Save the Last Dance 2 (Video 2006) Poster

(2006 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
i thought it was going to be poor, but you know what its not bad.....
lucasrulez10 December 2006
I've got to say when I first heard about a Save the last dance 2 I thought cheap knock off can never come near the original. Then when I saw the cast for this film i was even inclined to feeling this was going to be a poor sequel but you know what its not that bad...

I think that this is a fun lively little film its not a world beating film or anything like that but a good film to watch in the comfort of your home. I find this is probably one of the better dance films on the market at the moment and the love story element flowing in the background carries the film along nicely. I think perhaps 6/10 is a fair mark for this film.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Izabella Miko and the Dance Choreography Make It Worth
claudio_carvalho25 May 2009
Sara (Izabella Miko) joins Julliard in New York to fulfill hers and her mother dream and become the prima ballerina of the school. She befriends her roommate Zoe (Aubrey Dollar) and Miles (Columbus Short), who gives classes of hip-hop. She has ballet classes with the rigid and famous Monique Delacroix (Jacqueline Bisset) that she idolizes and Monique requires full commitment, discipline and hard work from her students. When Miles, who is a composer that researches sounds, invites Sara to help him in the dance choreography of his music, Sara's passion for hip- hop arises and she falls in love for Miles. When she is assigned to perform Giselle in an important event, she feels divided between the technique of the ballet and the creative work offered by Miles.

"Save the Last Dance 2" is a messy romance, full of incoherencies. For example, Sara's dream has always been to join Julliard and become the prima ballerina. Her mother died while driving to see her audition. However, when she has just accomplished success and recognition, she concludes that ballet is a mechanical repetition of steps and movements and she throws her promising career in the garbage in an absurd impulse. The relationship between Miles and Monique is ridiculous. I could list many other flaws in the story, but "Save the Last Dance 2" is also pleasant and entertaining if the viewer does not think much about the plot. Last but not the least, Izabella Miko and the dance choreography make it worth. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "No Balanço do Amor 2" ("In the Swing of Love 2")
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
WTF did I watch
kamsitheprince24 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Why change cast, whats this writing. To many pacing issues, also Sara would never give up her dream of being in julliard. Wtf was this honestly.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This Writer Should Not Be Allowed to Hold a Pen
nimbus-chick16 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
There were some good moments in STLD2, sure, but the few good ones could not make up for all the bad. In the first five minutes of this movie we saw an interview with no context (Who was interviewing her? Why? Documentary?) and a misfired Hamlet joke.

On the first appearance of the room mate, Zoe (who even has a cliché quirky brunette name) we see that the writer clearly doesn't even have the basic knowledge required for his craft. Zoe's trunk is full of random things that are nothing but random and there to paint her as the crazy whore drama kid. Thanks. I appreciate you stereotyping my people. When the skull was picked up and Zoe said that it was Hamlet, I almost turned off the movie. I don't think you can call yourself a writer if you are not familiar with the masterpiece of English speaking literature. THE SKULL IS YORIK! The rest of the movie follows in this way. Clichés, bad lines and jokes that don't quite make sense in context. There was a good moment where Miles (Columbus Short, the redeeming actor in this movie) plays the sound of ice cracking. That was pretty much it. The dances weren't that good and half of them were cut creatively so they didn't really have to show them. Half of one girl's dance was inter cut with the exact same "oh puh-lease" expression that the main actress kept pulling. It was painful.

The movie didn't address the race issue (which was half the point of its predecessor) and the conflict was a creation of the main character's head where she decided her boyfriend lied to her when in fact he never did. They never danced together either. So why was it a sequel? The movie also had an annoyingly self righteous message about conservatory schools. They painted the elite elimination of students in the lower half of the class as cruel. Sorry, in the real world you DON'T get an A for effort and people CHOOSE to go to conservatory schools for the elitism and the status they can achieve if they make it through. Boohoo, life isn't fair.

At the end of the movie I really hated the main character. She pretty much spat in the face of her teacher by refusing to go to the party. Instead of being grateful for her amazing opportunity and letting the old bird show her off for a few hours and then quitting ballet the next day, she had to embarrass her. It's not her fault you don't wanna be a ballerina! In the end I think someone else wrote Miles (Columbus Short) and then they hired a fifteen year old girl wannabe dancer to write the rest of the movie. Way to go. When there are so many talented writers who are struggling to make ends meet, you go and pay someone who should probably go be an accountant.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible!!
leanne_hoadley198823 February 2007
This film has got to be one of the worst sequels ever produced. The plot line was poor, confusing and the ending was really unclear.

Characters who were in it just disappeared without any fuss.

No where near as good as number one.

This sequel goes down in flop history with:

Grease 2 & Dirty Dancing 2

Classics having their names ruined with producers who make one film to many!

I just wondering if any of the people who have written reviews have actually seen the film??

Total waste of money. I wouldn't recommend it at all!!!
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Entry
tedg2 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a sucker for dance movies, even teen dance movies.

Its one of the most basic pleasures, to see young people dance and if I am lucky, to dance with them.

I'll tell you straight out that this is one of the very best of these. Yes, it has problems. Those first. Its stuck with this teen notion of "being yourself," to not let adult traditions become expectations that guide your life. Like all such movies, it itself is a rigid expectation, and the "freedom" here has our gal move into the most commercially defined trend in all the world. Its hardly free and individual to follow an adult template (refined to capture your ticketfare) which guides you to a mere collection of styles (appropriated and packaged to collect other dollars).

Today, there is no genuine Hip Hop. Anywhere. And there are problems with the movie as well. There clearly were huge cuts. An entire story line involving a modern dance teacher seems to have been excised, even to the point that the actor isn't even credited! Some edits are really bad. All of the background characters are offensively trite.

And maybe the worst offense is that the hip hop dance sequences aren't energetically photographed. Shucks. Our girl, is pretty. Very pretty. But the makeup is so perfect and extreme that it fights the impression we are supposed to get.

Because this was made cheaply, it rents stock footage of New York and the exteriors of the center. One shot has the skyline with the twin towers. Its so jarring it breaks the flow.

But forget that, because what's good is very good. I saw this young actress in "Forsaken" where she was merely the designated boobs. She's come a long way. She's credible in this rather constrained character. She seems natural, perhaps because she actually went through a similar experience.

She really is a dancer, with a dancer's body. Strong back which we are allowed to see move. Ballet moves that because she is a real ballerina seem genuine. I see in the credits that she is doubled by a real dancer, but I could not see where. She is credible in both the ballet and "street" dancing.

The male interest is also playing a role close to who he is, or thinks he is. So he does well.

The story is a bit choppy, but it isn't at all the typical fare. There's a real surprise here that raises deeper issues of family than you expect. It really is nice to be surprised in the middle of one of these things. Its not predicable at all.

The one ballet performance is photographed well, really well. Its only few moments, but dear, borrowing from Altman and "Red Shoes." Now, let me tell you why I want you to see this. Teen projects almost exclusively start and end clumsily. Its because they are so formulaic they needn't introduce you to the world because you come to the theater already tuned. This project starts so expertly I was charmed from the start.

Our girl is in a chair with a small table, white background. She is speaking directly to us as if we were interviewing her. She explains the background of the predecessor movie as the background behind her changes. It seems she is controlling the staging of what we see while she is giving it.

This is a scriptwriter's intelligence. The central notion in all these is to fold the audience in the theater to one on screen watching the climactic performance. This opening tells us that we will be a folded audience all the way through. Its a schooled technique, but I was glad to see it.

The story comes to a close with all sorts of hanging threads. In an ordinary production, you'd see each of these in turn being resolved. Does she quit? Does she move in? How are the upset parental issues resolved? Thankfully, all these are left hanging. The final image we see is our girl in a frozen ecstatic leap, in the midst of a fusion dance, free. In a sort of Olivia Newton John wild girl outfit. Juices flowing.

Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't See If You Liked the First
the_green_monster19 January 2007
This was a terrible movie with a bad plot line. They repeated the same story line as the first but with a different love interest for the same main character. The girl that they got to play Sara however was a terrible actress and was like watching a bad car crash. They had her in red gothy lipstick throughout the entire film that was distracting and unlike Sara. I can't even remember the dancing or the music because all I could think of was how bad this movie is. It totally ruined a great movie and now I am going to have to try to forget that I ever saw it in the first place. I honestly only watched it because it was on t.v. and there was nothing better to watch. It did not relay the message as the first one did. It sent out weird racial messages and was a disgusting display of how Hollywood is out of original ideas. I'd hate to be the writer of this script.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If not compared to the first it's a pretty good flick
mimryan5 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
If you don't think of this as a sequel its actually a pretty good movie. Again with a great soundtrack, it's just a bit more grown up. With a lot more ballet, but a little less plot. It carries on the story where the original film ended. Kindly giving us a detailed reminder of the first in the opening and introducing us to the new actress who is playing Sarah, who seems the ballet dancer much more than our first Sarah did. Short one hunky boyfriend we soon find a new love interest in the shape of Sarahs uber hot hip hop teacher. From here the film is pretty predictable, what is Sarah's real dream and how can she reach it. I'd recommend this to anyone who enjoys films with love and dancing. It may not be original but it's still a fun watch.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Did not care for the movie
ladydiana041527 December 2006
My daughter and I loved Save the Last Dance 1 (one of our favorite movies). When we saw there was a second one, we were so excited. We watched the movie through it's entirety, but at the end of the movie we were both very disappointed in the movie. The movie itself was good - but just knowing that it was a continuation of Sara's life, is what upset us over the movie. None of the original cast was in the second one (no one can take Julia Stiles place in that movie) and just the fact that everything that Sara and Derek went through in the first one just to be together - "they" decided to take a break from each other and date other people. The second one was a big let down. If the second one would have been about someone else's life - it would have been a great movie - on it's own.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No relation to the first movie other than the title.
jordondave-2808520 June 2023
(2006) Save The Last Dance 2 DRAMA

Second film with no relevance to the first one made in 2001 starring Julia Stiles and Omar Sean Patrick Thomas, other than they are both dancing movies and with an entirely whole new cast, this one stars Izabella Miko as Sara and Columbus Short as Miles whose ambitions intertwined when Sara on her first day to Julliard with aspirations to become a professional ballerina, except that she's exploring other dances and is starting to enjoy it too. Despite some bad acting and without seeing the first one, I thought this film is a realistic portrayal about the dilemmas teenagers have to confront who have ambitions to become the best dancer when the training can be rigorous. And although the relationship between the two stars can be seen a mile away, it serves only a small portion of the film's overall message which viewers can use the fast forward button for, it would've been nice if the dancing was a little deeper instead of just using familiar issues regarding dancing, such as pills and peer pressure. And I didn't care too much about some of the track songs either.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This falls shy of the fist film.
cgvsluis8 December 2020
This is a continuation of the story as it was left off at the end of Save the last dance. Our main heroine goes to Juliard and seems to have abandoned her Georgetown headed boyfriend, but magically picks up with another hip-hop loving individual who can dance named Miles. Lots of ballet and an extremely dedicated and severe teacher...who turns out to be Miles' mom. Not too much plot...a more understanding contemporary dance instructor and some choreography later...movie over. Watch the original, it has more grit and a more complex plot.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
adequate
mattkratz17 November 2006
This wasn't too bad a movie. It was basically about following your dreams and dealing with adversity along the way. Although I had basically seen the movie before with different titles (if you get my meaning), I thought the movie was good. Izabella Miko was good in the lead role as she performed the dance scenes well. Those scenes, by the way, were spectacular! (especially the ballet scenes and the part at a night club) While the themes of the movie were familiar, I found this movie to be refreshing and a good way to spend less than an hour and a half. I would recommend it.

** 1/2 out of ****
20 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Terrible
skpn12318 August 2021
The biggest problem with this film is the total lack of resonance with Save the Last Dance 1. As a stand-alone it is no worse than any other average dance movie I have seen. It lacks emotional connection but not sure if it is the script or the lead female actor.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Huh, what?!?
rdh-361071 September 2022
I'm started movie a little late. Didn't realize it was a continuation from the first one. It would have been nice 1. Movie was based on a new character 2. Chenille came to visit 3. To see Colombus Short dance.

I can't believe Sarah gave her her dream so easily after she works a hard to get to that point. I don't like the fact that she's always easily influenced by some man. Also after all with her and Derek went through in the first one I find it strange that they just woke up so easily. And if being in an interracial relationship was hard why does she jump into another interracial relationship So quickly. Part of her audition to Julliard was a hip-hop number so why isn't she doing that type of dance class while attending school there.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth your time
zoom_capricornus3 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
What i didn't expect about (Save The Last Dance 2) is that a movie made for a home release only can be that good. To be honest it's almost an exact replica of (Save The Last Dance), same plot, same dance styles. However a different cast and a slightly different story could make you enjoy this one just as much you enjoyed (Save The Last Dance). The acting was good enough, directing was OK, although the editing was quite bizarre, scenes were like suddenly changing that at some point made the movie a little bit hard to follow at a certain plot twist. Izabella Miko and her fabulous look and her excellent dancing style was the best thing in the movie. also the music chosen in the movie really fits. To sum up i think this movie is worth your time. i hope you enjoy it. .
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No character continuity, terrible
aja-conway20 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
To be fair, I didn't make it past the first 5 minutes, but I'm the person that loves even the cheesiest of movies. I love this actress, but the only way this move work is if she's not a continuation of Sarah Johnson. OK, change the actress you might have since differences, but Sarah was a laid back calm person. From scene one she was jumping and dancing around. Also, I know ten break up when going to college, but I don't but that they broke up before even trying to make it work, after all they went through.

Honestly, the 5 minutes I saw betrayed the original character's personality so much I just couldn't go further. Don't bother.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
complaints
sarahchinchin29 December 2006
OK well i definitely think that they should have stuck with Julia Stiles and Sean Patrick Thomas. They would have looked so much better in save the last dance 2.Izabella Miko was to Gothic to be Sara i didn't like how when she was in the "pit" she was very Gothic and it did not look like something Sara Johnson would were. And one more thing when Sara and mille are walking in the park her boot steps are WAY to loud you can barley hear them talk.Oand what about Zoe what was her point in the movie any way? at least Chenille was there to help people along the way and she got a point across that it doesn't matter who you love as long as they love you back. I done now.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring and poorly done.
speedolstar9 December 2007
I did not enjoy this movie at all. It is one of the worst sequels ever made. All they did was alter the first movie slightly, take out some of the conflict, throw in some different actors...

The fact that they found another actress to play the same character was already a huge disappointment. And this was before I even started the movie. Facts pop out randomly and characters that started out in the story just disappeared because of lame reasons.

I did not find the 'big finale' very interesting, meaning I had to sit through an hour and a half of drama that I'd already seen in the first movie, just so I could see the poorly done finish.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
weak lead in the same old story
SnoopyStyle11 June 2015
Sara (Izabella Miko) is the innocent freshman in Julliard in NYC studying to be Prima ballerina under the tough famed dancer Monique Delacroix (Jacqueline Bisset). Zoe (Aubrey Dollar) is her wacky Texan acting roommate. Katrina (Maria Brooks) is her assigned mentor. Miles (Columbus Short) is a student substitute teaching in her hip hop class. She falls for the aspiring composer as she's pulled between the world of hip hop and the traditional ballet world.

The story is cheesy and very unoriginal. The main problem is that Miko is a relatively weak leading actress. The main saving grace for me is Dollar's friend character. She's funny cute especially when one of the first thing the movie does to her is to put her in an eye patch. Bisset is good as the grand dame of the piece. This is weak sequel with a poor actress at its center. However there are some minor good parts.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A bad sequel
MihaiSorinToma1 August 2017
The continuation of Sara's life after the events from the first movie is presented in this sequel, together with the new challenges that she must face in order to fulfill her lifelong dream of becoming Prima-Ballerina. The exaggerated pretensions of her famous teacher consume most of her time, but the new friends she makes also request her presence in the hip-hop world, so she'll soon find herself in the situation of choosing between her dream and her love.

Although it sounded like a good idea to continue what happens in the first installment, this movie begins to commit mistakes even from the beginning, by choosing different actors. It's not necessarily something dramatic, but it will inevitable alter the perception of the viewer, especially if he has seen the first one first. Furthermore, the characters which are superficially presented (for some of them you might even wonder why are they even present in the movie) participate in a series of even more predictable events (comparing to its predecessor) which ultimately lead to an unsatisfying and expected finale.

It leaves the impression that it wasn't well thought, written or even produced. Everything seems rushed, superficial, put into play just to be there. It also decides to present much less sequences of hip-hop or dance in detriment of the "struggles" of ballet, which isn't impressive, to say the least. The good part is the performance of the actors which truly had to struggle with such bad dialogue and plot, but somehow managed to steal a couple of smiles and even a bit of laughter.

I wanted and hoped for this movie to be good, but it ended up in a very bad position, the one of the sequels which shouldn't have existed in the first place. It's not such a bad movie, but it disappoints from almost every point of view, making you wish it shouldn't have been made.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
loved it, definitely buying it :)
wvchica9 October 2006
I liked this movie just about as much as the first, if not more. I know it's odd to say that about a sequel, and a sequel going straight to DVD without it's original cast no less, but I really liked it. I thought it was a good movie about following your heart and finding your place and passion. Some people are saying that it has the same storyline as the original, but I didn't see that. I thought it was completely different. There are different people, different surroundings. Sara is already at Julliard in this one and she's in love with rap and hip-hop music at this point. How can you be more different than that? This movie talks about the love of dance whichever way your dreams take you.
28 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
boy likes girl. boy gets girl. music involved along the way
eesonusa16 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
this movie is something that you would watch if you have nothing better to do and you are stuck in a baking desert bus stop, with it being your only form of mental stimulation. The comment above is totally wrong. this movie is the same as the 1st and nothing has changed except the actors get worse and the budget is minuscule. Anyone who has seen this movie will agree with me that love when your young does not happen in the way portrayed in this movie. not that it was ever meant to portray a true sense of young love. moreover, the scale on which they portray love and relationships is beyond fairytale proportions which Walt Disney himself could not have conceived. in closing i would not recommend you wasting your valuable time watching this movie. if however, you are stuck in a baking desert bus stop think of this article and laugh as you watch it and say isn't that something.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
!!!!!!Worst Ending ever!!!!!
adam-williams-45 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
for those of you who have seen it anyone notice how the film didn't actually go anywhere? it just sort of ......stopped. so there was a lot of lardy dardy dancing, which is to be expected. but thats it. The plot line sort of fizzles out. Runs very similar to the first one.So ballet isn't for her. whoop de do. Nothing comes of that woman she meets outside smoking a cigarette. "come see me if you want to talk about anything" does she... no! a better ending would be that woman sets Sarah up for some choreographing interviews for big hip hop dancers. or something anything but the ending that was on there. I say again Worst ending ever
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lacking Something
lovely124927 December 2007
I just recently saw this movie because I really was looking for a movie to watch. I had already read he comments for this movie before I saw it. This movie was lacking something. I mean the chemistry was OK between Sara and Miles but the dance movies was horrible. A viewer could tell that the new Sara could not dance hip hop. The way it went with the music was just bad. I did like the plot and the meaning behind the movie. The way Sarah acted and her ballet was excellent though. The funny thing is that you can tell that the actress used to be a ballerina in real life. I did love Miles. He really is why I watched the movie for the second time. He is really cute and his smile does light up the movie. But after everything was said and done, the movie was just missing something that I can put my foot on.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not terrible, but not great.
blackpopsicles14 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Having quite enjoyed the first movie this second one felt like it was cheap and rushed. The main character of Sara being played by a different actress was the first thing that threw me off, and I had a hard time pretending it was the same character. The plot dealt with pretty much the same issues as the first movie, being into ballet then finding Hip Hop.. um, didn't she already do that in the first movie? It felt like they were just repeating what had already happened instead of continuing the journey. Columbus Short made the movie for me, didn't really know that much of him before but loved his performance and he was a likable character. The dancing didn't seem nearly as good in this movie either, and I'm assuming that is down to the editing rather than the actually choreography. I know they used some of the same choreographers (Rich & Tone) as they did in the first movie. Not sure how many they had though. The battle between Sara and Candy seemed way too staged and didn't give the image of a real club battle to me. The first film had quite a gritty vibe to it whereas this film was a lot lighter but less believable.

I wouldn't say don't watch the movie because there are good parts, but don't expect anything like the first film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed