What's Up? (2004) Poster

(2004)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Appallingly bad
debblyst13 April 2008
(Un)inspired by Mathieu Kassovitz's powerful "La Haine", this ludicrous testosterone-addicted tragic farce "Ódiquê?" (a neologism meaning "ódio de quê?", "hate for what?") follows 24 hours in the life of three 20-something jackass middle-class friends in Rio de Janeiro, who decide to fake the kidnapping of a wealthy buddy so they can collect money to travel to paradisaical beach Arraial d'Ajuda for the Carnaval.

First-time feature film director Felipe Joffily and first-time screenwriter Gustavo Moretzsohn prove that being graduated at NYU Film School doesn't necessarily translate into minimum quality cinema: the plot is a mess and the film looks amateurish even by Youtube standards (I wonder if their NYU teachers saw the film and what was their appreciation of it). Considering it took four years between the writing and the actual shooting, it's alarming how appalling the final script is, with holes, digressions and contrivances enough to madden the most indulgent viewer. It's like a collage of amateur improv acting classes, only there are no real actors at work here (with the exception of old pros Cássia Kiss and Henri Pagnoncelli in embarrassing cameos), just shirtless MTV-type models trying their turn as gross apes with jackass ideas of fun (TV hottie Cauã Reymond is so unskilled he cracks in some of the "dramatic" scenes).

There are serious sound problems, and we can only thank our gods that we can't hear part of the indescribable dialog. The direction is so confusing that we have to waste precious neurons linking the dots between the scenes and figuring out the most basic contradictions, like how these penniless guys have got their own cars and motorbikes or how the shootings cause no stir in the neighborhood. And there is a scene to be inscribed among the most cringe-worthy ever made, where Reymond's character terrorizes a kid who is retarded AND homeless AND black for the fun of it -- it's the kind of cheap, falsely provocative, sickening scene that makes you want to throw rotten eggs at the screen (but then you realize it's not the screen's fault, and anyway you haven't brought rotten eggs with you).

"Ódiquê?" lay on the shelf for three years before finding theatrical distribution, only to open to dismal box-office and critical reception, proving that sometimes distributors, critics and audiences DO agree. "Ódiquê?" wants to be controversial and denunciative when it's just prejudiced, misogynist, scandal-hungry tabloid-cinema: it belongs in the same movie limbo as the excruciating "Cama de Gato" -- films that are best unseen and forgotten. P.S.: to top it all, the DVD transcription has technical problems of its own!
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A terrible waste of time!
mario_c29 May 2008
This is for sure one of the worst Brazilian movies I've seen latterly! The plot is weak and the acting too! The main characters are a small group of friends that just want to have fun and screw everything up, as they represent the typical jackass middle-class boys who just like to screw around. They don't create any sympathy in the viewer, as they are so stupid and unfunny!

To reinforce this position, the movie has a few scenes, making fun of the minorities and of retarded people that weren't funny but quite annoying instead! One of them is with one retarded black kid who's scared to death by one of those assholes (probably the worst of them). The other one is with the Portuguese emigrant. I know that in Brazil there's a bad and stereotyped image about Portuguese emigrants but even so I didn't like to hear the jackass say: "if I were president of this country I would put every Portuguese in a boat and would send them back to Portugal, because you are like that, dirty, smelling bad…"! Great! That's fine, but let me remember one thing my friend (I'm talking to every Brazilian assholes that think like this one, and I know there're a lot!): These days there're much more Brazilians going to Portugal than Portuguese going to Brazil (I'm talking about emigrants, not about tourists) and it is also very easy to create a stereotyped image of Brazilian people that arrive in our country, because if I generalize I can also say that the majority of women come to Portugal to work on prostitution and men to play football (most of them in secondary leagues)! So, as you can see, it is very easy to create stereotypes and have xenophobic and intolerant attitudes! Let's just not follow this way, OK?

I know this movie shall be taken as a critic to Brazilian society but even so I think this film is bad, because this social criticism is terribly done. It is much worse than in other Brazilian films I've seen recently (and I've seen some…). It was a terrible waste of time!
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie, but the plot has problems
iradao11 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The movie is not as bad as the others commented here in this site. Maybe the commentarists are too old. I am young like the characters in the movie and I perfectly understood the dialogs and the situations exposed.

The story is about three youngsters from Rio de Janeiro that have no money and want to play carnival in Arraial D'ajuda, a paradisiac beach in Bahia. Many young people don't like the carnival in Rio de Janeiro and find more exciting in other places, as is said in the movie: to see and kiss other girls. But without money they cannot go.

As they smoke marijuana, they have an idea to steal small drug dealers, and manage to do it and earn 150 reais. This is the first plot problem, because it is really very very dangerous and nobody would have this stupid idea, because behind a small drug dealer there is always a big drug dealer.

Later they call another friend, son of a congressman to join their group. In Rio de Janeiro there are some youngsters that feel exciting in committing crimes, not for the money, but just because of the adrenaline. So they start committing crimes, until someone has an idea to kidnap some other person. This is the main gap in the plot, because it is not well explained and doesn't make sense at all.

Beside the story problems, the dialogs are very funny and very alike to youngster cariocas that smoke marijuana. The character Tito (played by Cauã) seems to be high during the whole movie, which can be somehow annoying but also very funny.

There is a scene where he humiliates a black retarded boy. It is very cruel, but the movie doesn't turn worse because of it. If it was true, some Hitler and Holocaust movies could never be shot. It is a shame that some dialogs cannot be understood because of bad sound mix, but the quality is better than "Cama de Gato", a movie that looks like Ódique.

I think that for a first movie, it can be considered a success for Moretzsohn. Hope he returns with even better movies, for the good sake of Brazilian cinema.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed