Ooru naito rongu 3 saishû-shô (1996) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Humans.....are living garbage. Face it.
Bogey Man20 April 2003
Japanese film maker Katsuya Matsumura is responsible for this extreme trilogy, All Night Long, that is highly controversial in Japan (and elsewhere where it's known) and only the first film, All Night Long (1992), managed to get a theatrical release, the sequels, All Night Long 2: Atrocity (1994) and All Night Long 3: The Final Atrocity (1996), were denied a theatrical release and so they received only a video market distribution of some kind.

This third entry is a little different from the first two films and concentrates on a disturbed teenager who works on some kind of a sex hotel in which customers visit with their sex companions, spend a steamy night together and then leave the room filled with used condoms and other filth around the place. This protagonist works there with another male and a slightly elder female who all are not as balanced human beings as they could. He collects pubic hair from the sheets and practises other similar anti-social things. Soon the boy starts to get obsessed with a girl that lives near and he starts to collect her trash and leftover food and everything possible. He becomes obsessed with trash bags and collects them to his room, bathing in filth, literally and eating (the girl's) garbage and making nice collections of her sanitary towels and so on. It is easy to get the picture by now, and the film really is as outrageous in its imagery and hard to take (to say the least) as it sounds. Welcome to the origins of living, sorry filth, the truth about our very selves, but in a very extreme and merciless way without too much hope for a better world anymore.

The film is as horrible as just possible, without any signs of humanity or purity left. The first film had that one female character, the second film had also at least one (albeit a very unbalanced and disturbed one after strong sexual humiliation etc.), but this third film is practically completely without those elements of hope. There are only bad, selfish, mean spirited and evil characters here who only try to keep on living by satisfying their instincts for carnal pleasure, humiliation and violence, all of which are usually practised together. The imagery and scenes are so dirty and depressing it really requires an "experienced" non-mainstream cinema viewer to be able to handle it, I would say according to what I felt when watching this. That is also among the film's negative things as it would have needed, like part 2, at least one ray of light among its characters, but, like the previous film, these sequels work better if they are watched as if they were connected to the first film straightly.

This third film is also the "smallest" in the series, taking place in the mysterious apartment/dumping ground environment where the half dead characters scrape their precarious living. The second was slightly better as it had those images of real life atrocities and terror, but the "largest" is easily the first film which takes place in a familiar society with its schools and other elements found everywhere where humans live. Still part 3 has many scenes of products of industrialism (like military aeroplanes and so on) which Matsumura shows a lot so he definitely tries to achieve bigger waters with this film, too, which is of course good for the film.

There are some great lines that crystallize the themes of this series in each film, alongside the greatest power in Japanese cinema, the silence which is used (fortunately) in Matsumura's work, too. In part 2, a character says "if there wasn't sex, you people would be nothing" and that goes very well with part 3, too, as the film is set in the hotel of sexual desire and voyeurism. It is really the only thing these people have in their miserable lives as it is one of the primary instincts in our nature. Another great line comes from this part 3 which suggests that humans are born half dead, growing up until they finally become completely dead. Humans are living garbage, nothing else. Matsumura must be the most pessimistic and misanthropic film maker ever and that's why his honest, argumented and feared work is so great even with its few flaws.

Otherwise part 3 has one rather negative side and it is its slow pace and a lack of a "hook" at the beginning to really grab the attention of the viewer. Now the 82 NTSC minutes piece feels awfully too long especially as the first 45 minutes or so of the film is so calm and full of silent images. There would have been something to make it very interesting from the very beginning and also some cuts to the more unnecessary parts would have been welcome. Also the bullied school girl character remains a mystery: why can't she fight back and try to survive from the hell her school mates have created around her? I would also like to ask why the lead character becomes so obsessed with the filthy white trash bags in the first place, so the characters in this third All Night Long film are easily the weakest ones.

This is an expected ending to the disturbing trilogy. It has perhaps more shocking and graphic violence at some parts, but overall is equally nihilistic and horribly disturbing with the previous films, especially part 2. This is the kind of cinema that don't get made too often or in too many territories, Japan being usually the bravest one. All Night Long is probably the darkest film trilogy ever made anywhere, and it is great it has a rather talented and visionary maker behind it so that it achieves a lot more than an average exploitation director, with no ambition, from the same script would have achieved. Enter if you dare to see the harrowing truth and vision of ugliest kind. 5/10
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Long I Don't Know
frankgaipa26 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I'm no slouch at finding "redeeming social value." Whatever book or film people want to suppress, from Huck Finn/Heart of Darkness to, I don't know, Deep Throat or the latest hostage beheading, I sincerely wish they wouldn't. I'm not a lover of porn or of violence-as-entertainment, but what of them I chance upon I tend to see camera angles, cuts, pans, lighting, rhythms, nearly to the exclusion of fear or titillation, sometimes even missing filmmakers' or actors' intent. Even from footage that reasonable people may argue should never have existed, I always imagine there's something to learn. I wonder more at how a film does than about what it does. Maybe that's wrong of me. Wiser but harder than deconstructing unpleasant cinema, might be to see cuts, pans, etc., at one with and inseparable from no matter what content. I ask myself what horror filmmakers and church architects have in common. Add in political filmmakers, fascist and not. All manipulate with light, space, and sound in order to alter perception and mood. How different are their goals? How different are the goals of those who film real atrocities for use as propaganda?

When the original All Night Long (ANL) trilogy appeared on my shelf, I left it unwatched for nearly year. Curiosity had made me buy it. I sampled a few minutes of "1" the day it arrived, up to the awkwardly sound-effected street corner stabbing that seems really an attack on film viewers' sensibility, found it inept but effective. I'd have to come back to it, certainly, but didn't relish the prospect. Clearly this wasn't the sublime horror of Kairo, Cure, Angel Dust, Lain, the rawer but still traditionally framed horror of the first Evil Dead Trap, the overtly political work of Koji Wakamatsu, or even the brilliant crudity of early Cronenberg.

Maybe that word "attack" is key. Matsumura attacks not his characters, but his viewers. I can't watch these at this point in history without thinking of both Abu Garib (some of which I think I recall was evidenced on video) and the hostage videos, but also about Godard's torturers (in Le Petit soldat?) to whom atrocity is just a job, a fraction of a person's workday. And then there's the prolonged Northern California news story whose details I barely remember but can't entirely forget because it too entails "cinema," a duo of serial killers notorious, if suggestion isn't playing games with my memory, for having videotaped themselves torturing victims.

All three ANL entries are revenge cinema, vigilante exercises, but I'm attaching these notes ANL3 because it's the most ambitious and may constitute a turning point for director Matsumura. (I haven't seen the entries that followed ANL3.) Through the first two offerings, I imagined a camera fallen into the hands of one of those fringe kids from middle or grammar school who obsessively draw war scenes or other atrocities. (Or as if one of Matsumura's revenge-crazed characters had turned writer-director. Anyone watching these who hasn't seen Michael Powell's Peeping Tom would do well to see it.) But ANL3 seems to aspire to mainstream. Matsumura's protagonist grows carnivorous plants, allowing for some typically Japanese cool close-up nature shots. There's also, for the first time a Matsumura film, a traditionally erotic sequence: Kikuo's female boss sneaks up and begins to caress him while he's peeping at the love hotel's customers. Kikou finds himself unhappily sandwiched between. He's a middleman voyeur. The brief thrill comes from the layers of voyeurism. There's even a philosophical/poetic garbage sifter, a garbage voyeur who somehow makes me think of the poem repeated in Wakamatsu's not-at-all-what-it-sounds-like Go, Go, Secondtime Virgin.

I'm getting nowhere with this, and it's getting in the way of my commenting other films. Can't escape the suspicion that a few years on I'll walk into a Matsumura retrospective at my local film archive, maybe hosted by some learned character who's caught onto something I'm missing.

How much does it matter whether the director is or simply "gets" his lethally muddled protagonists? Does he even have to understand them? Maybe a director's job is just to spew it out, then let critics, sociologists, and the rest of us hash things out. Maybe directorial or artistic responsibility is a bogus notion.

My final struggle with this thing had me wondering what on earth a woman thinks watching these overwhelmingly male exercises. We put women through this over and over, from Star Wars to et cetera and et cetera and on and on and on and on, but is anything quite as male-skewed as the All Night Longs?
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
worse than its predecessors
trashgang27 June 2010
Part 3, that's were it ends. I know there are other parts after this one but it stops right here. Again we have a sick and depraved movie. And as the other parts it starts slowly, just sit through that and you will have a provoking flick. It really tries to get the viewers. It starts of simply with a guy collecting rubbish and trash from a hotel he is working. And it is what he collects that some will find offending. Used sanitary napkins, pubic hair, used condoms...until one of the employees shows him a room were you can watch another room were people are having sex. Watching that and being obsessed with a girl it becomes unhealthy. From then on the gore is the main point. And as I said before, it's filthy and not for the squeamish. You hate it or you will love it, better watch the trilogy, sigh, all night long!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good just like the first two
stepflan28 February 2008
The movie wasn't really as gory as All Night Long 2 but it did have a few nasty scenes in it anyway. The blood and gore isn't really the most disturbing part of the movie anyway. It's the rape scenes which seems most gruesome to me. If you haven't already heard about the All Night Long movies then you should know that it is defiantly not for those with weak hearts. It has a lot of rape and sadism in it which I guess that every movie in the All Night Long-series has. There is no music in these awful scenes either. This brings up the shock value in the movie and also gives the whole thing more of a realistic.

The atmosphere is very depressing and dark. Which all of the All Night Long movies are famous for. They try to show how crap some humans can be. And the moral is that all human beings are only living garbage.

Now the quality of the movie isn't really that good. The director probably didn't use a very good camera. And most of the scenes are shot really bad. But it actually makes the movie even more realistic and disturbing. So it all adds up. I actually enjoyed the story, even though it got a little bit stupid at the end. So, if you like underground Japan shock films or any of the other All Night Long flicks then this could be something for you.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
People are just imperfect corpses.
HumanoidOfFlesh4 August 2003
Katsuya Matsumura's "All Night Long 3" is pretty much on the same level with "All Night Long 2"(1995),and has the most pessimistic tone of the whole series as it suggests that humans are nothing but filth and rubbish.Kikuo is a Japanese boy who works in a sleazy hotel where men bring women for sex.One day he takes bag which contains a woman's personal items that she has thrown away.Becoming increasingly interested,he starts obsessively collecting her refuse."All Night Long 3" is by far the most extreme of the three films and the hardest to watch.The violence is extremely graphic in this part and comes sudden and shocking to hit the viewer numb.Some scenes like a brutal torture,murder and dismemberment of a young Japanese girl are truly sickening.All in all if you liked the first two "All Night Long" films give this one a look.Recommended!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The final film in the twisted trilogy.
Captain_Couth19 February 2005
All Night Long 3 (1996) is the final film of the dark and depraved trilogy. Part three (like the second movie) was also shot on video giving the movie a gritty snuff video feel. This film summarizes the trilogy by referring to humans as garbage. The film maker's over all view of the world that we live in today is pretty grim. Ah, what a world we live in today.

A young and sleazy guy works in a sex hotel. He has to take customers up to their rooms. Working in this type of environment is not very helpful for a person's psyche, especially this clown who's only a few steps away from a total meltdown. One day he spots his perfect mate. There's one problem, she has no idea that he exists. But that doesn't stop him from following her all around town and rummaging through her garbage and eating her left overs. Soon he meets a man who looks like an older version of himself. He shows him all the tricks of the trade (he's a garbage digger himself). It's only a matter of time before the student becomes the master. Will the guy ever regain his sanity before it's too late? Can he meet the girl of his dreams without fumbling around in her refuse? Will he ever find true love? Who knows, you'll have to watch to find out!

A dark and twisted ending to the trilogy. I wasn't prepared for this type of film when I first saw them. I don't think anyone can sit through all of the films in one sitting. The realism the film maker used when making these films is quite shocking. What's scary about this movie is that there are people like the ones showcased in the trilogy floating around out there all around the world.

Recommended for fans of the genre.

Rated X and it definitely shows!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Human Beings Are Garbage! - Part 3
EVOL66626 September 2005
The 3rd installment of the now "infamous" ALL NIGHT LONG trilogy, THE FINAL CHAPTER, is also a very decent film. Part 1 of the series was kinda slow and not too "shocking", but ATROCITY (part 2) and THE FINAL CHAPTER really stepped things up a notch. Although THE FINAL CHAPTER may not be quite as bloody as ATROCITY, this one is far more psychologically whacked-out, and really extends the idea of alienation and social outcast-ism to the highest level. A semi-retarded kid that works in a "by-the-hour" hotel becomes obsessed with a cute grocery store worker. He begins digging in her trash and decorating his room with her discarded personal items, including her used tampons and maxi-pads. Needless to say this kid is a f**ked up freak. Like part 1 of the series, there are a few plot lines that are unnecessary, like the retarded girl that keeps getting abused by everyone for no apparent reason in the beginning of the film, then just disappears after the first 20 or so minutes...but even so, the gradual decline of this kid into utter insanity and obsession is interesting and powerful to watch. There are definitely some "rough" scenes, the rape, kidnap, torture and dismemberment of our main character's "surogate" obsessee is pretty hard-core. The ending is appropriately gory and distasteful - and extremely downbeat and hopeless. I feel that THE FINAL CHAPTER is the strongest in terms of being psychologically disturbing, but still has a few minor faults in the story-telling. ATROCITY (part 2) is sleaker and gorier, but not as "deep". I definitely like both of the sequels better than Part 1, but I can't honestly say which of the second 2 films I like better. Both are good and definitely worth checking out, especially if you've only seen Part 1 and walked away disappointed. Altogether, the ALL NIGHT LONG trilogy is pretty strong viewing and absolutely not for the casual movie-goer. Those of us out there that seek out extreme "shock-cinema" will be pleasantly surprised. Recommended 8.5/10
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Even more bleak than the first two.
BA_Harrison23 February 2021
The third film in Katsuya Matsumura's All Night Long series (originally a trilogy, but currently standing at six films) is disturbing, even more so than the director's previous two ANL movies, which goes to make it the most 'successful' of the original trilogy. If, like me, you felt that parts one and two weren't quite grim enough, this tale of utter moral turpitude should definitely do the trick.

Yûjin Kitagawa stars as loner high-school student Kikuo Sawada, whose job cleaning rooms in a love hotel allows him access to all sorts of goodies: pubic hairs, used condoms, dirty tissues etc. Kikuo's interest in yucky detritus becomes an obsession when he discovers the trash of pretty grocery worker Hitomi Nomura (Ryôka Yuzuki). Rummaging through her waste, he finds such treasures as dirty panty liners, old stockings, a used toothbrush, half-eaten food, and personal documents, which he takes home to create a shrine to the young woman.

One night, while diving into Hitomi's rubbish on the sidewalk, Kikuo is approached by fellow 'dust hunter' Kawasaki (Tomoroh Taguchi of the Tetsuo trilogy), who takes the lad home to show him his own collection, all neatly catalogued and filed.

As Kikuo continues with his hobby, he becomes more and more divorced from reality, viewing people as little more than garbage. So when he discovers a schoolgirl unconscious at the local dump, the girl having been raped, urinated on, and bludgeoned by his co-workers at the hotel, he takes her to his home and treats her like just like one of his pieces of refuse, prodding and examining her and cataloguing her details. When the girl finally recovers enough to object, calling him trash, he strangles her. With no further use for her, he saws up her body in the bath and takes her back to the dump. While Kikuo is digging a hole, Kawasaki shows up with some helpful advice for getting rid of bodies, directing the young man to a nearby furnace. Not wishing to leave things to chance, Kikuo kills Kawasaki with a shovel and throws his body into the fire as well.

Kikuo descends even further into madness (yes, even further) when he spots Hitomi entering the love hotel with a man. Spying through an air vent, he sees Hitomi having sex, and his idealistic impression of the woman is destroyed; after pulling down his shrine, he arms himself with a gun (found in a drawer at Kawasaki's home), and goes on a bloody rampage. The film ends with Kikuo taking Hitomi back to his home, just another piece of rubbish to be catalogued (and we know what happened to the last girl he treated that way!).

Director Matsumura doesn't shy away from showing acts of extreme violence, rape, degradation, humiliation and general deviancy in detail (especially the despicable treatment of the throwaway character of a mascochistic girl with scarred legs). However, it is the film's relentlessly nihilistic tone, and its extremely pessimistic message that humans are nothing more than living garbage, that go to make this a particularly challenging watch. There is not a single ray of light or positivity in the whole film, making it an essential watch for fans of transgressive cinema.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
living garbage
white pongo16 November 2000
I was not impressed by the first entry in this series and the second one was only a slight improvement.However this third entry remodels ideas found in both of those into a genuine masterpiece of voyeuristic cinema.Yuji Kitagawa (later a pop star) is a college student who collects people's garbage as a hobby.While sifting through Kanori Kadomatsu's garbage,he falls in love with her and obsessively collects all her throwaways (including her sanitary towels).He even eats her leftover food and drink.All the other characters in the film are equally twisted,including "dust hunter" Tomoroh Taguchi (TETSUO).If you're not easily offended (honestly,it's pretty strong stuff),this vicious slice of anti-social cinema is very very well made and will stay with you for a long time
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed