Restless (2011) Poster

(I) (2011)

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Lessons to be learned
synevy22 December 2011
Restless tells the story of two controversial -but somehow the same- teenage characters and their perspectives of dealing with death. Enoch (Henry Hopper) has dropped out school and tries to cope and face his fears by attending funerals. That's how he meets Annabel (Mia Wasikowska), a girl with a terminal disease and a love for life and nature. There's also the ghost of a Japanese kamikaze Hiroshi (Ryo Kase), from WWII and it seems that he is a story inside the story of this film. Sometimes you may think that his part is unnecessary in the plot, although, in the end it turns out that he wasn't so much irrelevant after all.

The film is not as morbid as you might think. There won't be any moment where your heart will feel heavy. Every scene is a walk-through towards realization and the art of getting familiar with the absolute fact such as death and the importance of love and the "now" moment.

The photography is soft and atmospheric and so is the music. Keep in mind that the director (Gus Van Sant) is the one who also directed Good Will Hunting, a brilliant movie. I first saw Mia Wasikowska in Alice in Wonderland, then in Jane Eyre and i believe she's one of the many talented young actresses that'll stand out in the industry. Henry Hopper on the other hand is the son of the late -and great- Dennis Hopper. His filmography is still in its early stages but he seems very promising.
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful, Romantic and Sad
claudio_carvalho30 June 2013
Enoch Brae (Henry Hopper) is a morbid teenager that enjoys attending funerals. He meets the teenager Annabel Cotton (Mia Wasikowska) in a memorial service and they start to see each other. Enoch has lost his parents in a car accident and lives with his aunt Mabel (Jane Adams). His best and only friend is the ghost of the Japanese kamikaze pilot Hiroshi Takahashi (Ryo Kase) and Enoch neither goes to school nor has a car. Annabel is terminal with brain tumor and lives with her sister Elizabeth (Schuyler Fisk) and her mother Rachel (Lusia Strus). She loves to read about birds, especially the water birds. Soon the unlikely couple falls in love with each other improving their lives.

"Restless" is a beautiful, romantic and sad movie about love, life and death. Enoch Brae recalls Harold, from "Harold and Maude", a teenager with a trauma attracted by memorial services. Mia Wasikowska is wonderful in the role of the sweet Annabel, a teenager terminally ill that loves life. The story is sensitive and their romance is heartbreaking. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Inquietos" ("Restless")
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sad story , yet beautiful movie..
malarea318 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Well,the movie its self deals with a very serious burden,a fatal illness.Every movie from now and then has a similar topic like this, so it's up to the point of the script and the director to show every aspect of the situation.Luckily,this film without being offensive reveals a clever way of coping with all the misfortunes of life.The road of "acceptance" and "moving on"..even by the person who is going to die.The title of the movie "Restless" gives away the key to this movie,and personally i would say the key to everything.Be happy and never "let go" until it's time to do so,when it no longer depends on you and your perspective towards life.

The characters of the movie played by Mia Wasikowska(Annabel)and Henry Hopper(Enoch)seem special in a unique way and sometimes out of the ordinary,without this being a disadvantage of them.Even the "ghost"Ryo Kase,presented in the movie as Hiroshi is very sympathetic and helpful,full of emotions.

The score was absolutely amazing,i got "enchanted" by every single song in the film.

Overall,this is a very sweet movie although dramatic.I felt like i was there with them,rather than watching just a film..I definitely recommend it :)
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A tender love story between life and death
saschakrieger25 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Enoch has an unusual hobby: He visits the funerals of strangers. At one of them he meets Annabel, or rather she meets him, he, the teenage boy always dressed in black ("I don't have any bright colors", he says), shies away from the living, he prefers the society of the dead. But Annabel cannot be gotten rid of so easily. At another funeral she turns up and rescues him from an inquisitive funeral director. The ice breaks and the two run off together. It's the beginning of an unusual friendship and later romance: For these are two people in limbo, hovering between life and death: Enoch lost his parents in a car crash which nearly killed him, too. He is alive and healthy, yet has tuned out of life. Annabel, on the other hand is full of life yet death has a firm grip on her. She has cancer and only three months to live. Both tread that wasteland between life and death, both in different ways. And yes, they both need each other, one to learn to live again, the other to walk into death with her held up high. One need not go back to Love Story in order to detect the clichéd nature of this set up. But this is a Gus van Sant film and the master seismograph of youth works his magic once again.

These two wanderers between life and death have fallen out of time, in their state of limbo it does not matter, it might not even exist. In fact there is a third such wanderer: Hiroshi, Enoch's only and, of course, imaginary friend, the restless ghost of a Japanese kamikaze pilot in World War II, a wanderer in that nowhere land coming from the other side. A strange sense of time permeates this film, or rather a timelessness. Everything looks and feels old, as if already past. Enoch's clothes as well as Annabel's are from another time, or maybe none at all and the same is true for the interiors. Everything is half hidden as if by a veil, it is a world not entirely real as neither protagonist is truly part of what we like to call the real world.

Yet, in a strange way, what we see is entirely real, as, impossibly, these two lost souls orbit around each other, edging ever closer, before they collide in the tenderest and wholly unsentimental way. They may be in need of each other, but it is much more simple than this. They just fall in love the way teenagers do, for the first and undoubtedly the last time. All is serious and playful at the same time and the two actors, Mia Wiakowska and Henry Hopper (Dennis Hopper's son) play this in such a spectacularly unassuming as well as matter-of-fact way that none of the cliché-ridden turns and set pieces this most conventional of van Sant's films is full of, do not stick and cannot plunge it into sentimentality. There is a lightness to this film which is made even more poignant by the heaviness of the ever-present death. For this is not a "normal" teenage love story, it is a dance with death, which cannot deny being in fact a dance with life. And these two totally unpolished young actors lend this a credibility all too rare in Hollywood today.

The story itself is as predictable as it is well-known. The odd couple holding on to each other to teach each other the meaning of life, the complementariness of the life-death ambivalence in the two central characters, the breaking apart of the deal they have struck when Enoch cannot accept Annabel's imminent death, their coming back together in the end, all these are well-worn clichés. Danny Elfman's unceasing and often borderline sentimental music is not much of a help. In the hands of a lesser director, this would have turned into an unbearable tearjerker.

Not so with Gus van Sant: Repeatedly he adds little touches which recall this from the abyss of kitsch into which this film might have fallen. Hiroshi's ambivalent role helps keep it afloat and so does a good dose of irony and humor. The silly fun in the morgue or the horribly cheesy death scene which turns out to be just playacting tip this alway back on the side of life. Restless is a conventional story conventionally told and far from van Sant's most daring films, a minor work maybe. But even so, it is, nonetheless, a tender, touching and even uplifting story about the trials of youth and what it means to grow up that can only be told by an observer as keen and sympathetic as Gus van Sant.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sad, funny, quirky and romantic! (Love in the face of Death)
akash_sebastian23 March 2012
Gus Van Sant rarely makes bad movies. I've liked him him since 'My Own Private Idaho', and who can forget masterpieces like 'Good Will Hunting' and 'Milk'? With a gloomy premise involving a cancer-stricken girl (who's going to witness death) and a recently-out-of-coma funeral-crashing guy (who nearly witnesses death), people might lose interest in the beginning itself. But, it's a beautiful movie which explores love, life and death, and challenges our ideas surrounding death.

Many may find the movie slow, unconventional and hollow... But, it really worked for me. It's sad, funny, quirky and romantic! All the three lead actors, Mia Wasikowska, Henry Hopper and Ryo Kase fit their roles very well. Mia Wasikowska is an incredible young actress who has been part of wonderful movies like 'The Kids Are All Right", 'Jane Eyre' and 'Albert' Nobbs'.

Starting with Beatles' "Two of Us", and with the addition of one of my favourite French songs ("Je ne veux pas travailler") in the background score, it makes me love the movie even more...

I loved the character of the Japanese Kamikaze Ghost, and his character summarizes the movie well.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A story about unusual young love and a beautiful soundtrack
hallesito121 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The movie in itself is an often viewed topic, but as they say... it doesn't matter that we had have seen the same topic over and over again, it's about how it is done. In my opinion the main characters were equally important and that gives a great balance. The soundtrack is beautiful and those scenes with little details are just perfect, although I didn't feel an authentic pain in the film and that excessive positivism made me mad almost the entire movie. The conflicts were pretty simple and the reactions were too complicated for the conflict. It's a good movie, above the average because it has those pretty details and that carefree puberty that is what is missing in other movies dealing with this topic and -Contradicting my first point of view- that excess if positive attitude made that those pretty details authentic and jovial.

In my humble opinion.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
'About the hospital. I don't work there. I am a patient.'
gradyharp6 June 2012
Gus Van Sant probably understands the minds of youngsters better than any director around and he proves it again in this rhapsodic film about loss and love and loss again. His cast is so well selected that they seem to be an ensemble from a stage company, so well integrated are their relationships in this beautiful film written by Jason Lew.

Enoch Brae (Henry Hopper, son of Dennis Hopper, and a very fine actor) survived a car accident in which his parents were killed: he remained in a coma and missed their funeral and the chance to in some way say goodbye. Living with his Aunt Mabel (Jane Adams), he now spends his days not attending school but instead going to strangers' funerals. One funeral organizer (Christopher D. Harder) notices his repeated appearances and tries to have him arrested for trespassing but he is saved by a strange girl named Annabel (Mia Wasikowska in a brilliant performance). Annabel also attends funerals: she tells Enoch that she works with children with cancer at a hospital. Enoch is wary of making friends - his only ally being a Japanese kamikaze pilot ghost Hiroshi Takahashi (Ryo Kase) with whom he talks about everything. But gradually Enoch and Annabel bond and Annabel reveals to Enoch that she doesn't work with 'cancer kids', she is one - she has brain cancer and is on short-term time. Annabel's sister Elizabeth (Schyler Fisk) and mother Rachel (Luisa Strus) accept Enoch's growing supportive love for Annabel. As Enoch grows form his experience with Annabel he no longer needs the presence of his ghost or his need for attending funerals and instead spends his time giving Annabel the best three months (remaining) of her life. How the story draws to an end is so enchanting that to share it would deprive the viewer of the magic of this film.

This is one of those perfect little films that glow in the heart. Mia Wasikowska and Henry Hopper create such memorable characters that once seen they will never be forgotten. Highly Recommended. Grady Harp
42 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another usual plot
leechanghwang23 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
"We have so little time to say the things we mean."-Enoch Brae

Ever since I saw the film's poster, I made a promise to myself to see this film, and finally promise kept. This poster caught my interest because of the colors used and how it looks different with other poster. Usually lead characters in poster have those "practice poses" but this has a natural feel in it. It seems that I'm paying too much attention with the film advertisements nowadays, I just can't help it, because it's one of the factor that will always arouse people's interest. And aside from that I'm a follower of Mia Wasikowska, giving me enough reason to watch this film plus I was anticipating for the performance of Ryo Kase, who looks younger than ever in his role.( I never thought that he has a Hollywood debut! He looked really good in Hachimitsu to Clover, but he looks way better here!)

Story-wise(spoiler alert!), even though the plot is nothing new but another usual death of the ill female lead and the positive change it will bring with the rebel male lead, I still commend the writer for being able to create a different angle out of the overused plot. I also like how they used an indirect scene with a solid meaning to conclude the story, it's as if leaving us the option to think of what happens next after the last scene.

I'm also deeply impressed with the woody tone of the film that they've used, giving a classic silent film vibe which suits the story and the characters. The cinematography is beyond average though music scoring is quite average, but still the total package is alright, it's decent.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Small gem, great tribute to Nouvellevague
Masako-230 December 2011
This underrated film was released just before Christmas in Tokyo. As a long time fun of the director, I enjoyed very much this beautiful film. It appears to be an ordinary boy-meets-girl story with somewhat quirky atmosphere, but inside I found the film is filled with homage to the Nouvellevague cinema.

Among them, I remember the film "Cleo de 5 a 7" by Agnes Varda (1962), which includes discussions of mortality, despair and the meaning of life. I also felt the airs of Jean-Luc Godard and François Truffaut. If you love the French films in 60s, I believe you will enjoy and appreciate it more.

The line by Hiroshi (the Ghost) summarizes the theme of this film.

"We have so little time to say any of the things we mean. We have so little time for any of it."
32 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Restless
lasttimeisaw2 April 2012
A Febiofest screening, nothing signposts that 3 years after multi-Ocsar nominated (including 2 wins) MILK (2008), Gus Van Sant will cook such a cancer-ridden romantic flick grappling with a soul-healing recovery of a parents-bereaved boy after his short relationship with a dying girl although death has been a persistent topic all through his omnibus.

The over-simplified structure may impede Gus from a more spacious platform to perform his mastery, and precipitating an out-and-out snub from all sorts of awards consideration and the disastrous box-office turnover is fatal to destroy its investor's confidence, a total domestic grosses of $164,000 versus its $8 million production budget, which is a far cry not only from MILK, but also much lesser than its indie-alike PARANOID PARK ($490,000), signals that only Van Sant's loyal zealots showed their precious appearances in the cinema. Although smaller the scale, the film still holds steady its stunning visual mode, with bountiful layers of spiritual remedies to cure any scarred heart.

Plot-wise, there are nothing really popped-out, only the Japanese ghost-friend deployment has its exquisite enchantment and exotic luster, but is far from sheer original, which also coincides the film's suffering from the paucity of a one-of-a-kind uniqueness once one can notice among Van Sant's better works (say, ELEPHANT 2003, GOOD WILL HUNTING 1997, and MY OWN PRIVATE IDAHO 1991), the story tends to be more lachrymose while marching on the unavoidable finale.

The two leads are basically serviceable, the tenderfoot Henry Hopper, who had just lost his father Dennis Hopper (1936-2010), is inappropriately in time for the role, handsome boys are never amiss in Van Sant's work. By contrast, a burgeoning Mia Wasikowska is the main magnetism on-screen, a product only cannot be stemmed from fiction as it's too ideal to be real.

Personally the film pleased me in a gently soothing method, but it is Van Sant in its very comfort zone without challenging too much of himself.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK, but not great
grantss6 September 2020
OK, but not great. Plot is pretty basic but has some good emotional moments. Doesn't move at a decent pace though, and a lot of the movie feels like padding, however.

Good performances by Mia Wasikowska and Henry Hopper in the lead roles. Good supporting cast.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A pure pleasure to watch....
JimmyCollins11 December 2011
Restless is an absolute pleasure to watch, i am a fan of Mia Wasikowska as an actress and I'm a fan of Gus Van Sant's more edgy stuff so i was a goer for this movie, initially it sounds like a kind of silly premise but quickly you fall in love with these two amazingly quirky characters and you suspend disbelief.

Rarely do young actresses like Mia Wasikowska come along, she is a fellow Aussie and she is in my opinion probably the most talented young dramatic actress in Hollywood today, with each film she becomes more and more terrific and this is no exception. The relationship between Anna and Enoch is just beautiful, Anna is a cancer patient who has very little time left to live, Enoch is a strange loner who likes to attend strangers funeral, they meet, become friends, that friendship turns into one of the loveliest romances i've seen in a movie in a very long time. These two people are just so strange and weird but instantly they get each other, its nice to see something a bit different like this.

Henry Hopper is my new crush now, he impressed me a lot, he has a very subtle nerdiness to him that is perfect for this character and his performance in Restless is wonderful, i cant wait to see what he is in next. This movie almost doesn't seem like the standard Gus Van Sant type of film, it still has the staple Portland locations but its a lot more accessible than say Elephant or Paranoid Park, but its a new style for him and it was one i found worked extremely well.

This movie is not going to affect everyone the way it did me i know that, but i really just fell in love with these two beautiful quirky characters and i think if you just let yourself be open and go with it it's something that is really rather beautiful.

Sad, Funny, Romantic, Quirky. The perfect movie for a rainy Sunday afternoon. Loved it, i cant wait for the DVD so i can watch it again. ;)
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A story about a boy who meets death, then a girl, and then love
napierslogs17 October 2011
"Restless" is the story of a boy who is restless with the living side of life and a girl, also restless with the living side of life since she just wants to get on with her own impending death. Enoch (Henry Hopper) is more interested in death since death claimed the lives of his parents and the life he once knew. Annabel (Mia Wasikowska) is a terminally ill cancer patient and instead of fighting her illness, is content living her final days studying nature. Until they met each other.

It's a story of boy meets girl, if you will. Except, these are not conventional characters, so this is not a conventional love story. The son of Dennis Hopper looks like he just walked out of the Cleary Estate from "Wedding Crashers" (2005) as the misbegotten son with creepy obsessions. The problem with this type of character in a drama is that he isn't endearing enough and he certainly isn't there for us to laugh at. Annabel doesn't hold her own life with much respect either (not that she has much choice with her terminal illness and all) but either way it's hard for us to care about her all that much too.

The most sympathetic character was Elizabeth (Schuyler Fisk, daughter of Sissy Spacek), Annabel's sister, who has no father, an inept, alcoholic mother who would be better off dead, and a dying sister who is perfectly happy with the finality of her life. I felt bad for her. The next most sympathetic character was Hiroshi (Ryo Kase). He was a ghost. If the film is starting to sound a little odd, that's because it is.

I certainly applaud the film for creating such odd characters with odd responses to life as it goes on around them. But because the characters were so far removed from anything I know, it was a little hard to fully appreciate them. It's still interesting enough and well written for those craving a small, independent movie about life, love and death. Mostly death.
33 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The kids of Hollywood royalty (Henry Hopper, Bryce Dallas Howard) are unable to rise to the level of their parents
chaz-2830 September 2011
Annabel (Mia Wasikowska) has cancer, but don't worry, it's just movie cancer. She has a brain tumor which has a precise ticking clock on how long it will allow her to live, but she can still run around, dance, skip, and eat cheeseburgers and milkshakes. As opposed to what real cancer looks like, you have probably seen movie cancer before in the likes of Love Story and The Bucket List.

Enoch (Henry Hopper) has bad timing. He meets Annabel right around the time she learns of her depressing fate and discovers they share a particularly odd outlook towards the rest of the world. He spends his weekends gate crashing the funerals of strangers because he has an unhealthy preoccupation with death. Annabel finds this peculiarity attractive and they start building a relationship from there. Annabel does not lie to Enoch though, he is well aware from the beginning there can only be one result of spending time with her.

Enoch is not alone though. He enjoys the company of a ghost, specifically a Japanese kamikaze pilot named Hiroshi (Ryo Kase) who remains forever in the flight suit he was wearing when he fulfilled his destiny. Hiroshi encourages Enoch to talk to and spend time with Annabel and he is also much more active than your average ghost, but certainly not to a Patrick Swayze level. Hiroshi enjoys nightly games of Battleship with Enoch and even gets visibly upset when the word Nagasaki is mentioned.

On paper, these are three intriguing main characters that should have produced a wonderful, quirky film, especially since Restless is directed by Gus Van Sant. Unfortunately, Restless comes nowhere near to fulfilling its promise which is mainly a result of a poorly written script and shoddy acting. The screenwriter is first timer Jason Lew who adapted it from a play he wrote at NYU. This story may very well work much better as a play and observed with real time actors on a stage. His friend at NYU, Bryce Dallas Howard, saw the play's promise and produced Restless along with her father Ron Howard and his production partner Brian Grazer.

Those are some very influential names. I am shocked to see that Brian Grazer and Ron Howard would put their names and money behind Restless; we're talking about the guys behind A Beautiful Mind, American Gangster, and Arrested Development. Well, Brian Grazer was also behind Blue Crush and something called Curious George 2: Follow That Monkey! Perhaps it is not that strange.

Restless also appears to be one of those vehicles for the Hollywood kids. Henry Hopper is Dennis Hopper's son and this is his first lead role. Bryce Dallas Howard is Ron Howard's daughter and this is her first time producing. Annabel's sister Elizabeth is played by Schuyler Fisk who is Sissy Spacek's daughter. Fisk was also in Orange County which is another Hollywood kid's film; remember the lead character there was played by Colin Hanks, the prodigy of a Mr. Tom Hanks.

I mentioned the acting was the second reason Restless does not work very well. Henry Hopper is unsure of himself in his first lead role and any scene which requires him to be agitated, angry, or upset turns out to be a disaster. Mia Wasikowska is much better but comes nowhere close to her superior performances from Alice in Wonderland and Jane Eyre. She has a horrible script to work with and is unable to produce much good from it.

Restless was the opening film from the 2011 Un Certain Regard section at the Cannes Film Festival. These films are reserved for "original and different" films which the festival organizers think deserve international attention. I can see why they would put a Gus Van Sant movie in this category because of his previous films such as Elephant and Gerry. Those two were absolutely original and different. However, just because his name is Gus Van Sant does not mean every movie he makes will be original and different; Restless is not. It is just plain vanilla and a waste of some major talent.
26 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Life and love is precious
dazworthy6 December 2011
Director Gus Van Sant is renowned for films that explore the lives of lost or outcast characters, and reveal their strength and beauty. And his latest film Restless is no exception.

The film tells the story of two free-spirited teenagers - Annabel (Mia Wasikowska) and Enoch (Henry Hopper). Annabel is suffering a terminal illness, whilst Enoch splits his time between attending stranger's funerals and talking to the ghost of a kamikaze pilot named Hiroshi (Ryo Kase). As they fall for each other, it becomes clear that they are exactly what each other needs, and their lives revolve around making the most of each moment together.

Based on this summary you could be excused for thinking that Restless might be too melancholy. But I think it is more a celebration of life. Don't get me wrong, the film certainly does tug at the heart-strings, but there is an appreciation and acceptance of the fleeting nature of life that overwhelms the sadness.

Van Sant has created a beautiful film with vivid images and masterful direction. It's also quite quirky due to its interesting characters, script and film score. The performances are very good (especially from Wasikowska) which I think add to the strong emotions elicited in the audience. Annabel's zest for life is especially inspirational.

In this sense Restless is so much more than a love story. It certainly makes you appreciate life and loved ones, and this is what I really liked about the film.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A flawed indie drama that misses its potential.
lewiskendell22 February 2012
Mia Wasikowska seems to be drawn to these quirky indie movies, and she should be because she's good at them. She's the best thing about Restless, a drama about an emotionally wounded young man, a dying young woman, the ghost of a Japanese kamikaze pilot, and birds. 

Unfortunately, she's not the main character. That's Enoch, played by Henry Hopper. He's just not right for the role, and veers between unlikable and uninteresting. Restless also seems a bit unfocused, as well, as if the concept wasn't properly expanded by the writer into a full story. It starts off with promise, only to lose some of my interest on the way to the mishandled ending. 

As a result, the movie just isn't everything it could have been. I liked it, it's just hard to not be somewhat disappointed by the wasted potential. There are resonant moments throughout the story, but there are just as many scenes that just seem hollow or misplaced. Restless could have been very good, instead it's just okay.
13 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I would say, it was an alright good film..
Irishchatter9 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I found this film alright like Im not gonna say its the best because it was weird and uncomfortable at the same time. Henry Hopper's character Enoch Brae likes to crash into peoples funerals who he rarely knows and it seems like he is an antisocial person. It was rude of him to back away from Mia Wasikowska's character Annabelle, she is just so like a friend that anyone could have! Then when the pair of them became a couple (finally!), they had arguments that I didn't understand the reasons why they happened to fall out but they did.

It was sad to find out that Annabelle had a few months to live because of cancer and Enoch will be soon losing her. Although, in the end, I felt they didn't make a big deal of Annabelles death. No one was even crying or wearing black clothes which was really odd and disappointing. It just doesn't make any sense! I would suggest anyone watching this movie to be prepared for disappointment and weirdness!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Food for the Heart and the Mind
eldestjay11 December 2011
I cannot tell you how much I adore this film. Restless is one of the greatest movies ever made. It's simple, but it's complex. It's confusing, yet it's still subtle. It's charming, dark, funny, romantic, bold, and shy all at the same time. It's truly a masterpiece, and it's one of the most under-appreciated movies of all time. 

The acting is phenomenal. Mia Wasikowski, is truly a little actress. She was the only good part about Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, and she adds charm, liveliness, and quirkiness to an already fantastic film.  I had never heard of the title actor before Restless, and after watching the preview, I wasn't that impressed with him. But during the actual movie, he took my soul on a journey. 

This movie is unbelievably good. It's honest. Not only about life, but about the moments in life that make it so special.  If I had to create a moral for the film it would be: Don't count the days until life ends, count the moments with the ones you love.

It truly is magnificent. It's A Walk to Remember, only with ghosts, snow angels, and a dash of lovable-ness that the Adam Shankman classic was always missing.
30 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice simple teen romance with a difference
blrnani26 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Basically, it's better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. Although the focus is mainly on the rather disturbed (and I won't say harmless, because in typical American male fashion he readily resorts to violence as a way to resolve his problems) Enoch, the story is driven by Annabel, a vivacious young girl with a sad secret. That they are both good for one another is undeniable, even for Annabel's protective (but not overly so) older sister. I wasn't sure how Hiroshi fitted into this until the end, and that realisation added much to the depth of the film. I won't say any more to avoid spoiling the journey for others.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Death-obsessed beauty.
hello-310-6266109 March 2012
I don't know about you, but as great as Dennis Hopper was, I was never able to love him. He was so mean and frightening – all those horrid things he put poor Keanu and Sandra through on that bus, the sacrifices that Jack had to make to get him in 24 and that frankly frightful tongue in Super Mario Bros. But, finally, from his loins, comes something I can love – wee little Henry.

He seems to be carved from the finest tree in the Gus Van Sant forest of indie-actors, whilst having a face perfect enough for the inevitable actor-cum-model turn for the odd glossy magazine.

Death, cancer and all that stuff is hard enough to deal with when you're an adult, but when you're abandoned by your parents to make sense of this world and all its harshness, there's really only one place to go and that's off the rails. Finding yet more death in his imaginary friend and his new girlfriend, young Enoch is just a little bit dark and kooky.

And talking of his girlfriend, is there nothing that Mia Wasikowska isn't in these days. Six months ago it was Amy Ryan who seemed to be in every movie in the cinema, film on iTunes and series on TV; but for the past couple of months Mia has been everywhere. I just caught, and fell in love with, her in In Treatment; and here, well she continued to win me over.

I love a film about grief – and this one is beautiful, cute, and has that little Romeo and Juliet vibe. And a little note to the film's stylist – loving your work.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Definitely one for cutesy space cadets
whatalovelypark18 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is a quirky little tale about a young couple, both screwed up in different ways. Yet they find something wonderful in each other. She has cancer and will soon die. His parents are dead. Yet they find love.

That's pretty much the entire film.

There are lots of scenes with the pair being cute and lovable. Of course, she doesn't show any symptoms, and she doesn't mind that he has an invisible friend, even though he must be at least 16. Yes, the story line would be more believable if they were five-years-old. But as near adults it's very sickly sweet.

It is also very male biased. Most of the content is about the male character, while the female is this perfect entity for him to interact with, less real, in many ways, than his imaginary friend. In fact, we're never actually told how the rest of her family feels about her death.

It would have been better if the film was cut down to 45 minutes, and the next 45 minutes explained to us how the male character was going to be a successful adult while talking to his imaginary friend.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dark and sweet
rodolphefleury16 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I thought the acting was excellent, it's not actor studio and it's probably for the best. I never liked people who over act and think they're portraying reality (except James Dean and Marlon Brando in Apocalypse now). Sean Penn in Milk to me was unbearable, flamboyant and irritating. So it was quite refreshing to see Henry Hopper being so vague and timid, I thought he was touching, he looked hurt and lost and that was better to me than "professional acting". Mia Wasikowska was beautiful and charismatic. They were both real to me, they exist. It's no Elephant or Gerry and guess what it's not MOPI or Drugstore Cowboys either. It's Gus Van Sant doing a romantic comedy with his themes death, friendship and teenagers. It's light on the surface and dark below.

A film doesn't work necessarily by his script but by the feelings, the atmosphere and the tone it leaves you with. That film grew up on me hours after I've seen it. It made me think about life, just like Melancholia did (Melancholia felt to some people like a bunch of scenes where nothing happens, well it creates a whole thing, like pieces of a puzzle you gather altogether, it's not easy cinema where everything is explained to you, dully underlined, where you're being forced a message without having to think for yourself, like Paul Haggis's CRASH for example).

Restless is a good little movie, not a big masterpiece. Restless is a deep and arty film disguised as a quirky Rom-com. It has different levels of lecture. It's about questioning the time you spend on earth, what you decide to do with that time and lots of other

Some argue it's too clean in its depiction of cancer? So what? The subject is not cancer but the beauty of life and how death is part of life, and after all it is a romantic comedy so why show an ugly death? Furthermore some cancer don't disfigure people? I known a man who died a week after he got diagnosed, he had a brain tumour.

It's got a beautiful cinematography (Portland in autumn, great lights and beautiful colourful trees), wonderful themes (Life and Death with bugs, hospital, birds, Darwin) and nice soundtrack. It's a very moving film and it worked for me.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Restless" is full of clichés of the genre and does not go much beyond the famous "acceptance drama" about the unhappiness, anguish and inevitabilities that surround us
fernandoschiavi4 August 2023
"Restless" shows death from a different point of view, without being melancholy, without necessarily being the end. Death as part of life, as part of any trajectory, more than that, death as a new beginning. The character Enoch has a strange relationship with her, he lost his parents when he was little and his best friend is a ghost (Okay, that last part we ignore!), he goes to funerals and dresses like someone from another time, a being that definitely doesn't see much meaning in life, but that he understood and accepted his course. Annabel is never shocked by her harsh reality, even when she finally finds a reason to want to live she discovers that she will not be able to enjoy all her happiness. Happiness that can be summed up in a short period of your existence, however, that will already be worth your entire life. And both, together, face this passage, Annabel to understand death, to let go of what completes it, and Enoch to understand life, even when what finally gave it meaning is about to depart.

There is a lot of beauty in this work, that is undeniable, director Gus Van Sant delivers poetry to death. Costumes, soundtrack and photography, all in perfect condition, ready to deliver to the public a work to remember. However, this does not happen and it is in the script that its greatest flaw lies. Written by someone who probably understands a lot about death but little about life, where its conflicts and characters seem to have been taken from another movie, not the real world. It's all so alienated and artificial the way the couple lives and how everything is explored in the plot, Annabel and Enoch who were born from a prototype already created for "young misfits", with the right to strange names, family conflicts and bizarre quirks like reading about insects and Darwin (every indie character has to have unusual hobbies for their age) and throwing stones at trains (??), where in the end they are just normal, good-looking young people, with modern haircuts and a top stylist. The script tries to convince us that they don't fit into society, but the construction of the characters is so shallow, so poor that it was very difficult to embark on this journey and believe in their dramas.

Enoch and Annabel are the typical "indie" movie characters, they are saved, however, by the performances, mainly by Mia Wasikowska, who easily enchants and proves, once again, her great talent, despite her youth. Henry Hopper doesn't disappoint, but he doesn't surprise either. "Restless" brings a warm direction from Gus Van Sant, who doesn't dare, in a film that has a good premise, but wastes the rest of the plot with an approach already portrayed in other works. Of course, everything is very beautiful and well done, it's still adorable. However, ironically, in this film that talks about death, the only thing it lacked was its own life, resulting in something without personality, tasteless.

Of course, an orphaned boy, traumatized, expelled from school and with no other activity than breaking into other people's wakes was not enough. Therefore, the character of Ryo Kase appears. Hiroshi Takahashi is a friendly ghost, a true kamikaze from the Second World War, who still wears the uniform with which he threw himself on an enemy ship. Perhaps he is the most interesting character, although we don't even know if he is real or a figment of Enoch's imagination. His scene after "discovering" what happened to Nagasaki, for example, is a detail that almost goes unnoticed, but brings in its essence the main theme of the film: the uselessness, or otherwise, of our sacrifices in life. There are three boys in extreme moments who cannot reposition themselves in the world. Incidentally, both Hiroshi and Annabel can be considered parts of Enoch's own personality, who feels wronged by life for having lost his parents so early and not even being able to say goodbye to them. Maybe that's why he wanders around other people's wakes imagining that he can rescue some kind of moment. Maybe that's why he has a kamikaze friend, who gave his life believing he was saving his country and it was destroyed by two atomic bombs. And, suddenly, he meets a beautiful, intelligent girl who loves to read Darwin and his evolutionary theories and who, ironically, is being destroyed by her own organism. After all, cancer is nothing more than a human cell that degenerates and attacks others.

Aware that a film benefits from conflict after reading something like this in a script manual, Jason Lew here and there tries to throw obstacles in the way of his characters by including disagreements and fights so artificial that it's a surprise the actors don't burst out laughing. When staging them - as in the moment, for example, when Enoch and Annabel disagree when he decides to improvise during a staging they are rehearsing about the girl's death or at the moment when the boy argues with the hallucination-ghost of a kamikaze pilot. And what about the efforts of Elizabeth (Fisk, daughter of Sissy Spacek), Annabel's sister, to prevent the young couple from meeting, since she doesn't appreciate Enoch? What does she fear? That he is a "bad influence" on his sister... who will die in three months? Not that we don't agree with Elizabeth: Enoch is, in fact, a bad influence on anyone and a deeply unsympathetic and ignorant individual ("Was Darwin the Evolution guy?"): selfish, resentful and ill-mannered, he is the typical guy who believes he's a lot smarter and funnier than he actually is - and when his girlfriend's sister greets him with a "You must be Enoch", he immediately responds with a "I must be" which, despite clearly believing it to be a great, just illustrates his constant rudeness. With that, not only do we not understand why Annabel would decide to spend her remaining time on Earth next to someone so irritating, but her decision still ends up reflecting poorly on our judgment of her ability to discern.

What differentiates the film from others of this genre is Van Sant's direction, with its decoupage and dramatic resolution quite simple and efficient at the time of composing a direct and honest film in its intentions, but which, even so, does not leave the common ground and of the low ambition of its script. It is a relief that the film has the speed of its style greatly reduced - you see again, as in several of your films, sequences practically resolved in three or four shots, in-depth staging, large sequences based solely on dialogue and few visual inventions. Digital or photographic juggling is few. Even though it deals with such a heavy topic, it is a light, smooth and introspective film - no wonder, all the characters' cries are hidden from the view of others, except for us. It's a cinema that wants to accompany our intimate, not invade it.

Those who know Gus van Sant's filmography know that he has a predilection for dramas involving young people. This constant visit to his youth makes him a filmmaker of sensitive and deeply reflective works, which, as a rule, are outside the great commercial circuit, even though his great films, such as "My Own Private Idaho", "Paranoid Park" and "Elephant", have captured viewers (and deservedly so). Awards) around the world. In the case of Restless, it seems to me that the drama is not that young. Not only for the metaphysical, philosophical and religious questioning around life after death and its acceptance, but because, despite being physically young, Enoch and Annabel act like depressive adults.

The mixture of the indie booklet and the vintage tone generally applied to the film, makes it a fun and romantic story, which, despite its narrative problems, manages to remain minimally interesting. In the opening, we have the beautiful song Two of Us, by the Beatles, and during the projection, we come across French songs, Bach, and orchestrations by Danny Elfman. The musical beauty just cannot overcome the photography of Harris Savides, a great director of dramatic environments with his non-metallic and contrasting colors. In one of the film's best sequences, on Halloween night, we have practically a whole series of tonalities and exposures of light, and in none of them we have monochrome, refraction or dramatic divergence between color and plot. It is in this same sequence that the costumes, editing and makeup are divinely creative.

But it is clear that only the director does not make a film - even if it is anchored by beautiful pop songs and Danny Elfman's discreet, but always melancholic and omnipresent soundtrack - and the script does not go much beyond the famous "acceptance drama" about the unhappiness, anguish and inevitabilities that surround us - and that happiness would be like the relationship between Enoch and Annabel, something quick, intense and brief - like human life, which as the protagonist says is equivalent to seconds in the entire existence of the universe. Well-designed and even predictable story in its three arcs, with all the nice clichés that avoid pain and absolute despair and that, at least this time, shows how the misfits, time or another, can resolve their intimate issues to make life better. In that least unbearable blue globe. "Restless" follows its own rhythm. The rhythm of waiting for death or for a miracle that can make the characters understand the meaning of it all. The meaning of life, the meaning of death, the meaning of love and the meeting of two very different souls.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
like everyone but not much of a story
SnoopyStyle30 November 2015
Enoch Brae (Henry Hopper) has an imaginary friend in the ghost of a Japanese kamikaze pilot. He likes to crash funerals. He meets Annie Cotton (Mia Wasikowska) at the funeral of a cancer kid. She lives with her mother Rachel and sister Elizabeth (Schuyler Fisk). Mabel Tell (Jane Adams) is Enoch's aunt and guardian. Annie and Enoch begin a relationship. She has cancer and only months to live. He has to process the losses that he has suffered.

This is a slow contemplative movie from Gus Van Sant. The imaginary pilot feels a bit gimmicky. Henry Hopper does an able job as an odd introvert. Fisk has some good scenes. Mia continues to shine. I like everybody but there is no tension. The movie mopes around in yet another sick person romance.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
3-in-1: witty, morbid, warmhearted
BeneCumb31 January 2013
It is pleasant to watch movies in which sad and tragic events are not depicted in a depressive and gray manner, and the characters are able to enjoy the current day. Restless is one of those movies, and despite the sad background, the viewers can follow different undertakings of the lead characters, their joys, worries and moods. The ending scene is settled in an interesting way as well.

Henry Hopper as Enoch Brae and Mia Wasikowska as Annabel Cotton are good and credible; both of them could be used more in non-mainstream movies. Hiroshi Takahashi (Ryō Kase) is an interesting finding, providing additional dimension to this otherwise linear movie.

The movie is definitely for you if you are not ultra-conservative and/or have fresh respective experiences. You have a possibility to enjoy something different and ponder whether your own life is as bad as it may often seem...
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed