"Law & Order" Patsy (TV Episode 1999) Poster

(TV Series)

(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Ambiguous.
rmax30482310 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A young woman is found in a coma, shot up with a substance to which she is allergic. Chief suspect, the pinched-faced Sebastian Roché who first denies knowing the victim and then claims she'd been harassing him because she blamed him for the murder of her sister. Roché isn't a stereotypical big brute. He has a small frame. But he also has an explosive temper, which he demonstrates for the detectives and the DA's crew from time to time.

Roché's lawyer is James Rebhorn, always reliable as a tall, bony accountant or executive or something. He does quite well in this episode. When balked, he's convincingly stumped. But Rebhorn develops this wild theory that one sister murdered the other and then framed Roché for both crimes -- the original murder, for which the body hasn't yet been found, and the injection that sent the second sister into an apparently irreversible coma. The way in which Rebhorn argues the frame was constructed include the transfer of semen by means that my morality prohibits me from describing here. It's true that I have no principles whatever, but they're very firm.

The plot is complicated and at times you have to put some effort into grasping the machinations involved. All the time, you keep thinking that Roché MUST have done it all because he looks and acts like exactly the kind of swine who WOULD do it. Yet this inconclusive evidence keeps cropping up once in a while -- a hair here, a whore there -- indicating that in fact Rebhorn's crazy theory may be true. Maybe the surviving sister, the one now in a coma, actually DID murder her own sister and turn herself into a vegetable just in order to put Roché behind bars for good. If so, she succeeded. What makes the episode more interesting than some is that we'll never know.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Reversal of fortune
TheLittleSongbird21 October 2021
"Patsy" was one of those 'Law and Order' episodes on first watch that had a number of good things but did feel on the ordinary side and didn't stick in the mind long after. There are episodes of the show and the 'Law and Order' franchise in general that felt like this, but there are many on both counts where that type of episode on first watch fared better on rewatch and were better than remembered seeing it through older eyes.

After being very impressed by all but one of the previous Season 10 episodes, "Patsy" was a slight disappointment. Especially when following on from two outstanding outings in a row. Don't get me wrong, it is still good and has a lot that is very well executed indeed (the best aspects even being brilliant). Do prefer episodes that have tougher topics explored more uncompromisingly and also the ones that are more complex and also more complete feeling.

Beginning with the not so good, even for an ending meant to be uncertain the ending did feel too abrupt and something of a head-scratcher. This was a case that needed all the questions answered and it is agreed that one finishes the episode left with more questions than expected.

While there are far more improbable defense arguments, the defense argument while quite entertaining is a bit too silly and out there. The final quarter is on the over-crowded and muddled side, due to not enough development to too much information.

However, a lot is great. It is a slickly made episode, the editing especially having come on quite a bit from when the show first started (never was it a problem but it got more fluid with each episode up to this stage). The music is sparingly used and never seemed melodramatic, the theme tune easy to remember as usual. The direction is sympathetic enough without being too low key on the whole.

The script is taut and intelligent, with everything intriguing. The story is not perfect, but it is never dull and doesn't feel simplistic or like there were not enough twists or surprises (plenty in fact). Most of it is not too complicated, apart from the final quarter. All the regulars are very good, while James Rebhorn manages to bring believability to a role that easily could have been silly in the wrong hands and Sebastian Roche makes one feel uneasy.

Overall, pretty good but not great. 7/10.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
We'll ask her, when she wakes up.
Mrpalli7715 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
A super found a tenant nearly dead in her apartment. The place was a mess, it seemed there must have been a fight. She was a travel agent, someone injected her a poison with a syringe on her thigh that led her into a coma. She didn't have any next to kin still alive, but detectives realized she had dinner in a fancy restaurant with a guy from Albany the night before. The man (Sebastian Roché), a political figure addicted to painkillers, could have been the reason victim's sister passed away years before (even if he hasn't been convicted for the murder). His DNA was found in the crime scene, thanks to semen marks left in the blanket, so he was arrested as a result. But he insisted, even at trial, that someone wanted to frame him. When the only thing defense attorney could achieve was a plea bargain, something changed and investigation went to the first homicide.....

Charmaichel attitude is the key point of this episode (she's the only one to believe about the escort service claimed by the defendant). Anyway it would be hard to realize if the defendant is the good guy or the bad guy, wait till the last lines. I've never seen McCoy so angry at trial.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well this was different
thbryn5 May 2020
Yes it was a good ep. And we don't get answers. In a way we didn't get answers in the real Claus von Buelow case in Newport. Claus may have done what he was accused of but IDK? This case isn't really similar but look the defendant put up a good show if he's innocent even though he had an unseemly temper.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One a the rare cases of police tunnel vision
alessandrocs27 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Good episode the suspect is arrogant but innocent the sister of victim is the real killer that came out in the if the episode McCoy went forward with the tunnel vision;it's classic case of tunnel and where often happen wrongful conviction I am glad that how the case ended,he was arrogant but probably innocent I didn't like how McCoy went after him,the real arrogant was McCoy,Abbie felt that he was innocent the police plus Briscoe and Green did a sloppy investigation;it's one of those cases where police and prosecution tunnel vision can put an innocent person behind bars because they believe the victim and not the evidence.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
PERFECT Title.
hiltonsmithjr21 June 2020
Perfect in Every Way. Except McCoy is the PATSY!!!🤣🤣🤣 BLEW this case Badly.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Really no conclusion
bkoganbing10 September 2020
Both Jerry Orbach and Jesse Martin respond to a woman who might have been date raped. Whatever happened went horribly wrong as the victim now lies in a coma.

What emerges is that the woman may have staged the whole thing in an effort to trap a man who works in state government for the unsolved disappearance of her sister who was involved with Sebastian Roche.

roche is a man with a nasty temper and a personality you love to hate. Orbach and Martin and then Sam Waterston are less than charmed by him. Proving he's guilty of something is another matter.

When this episode concludes there are more questions than answers. i
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unsure why the crew was OK with unresolved issues.
CrimeDrama116 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
What a confusing episode. We had a partial resolution but that went away and later there may be evidence that the woman in a coma (Cecelia) actually killed her sister (Julie) and took numerous steps to frame the man (Taylor) her sister broke up with, including the unbelievable staged assault that left her in a coma. The big question I am left with is if Julie broke up with Taylor, why would Cecelia kill her and frame him twice? It seems A LOT more reasonable that Taylor killed Julie and that's why Cecelia wanted to frame him. The mistrial? It seems too easy with McCoy's emotional tendencies and judges being far from perfect, leading to mistrials and threats of contempt of court (McCoy has been jailed for it before). I will never be OK with unresolved crimes on this show. A complicated case makes sense but not coming close to the truth does not. Fans of "The X-Files" know that a show can have stand alone episodes and work in overlapping stories or mythology into the other episodes. I am left asking, "What really happened to Julie?" I don't like it.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed