"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Baggage (TV Episode 2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Heavy baggage
TheLittleSongbird6 January 2022
There are a number of 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' episodes that got much attention for its guest stars, many of them more than living up to the hype. When it came to the episodes overall, there were a number that were worthy of the guest star in question but there were also a number where the guest star was a lot better than the episode and deserved better. It is hard to not expect a good deal when a guest star for anything gets a lot of attention, and that can be said for Delroy Lindo.

"Baggage" is one of those episodes where the guest star performance was better than the episode itself, of the episodes with guest star turns that got a lot of attention Carol Burnett for "Ballerina" and Brenda Blethyn for "Persona" were the closest the season got to an episode being as good as the star. Not because it is a bad episode, actually thought it was rather good if not great on the whole. As far as previous Season 10 episodes go, "Lunacy" with James Brolin is another episode where this applies but this is the better one as it is not as predictable. There are a number of great things, but it is frustrating that the way the case is handled is severely flawed.

Am going to start with listing the flaws, a lot of it being to do with the way the SVU handle the case which was an issue in quite a number of Season 10 episodes. There is too much baseless conclusion jumping, where the team immediately decide that the suspect is guilty without evidence. Then resorting to sackable offense-worthy actions with little consequence. The police work is sloppy, and it does take a little too long for them to get to the truth (which was not that complicated).

Did think that it was on the rushed side at times, especially when it became too crammed towards the end. And yes, the not questioning a suspect and the arraignment decision didn't ring true or make sense.

Having said all of that, "Baggage" is still worth seeing for the performances. Especially Lindo, who does abrasively intense and tortured very believably without resorting to over-acting (unlike for example Anthony Anderson in Season 7's "Fat"). He has great chemistry with Christopher Meloni, also excellent. This is also one of Stabler's better pairings with anybody not from the SVU, being one of the few ones that work. Namely because Lindo's character is actually interesting, the writers don't over-egg any conflict and Lindo's character also has a conflict that is relatable and not too soap operatic.

Script is tight and intelligent, never sounding rambling or overripe. Much of the story is fine, it has tension and packs an emotional punch. The production values are solid and the intimacy of the photography doesn't get static or too filmed play-like. The music when used is not too over-emphatic and has a melancholic edge that is quite haunting. The direction is sympathetic enough without being leaden.

On the whole, good but not great yet with a great guest performance. 7/10.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the Best
championbc-99-50053 December 2014
Yes, I know that this show has some pretty graphic photos of some pretty violent killings, but, you know, the title of the whole series gives you a "heads up" that this is going to happen.

But it is a great show, with a great character making a one-time appearance, who arguably would be good in his own series. The chemistry between him and Stabler is fun to watch as it develops, and the ending scene is what keeps me coming back to this show.

There is some formula, of course, including "arrest the wrong guy first, and we're all sure he's guilty," and "someone pulls rank on SVU, and we have to do a little cutting of the corners to get back in," but both were well done.

I noticed that Mariska Hargitay was out of this show for medical reasons, and I'm glad she was back in time for the next one, but this one did not need her, and it's nice to see Stabler and Tutuola working together -- things seem to be getting a little better for them after Tutuola ripped Stabler last season and let him know how much he disliked him.

It was also fun to see "Seven of Nine" in a minor role as a defense attorney, though I am beginning to wonder if all the prosecutors in New York and half the defense attorneys are beautiful women with an ax to grind. I also wonder if there are any male judges that are not idiotic buffoons, but that subject is for another day.

My advice: take your time and enjoy this one. It's one of the better ones in a very good series.
32 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Doesn't like to share, doesn't work and play well with others
bkoganbing19 February 2015
Christopher Meloni is put rather unwillingly in harness with a detective from Major Crimes played by Delray Lindo who does not like to work with partners in any event. But two homicide cases that have been linked together by SVU have been further linked to some cases that have been worked on for some time by Lindo.

Lindo does not work well with others and Stabler certainly takes a bit of getting used to. But this shotgun marriage has to work because they've got a serial killer out there who's well read on the subject. He does not leave much to work with. In fact they make one arrest who turns out to be a bad guy, just not the bad guy they're looking for.

Nelson Vasquez is their guy and he has a job that I can't reveal but it gives him access to women victims. And he works out a brilliant alibi for one of his victims that his attorney Jeri Ryan does not hesitate to get a dismissal for him when he's first arrested.

Lindo gives a fine performance and we do find out that he's a man with a few issues of his own, but those that come with both job and family.

Kind of like Elliott Stabler.
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The crime story worked, but the character story didn't. Oh, and by the way, the police were criminals,
wdstarr-124 December 2020
First, the reason for my one-star rating: at one point, in the mandatory "We've got the wrong guy but we're 300% sure he's guilty" phase of the episode, Stabler and Tutuola, though mostly Stabler, literally physically assaulted and battered a suspect in the interrogation room, whole Cragen watched them through the two-way mirror, not lifting a finger to interfere. This was a serious crime -- if they'd seen a civilian doing the same thing they'd have arrested him -- but since they're cops then it's eh, who cares, the guy was a slimebag anyway. This was just terrible: we don't need criminal cops in real life, and we don't need them portrayed as the heroes of fictional cop shows either.

Aside from that element, the crime, investigation, and courtroom action part of the "pursuit of a serial killer" story worked pretty well, though as reviewer depaderico pointed out there were two big holes in it: the detectives' lack of interest in a possible suspect because he's a farmer in North Carolina (what, he can't travel?), and the complete freeing of the killer by the arraignment judge despite the fact that while the murders couldn't be stuck to him, a separate assault certainly could be.

But the character-driven story of Major Crimes detective Victor Moran (played by Delroy Lindo) mostly fell flat: he just wasn't nearly as interesting as the writers seemed to think he was and he was really difficult if not impossible to care about other than as an annoying jerk. And no explanation beyond "Because It's In The Script" was ever given for the new Chief of Detectives' rabid and almost literally sneering championing of him at the expense of the SVU squad.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poorly written and generally unengaging story
IMDB-User-480126 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This episode has a poorly conceived procedural investigation and a throwaway drama. As usual with Law & Order, they try to gussy up a boring episode with gratuitous shots of murder victims and soon-to-be- murdered victims and some random self-inflicted gore posed by the initial false lead.

After the cold open, we learn that the killer's MO matches that of another recent murder. Enter a new, never-before-seen, apparently rival special victims unit consisting of a loner detective and his boss. The newcomers inform the team that the murders match the MOs of three additional murders in New York in recent months. This doesn't make sense, as the whole premise of the show is that there is a single elite squad "known as the special victims unit", not two rival squads competing for cases and childishly keeping secret their respective findings.

After the false lead they do one of those DNA tests where they put in the order to the M.E. at 10:30 a.m., and no sooner do they come back to lunch than they have up on their giant LCDs the drivers license photos of all the male offspring related to the "donors" of all the black pubic hairs they'd managed to uncover at crime scenes. Naturally, after a couple face-to-face interviews they are able to narrow it down to one single person (why so quickly do they dismiss the farmer from North Carolina?), and in a tease we see the perp about to commit another rape- murder when it turns out to be a sting operation. They arrest him, but because he has an alibi for one of the murders the judge allows him to go free. I'm sorry, did he not assault the undercover police officer just 15 minutes (11.5 without commercials) earlier? Does that no longer count as a crime? I suspect the writers were experiencing short-term memory lapses.

Thanks to these lapses, however, the writers gleefully show the perp in action on a real delivery. Stabler and Tutuola come in just in time to see a nude teenager lying hot-tied on her coffee table. Stabler attempts to rescue the dignity of the near-victim by placing his jacket over her, quickly realizing his stupidity as the jacket is not really designed with that function in mind and provides only a partial veil at best. Honestly, you find somebody hog-tied and give them your jacket? Meanwhile, the rival detective of the week kicks the perp a few times in the stomach, but then Stabler--always one to rough-handle anyone he considers a suspect--stops him (probably so that he can get a few kicks in later, when there won't be any witnesses about). Oh, and remember all that talk about what a professional the suspect supposedly is, never leaving fingerprints, etc.? He's bare-handed in this scene.

We are asked to care about our guest star, and while I admit that his character was well thought out, he would have been a more appropriate character as an arc spanning more than one episode. He does have a discernible character arc, as he becomes more cooperative with coworkers throughout this episode, but it's quite a lot for the viewer to take in. It seems as if the writers are working at cross-purposes, trying to make us care about this other detective while trying to distract us from that subplot by dropping juicy details about one victim's rectal cavity and another's secret life as a lesbian.

Overall, this is just another mid-season episode out there for viewers who care less about the procedural aspects of the show and more about the lascivious sex crimes.
13 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
this one's extra bad.
miss_manners_6217 March 2022
The level of police brutality and violations of rights in this episode is truly epic. I cannot imagine what was going through the minds of the writers.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed