A Warning to the Curious (TV Movie 1972) Poster

(1972 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Chilling ghost story
Prof-Hieronymos-Grost8 September 2008
Mr Paxton (Peter Vaughan) has been a clerk all his life with an amateurs enthusiasm for Archaelogy. So when his business goes bust, he decides to take up his passion full time. His first venture is secured after he finds an old book that mentions an old Anglo-Saxon legend of the three fabled crowns that protect England from invaders. The first two are reported to have been lost, one during a war and the second at sea, that leaves one hidden, its resting place rumoured to be in Norfolk near the town of Seaburg. On his arrival in the misty Seaburg, he checks in to the local Inn where he finds the locals are untrusting and suspicious of him, his inquiries lead to the grave of William Ager, who it is said was the protector of the last crown, who died twelve years previously decrying his sorrow that he was the last of the line of protectors and that England was now at risk. Paxton also finds out that there was another archaeologist killed nearby on just such a treasure hunt as he was embarking on, putting two and two together he believes Ager must have been the killer. His continuing detective work leads him to Ager's former home where he learns that Ager spent his nights in the nearby woods, working on instinct Paxton begins his dig here and soon finds his treasure, but this is where his problems being, as what he digs up gives him cause for grave concern and fears for his life from forces unknown…..Dum Dee Dum Dum Dummmm! Paxton entrusts his thoughts with the only other guest at the Inn, a Dr Black, he tells him he believes he is being followed by some spectral figures, that never seem to take the same shape, Is Paxton's paranoia well founded? Paxton believes that he must replace the treasure where he found it, in order to stop these visions apparitions and nightmares that plague his every moment.

In 1971 the BBC launched its periodic series of A Ghost Story for Christmas, to produce a one off film that would be screened each Christmas and based on Britain's most famous ghost story writer, M R James. A Warning to the Curious was the second of these adaptations that was first screened in 1972. Lawrence Gordon Clark was the brains behind the series, of which he directed the first 7 films, while also producing and writing the scripts, he managed to put his style firmly on these films and capture the very essence of James' writings in a visual format. Warning to the Curious is a slow burner that builds up its characters backgrounds before getting to the scares with Vaughn's understated performance being quite exemplary, the fear growing on his face by the moment. All of this is framed around an atmospherically set coastal town, drenched in mist and surrounded by barren marshes and stunning yet bleak horizons, that has echoes of that town from The Woman in Black(1989). The scenes in the woods are pretty tense too, as every rustle in the bushes sends a chill down the spine as Paxton with his back to the trees digs for his treasure. As its made for 70's TV, its production values are quite low and because of this and its leisurely pace it may not be for the modern horror fan, but for those of a certain age and a discerning eye for good ghost stories, this is hard to beat.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"He was here, you see? He came to take it back"
ackstasis4 October 2008
I'm not the greatest horror fan you'll ever find, but I know what I find creepy, and this is it. Modern horror directors, most of whom rely on violence, gore and sudden shocks as cheap scare-tactics, ought to take a look 'A Warning to the Curious (1972),' a short made-for-TV horror story presumably produced on a shoestring budget. It seems an odd thing to be frightened about, but I find few things more unsettling than an anonymous person standing at a distance, watching purposefully in your direction. Watching and waiting, watching and waiting. This film was adapted from a story by M.R. James {whose writing also inspired the equally-wonderful 'Whistle and I'll Come to You (1968)'}, and was directed by Lawrence Gordon Clark, the second film in BBC's acclaimed "Ghost Story for Christmas" tradition. While not particularly faithful to James' original story (of which an audio reading is available on the British Film Institute DVD), there are certainly enough unsettling moments to keep you awake at night.

Mr. Paxton (Peter Vaughan) is an amateur archaeologist who, having arrived in the small town of Seaburgh, is set on unearthing an ancient Saxon crown, the last of three buried along the Norfolk coast to protect its inhabitants from overseas invasion. Despite the vaguely-intimidating behaviour of the suspicious townsfolk, Paxton eventually succeeds in locating and excavating the prized treasure, but soon discovers that he has also unearthed something quite unearthly. Wherever he treads, he feels as though he is not alone, a presence personified only by the flicker of a shadow in the corner of his eye, a spectre also perceived by those around him. This is the ghost of William Ager (John Kearney), the final member of an old family dedicated to protecting the secret of the crown, even after death. Ager, dressed in a silly black cloak, might have made a laughable villain, but creative camera-work and editing – shooting from a distance, obscured by darkness or fog, blurred photography – means that this mysterious phantom is always at the back of our minds.

'A Warning to the Curious' is not quite as subtle as 'Whistle and I'll Come to You' – the ghost is seen, however briefly, relatively early in the film – making it more accessible to the average viewer, though some may require a few minutes to come to terms with the unique, underplayed style of British low-budget horror film-making. The photography is suitably atmospheric, with subdued colours decorating the bleak Norfolk landscape, though black-and-white would undoubtedly have been even better. The soundtrack, which '2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)' fans will notice includes György Ligeti's "Atmospheres," is perfect for evoking the ever-escalating presence of the mysterious and increasingly-sinister unknown. The acting is excellent both from Peter Vaughan and fellow visitor Dr. Black (Clive Swift) in whom he confides. All this, through the steady craftsmanship of director Lawrence Gordon Clark, adds together to create an excellent British ghost story chiller. To avoid casting doubt on my mental stability, I'll refrain from describing the vivid Ager-related nightmare I experienced just last night.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
GHOST STORY FOR Christmas: A WARNING TO THE CURIOUS (TV) (Lawrence Gordon Clark, 1972) ***1/2
Bunuel197623 January 2010
The best episode yet that I have seen from the BBC's yearly GHOST STORY FOR Christmas benefits greatly from a fine central performance from Peter Vaughn (atypically but effectively cast in a sympathetic role), an interesting archaeological-historical background to the story, on-location shooting of the lovely English countryside and brilliant direction that makes the most of its creepy loner villain; the sequences showing archaeologist Vaughn being relentlessly pursued at great speed by the ghostly curator of the burial place of the third (and last remaining) crown of Anglia sent genuine shivers down this spectator's spine. Clive Swift - who also appeared in the modern-day bookends of the previous entry in the series, THE STALLS OF BARCHESTER (1971) - plays Vaughn's fellow hotel lodger who, being an amateur painter, is a regular around these parts for the purpose of scenery sketching and, indeed, another frisson is provided when the ghost appears out of nowhere right in the middle of the landscape! The curator is actually introduced to us at the start of the 50-minute short when he brutally fells another nosy (and arrogant) gravedigger and, throughout the film, materializes himself among the trees, as a perennially late (and invisible) train passenger and, most memorably, as a pale-faced intruder in Vaughn's hotel room.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
WHERE CAN I GET THIS MASTERPIECE?
gary.goldsmith113 May 2000
This is an unparalelled piece of British eerieness. Filmed on location at some lonely piece of coastline in East Anglia 'A Warning to the Curious' is based on one of respected ghost story author M R James stories. It concerns a legend regarding three buried crowns of anglesea. The main character goes searching for one of these (hes a historian or something) and wakes up the nasty (and very scary) ghoul of William Ager the crowns protector. Cue very sinister yet never obvious happenings and a creepy ending. This is part of a superb series of MR James ghost stories serialised by the BBC and is well worth seeking out. I myself am desperate for a copy!!!
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Simple, surprisingly effective ghost story
banapaulo6 September 2008
This is a very slight but creepy tale of an archaeologist who goes to a remote English village looking for a crown, supposedly guarded over by a ghost. You have to appreciate that this is a very low budget TV movie (50 minutes) with very small production values, but it still manages to summon up an eerie atmosphere and some chilling moments through very effective direction and a minimal score. The photography is wonderful and the performances are effective, including a young(ish) Clive Swift who could later be seen in Keeping Up Appearances.

Worth watching with the lights off to achieve the best atmosphere. It's not super scary, or as effective and well done as the BBCs later adaptation of The Woman In Black, but it is a good example of how to create atmosphere with the barest of plot and resources.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A lesson in horror.
rsterling20200230 November 2002
I first saw this when I was 9 or 10. Naturally, I couldn't remember it now all that well, but I do remember being geniunely scared by the vague, colourless image of William Ager. (And I was A kid that didn't scare easily. I also remember being transfixed from beginning to end and mesmerised by (how you say?) the atmosphere...the setting...the aura...the general FEEL of the piece. After a considerable length of computerised detective work, I was able to revisit this MR James dramatisation recently, it having been released on VHS and DVD for the first by BFI last month. I played the disc with great anticipation. As soon as I saw the menu screen I had that spooky 'feel' again. Anyway, I digress. This excellent lesson in 'less is more' tells the story of an archeologist who attempts to unearth an ancient Saxon crown but gets more than he bargains for.

The setting is Seaburgh, on the Norfolk broads near the coast. For those that don't know England, this is a beautifully desolate place where dense forests lie intermittently across large open wasteland where you can see a man standing miles away. Set in Autumn, this fill shows the brilliant, subtle colours. As the character Dr. Black puts it: 'You can't tell where the beach ends and the sea begins.'

10 out of 10 in all departments: acting, script, plot, direction. Even the music is excellent in its unspectacular way.

Warning: this film may not be suitable for some American audiences used to a diet of unsubtle, sensationalist horror movies. This film is made in the British way. Either you'll like that or you won't.
36 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A classic Christmas ghost story
DVD_Connoisseur24 December 2018
Shown at Christmas time by the BBC, "A Warning to the Curious" is a classic spine chiller from the early '70s.

With music to induce nightmares (by Dick Manton), this is a dark and foreboding tale.

Peter Vaughan was always a very watchable actor and he's nothing short of magnificent as the haunted Paxton. Clive Swift is also splendid as the concerned Dr. Black.

7 out of 10.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
You won't need a bucket and spade....
Sleepin_Dragon16 December 2017
This is without any doubt my favourite entry in the Ghost Story for Christmas series. The story is genius, a combination of folk law tale and sheer terror is fantastic. Some really nice touches throughout like the coughing and the train guard convinced he'd seen a figure. Peter Vaughan is wonderful as the determined archaeologist Paxton, you get to see his character truly tormented by the ghostly figure. It shows that horror can be delivered in such a way that doesn't need to be graphic, subtle horror can be equally as chilling.

The Stalls of Barchester is a very good, very solid opener, this time they pulled out all the stops, A Warning to the curious is a master stroke, a fabulous, subtle piece of horror.

The moral of the story, be careful what you dig for. 10/10
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent.
binghunt6 January 2005
I remember seeing this TV adaptation as a child and being terrified by the presence of the ghost imagining that he was standing in my back garden when I went to bed. Plus I lived in the Norfolk countryside where MR James set the tale was set. The spookiest scene must be when Peter Vaughan is digging for the crown and we fleetingly see the ghost over his shoulder. Also the frightening moment when the ghost is in his room searching for the brown and his tubercular breathing is heard. The drama really does conjure up the bleakness of some of the Norfolk countryside and the fear of what might be waiting in those trees. I am a great lover of horror films but if I need to feel a real chill this always succeeds in producing the goods.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Curious get rewarded
malfunction-13 April 2007
This is really a hidden gem in the spooky department, a real pearl of a ghost story.

I did not expect too much when i came across this while searching for good old ghost stories, all the more surprised i was how good this little chiller is.

The dark setting, the sinister atmosphere and the desolate landscapes give the perfect not-of-this-world feeling, something that reminded me of the old Japanese ghost movies. This was really done by people who know their craft, especially the ghost scenes are very effective and eerie.

Now this is what i call a piece of fine arts. God save the British Horror!
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The title says it all.
ripetomato14 July 2005
If you are curious about watching this movie, be warned. It's a stinker and it is so obvious that even my wife could guess what happens next. I'm always looking for a solid ghost story, I happened upon this one from the IMDb and it sounded like a good chiller. I hunted this movie down, finally got a copy and told the wife it was a good one. I had to apologize to her after making her watch this. This movie offers nothing that would be even remotely considered scary, not even to little ones and it has nothing to do with gore or slasher shock value. I've watched countless no budget b movies and have found many gems, this is a stinker even for early 70's.

There is no real sense of danger or fear because the lackey who plays the "ghost" is ridiculous. Not to mention a bumbling, incompetent misfit even for a ghost. I didn't know if this movie was directed by Benny Hill or Monty Python by some of the chase scenes bordering on the absurd. Can't forget about the complete lack of any time/space relationship between point a and point b. A classic ghost story this is far from, but if you have 35 minutes to waste and want to get a chuckle at something really sad this could be your movie. However, I warn you...it might say 35 minutes running time, but it feels like 200. Maybe that is the scary part.
4 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Frightened? You will be.
sonofajoiner17 November 2003
Quite simply one of the most amazingly creepy and genuinely hackle-raising supernatural horror films ever made. Not particularly faithful to the original MR James short story but a blinding adaptation nonetheless! Contains a number of very good scares and on the whole avoids going for the obvious. Its one of the few films whose impact doesnt lessen with each viewing. I guarantee that this film will cause at least one sleepless night!
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the scariest ghost stories ever filmed
Leofwine_draca17 April 2001
Warning: Spoilers
One of the Ghost Story for Christmas films that the BBC ran yearly back in the 1970s, this is an excellent suspense story which ably succeeds in scaring the wits out of the viewer. The story itself is based on a tale by M.R. James, that master of the ghost story, and authenticity is added in the bleak Norfolk surroundings where the tale is set. The sinister title neatly sums up the contents of this film, where a man is purchased by the sinister spirit of a tramp after digging up a legendary crown.

After giving the character in the story realistic reasons for wanting the crown (he's recently unemployed), the film then propels the viewer into a nightmarish netherworld where he can never be free of the tramp's spirit. Like the recent trend in horror films such as THE SIXTH SENSE and THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT, this shows that the best horror works when it is subtle and chilling instead of gory and horrific. Just watch the ending, so subtle and yet so frightening.

Peter Vaughan is well cast as the man who digs up the crown and is haunted, and his name lends support to the BBC's production. He is given able support by one Clive Swift, nowadays more recognisable as Patricia Routledge's long-suffering husband Richard in KEEPING UP APPEARANCES. Set in a time and era that can never be recaptured, A WARNING TO THE CURIOUS is, like most of the BBC series it was included in, a forgotten gem of a film which keeps it simple and succeeds in horrifying the viewer, a rare occurrence these days. I'd go so far as to describe it as a chilly visual masterpiece, and one of the most purely effective and primal ghost stories ever filmed.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best M R James adaptation
bayster91226 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Other reviewers have said as much. The master, M R James was the very finest writer of ghost stories, and this is the adaptation which best captures his style. It doesn't stick strictly to the story but the the difference is not worth noting - as to the ghost being able to bash your brains out, well M R James did always make his ghosts malevolent and able to do you harm, either just by frightening (Whistle And I'll Come To You) or by violence (Casting The Runes). Best moments: the scene in which the farmworker looks up the track and sees Peter Vaughan being followed by the ghost, and that in which the ghost is in the hotel room and the lights go out - superb.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Atmosphères!
DavidDevant27 April 2008
Like most other reviewers here, I love this short film dearly. One of the best adaptations of M.R. James to date alongside "Whistle and I'll come to you" and "Lost Hearts".

I just want to add that the music used in "A Warning to the Curious" is a section of the aptly named "Atmosphères for Orchestra" by György Ligeti written in 1961. Previously used to great effect by Stanley Kubrick in "2001: A Space Odyssey" during the star gate sequence and I'm pretty sure that the version used here in "A Warning to the Curious" is the same version used by Kubrick in "2001" - Ernest Bour conducting The Sudwestfunk Orchestra.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A lesson in horror
grrrr9724 April 2002
It's true this film is one of an endangered species of Horror films. It is quite simply at first glance terrifying, it's blend of suspense, dark atmosphere, good script and wonderful shots make it one of the best ghost films there is and I hear it cost under £10,000 to make, Hollywood could learn a thing or two from these British classics. Vaughan and Swift are good in the leading rolls and the ending is really spooky to say the least.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A near-perfect example of how to make a genuinely scary ghost story for television
dr_clarke_23 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The flawed but atmospheric The Stalls of Barchester started off A Ghost Story for Christmas in promising fashion; the following year's A Warning to the Curious would deliver on that promise in spades. Once again adapted from an M. R. James story and directed by Lawrence Gordon Clark, it sees him scrap the framing narrative of The Stalls of Barchester (but retaining his original character of Dr Black) in favour of a more straightforward story format, and the result remains utterly chilling decades after it was first broadcast in 1972.

Clark's screenplay updates the setting of James' story to the nineteen thirties (the protagonist, amateur archaeologist Paxton, has lost his job due to the Depression and briefly thinks his luck has changed when he finds a buried Anglo-Saxon crown), which allows him to establish continuity with The Stalls of Barchester by including Clive Swift's academic Dr Black; whilst he doesn't function as a literal narrator on this occasion, his inclusion gives Paxton somebody to converse with, aiding exposition. But for the most part, the adaptation is true to the original story, with Paxton discovering an ancient lost treasure on the Norfolk coast, only to find out that it has a terrifying supernatural guardian.

The screenplay is effective, but it is Clark's direction that really makes A Warning to the Curious so unforgettably atmospheric. Once again shooting in 16 mm film, he imbues the whole thing with menacing imagery right from the brutal murder in the first scene, and the bleak location filming - which will become a recurring feature of his A Ghost Story for Christmas episodes - enhances the story's unsettlingly cold atmosphere. John McGlashan's cinematography is a key contributing factor to the look of the episode, but isn't the only one: the scene of Paxton digging up bones - and the crown - is incredibly creepy as the camerawork is combined with a soundtrack by Dick Manton that leads the audience to expect something to happen to him, even though at this point in the story, nothing does. Clark's mise-en-scéne includes an antique shop containing with human skulls, a sinister stuffed fox head, and a weird proprietor; we get dark woods, exposed beaches, and an overgrown graveyard.

The episode stars Peter Vaughan, who gives an excellent naturalistic performance as the doomed Paxton; he's impressively convincing as Paxton becomes increasingly nervy and sweaty when he realises that Ager is haunting him. He gets strong support from Clive Swift, who gets far more to do as Black than he did in The Stalls of Barchester and pays the price: with Clark no longer writing the scripts for A Ghost Story for Christmas after A Warning to the Curious, the character is dropped: the final scene implies that the narrative reason for this is that Ager turns his malevolent attentions towards the good doctor. Clark's casting of John Kearney as William Ager is inspired: he gives a terrifying performance and although after his appearance in the opening scene the ghost is only ever seen in long-shot, often running towards the camera, it makes for profoundly creepy image. Meanwhile, David Cargill's weird Arnold Boots adds to the folk horror vibe of an isolated village whose inhabitants guard its secrets.

Fans of A Ghost Story for Christmas often cite the later Charles Dickens adaptation The Signalman as the highpoint of the original nineteen seventies series and they make a good case. But A Warning to the Curious provides that episode with stiff competition. It remains the best M. R. James adaptation of either the original series or the twenty-first century revival and remains a near-perfect example of how to make a genuinely scary ghost story for television.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sorry Mr James - there is a God, and he works on a low budget
surrey-garland23 January 2008
The doomed solitariness of James'protagonists is what these films get so absolutely right. A comparison with Hamlet in this regard is not too far fetched: we stand by, as the porters and 'Dr Blacks' and other Dons and hotel staff do, witnesses to another's horror - the horror visited on the solitary intellectual (here, an amateur) who enquires too much. All the BBC2 GSFCs by LGC are far and away the best adaptations of the often arid James texts. Is the emptiness of convivial people to do with budget, or is it the director's conception? Either way it's brilliant. All credit to the sound and music too - the sound just hangs on in here. Rewatching them again convinces me that Nic Roeg must have spent Christmas 1971 imbibing these small masterpieces before he went on to make Don't Look Now (Or maybe it was vice versa?) Not just the black cloak, but also the lack of salvation offered by the Church - compare the disillusioned vicar here with the scene (in Don't Look Now) in which the Dean of the Venetian church turns away, covering his crucifix, as if to say: 'no redemption on offer mate - you're on your own - sorry'. 16mm film is here consummated in long shots where overexposed figures bleach out into Jamesian formless beings. Had it not been made for TV there would be more of this I'm sure. By the way, I suspect the key location isn't the Norfolk Broads, but Holkham Beach. Go there - you'll lose yourself in the pines like the camera does - and, like the camera, you'll be looking over your shoulder to see where the rustling comes from. Final note - don't confuse these gems with the more famous but to my mind inferior Jonathan Miller adaptation of Whistle and I'll Come to You.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
cracking good ghost story
myriamlenys20 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Based on a fine M.R. James story, this is a deliciously frightening yarn, in which an amateur archaeologist is convinced that he knows where some fabled treasure is buried. However, there are some who do not like people showing disregard for their historical heritage...

It's got everything you need for a very British tale : history, crowns, ancient churches, dusty books, graveyards, grey-haired vicars pointing at gravestones or talking about unholy local traditions. You also get a large dollop of Locals Who Know But Will Not Speak. As befits the same tradition, the amount of special effects and gore is kept to a strict minimum - and yet this is a tale one should not watch while alone...

Good acting and some remarkable coastal scenery.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the Scariest Film Ever Made
Dave Phillips20 June 2004
I do not make the claim lightly. According to the IMDb I have seen 2275 films as of June 2004 and 530 of those are classified as horror. I've seen films from all over the World and IMHO this is one of the scariest.

I'm not saying the majority of viewers would agree if they were lucky enough to see this classic short, just that it's my favourite. Whether you might agree depends on what you like in a horror film. My favourites all seem to have a common factor; AN OVERWHELMING ATMOSPHERE OF DREAD. "The Haunting (1963)" "The Wicker Man" "Don't Look Now" "Halloween" "La Cabina" "BWP"...........they all have this same quality but "A Warning to the Curious" does it best.

I won't include any spoilers but I will say that the film contains two terrifying images and the music is extremely unsettling. Made on a very small budget (so don't expect any special effects) this BBC classic is now available to buy on DVD from the BFI. It is one of a series of DVD's re-issued by the BFI from the BBC's "A Ghost Story For Christmas" series aired in the 1970's. They have also issued "The Signalman" and the excellent "Oh Whistle and I'll Come To You" both of which are worth purchasing.

The film has some unique features. A ghost that appears in the day as well as the night? A ghost that runs after you rather than float or walk? You get the feeling that something very strange is happening and that some or all the other characters, other than the lead, are in on it. Very reminiscent of "Don't Look Now"

The film also retains its eeriness no matter how many times you watch it.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Atmospheric ghost story
imogenwooder15 September 2017
I saw this on television one Christmas Eve when I was in my teens and it is my favourite ghost story. The story by MR James has been altered with director's licence by Laurence Clark and for once the changes chime in perfectly to make this more than a story of an obsessed academic and it becomes a poignant story of a working class clerk with talent and ambition to become an archaeologist. It becomes a story of class conflict and alienation.

Peter Vaughan was at his best in the role of the unemployed man who looks for and finds treasure that professionals have been looking for in vain. The setting in Victorian Norfolk is accurate and atmospheric and it gains from the involvement of another man who is a guest, perhaps not initially drawn to the clerk but forced in the course of the story to act through sympathy and later horror.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Top notch BBC ghost story adaption
Red-Barracuda6 June 2022
The 2nd entry in the ''Ghost Story for Christmas' strand from the BBC is another M. R. James adaption. It tells the tale of an archaeologist who is searching for one of the lost crowns of East Anglia. He learns it is buried in a grove but is warned that it is guarded by a frightening entity. Of course, he ignores this latter useful advice and thereafter has to contend with the none-too-pleased supernatural guardian. This could be the best of these BBC adaptions up to this point in time. There is a great sense of location and the photography really accentuates the mood, meaning that there is plenty of atmosphere in this one. Quality ghostly goings on.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best of the BBC ghost stories
alexmgreig2 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Absolutely unbeatable as a Victorian ghost story this 1972 BBC production has everything. Haunting theme music, an ancient mystery, wintery coastal vistas, shadowy figures seen in a distant landscape, beautiful slow pace, sudden terror and the gradual disintegration of the main protagonist as he is pursued by the guardian. Solid performances by Peter Vaughan as the seeker of treasure and Clive Swift as the holidaying doctor who befriends him. No blood or silly special effects, it is a spine chilling masterpiece that still causes frissons even after 50 years.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Warning
Gary-16130 January 2005
This scared my sister and I silly when it was originally broadcast. With age, ghosts are a bit silly. Especially coughing ghosts. In Lost Hearts there was talk of the 'psychic portions of the subjects being problematic, especially when able to command what we are pleased to call material objects', or words to that affect. Nevertheless, I could never buy into spirits being able to hold objects and hatchet you in the face. Either you're dead or you're not, son.

Despite risibility, Lawrence Gordon Clarke deserves to be acknowledged as one of the great directors of horror and suspense, like Hitchcock or Carpenter, depending on your point of view. One day I think he will be, because there are so many moments in his productions that anchor in your memory years after. This was one of the best.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Is this the best ever film of a ghost story?
jmmstuart28 September 2003
M. R. James was among the greatest writers of ghost stories and A Warning to the Curious is one of his most celebrated works. Although made for television, this may be the finest ever film version of a ghost story. The film has a sepia look and the atmosphere and use of music are superb. This film is more satisfying than many big budget movies, although comparable films include Stanley Kubrick's `The Shining' and the 1963 version of `The Haunting'.

What sounds like the exact same piece of music as accompanies Paxton's night-time dig for the crown was also used in the night-time robbery sequence in Michael Mann's `Heat'.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed