"Gunsmoke" Robin Hood (TV Episode 1956) Poster

(TV Series)

(1956)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A Charismatic Thief Runs Rampant in Dodge City
wdavidreynolds1 December 2021
John Henry Jordan is a thief who does not mind committing murder to eliminate any witnesses. At the beginning of the story, Jordan is on trial in Dodge City for robbing a stagecoach and one of the passengers, Mr. Botkin, the Dodge bank president. Two other passengers on the stage, Mr. And Mrs. Bowen, lie when called to testify. Both contend Jordan was not the person that held up the stage.

The jury acquits Jordan of the charges, primarily due to the testimony of the Bowens. Matt Dillon is convinced Jordan is guilty and will repeat the crimes when given the opportunity.

Jordan has established a reputation as a thief that only robs wealthy people. He is a charismatic individual. As a result, people tend to be sympathetic to Jordan. Even Doc Adams, Chester Goode, and Kitty Russell express doubts about Jordan's guilt.

(The episode gets its name from a scene in the Marshal's office where Chester awkwardly compares Jordan to Robin Hood, who Chester describes as a "green Indian," which causes Doc Adams to laugh.)

Jordan spends freely around town, especially at the Long Branch Saloon where he frequently buys drinks for the house, which helps endear him even more to the Dodge locals. He soon exhausts all of his funds, and, as Matt tells Chester, "...it isn't his habit to stay broke for long."

(This scene where Chester informs Matt that Jordan is broke includes a device that would be often repeated over the course of the seasons where the Chester Goode character is included. Chester often serves as Matt's source of information as to what is happening in Dodge. After Chester's departure, the Festus Haggen character would sometimes provide the same service.)

As expected, another area resident -- in this case a poor farmer named Pete Fisher, is found mercilessly pistol whipped to death and robbed. Matt is sure Jordan is the culprit but lacks any evidence to charge him.

These circumstances lead the Marshal to concoct a scheme to try to catch Jordan in the act of a crime. He convinces reformed gambler and card shark Vince Butler to engage Jordan in a card game. When Butler takes all of Jordan's money, Jordan will be forced to find another victim, and Marshal Dillon plans to catch him red-handed.

(A curious situation arises from Matt's scheme. After "winning" all of Jordan's money, Vince Butler shows up at Doc's office badly injured. Marshal Dillon should have anticipated this happening under the circumstances. He knows Jordan begins looking for a victim any time he is broke, and Jordan knows Butler just won $2,200. It is also curious that Jordan left Butler alive, as that seems to be contrary to Jordan's normal behavior.)

William Hopper plays John Henry Jordan in the first of two Gunsmoke appearances, both which occur in Season 1. Hopper, who is most remembered for playing Paul Drake on the Perry Mason series, was not a great actor, which is evident here. It is easy to buy into him being a friendly character that most people are drawn to, but when he tries to shift into villain role, it falls a bit flat.

Barry Atwater and Nora Marlowe make their initial Gunsmoke appearances as the naïve Bowens in this story. Both actors would go on to appear in several additional episodes in the series. Atwater appeared four more times, and Marlowe appeared five more times.

Actor James McCallion portrays the former gambler Vince Butler in the first of three Gunsmoke guest roles. Interestingly, McCallion would not make another series appearance until Season 14. It should also be noted that McCallion and Nora Marlowe were married in real life.

Actor S. John Launer plays the judge during the trial portion of this episode. This is noteworthy, because he often played judges and other people of some authority. He could frequently be seen playing a judge in the series Perry Mason.

Wilfred "Budd" Knapp appears again as Mr. Botkin, and Bert Rumsey has a few lines again as Sam the bartender (although Rumsey's part is not credited).

This episode is entertaining, although it is predictable, and the acting falls short of the usual Gunsmoke ambitious standards. It is interesting that so many of the Dodge citizens do not seem to mind Jordan's chosen profession if they think he is only robbing people they consider wealthy. Jordan never even makes any claims that he is anything other than a thief, but foolish people like the Bowens welcome the crook into their home. It is worth noting that Jordan could not continue to do what he does if not for the people who enable him.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Book's Cover
darbski7 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Yup. Just like in life, pretty people get their share out of the middle of the pie. People believe them when they shouldn't, give them breaks they don't deserve, and a lot of it is because they want to be liked by them. So it is with this much more reality based "Robin Hood" tale. Almost all of the stories based on that model are completely untrue; leaving out, of course, the theft part. Whether it's girls who sell their souls to handsome guys (or the opposite with guys) or people who get conned out of their life savings by someone in an expensive suit, when you think "they're helping those less fortunate", or any other thing than self promotion, just remember the axiom "You Can't Read a Book By Looking at It's Cover".

Bill Hopper did a passing fair job, here, the message is what counts.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Robin Hood - Western Style!
mitchrmp22 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This was a western Robin Hood tail. A man was robbing from the rich to give to the poor, and because he was so "loyal," the 'poor' wouldn't identify him as the one robbing stages. But Matt knew he was guilty and he was going to prove it...

It was an interesting concept, but unlike the "fairy tale" that's still alive today, this man was a killer. It was pretty predictable on how it was going to end, and I knew from watching other Gunsmoke episodes just how it was going to end. Still though, it was interesting to watch Matt Dillon solve the mystery and save the day.

And maybe the poor learned something along the way.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
morality play about civic responsibility
lrldoit14 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This episode is an improvement over the radio show episode, broadcast a year earlier. The episode is set up by Matt Dillon's opening narration about people forgetting why they hired him. John Henry Jordan is a cutthroat robber and murderer with a gimmick. When possible he robs only the rich. He even pals around with and throws parties for the ordinary citizens. In gratitude we see various citizens lie in a courtroom, allowing Jordan to get off. Only Matt knows just how bad he is. He sets a trap, but it will take time. Along the way, a poor man is murdered. Matt knows it was Jordan who did it. He also knows that if somehow Matt could have stopped the killer earlier, his victim would be alive. Matt, knowing Jordan is after more money, gives orders to have additional men riding shotgun at stagecoaches. He has a reformed cardsharp steal Jordan's money in a rigged poker game. The man who helped Matt is almost killed while Jordan hunts for more money. Jordan visits the husband and wife homesteaders who committed perjury to get him off. He seems friendly, charming, and soft spoken. Matt visits them, while they hide Jordan. After Matt leaves, Jordan stuns the couple (who had let him know that they have a fair amount of money, even though they are not wealthy). Jordan calmly asks them where they keep their money and points a gun at them. After he takes the money, Jordan calmly and quietly points his gun at the couple, explaining that he is leaving no witnesses. Matt returns. He had noticed that the supper table had too much food for two people. Jordan demands that Matt drop his gun. Matt lowers his gun and shoots out the light. Jordan is captured alive after the shootout. The townspeople will have learned a lesson. They should also be told that Jordan didn't rob the bank's money, but the depositors' money. This is a first rate, compelling morality play - made even better by William Hopper's understated performance.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another western had this theme
sherry5426 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
On Laramie, season 2 episode 15, they had almost the exact episode. Jesse from the show was saved by a man who later robs stage coaches. He too robbed the banker. In that episode he gave some money to the elderly couple. Banker swore he did the robbery and elderly couple said it wasn't him. Later they also had a friend, a deputy, gamble with him. He died in the episode as did the elderly couple when the robber ran out of money.

I find some themes in TV westerns do get repeated. I checked and each episode was written by the same author. The one on Gunsmoke 1956 Laramie's in 1961. Someone thought we'd never figure this one out. But otherwise good episodes.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What! No Green Tights!
dougdoepke15 September 2007
Interesting concept-- a robber who only takes from the rich, but doesn't give to the poor. Still, the premise is unevenly played out. Opening scene is in a courtroom with two familiar actors from the old Perry Mason show. A sleek William Hopper plays the modern day Robin Hood, while the judge is Mason regular S. John Launer. It's sort of unsettling to see Hopper cast as a villain in a courtroom and without Raymond Burr. The problem here is the script requires Hopper's Robin Hood character to swing back and forth from gentlemanly highwayman to cold-blooded killer, and Hopper, for all his good looks, simply lacks the skills the role demands, especially the part of nasty killer. Being vicious is simply beyond his range. And with that lack, goes the episode's potential. (In fact, the level of acting from the supporting cast as a whole is unusually substandard, including the usually reliable Barry Atwater as the homesteader.) One nice touch-- using a reformed card-sharp to help the law, though the script can't resist making him too virtuous to be believable.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The interest in the story was lacking.
kfo949411 May 2013
John Henry Jordon played by William Hopper (from Perry Mason fame) is on trial for a stagecoach robbery with Mr Bodkins giving testimony that it was clearly Jordan that stole his money. When Mr and Mrs Bowen, that were also on the stage, give their testimony they claim that it was not Jordan. The jury has no other choice but to find Jordan not guilty.

It seems that Jordan is a western style Robin Hood. He stole the money from the rich Mr Bodkins but left the farming couple alone to keep their small amount of dollars. This prove to be genius by John Henry Jordan because in return the poor people refused to identify Jordan as the robber.

But Marshal Dillon knows that it will only be a matter of time before Jordan strikes again. When Jordan runs out of money no one will be safe from his reign of robbery and murder. Not even the poor.

This is a rather predictable episode with little in the way of action. The plot sounded well but on screen the story did not play as anticipated. Nothing wrong with the acting it was just a story that did not have strong interest.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Guilty Of Robbery
StrictlyConfidential24 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Robin Hood" (episode 17) was first aired on television February 4, 1956.

(*Marshal Dillon quote*) - "But I'm warning you, gentlemen, this man is worse than a thief."

Anyway - As the story goes - Marshal Dillon turns the tables against a criminal who repeatedly bribes witnesses to escape justice.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
One of the weakest episodes.
mstewart-8437225 August 2020
Predictable story. Poor supporting acting. Hopper is such a stiff.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed