"Monk" Mr. Monk Is on the Run: Part 2 (TV Episode 2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
The Fugitive part 2
safenoe14 January 2021
Here Monk is, as the title suggests, on the run. It has the fugitive feel to it, and we're all rooting for Monk to get justice and survive being on the run and managing with his OC and not getting his favorite food.

Monk is a smart guy. I wish Monk was rebooted so that we can see him experience the world of social media and so on. Monk on TikTok would be sublime.

Thankfully we get seasons 7 and 8.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This part was pretty good
dmcreif17 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Stottlemeyer has helped Monk fake his death. Now Monk must go into hiding until they can find a way to clear his name of the charges that have been laid against him. So Monk disguises himself as a car wash employee in Nevada.

This episode has several highly emotional moments, including Natalie realizing that Monk is alive, and when she finds Monk at the car wash. And it also represents improvement for Monk, as he knows he has to get over a lot of phobias just to maintain his cover. And this part also is suspenseful, especially as we see the gang try to foil an assassination plot on the governor (though I always wondered something during the episode: if Monk had figured that someone was going to kill the governor, he should have gone to the FBI, even though technically he was a wanted man, and he could have easily cut a deal).

Of course, sometimes, I always thought that if Monk were going into hiding, he'd want to be as far out of California as he could, possibly hiding in the Midwest or the Northeast. And it also would have made more sense that Natalie and Randy would also be aware that Monk was alive.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Return of Dale
Hitchcoc12 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Monk, of course, resurfaces and is in cahoots with Stottlemeyer to try to find out who "Mr. Big" is. The hard driven sheriff continues to pursue Monk, even after it is presumed he is dead. We are made aware that there is a third party pulling the strings and we get to see him again again. What helps with this episode is an exciting conclusion where everything is on the line. Very easy to predict, but intense nevertheless.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Doesn't live up to the first part
TheLittleSongbird9 September 2017
'Monk' has always been one of my most watched shows when needing comfort, to relax after a hard day, a good laugh or a way to spend a lazy weekend.

Loved the first part of "Mr Monk is on the Run". It was a different 'Monk' episode, relying more on drama, crime thriller tension and emotion than on comedy and quirks (an interesting change of pace and a refreshing one), but nonetheless was a 'Monk' highlight. Liked however the second part less, not a bad episode but considering how wonderful the first part was it was somewhat of a let down and could have been better.

It does suffer from some lazy writing, especially regarding everything to do with the gun which showed a lack of research on the writers' part. It is not the first time that the writers have fouled up on research elements, having shown a lack of knowledge in the past of how game shows work, how casinos work and regarding car breaks, but the whole business with the gun as described in the previous review was one of the most glaring errors and made parts on the implausible side.

The biggest disappointment was with Dale "The Whale" Biederbeck. The prosthetics on him were badly cheap and like there was no thought on how to make him up, having been done much better with Adam Arkin and Tim Curry's vastly superior interpretations. All it looked like was Ray Porter with longer hair, looking larger in the face and wearing what looked like some kind of a fat suit, whereas it was hard to believe that the previous two were them. Arkin in particular was unrecognisable and both were excellent in their own way, showing more of the gross out factor (non-existent here), twisted humour (also non-existent) and menace (present only in his final line here, the only good thing to say about him). Also disliked Ray Porter's acting, for reasons also described in what made the previous two so good being missing here but also that he overacts dreadfully.

However, there are good things. There are emotional moments and suspenseful moments. Once again, it is a perfect example of the viewer rooting for Monk every step of the way despite it not looking good for him. Love the care and concern that the other three lead characters share for him and their loyalty to him. The story mostly is taut and compelling, and the writing does wonderfully with the dramatic and emotional elements, both ringing true.

One of the best things about 'Monk' has always been the acting of Tony Shalhoub in the title role. It was essential for him to work and be the glue of the show, and Shalhoub not only is that but also at his very best he IS the show. Have always loved the balance of the humour, which is often hilarious, and pathos, which is sincere and touching. Everybody else of the lead cast support him very well, particularly Traylor Howard and Ted Levine. The support cast do well, only Porter comes off badly.

The music is both understated and quirky. While there is a preference for the theme music for Season 1, Randy Newman's "It's a Jungle Out There" has grown on me overtime, found it annoying at first but appreciate its meaning and what it's trying to say much more now. The episode as always look slick and stylish.

Overall, decent and at its best very good, but lack of research on how guns work and the poor portrayal and prosthetics of Biederbeck really bring it down. Shame, it had the makings of a great season finale, as the terrific first part promised. 7/10 Bethany Cox
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Dead man?
ctomvelu-19 August 2008
The captain has killed Monk, or has he? Monk is actually hiding out in Nevada, working at a car wash while the captain puts together a case against the renegade sheriff (Scott Glenn) from the previous episode. Meanwhile, Natalie is preparing Monk's funeral. As with the previous episode, which was the first of a two-parter, this lacks the humor and creativity of a typical Monk episode. It is riddled with movie clichés, in fact. But it does have a highly charged moment or two when Natalie discovers that her boss is very much alive. I would not bother to see it just for that, but if you are a MONK compactest, nothing is going to stop you, anyhow. All in all, a very weak finale to the sixth season.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Poorly Written Script
Russell-412 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a big fan of Monk, but this pair of episodes did not achieve the level of quality of most that I have seen.

The assumption that you can swap one barrel for another in order to incriminate someone is flawed.

Monk's gun wasn't fired and anyone checking the gun would have found gunpowder residue ONLY on the barrel, thus proving that the gun hadn't been fired. A gun owned by Monk would have been perfectly clean, of course.

The shell from the shot would show a firing pin indentation that would not match a shell from Monk's gun since there was no suggestion that his gun had been fired by the person that set him up.

Monk knew he didn't fire the gun and he knew that the shot originated behind him, so he would have asked that the area be tested for gunpowder residue. Although this alone wouldn't have exonerated him, it might have led to an inspection of his clothes and perhaps the bad cop's clothes, etc. for gunpowder. Having no sign of gunpowder on his person might have been enough to exonerate him.

Monk would have known all of this, of course, so he would have had his pals from SFO Police look into these matters right away and they would have been brought up at the trial.

There were a lot of other flaws, but these were the most bothersome to me since they set up the entire storyline.

I don't expect Sherlock Holmes-like level of command of detail in TV mystery screenplays, but this one was far below what we have come to expect from Monk.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I'm So Angry With This Episode!
abbyadams19765 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Why did Natalie turn STUPID? She knows Monk faked his death to avoid going to jail for life. So she leads them right to him?? She's worked with Monk for years! She of all people should know how dangerous it would be. She knew he was safe, why risk it?

Dumbest thing she could have done!

I just don't believe this one.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sorry have to agree with the nay sayers, this was bad
robertdlar8 March 2022
Many of the negative reviews cover the bad things about this episode so I won't repeat them. I like Smart comedy and Monk 'used' to be full of it, but this was just stupid after stupid. You can still do comedy and a good detective story without turning ever one into bumbling idiots.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Season 6: Improvement on season 5 but still not as fresh and fun as it needs to be and the material reliant on character-development mostly falls flat (VERY MINOR SPOILERS)
bob the moo19 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I came to season 6 of Monk a few days after the Oxford English Dictionary entered the word "meh" into the latest revision. How appropriate then because sadly a word meaning indifference is one that I will find quite useful when considering this latest season of Monk. I am, of course, being a bit harsh but from the get-go it is apparent that season 6 is an improvement on season 5, where the writers regularly went badly off formula to try and generate stories and in the end it just made it feel false and far from the reasons I enjoyed Monk in the first place. Season 6 takes a different tack and instead of breaks in formula generating stories, we have events happening in the lives of people Monk knows as the main motivator for plots down the season. In itself this represents the same sort of "problems" the writers have in regards generating more stories with the same character and somehow keeping the series moving forward in a way that prevents viewers getting bored, but it is different because this method doesn't involving changing the very heart of the character/series in the way season 5 did so badly.

So this mostly takes away my problems with season 5 by ensuring that the reason I watch the show (I find Monk amusing and engaging) remains fairly steady this time. However this is not all that I am looking for it to achieve and simply "not making the same mistakes again" was not the only box I was looking for season 6 to tick. Sadly the results on this front are mixed and, while better than season 5, 6 doesn't manage to get itself on strong ground with any consistency. The first episode is spot on and it gave me hope, with Monk being Monk, a good story and plenty of comic awkwardness. Sadly this is followed up by an episode that sounds great but is actually poor – the one with Snoop Dog. Is there any comedy cliché more painful to watch than the "white people awkwardly trying to 'be' hip-hop"? No, I do not think so and this is all the episode had to offer. The two big guest stars out of the way the season moves forward with the reliance on the narrative device of Monk knowing the people and it mostly allows for solid enough stories although none without their flaws.

You see, I always liked Monk as being something light I could dip in and out of, so I don't really see the need for him to have a connection to each case to allow the case to exist. He works for the police and can drop in and out on their instruction without an explanation of connection. The writers though seem to have forgotten that Monk works like this and perhaps success in the ratings has made them think they need to "do something" with the character. When they do this though it generally doesn't work because the show doesn't manage to engage when it turns serious and the impact is only felt in the absence of fun – not the layering that they clearly have in mind. It is not awful though and I did enjoy most of the episodes, with only one or two that I considered poor. The conclusion is a lazy bit of writing though and the rubbish prosthetics on Dale Biederbeck (and the fact he is no longer being played by Alan Arkin or Tim Curry but rather Porter) suggest a cheaper standard that could be applied to the writing.

The cast continue to do their thing though, trusting the writers regardless. Shalhoub as an actor certainly has the ability to do more than his comic quirks but, (a) I don't really want him to and (b) the material doesn't allow him to do it. Instead he has to make jumps into more developmental type material which is sporadic rather than grown – and that is not easy to do while delivering a character rather than a sketch show. The impossibly thin Howard is good alongside him though, adding comedy without getting in the way – not sure about the slightly greater use of Clarke's Julie though. Levine and Gray-Stanford are freed of some of the errors of last season (building plots around them – remember Randy suddenly getting a farm?) and are better for it, giving good comic support (whether it makes sense or not!).The various guests are all OK and provide some interest.

So depending on what measure you are using then season 6 of Monk will come across different ways. If you are comparing it with season 5 then it is a massive improvement in terms of narrative and fun, but looking at it coldly it must be said that season 6 still has its problems. The writers struggle to develop the stories and characters while also keeping true to the simply formula and fun that has won it fans from the start. They generally do OK but only one or two episodes are really good. Of course it is a good thing that there are equally few that are "bad" but what this leaves is far too many of them that tended to mostly draw the reaction of "meh".
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed