And for the truth, not daddy's bs
What went down with Thomas Markle and the wedding. As we've seen, he keeps calling up the press and selling interviews and photos, claiming that Meghan's been ignoring him. Meghan's friends call bullsh-t. With specifics.
TEXTS SHOW Meg was desperate to get in touch with him. Yeah, he did what HATEFUL Sam told him to do, knowing that Sam always hated Meg. OK.
The Saturday before the wedding, Meg and Harry were told that a story was going to come out the next day saying that Tom was staging pictures with the paparazzi. Lainey: which he ended up admitting. Their team told them that if the story was fake, they could file a complaint.
So Meg calls Tom and asks him, and he's swearing up and down that it's not true. The next day the pictures come out. Even with all that, Meghan and Harry were still so focused on getting him to London. At no point was there talk of "Now that we know he lied, he's in trouble". Tom wouldn't take her calls, wouldn't take Harry's calls.
The next morning when the car got there to take him to the airport, he wouldn't get in. Later Meg heard he had a heart attack and she's calling and texting, even up to the night before the wedding. It was like, "Please pick up. I love you and I'm scared". It was endless. After the wedding she wrote him a letter. Queen told her to.
She wrote him a letter. Well Thomas Markle certainly never mentioned that - not in his interviews with Piers Morgan on Good Morning Britain or the Daily Mail for the Sun. All he ever says is that she's ghosted him. But there was a letter.
She's like, "Dad, I'm so heartbroken. I love you. I have one father. Please stop victimizing me through the media so we can repair our relationship". Because every time her team has to come to her and fact-check something he has said, it's an arrow to the heart. He writes her a really long letter in return, and he closes it by requesting a photo op with her. And she feels like, "That's the opposite of what I'm saying. I'm telling you I don't want to communicate through the media, and you're asking me to communicate through the media. Did you hear anything I said?" It's almost like they're ships passing. He knows how to get in touch with her. Her telephone number hasn't changed. He's never called; he's never texted.
Remember, Thomas Markle's sob story has been that he keeps trying to contact her and she won't answer. So who's lying here? Meghan and her friends or the dude who already lied about staging pap photos and who's always getting his close-up on TV?
Most rational people out there probably already saw the grossness in Thomas Markle's behaviour. This, though, is the first deliberate refutation of his claims. The upside is that Meghan's circle is getting to address the f-ck sh-t that's been happening recently. The downside? Thomas Markle is going to dial up his friends at the Daily Mail and the Sun and Piers Morgan and they're not going to ask him the tough questions and challenge him - it doesn't serve their purpose. So, probably by the weekend, we'll be hearing from him again. And then a fresh wave of mess will be upon us.
He goes on another video in 2023 with hateful jealous Sam, who he knows hates Meghan, and his son, moaning "how can I fix this" and does he think Meghan even knows there was a video? Supposedly his last one? HA. Guarantee that Meghan did not see it, probably does not even know it was made. But one sight of that hateful child-abusing Sam and well, guarantee she'd not watch it.
UpdateL Tom ALSO lied about this
Tom Markle lied about paying for ALL of her education:
The full details of the work that went into allowing the duchess to get a university education came out in papers filed in her case against U. K. tabloid the Mail on Sunday.
A filing by Meghan's lawyers last week read: "Mr Markle did not pay for all of Meghan's college tuition. Meghan's mother also contributed towards her university costs.
"In addition, Meghan received *scholarships* for academic achievement, which reduced the payable tuition fees. Meghan also undertook a work-study program whereby income she made from working on campus after class was applied directly to supplement and lower her tuition costs, thus personally contributing to her tuition as well."