The Lorax (TV Movie 1972) Poster

(1972 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Puts 2012 Movie to Shame
kirkir-179202 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Let's compare this to the 2012 movie, shall we:

Budget: 1972 version: Probably under $1,000

2012 version: $70 million

Runtime: 1972 version: 25 mins

2012 version: 1 hour 35 mins

Animation: 1972 Version: Hand-drawn

2012 version: Computer animated

Well, strangely enough, with enough effort, a movie with 1/70,000th the budget of a kid's sellout movie, surpasses it in every way imaginable. The 1972 version really has a message. While the 2012 version seems to avoid the actual 'we need to help the environment' theme, the 1972 version shows that we are not doing enough to do so. It has a meaning, and therefore gives everyone a reason to watch it. Watching it did not make you feel like you were being subjected to an advertising sellout and made you really think about the environment as a whole. I think the 1972 version is a brilliant masterpiece, that did justice to Dr Seuss' work. The 2012 version however, stuck the Lorax on a Mazda advertisement. This just shows how much the 1972 version respected the source material compared to the 2012 version, and why it remains a masterpiece.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Speak for the trees!
goya-423 September 2000
A Dr Seuss relatively unknown gem. A narrator (never identified) tells a story of how a person discovered a crop that could be used for anything. Soon all the trees where this crop grew were cut down and factories were built along with houses and highways while all the while a creature in the forest gives warning, saying he speaks for the trees. Unfortunately the warning goes unheeded and the wildlife that lives there make a fateful decision. A cautionary tale that was ahead of its time but seems very on point today. It warns us to be careful not to become to obsessed with our needs for consumer items and not to be suckered in by commercialism at expense of nature and the wonderful world around us. A Dr Seuss that should be shown on televison much more often than it is - some Logging companies in the west wanted it banned because of the ecological message - but now it is available to all. A must see and one to watch and discuss with your children. On a scale of one to ten...8
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Children's Movie Takes a Deeper Look into Society
labambastheman25 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Though it is most often associated with the playfulness and innocence of youth, even the whimsical, surreal land of Dr. Seuss isn't exempt from the destruction that ruthless, money-driven big business tycoons can create, as charmingly demonstrated in the 1972 animated film, The Lorax.

Our titular protagonist is a stumpy, passionate, and unmistakably Seussical creature who "speaks for the trees". He takes his job very seriously and adamantly speaks out against their depletion when an avaricious, faceless character known as the Once-ler, our antagonist whose blatant disregard for the environment is topped only by his insatiable greed, comes into the picture. Immediately upon seeing the soft, colorful tops of the Truffula trees, he starts hacking away in an attempt to turn nature into profit, but at a heavy price.

After seeing just one of the trees chopped down, the Lorax springs into defensive action, only to be brushed off nonchalantly. "Look, Lorax, calm down. There's no cause for alarm. I chopped just one tree, I'm doing no harm. This thing is most useful! This thing is a "thneed." A theed, a fine something-that-all-people-need!" is the Once-ler's lethargic reply. As soon as he begins selling the odd but versatile thneeds, consumers start buying, thus beginning a voracious cycle of supply and demand that Mother Nature had apparently never prepared for.

Before long, the Once-ler's business grows to the point where he cannot fulfill the demand for thneeds, leading him to call family over for assistance. They dutifully make the move over, bringing pollution and garbage with them.

Meanwhile, the fantastical creatures that'd been living there find they are being forced out by the gradual but steady destruction of their habitat. The Once-ler is not as clueless about the grave situation as he would like to pretend, but he argues that if he didn't do it, "someone else would." Before long, many confrontations between the Lorax and Once-ler later, no creatures are left and the pair are sorrowed by "the sickening smack of an axe on a tree," as they "saw the tree fall... the very last truffula tree of them all." And with that, a defeated Lorax pulls himself up from the "seat of his pants", leaving behind only a small pile of rocks surrounding the word "Unless".

Defying typical Seussical conventions, the film does not end on a generically happy note, but on an ambiguous one instead. The contrite Once-ler presents a young boy, presumably symbolizing the new generation, with the very last Truffula seed and the parting sentiment, "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing's going to get better. It's not." His words are especially powerful when one considers that throughout the film, he knew at the back of his head that what he was doing was wrong, but figured he could still take the time to "think it over" while the money rolled in. He finally realizes that things just don't get done by having people idly "think it over", and that instead action needs to be taken. While there is little evidence that suggests the boy's endeavor could be anymore successful than the Lorax's, one is still left with the possibility of hope, that even in the most dire of situations, things could always begin to turn around at least a little.

It is interesting to note the direct association the characters make with progression and the devitalization of nature. The Lorax cries out at one point, "They say I'm old-fashioned, and live in the past, but sometimes I think progress progresses too fast!" It's almost sad to note how even the Lorax instantly identifies the terror of what the Once-ler is creating as a step forward rather than a step back. The economy is often placed in higher regard than the environment, leaving even the most hard-headed environmentalist to reluctantly bow down to its magnitude. The power of a country is measured by its wealth, not how green it is. And of course, a wealthy, strong economy is nearly synonymous with big businesses, many of which unfortunately produce excessive amounts of waste and do little to give back to the environment they abuse.

It's also worth mentioning how the Once-ler manages to convince the consumer of what they need, rather than what they want. In today's society, this trend continues. Through clever advertisements, the line between a person's wants and needs is often blurred. Many of the items that we once may have considered a luxury are now thought of as necessities, and even things that may be flashy and superfluous are easily thrown into the category of "needs", as today in society it is imperative to live in luxury and be up to date with the latest trends. Little Tabitha doesn't want the new Miley Cyrus CD, she needs it. After all, if she doesn't get it, how will she be able to keep up with her all of her friends? She won't; she'll be isolated and doomed to the life of a loner, or so she argues to her mother, who begrudgingly complies. And so another voracious cycle begins.

I watched this movie as a project for a College Now class, and I'm glad I did. Great for giving the young ones a head start, and great for inspiring adults to start a new leaf.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Open your eyes
iLuvvU217 February 2008
Although a slightly silly film, as commented by another user, the Lorax is a revealing and relevant film. Released in the early 1970's when such issues were not publicly recognized, the film addresses perfectly the issue of the environment and natural resource depletion. The older generation feels that such a topic is not a pressing issue and needs not immediate attention. Perhaps that is why this "silly film" is aimed towards younger people, who will be impacted by its message and will not be too stubborn to make a change. The Lorax exemplifies this problem exactly, where the Once-ler feels that the economy and his own interests are more important then that of mother earth. God gave us one life, one planet. Act that way.
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Consider this movie's place in history.
yehudit11 July 2005
Well, of course it's good for kids--it's Dr. Seuss! Of course, he's for all ages, but that should have been a clue. I suppose adults can get something from Barney the Dinosaur (to use an extreme example) but it isn't really created for adults, is it.

I'm curious: how old is the poster to whom I am replying? I ask because I sense that without a real understanding of the concerns of the '70s, this film might appear just a piece of outdated animation.

While this film might seem simplistic, its timing was impeccable. It premiered at the moment that the original ecology movement had begun to touch the general populace, and it began with baby seals . . . and serious deforestation of US land. The true-life events and fears of that time were exactly as presented; in fact, this movie aired only that once (until decades later) because the lumber industry was powerful enough at the time to have it hidden on a back shelf. Imagine: they were that scared of the power of this message that Dr. Seuss created (ostensibly) for children.

In any case, I was thrilled to find access to the movie as it is one of those pieces that defined my childhood in its era. Enjoy it for what it is or spend some time really watching it, but don't dismiss it so easily.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Please. I object in the name of the trees.
Horst_In_Translation11 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This may possibly be my favorite animated movie from the famous Dr. Seuss. It has the usual witty rhymes and it has one actor I really like, Eddie Albert, already in his sixties when this was made, and prolific voice actor who does a good job here in portraying the Lorax as well as his antagonist, The Once-ler. Also, it's a topic that appeals to me more than for example the one in the Grinch.

At the beginning we see baboons and fish dancing happily though the forests and the green nature, but with the arrival of the Once-ler everything goes south. He starts building an industry at the expense of the nature and thus the Lorax, described as an an old forest creature that looks like the mix between walrus and hamster, is called into action to talk reason into the businessman. Sadly all attempts and neat rhymes from the little thing fail and more and more trees fall. Consequently, also the baboons and fish suffer and, eventually, leave for good. Growth and pollution increase rapidly and more and more trees fall until finally the very last one hits the ground, in what is really a sad moment and well displayed by the makers of the film. As there's no more raw materials left, the people leave the place and leave back an environmentally ruined area. The result is the Once-ler being equally ruined.

It's a good morale and it's a story that can teach something to all of us. I guess that's also what is implied by the fact that we never see the Once-ler clearly identified, only his arms and hands creating destruction. It could be anybody. I very much recommend this short film. Not too long ago, a full feature with Danny DeVito was made based on this 25-minute short. I haven't seen that version, but as animation draws audiences in masses to theaters these days, I'm sure many have and I hope they took something from it or maybe get inspired to watch the original from the early 1970s.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Seuss Strongest Story Well Done
DKosty12316 December 2009
The story is the strength here. Dr. Seuss message here is more that there has to be balance in everything that you do. You can't just make the needs that everyone, everyone needs without considering the price of making it, that everyone must pay. A lot of folks now go over board trying to go too far in one direction.

A bonus here is the talented Eddie Albert singing & narrating the story. That drew me to this story as I always loved Albert as Oliver Wendell Douglas on Green Acres.

This is a book, that is exactly mirrored in this animated special. I loved reading this book to my kids, & suggest to all parents this book to read to the kiddies at bedtime when they are small. It is as enjoyable to read as it is to watch here. Pure message & entertainment, par excel-lance.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wonderful Classic - Worth Revisiting - True to the Story
rannynm16 March 2012
The Lorax is a wonderful film based off of the beloved Dr. Seuss book. It shows the story of a greedy Once-ler who only thinks of himself and in his selfishness he destroys the Truffula trees. The Lorax, who speaks for the trees, tries his hardest to save the land and its inhabitance, but will his pleas be enough to stop the tyrant Once-ler? I enjoyed this film very much and I thought the cinematography was wonderful because it is exactly like the illustrations in the Dr. Seuss book. Being able to see the world through the creative eyes of Dr. Seuss is wonderful and now you can, better than ever, with the deluxe edition of The Lorax including an Ultra Violet copy of the movie. This movie delivers fantastic messages about caring for the environment and respecting the earth we live on. I like the Lorax character most because he stands up for the land and teaches that being greedy and self-centered leads to destruction. I loved all of the music in The Lorax and I especially liked the first scene when you see the land in all of its splendid glory. I give The Lorax 4 out of 5 stars for its strong messages and great classic entertainment. I suggest this film for ages 4 to 10. Raven Devanney, Age 15, KIDS FIRST! Film Critic.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
About the dangers of heedless action
Vartiainen7 May 2017
I've actually never read or have been read any Dr. Seuss books. They just aren't that huge in my country, mainly because translating them is something of a task. That being said, I've heard about them and I've watched a couple of these short films, as well as some the newer remakes. And from what I've seen, Dr. Seuss had a profound voice and ideas worth listening to.

In this tale we hear about the Once-ler as well as the Lorax. One of them a has-been business tycoon living in the ruins of his former success and the other a woodland spirit that serves as the voice of the silent nature that has been exploited by the former.

What makes this film work for me is the storytelling. The film quite clearly sides with nature. Its message is against cutting down trees and forests just for the sake of making money. Yet at the same time it doesn't villainize the Once-ler. It makes his decisions logical and something that seemed reasonable at the time. It doesn't condemn progress in itself, or even making money, rather asking for forethought and compromise. It doesn't say that progress is dangerous. It says that progress for the sake of progress is.

And true, the animation quality is nothing special, the story is somewhat short and the voice acting has a few hiccups. But when the underlying story is so strong, that really only gives it more charm, allowing for the message itself to shine through. Something I feel the 2012 remake missed completely.

The Lorax is worth seeing. It doesn't take much of your time, but hopefully you'll be thinking about it for a long time afterwards.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another Dr Seuss classic
TheLittleSongbird24 March 2012
I love Dr Seuss and I love the cartoon television specials based on his work, the live-action movies excepting The 5000 Fingers of Dr T not so much. The Lorax is one of Dr Seuss' best stories and the 1972 television special is one of the classics too. It has a wonderful message that is still relevant now, simple and I think beautiful animation, catchy songs, witty dialogue, timeless characters that have their conflicts(especially Once-Ler), a story that is just as charming, whimsical and surreal as Dr Seuss' writing and stories and great voice acting from Eddie Albert and especially Bob Holt. I know this is not adding very much to the previous reviews, but anything I wanted to say about The Lorax has been said brilliantly already and better than I could do. I haven't seen the recent movie yet(doesn't come out until July where I live), I am very dubious in all honesty but even if it does turn out better than expected I don't think it will surpass this classic. 10/10 Bethany Cox
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Groovy
cjzak128 May 2012
Cute and surreal, of course, with a message as timely as it could be. The voices are good and the songs - well, they sound more like game show themes than anything else, but they are endearing in their own anachronistic, groovy way. I appreciated the Once-lers vacillating viewpoint; he wasn't just a monster, he was torn between good and bad. It helps me have a conversation with my kid about money and the environment, so I appreciate the moral of the story, but since it's Suess, it manages to avoid heavy-handed messaging (and this is probably Dr. S's heaviest- handed) and it stays uniquely weird-looking, which I appreciate too, since it helps me have a conversation with my kid about aesthetics.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
more relevant than ever
lee_eisenberg26 August 2006
As Dr. Seuss's work was usually politically charged,* "The Lorax" does a good job looking at the environment. Scary is how realistic the book/movie eventually became (especially under George W. Bush). But it does have an element of hope to it. I guess that it makes sense to have Eddie Albert narrate, given his environmental work. After watching the movie, you just might feel like speaking for the trees, and all other wildlife.

*"The Cat in the Hat" was promoting rebellion, "Yertle the Turtle" was about the class system, "The Butter Battle Book" was about the Cold War-era arms buildup.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very 70s, but kids might like it
preppy-33 April 2001
A lorax tries to "speak for the trees" when Onceler moves into his beautiful country and destroys it by chopping down trees and causing pollution. So-so animation and some truly nauseating songs got on my nerves, but young kids may like it. It's very pro-environment and (when it sticks to dialogue) is kind of fun. Also very short (25 min). So, good for the kids but a bit much for adults.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Trees for Tommarow
hellraiser75 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Dr. Seuss is one of my favorite authors, the thing I love about his books are the accessibility they contain, they bring up some complex and serious issues by say a lot from the amount of satire they contain though simplicity. "The Lorax" has always been my second favorite Seuss story because to me it's the darkest, but has good messages we can hear loud and clear.

The animation is great just like in the book it has that surrealistic style to it, creating an alternate world that is one step similar to our own reality but also one step away. The music is also good though not quite memorable at least in my book. And of course the writing is on the mark, all the lines and quotes from the original book are intact.

But of course the strength of the film truly is in the story and the conflicting characters the Once-ler and The Lorax acted with perfection by Bob Holt who does both voices you really think two people are doing it. The conflict is intact, we are of course on the Lorax's side because we know he's right however we can't help at time emphasizes with the Once-Ler's side of things as well because even we carry those kinds of desires of progress.

Just as the story was relevant to the 70's decade when pollution really started to become a major issue, it's relevant to now with the problems were having now with our resources and the rush rush counterculture we've created. I like how in the story we see how the line between needs and wants blurs because everyone from the constant advertising and what goes on around them, they've all been manipulated into thinking the Thneeds are what they need even though in reality the Thnneds really a luxury by their nature and only has so many uses mainly as clothing, other uses they present are just plain useless like using it as a toothbrush holder and we see a photo and it can barely hold it or even as some kinda soup, yuck.

What disturbs me the most about the story is the behavior of the Once-Ler whom at first was like just a typical idealist whom has what seemed to be a harmless idea. But then of course as he becomes more successful we see his capitalistic pursuit has turned into a madness and addition which even his own conscious is too weak to fight against. But we also see that he's really not happy, it kinda goes with that saying how money doesn't by you happiness, from his talks with the Lorax even though he claims he's basking in glory, you can tell from his voice he's not. And when you think about it the Once-Ler really doesn't have a life, there is no friends or girlfriend (well it is a storybook story after all)all he really has is just a lifestyle, and the tragedy is like all lifestyles it's not forever because as another saying goes "business loves no one back".

And I even like the sense of emotionality, you really do feel for the Lorax and all the animals as things just get worse. We see that the capitalistic ventures have became a dangerous narcotic, their so concerned with making a big fast profit they ignore how much damage they've done to the very things that not just provide the Thneeds for them but that sustain their lives. It's disheartening seeing a once beautiful and plentiful enviorment become just an ugly lifeless wasteland, but once we see that final tree get chopped off it made my heart sink because I knew their fate was sealed. The ending is sad but it has a sense of hope.

The message in the story isn't to take better care of our enviorment as well as taking action now before it's too late, but that we have to exercise more responsibility in the business of providing for people's needs otherwise there will be nothing left.

A beautiful health enviorment truly is what we need because it's what always gives us a better tomorrow.

Rating: 4 stars
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best-ever Dr. Seuss TV specials
Woodyanders1 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Wise old forest creature the Lorax (beautifully voiced by Bob Holt) tries to warn greedy and ruthless industrialist the Once-ler (also voiced by Holt with suitably sinister aplomb) about the potential harm of chopping down all the trees in the woods he's the self-appointed protector of. Alas, the Once-ler doesn't listen to the Lorax's warning and eventually lots of severe irreparable harm is wrought on the woods. This TV special manages to persuasively articulate a pertinent ecological message in a humorous, yet still relevant and respectful way without ever becoming too preachy or heavy-handed. Yes, we still do have the trademark smart and witty wordplay, a wealth of lively and engaging songs, colorful and creative animation, and a certain playful air, but underneath all the deceptive silliness is a totally serious and heartfelt concern about the well being of the earth as well as a still timely and topical statement about the evils of deforestation, the dark side of so-called progress, and the savage damage beget by corporate avarice and amorality run dangerously amok. Indeed, the environmental havoc the Once-ler brings upon the land with his factory is profoundly grim and depressing to behold. The fact that this TV special's central message hasn't dated a bit speaks volumes about its considerable artistic merit. An excellent and admirable program.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silly little film
jbond121 December 2001
Not bad. I am a fan of Ted Geisel (a.k.a. Dr. Seuss, Theo. LeSieg)and his work. It has a good lesson but the book was better. For two reasons:

1.) You could use your imagination and 2.) No over used, annoying, pointless, not needed songs.

My opinion: 7 out of 10

Read the book you'll understand.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best adaptations from Dr. Seuss' book
mitsubishizero15 July 2019
As much as I like the recent adaptation with Danny Devito I like the original adaptation better due to it being more faithful to the story and message it was trying to get across. The story's about a boy who comes across the former forest now a wasteland caused by the once wealthy Once-ler. The Once-ler tells the kid that he caused the destruction due to constantly chopping down trees despite the the Lorax's repeated warnings. What's interesting to note is that the message is never heavy-handed nor does it say being green is the answer, rather it's about trying to find a balance between machine and nature. The Once-ler himself isn't evil as he does go back and forth with himself on what to do only to find an excuse and let his greed get the best of him. His inability to stop becomes his business and the forest's undoing.

The songs are hit or miss. Some of them are a little preachy but they do fit into the story. The animation really captures the look and feel of the book down to a T. The voice acting's really good as well. Anyone who's read a Dr. Seuss book knows that it's scruffy, uses minimal colors and often thick pen lines which are well captured here. The voice acting's well done too. The characters have good chemistry and when they talk it sounds natural. This's one of the most faithful adaptations ever made and kids deserve to see this. If you have little kids and or are a fan of Dr. Seuss than I highly recommend you check this movie out.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Trees and nature
Vievver20 June 2022
That was perfect must see.

There is no reason to think that if we do not do something else, we will do something wrong.

Because, this is the stupidest way of thinking and that way the stone is not tied to the stone.

And finally the damage goes back to us.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
lacks the fun of Seuss
SnoopyStyle18 July 2015
In an environmental wasteland, a boy meets the old Once-ler on The Street of the Lifted Lorax. He recalls the story of coming to the paradise in his wagon. He finds the wonders of the tuffs of the truffula trees and uses it to make Thneeds. The Lorax confronts him speaking for the trees. However he refuses to listen as he gains great wealth cutting down all the truffula trees.

The darker 'real world' subject matter takes much of the magic of the usual Seuss world. It could be argued to be an important story but it's not a fun story. It's also leaves tons of questions like why doesn't the Once-ler plant trees himself. There is a much better animated environmental movie called 'The Man Who Planted Trees'. I recommend that before this.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very closely follows the book with added evocative music
Viewer11111 February 2024
The Lorax from the 1970s is far superior to the 2012 movie version. In this original Lorax animated film, the story stays very close to the book material. Dr Suess himself (Theodore Geisel) was involved in the production of this version.

The animation is very similar to the drawings found in the book. The music is superb and draws viewers in. The music sets the tones and emotions for the scenes. Very well done on the musical score.

Voice acting is great, and Eddie Albert is perfect for his role.

The only downside is that the Once-ler is shown as a cigar smoker which has no place in a children's film, even though the addicted, self-centered, and self-destructive nature of tobacco smoking does fit the Once-ler's character.

My grade is a solid A. The 2012 movie version only gets a B- from me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enviro-hippie propaganda but better than the 2012 movie
SusieSalmonLikeTheFish12 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
When a little boy living in what appears to be a polluted brownfield pays a visit to a lonely and depressed industrialist, called the Once-ler, he tells the boy a story of how he polluted the earth cut down every last tree and drove the animals away, much to the annoyance of some sort of tree creature called the Lorax.

This was made in 1972 around the time Silent Spring by Racheal Carson had come out, and around the time of the Love Canal disaster and the beginning of the environmental movement, so it's mostly a load of hippie propaganda making out businesses, factories and industry to be evil. And what's wrong with pollution, I love pollution, who cares about the planet? I litter, pour chemicals, don't ever recycle, and I'm proud of it! However, the difference between this and the 2012 animated film is that the animation was better, the voice acting is better, the characters are more planned out and rather than inserting crude humor and romance they stick to the book with this one.

It is rather biased and one-sided, but it's not a bad cartoon for kids. But you know what would be nice? If nature and pollution could co-exist with none of this crazy hippie extremism.
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unless Warning: Spoilers
For many viewers, this is the Dr. Seuss story that has aged the best, and for a good reason, with an evergreen (how ironic) message.

But good messages aside, the short has enough artistic merit to be considered one of the best Dr. Seuss adaptations, along with The Grinch adaptation by Chuck Jones. All the expansions the story receives here were for the best, adding pathos and feeling quite organic to the source material.

I don't even hate the 2012 film made by Illumination, but yeah, I do agree the story gets lost among the typical modern artificiality.

This by contrast is very sentimental, much less bigger in scale, but also far more genuine.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A classic cautionary tale about failure of property rights enforcement
RicardoTheWonk3 October 2008
Since I was a small child I have always enjoyed this little political message about the fallacy of not having a suitable rights-enforcement body ensuring property rights of individuals in their jurisdictional area are upheld.

The Lorax was clearly the sole caretaker/maintainer/improver of the land, fauna and flora and therefore the proper owner of the idyllic setting the Onceler came across. Rather than attempting to negotiate agreeable use of the land and resources in exchange for recompense, the Onceler just moved his gang in to systematically steal and destroy the Lorax's property (this is revealed in the first 5 minutes of the film).

Clearly this was an anarchic state with no specific judiciary or security forces to enforce property rights. The Lorax, lacking independent power to protect his property had to resort to negotiation, which the Onceler - with greater numbers, finances, and physical resources, and in the absence of any property rights enforcement bodies - was able to safely ignore.

My children love this story. They can appreciate that human rights include property rights, and they see that things would have been better for both the Lorax and the Onceler if a properly constructed rights-enforcing framework had been in place at the outset. Alternately the Lorax could merely have been in possession of a semi-automatic weapon.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Effective Message
Michael_Elliott27 December 2011
Lorax, The (1972)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

Surprisenly effective "warning" film from Dr. Seuss starts off by showing a wasteland where there's pretty much nothing left. A young boy wonders onto the scene asking what happened and then we flashback to a time where trees were everywhere. A greedy businessman starts to cut all the trees down and doesn't take the advice of the Lorax who thinks it's best to save the trees. Going into this movie I was a little worried that we'd just have a boring, preachy film but that wasn't the case at all. In fact, I think you could make a very strong argument that this here is one of the best Seuss adaptations to come from this era. As you expect the animation is extremely beautiful, full of wonderful detail and is so pleasant on the eyes you can't help but get drawn into it. Just check out the scene where a duck flies into some polluted air and you'll see the creative ways that they used the colors to help tell the story. Another major plus are the characters with the Lorax character coming off extremely entertaining. I also loved the greedy guy and really liked the fact that we never get to fully see him. The story itself is certainly a message-driven one but I appreciate the fact that they didn't beat you over the head or preach to you. Instead they just told a good story and got the message across that way.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A cautionary tale ahead of its time
llltdesq27 September 2000
Warning: Spoilers
This animation, with voice-over in spots by Eddie Albert of "Green Acres" fame, is an early effort to sound an alarm about environmental concerns, told in typical Seuss style and it's very good. The previous comment is excellent, with one small error. Possibly a SPOILER:It is quite clear from the outset that the narrator is the industrialist who ruined things with his greed. TNT runs this usually once or twice a year as part of a Seuss-a-thon. Recommended.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed