Rumpole defends a Pakistani doctor accused of molesting a female patient, and Phyllida suspects Erskine-Brown of philandering.Rumpole defends a Pakistani doctor accused of molesting a female patient, and Phyllida suspects Erskine-Brown of philandering.Rumpole defends a Pakistani doctor accused of molesting a female patient, and Phyllida suspects Erskine-Brown of philandering.
Photos
Stephanie Schonfield
- Marietta Liptrott
- (as Stephanie Schonfeld)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaRichard Murdoch's last appearance in the series, as "Uncle Tom". He died in October 1990, more than a year before this episode was eventually broadcast as part of series six.
- GoofsThe opening paragraph of "The Beacon"'s feature 'Nanny tells of surgery ordeal' is actually Rumpole's summary précis of the article - in other words Leo McKern's dialogue has been printed up for him to read from.
- Quotes
Horace Rumpole: If you're no good at the bar, they make you a blooming circus judge. I'm surprised Uncle Tom isn't Lord Chancellor by now.
Featured review
Rumpole and the Quacks
It is not always the law courts for barristers. They also appear in front of regulatory boards defending lawyers, accountants and doctors accused of misconduct.
Rumpole is representing the urbane Dr Ghulam Rahmat (Saeed Jaffrey) who has been accused of inappropriately touching up his patient. An attractive young female who works as a nanny and turned up with a sore throat.
Meanwhile Phyllida Erskine-Brown is disturbed. Her husband Claude has got a pupil, although she is a much older woman taking up law later in life. Phyllida also finds a contact magazine where a barrister is looking for companionship. She is inflamed.
Rumpole too finds some interesting information in the same contact magazine. The nanny also advertises her escort services.
Dr Rahmat had a run in with the senior partner in the practice Dr Cogger. Rahmat was of the opinion that Cogger was too happy to prescribe expensive pills and too keen on inducements from certain pharmaceutical reps. It might just be that Dr Cogger had set up Dr Rahmat.
The episode is not without its problems. It has several false and hollow notes.
I can buy Dr Rahmat as a posh public school educated man from a post colonial India. That type still exists in India and Jaffrey had played those sorts before.
I just cannot buy that Dr Rahmat wanted to make an omelette without breaking any eggs. It transpires that he knew Cogger had set him up but wanted the matter dealt without humiliating anyone.
Dr Rahmat knew about the nanny and persuaded her to own up at the hearing. In exchange Rahmat was going to marry her.
I find it hard to fathom that Dr Rahmat would be so sanguine. When he is at risk of being struck off as a doctor, his professional reputation in tatters, forced to marry an escort all because of a greedy and vindictive colleague who Rahmat is happy to maintain cordial relations with.
At the end it was not Rumple who got Rahmat off but the client did his own defence.
There was a theme about the novel A Passage to India in this episode. Many viewers at the time would had been familiar with the basic story. It had been made into an Oscar winning film by David Lean a few years earlier.
Also Phyllida's story was weak. We have seen her flirt with other barristers in the past while still married to Claude. You just know that the barrister in the contact ad was never going to be Claude Erskine-Brown.
Much better if Claude and Phyllida had met as two bored lonely hearts. It would have been the Pina Colada song come to life.
Rumpole is representing the urbane Dr Ghulam Rahmat (Saeed Jaffrey) who has been accused of inappropriately touching up his patient. An attractive young female who works as a nanny and turned up with a sore throat.
Meanwhile Phyllida Erskine-Brown is disturbed. Her husband Claude has got a pupil, although she is a much older woman taking up law later in life. Phyllida also finds a contact magazine where a barrister is looking for companionship. She is inflamed.
Rumpole too finds some interesting information in the same contact magazine. The nanny also advertises her escort services.
Dr Rahmat had a run in with the senior partner in the practice Dr Cogger. Rahmat was of the opinion that Cogger was too happy to prescribe expensive pills and too keen on inducements from certain pharmaceutical reps. It might just be that Dr Cogger had set up Dr Rahmat.
The episode is not without its problems. It has several false and hollow notes.
I can buy Dr Rahmat as a posh public school educated man from a post colonial India. That type still exists in India and Jaffrey had played those sorts before.
I just cannot buy that Dr Rahmat wanted to make an omelette without breaking any eggs. It transpires that he knew Cogger had set him up but wanted the matter dealt without humiliating anyone.
Dr Rahmat knew about the nanny and persuaded her to own up at the hearing. In exchange Rahmat was going to marry her.
I find it hard to fathom that Dr Rahmat would be so sanguine. When he is at risk of being struck off as a doctor, his professional reputation in tatters, forced to marry an escort all because of a greedy and vindictive colleague who Rahmat is happy to maintain cordial relations with.
At the end it was not Rumple who got Rahmat off but the client did his own defence.
There was a theme about the novel A Passage to India in this episode. Many viewers at the time would had been familiar with the basic story. It had been made into an Oscar winning film by David Lean a few years earlier.
Also Phyllida's story was weak. We have seen her flirt with other barristers in the past while still married to Claude. You just know that the barrister in the contact ad was never going to be Claude Erskine-Brown.
Much better if Claude and Phyllida had met as two bored lonely hearts. It would have been the Pina Colada song come to life.
helpful•11
- Prismark10
- Jan 10, 2021
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content