In this repeated plot, Indian hatred raises its head as a cowboy shoots an Indian and believes he is right just because the person is an Indian. In comes Locke Gardner (Michael Rennie), a US Marshal, that is going to arrest the cowboy, Tod Mulvey, for the killing. But as with any episode with this kind of plot, there is potholes all through the show.
First the person that killed the Indian is the son of the Marshal's friend named Dan Mulvey. Dan had been shot with two Indian arrows a while back and has a limp and a dead arm. So there is not much lost for the Indian shooting. Also when the Marshal arrest Tod and brings him to the Sheriff's office, the townsfolk do not agree with the Marshal and sets the town against the US Marshal.
There is nothing wrong with the acting or casting in the episode, it is just that this plot has been played out in nearly every western book and film since the beginning of print. One lawman stands up against the entire town so that the rule of law can be followed-- nothing new in this show. It felt like a repeat on the first time viewing the show.
First the person that killed the Indian is the son of the Marshal's friend named Dan Mulvey. Dan had been shot with two Indian arrows a while back and has a limp and a dead arm. So there is not much lost for the Indian shooting. Also when the Marshal arrest Tod and brings him to the Sheriff's office, the townsfolk do not agree with the Marshal and sets the town against the US Marshal.
There is nothing wrong with the acting or casting in the episode, it is just that this plot has been played out in nearly every western book and film since the beginning of print. One lawman stands up against the entire town so that the rule of law can be followed-- nothing new in this show. It felt like a repeat on the first time viewing the show.