The Secret Agent (TV Mini Series 1992) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Means of Production Produces Knives.
rmax3048238 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I never read the novel but I did see Hitchock's far more commercial and erratic version of this sad story. David Suchet's conundrum -- he's a double agent working for both the police and the anarchists that haunted London in the Victorian period -- reminded me less of Oscar Homolka in the Hitchock version than of whistle-blowing cop in "Prince of the City," a tragic figure, exploited by both sides, who is ridden with shame, guilt, and fear.

Suchet, as Adolph Verloc, the shabby spy who runs a shabby shop, is nearly perfect in the role. What a range the guy has -- from prissy Frog to someone who looks "like a plumber presenting the bill," as one of his high-echelon anarchist bosses calls him. That anarchist boss, M. Vladimir, is exemplary by the way. What a terrible snob. His inflections ooze contempt. He's played by Peter Capaldi, one of many fine performances in this TV series. Nobody turns in a BAD performance.

Of course, some of the characters are less admirable than others. Not just Capaldi's sneering Vladimir but David Schofield's Ossipon who takes advantage of Verloc's widow, steals her money, and runs off, leaving her to her fate, which is watery.

It's an arguable view of life. Nobody really wins. The Heat is on the Chief Detective Inspector or whatever he is, who looks like Robbie Coltrane. He wants to pin Verloc's bomb explosion on an ex con named Michaelis but it doesn't work out for him. Verloc's widow loses her brother and Verloc loses his life. Yet, maybe he's better off for it. His dead body, with half a meat knife sticking out of his chest, looks almost peaceful in repose, as if glad to have escaped this valley of ashes he's been living in for seven years.

I've neglected the plot. It's simple enough. Vladimir demands that Verloc blow something up to prove he's worth keeping on. Verloc gets a bomb but it blows up accidentally in a park and blows his boyish, simple-minded brother-in-law to pieces. There is no Hitchcockian build-up of suspense. The explosion takes place off screen. Verloc loved the boy and loved the wife who kills him for his deed. The implications and insinuations are far more complex than that. (Verloc was too dense to realize that his wife had hated him all the years of their marriage.) But there's no space to get into it.

The name of the country that M. Vladimir works for is never mentioned but there's little doubt that it's the villainous Russia and her wobbly monarch. Joseph Conrad, on whose novel this was based, wasn't political but he hated Russians. To him, a Pole, everything Russian "smelled of cabbage soup." It's gloomy but it's a finely executed story.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Conrad's Masterpiece perfectly done by Suchet + Campbell
ashfordr4 August 2012
1992 BBC TV adaptation of Joseph Conrad's Secret Agent in 3 episodes has been unavailable in US, despite its excellence. Late Victorian London is full of anarchists of many stripes, (the forerunners of Bolsheviks, etc.) Suchet plays an agent provocateur, in the pay of a mysterious foreign embassy. His job is to keep tabs on all the other anarchists, and to provoke the odd incident to terrorize the populace, whenever his employer demands. However the police know all about him and the other anarchists. Also Suchet has settled down to a marriage of convenience with Cheryl Campbell, becoming a sleazy shopkeeper and promising to look after his wife's mildly retarded brother. When the embassy demands an incident, Suchet knows he must act, despite the risk of discovery, and of upsetting his household. Both of these consummate actors are at their peak in this gem, with its eerie echos of 9/11, a hundred years later.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Excruciating
joelbergsman24 January 2022
One of the most excruciatingly awful movies I have ever seen. It is saved by the unbelievable overacting of David Suchet, and the same from the actress who plays his wife. Most of the characters are one-dimensional caricatures, a fact that adds to the exaggerated plot and, again, the scenery-clawing performances. Suchet deserves an Oscar for excessive excess.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed