Dyshett). An ardently thought provoking film, `A Map of the World' invites a sense of introspection and reflection; a film that's definitely going to make you do some thinking. 9/10.
32 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
(Bad) Dream Weaver
writers_reign3 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Had this been made in the old days it would have been firmly labelled a 'woman's picture' and possibly rated as a one, two, three or even four handkerchief weepie. Although someone old-fashioned in content it does benefit from excellent performances from the thee leads and whilst it's true that Sigourney Weaver gets the lion's share both emotion and emoting-wise both David Staithairn and Julianne Moore both support and match her. The story has married couple Stathairn and Weaver opting out of urban life for the joys of the country, which tend to sour a little when Weaver, working as a nurse in a local school, ruffles a few feathers and winds up in the slammer on a morals charge. This would be bad enough at any time but it comes right on top of Moore's daughter drowning whilst in the care of Weaver. You can take it from there yourselves so suffice it to say it's a fine example of the genre.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
My Review
wrightiswright24 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Something is very off about this movie. It was very difficult to feel sorry for Sigourney Weaver's character (despite her innocence) due to her bizarre behaviour, and other people in it equally acted out in strange ways which felt directly at odds with the situation they were in.

Despite not being a bad film by any stretch, I can't quite put my finger on why I didn't think much of A Map Of The World, but it was definitely overlong by a good half-hour and the children in it were very annoying... and alas, we saw a LOT of them.

There's prison scenes, drama at home and even a final courtroom sequence, but nothing really connects and it just all seems unconvincing and unmoving.

Finally, there's a part where our main family, nearly bankrupted by lawyer fees and trying to find the resources for bail, decide to sell their farm and relocate to the city. This means getting rid of their cat... and the glib way they treat losing a family member made me lost whatever sympathy I had for them in the first place.

Which, considering how weird they've been from almost from the first shot, wasn't a heck of a lot to begin with. 5/10
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
How did this one get away? A clever, beautiful and intelligent film.
Another_Face9 June 2008
This is a tough task. I want to explain why this film is very worthy of a viewing, without giving any spoilers away. It's not the most incredible film ever made, but it's so much better than many films made in 1999. It's beauty is organic, in that from a good story/novel comes a very finely honed and skilled script. A story that manages the odd laugh in some very dark situations. A script that gives us the kitchen sink drama of folk attempting the American dream, the tense drama that sometimes has you wondering whether you like that person you loved a minute ago, and some very normal, human days. Then you take the immensely talented Sigourney Weaver, David Strathairn, and Julianne Moore (along with other mentionables such as Richard McMillan and Aunjanue Ellis) to deliver the dialogue, and we already have something worth watching.

I could attempt to interpret it, and tell you what it's all about, what it all 'means' but, in essence it's a story about some people dealing with some extraordinary events in their ordinary lives. What we learn, or take away from it is down to the individual watching.

The direction, and photography is flawless, with some subtle colour themes running throughout the movie. Greys and pale blues, set with rust and bright orange as the story progresses; fields and concrete, hope and despair. The story is linear, but very rarely the camera cunningly takes us to different times and places. The soundtrack is just fine, and while it, and the film sometimes verge on being a little saccharine (which it manages to avoid in the main), what we see here are some very talented people making a good solid film.

A lot of the time what you think is about to happen next, often does. But be ready for a couple of surprises, and even if what happens next is what you suspected would occur, just watch some people acting their socks off!

I only found this film because the DVD was on sale for half a dollar, and bought it purely on the strength of Sigourney Weaver and Julianne Moore, who have never let me down. They are a couple of the best actors of their generation - I only have to point you to Snowcake, The Hours, or Magnolia for solid proof of that. Apart from their obvious acting abilities, I particularly applaud their lack of vanity, and dedication to getting things right.

If you think you're into good film, and want to see all of them before you die, then you really should watch this one.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great Weaver, confused story
jimcheva22 August 2021
One certainly can't fault Sigourney Weaver's acting here and she's in good company. But above all the pacing here is off, so that the film is too slow sometimes, then speeds up unexpectedly. The key dramas that drive it might have been spaced out a little differently and at least one motivated more clearly. The dynamic between husband and wife is hard to follow sometimes, as are the purpose of various scenes, notably what look like outtakes from "Orange is the New Black". Does the film have a moral, a point? Missed it if so.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Drab and soapy
MOscarbradley27 May 2006
At the heart of Scott Elliot's drab, soapy screen version of Jane Hamilton's novel is a terrific performance by Sigourney Weaver as a woman accused of child abuse. She is a school nurse who hates her job, is unhappy in her marriage and in whose care her best friend's daughter drowns. Jail is a kind of redemption. The film ought to shake you up, but Elliot imbues it with a kind of cold, clinical detachment. It's like a blueprint for emotion and, while Weaver is very powerful, the material never touches you. As the friend whose daughter dies, Julianne Moore touches a few nerves and David Strathairn is very fine as Weaver's dull, uncomprehending, caring husband. But they are all acting in a vacuum. You don't care what happens to anybody.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A bravura performance by Sigourney Weaver
GIARDINA-38 May 2000
It is a pity that "A Map of the World" was not better directed. It had it all, a wonderful story, brilliant actors but the movie somehow lacked guidance. In spite of this problem, Sigourney Weaver was nothing short of magnificent, her performance did deserve an Academy Award nomination. It is astonishing how well she plays roles that range from comedy to drama, always doing it beautifully. If "A Map of the World" were to be directed by somebody else, it would have been a masterpiece.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
great performances
SnoopyStyle16 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Alice Goodwin (Sigourney Weaver) is a school nurse and overwhelmed wife to Howard (David Strathairn) with two daughters on a Wisconsin dairy farm. Theresa Collins (Julianne Moore) leaves her daughters with Alice to babysit. Little Lizzy falls into the lake unattended and eventually dies. Everybody turns against Alice when the police arrests her for abusing student Robbie, the son of Carole Mackessy (Chloë Sevigny).

There are some terrific performances in this movie. Obviously Weaver is doing the majority of the heavy lifting. She's full of great little nuances. Moore does some powerful acting as a mother who lost her daughter. Strathairn does the most interesting pathetic husband. He does it without any malice. The movie does have a couple of awkward moments that are probably best left out or changed. They build up to a kiss between Howard and Theresa so much that it's annoying. The whole section detracts from the drama turning it into melodrama. The other section is Alice hitting herself. It's a little weird and work as a detour. The movie is better off to get on with the trial by that point. Overall, this is a good movie with three great performances.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Well presented true story...
MarieGabrielle26 September 2006
kudos to Sigourney Weaver for yet another outstanding and sympathetic performance. David Straithairn also is effective as the husband, caught in a web of chaos; Weaver as a school nurse is accused of child abuse in a small Wisconsin town; this after a child she is babysitting accidentally drowns. (The mother of the drowned child is portrayed by Julianne Moore).

Look for an excellent part with Arliss Howard as the defense attorney; it is a shocking surprise that 5 other children come forward accusing Weaver; it develops into a sort of witch hunt- and the actress playing the prosecutor is quite odious.

"A Map of the World" is not an easy story to take to; there are many complicated and also malicious sides of several characters; The character Weaver portrays is complex; guilty, and angry about a child accidentally dying, she accepts prison as an appropriate sentence, and even injures herself; She remains sympathetic however, throughout this film, and that is a rare talent that many actors could NEVER carry off. A must see. 9/10.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
One conflict too many
rexfordavenue22 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This film has a big problem with having too many huge conflicts in one film.

Conflict #1 - Character has a horrible family and life in general Alice here has two uncontrollable hellions who, when they aren't screaming about how much they hate her, they're almost getting themselves killed. Her husband is unaware of his surroundings to the point of apparent brain damage. Dude, there is a pot boiling over inches from your head, don't you smile at her all innocently like nothing's amiss, what is wrong with you?

Alice is the only responsible person in the house and drags everyone's weight, whether it be her children's abuse or her husband's uselessness, like a beast of burden. To top it off she has a terrible job as a school nurse that she hates as well.

All of this is pointing to a nervous breakdown on her part, perhaps a coming-around of her husband and children. This conflict alone would make a solid narrative with a satisfying, if frustrating, structure. Does this happen? No, because...

Conflict #2 - Child in Alice's care drowns herself

Wow. Um, that came out of nowhere. I see that the reason the kid dies was because A. nasty bitch daughter demanded that Alice leave them alone to find a different bathing suit and Alice like a doormat does as she's told, and B. useless dad was too busy screwing around with the car to see the tiny child wander past him.

That is a heap of unnecessary stress on an already stressful story. While this conflict alone would be good as it's own movie - exploring guilt and grief and a broken friendship between two moms - it's pretty spoiled by an already gasping-for-breath stressful setting.

Okay, maybe this can be salvaged.

Conflict #3 - Alice is wrongly accused of molesting one of the students

What. The. Fudge.

Wait, this has nothing to do with the previous two plot lines? Why is this here? ANY of these three conflicts would be enough to cause a nervous breakdown in a normal person and deserve to be explored individually. Lumping them on top of each other like a precarious ice cream cone does none of these serious issues justice.

Alice isn't strong - she's the butt of a sick cosmic joke. She's the universe's doormat and she doesn't have the guts to demand better.

Three stars for Julianne Moore.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sigourney Weaver at her Best
hroeder30 August 2001
This film could terrify some. It is certainly gripping, but it's carried by superb performances by Sigourney Weaver and Julianne Moore. The only film I can think of that is quite as moving is another Sigourney Weaver film, Death and the Maiden.

The tone of the two is very similar, but there is more hope in this outing. It still isn't something for the kids. But if you love acting, if you love to see real emotions rather than concocted attempts to feel, then watch it. And remember to keep your own Map of the World.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poor characters well acted.
lark-1019 December 2005
This movie has great promise but falls apart. The performances are excellent but what the actors had to work with is questionable. About a quarter of the way thru the movie the characters begin to behave in ways that are undeveloped, unexplained and unattached seemingly to the rest of the movie. It's almost as if they each start to act in a movie of their own. Weaver's character is particularly at fault. In addition there are events that are unexplained - one example of several is when the thing happens to Weaver with the black women it is never made clear how it happened. Maybe we don't need to be told and are expected to draw our own conclusions but why isn't her husband told? All up, very disappointing.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An unusually mature theme, endearingly enduring, with mature performances for mature audience
ruby_fff1 February 2000
It's not an easy subject at all. It's about the life of a married woman (a city woman) in a farming small town environment, with two young daughters and a not quite communicative husband, how things just happened one day out of the blue, and the subsequent unexpected spin-off events turning her life topsy turvy, and her unusually calm approach to it all. Nothing is what it seems - we just have to ride the enduring travails with the three principal characters.

Very mature performance by Sigourney Weaver as Alice Goodwin, the seemingly always self-assured, independent, educated person in control: as the wife giving instructions to her husband, as the mother handling her daughters, as the school nurse attending to the kids. She always knows what she's saying or doing. Yet she's actually holding back a lot of mixed emotions within herself, unable to let go, most of all, unable to forgive herself.

Julianne Moore is Theresa, a good friend and neighbor to Alice. She gave another supporting nuance performance. David Strathairn is Howard the quiet gentle husband. Arliss Howard is the assured lawyer that Alice wanted for the case; he commented he has never seen anyone took to these wrongful accusations so well, and asked what's her trick to keep so calm and collected, to which she replied, "Have you ever wanted to go away on an island…" That's how she felt about being away from it all - that world of conceivable madness outside.

The three principals are veteran actors who have matured with such elegance and in multiple intelligent roles:

Sigourney Weaver is far beyond the queen of alien movies since 1979 with the subsequent three sequels, she has been the unattainable woman opposite William Hurt in 1981 "Eyewitness", Mel Gibson in 1982 "The Year of Living Dangerously", Michael Caine in 1986 "Half Moon Street"; delivered tour de force performances in 1988 "Gorilla in the Mist", 1994 "Death and the Maiden", 1995 "Copycat". Twice opposite Kevin Kline in 1993 "Dave" and 1997 "The Ice Storm". Comedy-wise, she shines as one of the super fun members in 1984 and 1989 "Ghostbusters" flicks, the wicked boss to Melanie Griffith in 1988 "Working Girl", and yet another fun member of the hilarious team in 1999 "Galaxy Quest".

David Strathairn - I first remembered him in director Phil Alden Robinson's 1992 "Sneakers" with the fun ensemble cast of computer wizards Robert Redford, Sidney Poitier, River Phoenix, Dan Aykroyd; Strathairn was the wiz who's blind and what an outstanding performance he did. His other roles have been pretty much the subtle supporting man, e.g., to Mercedes Ruehl in 1993 "Lost in Yonkers", as the pastor in 1998 "Simon Birch", but he was definitely front and center in his long time association (since 1980 and seventh time round) with John Sayles in 1999 "Limbo", delivering a terrific performance opposite Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio and Vanessa Martinez.

Julianne Moore - I remember her initially in Robert Altman's stellar ensemble cast of 1993 "Short Cuts", then her unforgettable performance in Todd Haynes' 1995 "Safe"; she stands out in another ensemble cast in Paul Thomas Anderson's 1997 "Boogie Nights". In 1999, she's in five films: an outstanding delivery playing opposite Glenn Close in Altman's fun ensemble piece "Cookies Fortune"; another ensemble tongue-whipping cast in Oscar Wilde's "An Ideal Husband" (Oliver Parker directed); yet part of another ensemble engineered by P.T. Anderson in "Magnolia"; then front and center as the love of Ralph Fiennes' character in Neil Jordan's "The End of the Affair"; and here an effective supporting role in "A Map of the World".

Bold (debut) direction by Scott Elliott. A bonus is the film scored by the Pat Metheny Group - the guitar plus strings aptly complemented the mood and flavor of the plot. This film may not be for a teenage audience, it certainly warrants mature appreciation.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Soundtrack Review
rtbond27 November 2003
Here's yet another nod to composer, arranger and musician/performer Pat Metheny (sans the Group, as was incorrectly identified in another review). On this soundtrack, Metheny is accompanied by an unidentified chamber orchestra (percussion, violin, harp, flute, viola, cello, horn, bass, clarinet and the talented Gil Goldstein on organ).

Mostly variations on the title track, these melodic interpretations are quite eloquent (as one would come to expect from both Metheny & PMG), but arranged such that they never overtake the scene in which they are scored. Metheny contributes his own brilliant lead acoustic guitars, as well as piano and keyboards, with an overall combined feel of his previous Secret Story and Beyond the Missouri Sky releases.

A warm, introspective journey, this set of 28 tunes (6 less than a minute long and another 10 less than 2 minutes) are well-crafted and are worthy for a listen on a Sunday morning with coffee, in front of the fireplace with a nice bottle of wine or a drive in the country, esp. for those in the midwestern US.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The truth should be told no matter what
view_and_review26 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It wasn't so much that this small Wisconsin town turned on a school nurse who did nothing but deal with wild kids, it's that every single one of them did. There wasn't even a single person who was the least bit skeptical of Alice's guilt.

Alice Goodwin (Sigourney Weaver) and her husband Howard Goodwin (David Strathairn) lived on a Wisconsin farm with two daughters. One daughter, Emma (Dara Perlmutter), was the spawn of Satan. Obnoxious yelling, screaming "I hate you!", and breaking bowls of cereal were a regular part of her repertoire. I will be the bad guy and say that her being spanked or deprived of something she wanted could've been a good attitude adjustment device.

Alice and Howard had two friends with daughters as well, Theresa Collins (Julianne Moore) and Dan Collins (Ron Lea). Alice's life was flipped on its head when one of Theresa's daughters drowned while in her care. Alice sank into an irretrievable depression and things got worse. She was then charged with the inappropriate touching of a minor. A kid named Robbie (Marc Donato), with the help of his mother Carole (Chloe Savigny), accused Alice of doing unspeakable things to him. Alice was arrested and held on $100,000 bail.

It was at this point the entire town of Craphole, Wisconsin turned on Alice. What we learn is that Alice was a relative newcomer to the town, hence an outsider. Her husband was trying his hand at farming and she and the kids were along for the ride. Apparently, in small towns people will believe spurious things about you so long as it comes from the lips of an "insider" (a lifer, a townie). And the more despicable the easier to believe.

While Alice was living it up in jail her husband and Theresa got a little too cozy. They didn't quite sleep together, but they did passionately kiss which seemed wholly unnecessary. As Theresa was trying to help out Howard and keep a semblance of normalcy for the three remaining girls you couldn't help but get the feeling that there were going to be sparks between them. Hollywood is always good for making sparks between a man and a woman when they spend time together. Nevermind that this guy's wife, and her best friend, is in jail, they can't help but join lips. Theresa goes out of her way to let Howard (aka the audience) know that he's a good guy even after the kiss so that you moralistic viewers don't start having negative thoughts about this man who kissed his wife's best friend.

Though Alice's time in jail was no walk in the park, she still left forlornly. It was a scene that made me think, "maybe jail isn't all that bad." Then I think of real shows like "Lockdown" and remember that this is just a bad movie.

When Alice finally got to trial her lawyer put up a wonderful defense only to be kneecapped by his own client. Alice got on the stand and began sabotaging her own case. It was infuriating. In this overly sentimental fluff piece of a movie, Alice had to use the witness stand as her personal confession chambers and let the world know of her sins because they "make her human." When asked had she inappropriately touched Robbie, she said "Yes."

Why?

My first thoughts were that she wanted to go to prison and be someone's girlfriend as some form of atonement for letting the little girl drown. My second thought was that she simply lost her marbles and wasn't cognizant of reality. The reason she gave was that she had to "tell the truth." You see, she'd slapped Robbie before and that wasn't right. So she chose now, of all times, to reveal that information. She hadn't told her attorney before--in fact she hadn't told a soul--but when her freedom is on the line she decided to SPEAK THE TRUTH. It was a move that would drive any lawyer to throw up his hands and say, "Lock her up judge."

She further hurt her case by mentioning the drowning when the judge had already ruled that it was inadmissible. Again, refer to my first and second thoughts above as they were the same here. Her lawyer was understandably incensed. All the preparation he'd done and she just threw it in his face.

Because this is a feel good movie about "forgiveness" and redemption, and we have to have a happy ending, Alice was acquitted. She told the world the truth that no one asked for and it worked out for her. Sure, she had to leave the little backwards town in Wisconsin and move back to the city, but profound lessons had been learned and her family was now a better unit for it. Or so we should believe.

In the end Alice is better than all of us. She doesn't hit children, and the time she did she told the world when it could've cost her her freedom. We should love Alice and be like Alice. We should all risk our freedom for the sake of an irrelevant truth, because the truth should be told no matter what. Yay Alice.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A powerful drama with speed bumps.
=G=19 September 2000
"A Map..." offers a mature, lengthy look at the vicissitudes and tragedy which befall Weaver's character, a Wisconsin dairy farmer's wife with an unusual ability to cope. A powerful performance by Weaver and excellent support by Moore and Strathairn help to make this sometimes tedious film well worth watching.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Melodrama with much potential, most of which goes unrealized...
moonspinner555 April 2007
Infuriating story of a small town nurse (Sigourney Weaver) who is accused of sexual abuse on a child right on the heels of a toddler's accidental drowning on her property. Tepid film of Jane Hamilton's book, directed by Scott Elliott as if he were doing a movie-of-the-week. Weaver's central performance is iffy, and overall the film is hampered by her character's screwy behavior which is never in her own best interest. Isolated sequences have a feeling of truth, but the depth of emotion just isn't there. Supporting players David Strathairn and Julianne Moore do what they can, but the film is strictly one-dimensional. ** from ****
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed