"Law & Order" Kid Pro Quo (TV Episode 2003) Poster

(TV Series)

(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Knowles School
bkoganbing20 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This episode of Law And Order, Kid Pro Quo, takes us into a world of exclusivity like we plain folk rarely see. Like Jerry Orbach and Jesse Martin, I can't wrap myself around the concept that it's so important that kids get into a prep school kindergarten. I have trouble turning over in my mind the idea of a prep school kindergarten. As Orbach says he's got a legacy his father went to PS 26 and so did he.

Roger Rees as the headmaster of the Knowles School who puts on such highfalutin' condescending airs and yet is not above a little upper crust bribery to bump some kid out of a scholarship to get dibs on an otherwise expensive Co-op totally dominates this episode. He's such a condescending twit you want to smack him on general principles even before Briscoe and Green arrest for murdering the woman who was the admissions director at the Knowles School.

I remember years ago seeing a production of The Cherry Orchard and one of Chekov's great characters was that of Piers who was the house servant to the aristocratic Russian family who were the protagonists. He totally identifies with them and their point of view that he thinks of himself as one of them. But when they flee to Crimea until this peasant revolution blows over, he's left behind like the furniture in the mansion. And as the play ends he's wandering around like a lost soul not believing he was abandoned.

Something very similar like that happens after Sam Waterston does a devastating cross examination to Rees. He's left high and dry after the verdict. He thought he was one of the upper crust and he finds out he's just hired help like poor Piers.

Nice episode of the fabled anthology series, don't miss what Roger Rees does with the pompous and pretentious Wyatt Scofield.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This for that
TheLittleSongbird16 June 2022
"Kid Pro Quo" was one of those 'Law and Order' episodes on first watch that had a number of good things but did feel on the ordinary side and didn't stick in the mind long after. There are episodes of the show and the 'Law and Order' franchise in general that felt like this, but there are many on both counts where that type of episode on first watch fared better on rewatch and were better than remembered seeing it through older eyes.

This is an example of one of those episodes. It is not as good as the brilliant four episodes that came after it, the last three of which being the three best episodes of Season 13. It is though a big improvement over the previous episode "Seer", which left me disappointed and indifferent and the only episode of the season to not work for me. While not a great episode, "Kid Pro Quo" is close to being that with the many good things being at their best excellent.

It isn't perfect. It is a bit ordinary to begin with, which is not uncommon with 'Law and Order' and this is throughout the show's run, not just one period.

Really do not like Southerlyn, she really lacks life and what little there is of her personality is not compelling or easy to endear to. Elisabeth Rohm's even flatter acting doesn't help.

Jerry Orbach (Briscoe is a very popular character in the franchise for very good reason) and Jesse L. Martin are never less than great leads and Sam Waterston shows his usual authority and ruthlessness in the second half. Roger Rees plays a person that one does not want to mess with and roots for being convicted. While the story starts off on the predictable side, it is riveting once it comes to trial. T no longer becomes too simple, surprises more and lots happens in terms of events and twists without being too complicated. The climax is one of the season's better and more tense ones.

Furthermore, the dialogue is thought-provoking and has a pull no punches grit without being heavy-handed. It is shot with the right amount of intimacy without being claustrophobic and that the editing has become increasingly tighter over-time has been great too. Nice use of locations too. The music doesn't get over-scored or overwrought, even in the more dramatic revelation moments. The direction doesn't try to do too much and is understated but never flat or unsure.

On the whole, very nicely done once it gets going. 8/10.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sounds like you weren't really part of their world either.
Mrpalli7728 November 2017
Two friends in a tracksuit were walking down the park when they noticed a dead body on a bench with the skull fractured. The victim was a teacher in the local prep school and the murder weapon was her own walking stick: she was actually a little crippled due to an accident occurred months before that caused her a broken hips. She recently filed for divorce and she dated a married man (Stephen Schnetzera) a couple of times, but none of this people seemed to hold a grudge against her. Back to her work, she was in charge of the admission board for students and she may have found out something not so ethic in the admission procedures (she has been hired for few months, so she didn't know how things worked inside her new workplace). Headmaster had better admit the "king of porn"'s son instead of a high IQ African American kid: why did he do that?

This episode comes to light what usually people had rather not speak openly: they secretly are willing to pay for their kids best education. Anyway meritocracy is the standing point in democracy.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed