"Law & Order" Ghosts (TV Episode 2005) Poster

(TV Series)

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
How long did you make eye contact with the man with acne and a ponytail?
Mrpalli7728 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A thief had just robbed two young girls on a sidewalk. They called the police that suddenly came to catch the perp: a gunfight occurred and the robber was arrested. At the hospital, knowingly he was about to pass away, he confessed to Fontana about a murder he took part ten years before. Fontana remembered the case: he thought at the time a father raped and killed his own daughter. That man (Raymond J. Barry) is still free, but his life his ruined, because even his wife is in bad health after what happened (she is confined in a wheelchair). After some time the investigation lead to a former junkie who needed cash in order to score and he choked the girl shortly after his partner raped her. A cold case very hard to deal with, expecially for Arthur Branch, now the target of reporters.

An episode in which we figured out that even a good detective like Fontana could make some mistakes. Anyway neither McCoy nor the girl's father would forgive him.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ghosts of remembrance past
TheLittleSongbird15 August 2022
Am not always a fan of the 'Law and Order' franchise having heavy focus on the personal lives of characters. The original 'Law and Order' actually did this very well whenever it did so, especially with Briscoe, where the development for the focused upon character was illuminating and where it revolved around complex issues handled tactfully. Late 'Special Victims Unit' was less successful, where the storylines were soapy, regressed the characters rather than forwarded them and dominated too much.

While Fontana had already come on a long way as a character, he had not really had an awful lot of development prior to "Ghosts". So this story was in a way needed, and on the whole a very good job is done with him and the story. The story, and the episode definitely did the right thing looking on a past case and having a character trying to put things right, has a lot of power, and it really does further Fontana's character while not taking over the case too much. He doesn't come off too well here considering what he did in the past, but it is hard to be too upset with him. "Ghosts" is very good, both for 'Law and Order' and as an episode for anything.

"Ghosts" perhaps starts off on the ordinary side and the episode tries to cram in a little too much towards the end.

However, the character development for Fontana was great, being illuminating and making him a more interesting, more rounded character in a situation that proves that even good detectives can make major errors. It also manages to be a big part of the case, which is a tough subject handled in an unyielding but moving way. Will admit to being in tears at the end. The story is always compelling, though the more complex and emotionally powerful second half is better than the first. McCoy's role is handled very well.

The acting is very good too, with Dennis Farina giving one of his best performances of the show. Raymond J. Barry gives a very poignant portrayal of a father grieving, the character felt most for.

It's well made, intimately photographed and slick with no signs of under-budget or anything. The music didn't sound melodramatic or too constant and the direction is accomodating while still having pulse. The writing doesn't ramble, although as usual there is a lot of dialogue to digest, and really provokes thought, disturbs and brings a lump to the throat. It is especially intriguing and thoughtful in the second half.

Concluding, very good episode. 8/10.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
TREMENDOUS EXAMPLE OF WHAT MADE THIS SHOW GREAT!
rsarkisian15 September 2018
To see a great example of quality TV just watch Season 16, Ep. 3 of Law & Order "Ghost." One of my faves of an iconic series that delivered quality for 20 years. Raymond J. Barry as the grieving father is magnificient. Anyone with children that watches this will be moved and wordlessly utter a wow at the ending....check it out!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A most cold dish
bkoganbing15 September 2014
Shades of Jon Benet Ramsey. On his deathbed after being shot by a cop while getting away from a robbery, Art Fliakos confesses to a long unsolved homicide of a little girl during a home invasion. Before dying he says that a friend named Johnny was an accomplice. Who hears the confession, but the detective who couldn't make the case when it was fresh Dennis Farina.

So Farina and Jesse Martin have to follow through and the 'Johnny' they come up with is David Vadim. It's a weak case to be sure and Fred Dalton Thompson starts with the old Steven Hill maxim of let's cut a deal.

The father Raymond J. Barry who was for a time suspected of killing his daughter is most reluctant to help authorities especially Farina who was for a time looking at him. He's a man of conflicted emotions and he registers them all in his performance.

Justice is served somewhat although this one is a most cold dish.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wasn't Fontana in Chicago?
SlimJim3917 March 2019
This is about a murder that took place in New York City ten years ago. Fontana was in Chicago, according to the storyline, ten years ago! Oops.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Compelling story but horrible final scene
CrimeDrama12 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Robert Dolan's character does not evoke much sympathy from me. Certainly, I cannot relate with him but I believe in facts, not speculation. I can be objective even when bad things happen that are out of my control. Of course, police are always going to look at the family of a murdered child. They have a job to do and I know people lie to the police all the time. It was Robert's choice to stay in the area not only after his daughter died but after his wife died too. I would have moved far away. I would never shut the door in a detective's face after justice was served and the detective wants to make things right with me. Robert didn't have to say anything but he should shake Fontana's hand, which was extended. The disrespect shown in that scene angers me. I relate more with Fontana who is trying to do the right thing. I am surprised the writers chose to make the father of a murdered girl so unsympathetic. Based on what Robert had said and done in the past, I wouldn't have bothered going to his home like Fontana did. I have learned that if someone doesn't care, I can't make them care.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed