I have to respond to the previous comment:
It's a six minute short film. The first person POV is not a voice everybody gets to hear every day, regardless of who wrote it. If the film was an hour and a half long (and nothing else was added), then I can see how it would lack "grit". I feel like the previous comment is irrelevant to the films message.
Additionally, the difference between working in a fast food restaurant or a place of business versus working in somebody's home is entirely different. It's an intimate and very personal setting that gives the homeowner home-court advantage. I get that using the word "dehumanize" instead of "servant" is preferred by the writer of the previous comment, but I don't know if the film's target audience would be able to truly empathize with the word "dehumanize". This assumes that every privileged person in America knows what that feels like. And I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that they don't. I think that using straightforward language, like "servant" is far more reaching and impactful than decorating the film's vocabulary.
It's a six minute short film. The first person POV is not a voice everybody gets to hear every day, regardless of who wrote it. If the film was an hour and a half long (and nothing else was added), then I can see how it would lack "grit". I feel like the previous comment is irrelevant to the films message.
Additionally, the difference between working in a fast food restaurant or a place of business versus working in somebody's home is entirely different. It's an intimate and very personal setting that gives the homeowner home-court advantage. I get that using the word "dehumanize" instead of "servant" is preferred by the writer of the previous comment, but I don't know if the film's target audience would be able to truly empathize with the word "dehumanize". This assumes that every privileged person in America knows what that feels like. And I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that they don't. I think that using straightforward language, like "servant" is far more reaching and impactful than decorating the film's vocabulary.