The Field of Blood (TV Series 2011–2013) Poster

(2011–2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Glasgow kiss-off.
Lejink9 May 2011
I read the Denise Mina source novel a couple of years ago and was pleased that this adaptation seemed to stay true to its good source. As a Glaswegian, myself, I always get a kick out of spotting known locations, especially as I'm an Eastender where much of the location work was done.

The story here of course recalls the awful Jamie Bulger case, although being set in the early 80's it actually predates that horrific crime, the association can't help but provoke a certain amount of discomfort (almost certainly evincing the prominent "Any similarity..." legend over the end titles) but there is a good deal more to the narrative than this, with a related almost identical murder some 10 years previously and a good twist at the end as the true murderer is revealed.

The back stories centre on young, ambitious Catholic copy-girl Paddy Meehan trying to get on in the male-dominated newspaper world and her relationship to her strictly R.C. family, rightly dispensing with the original book's insertion of the dichotomy between this Paddy Meehan and the famous miscarriage of justice victim of the same name from years ago (although the original Paddy Meehan was a male). That said, viewers unfamiliar with the real-life Paddy Meehan story might scratch their heads over these references at all and to be truthful adds nothing to this dramatisation. I also wasn't taken with the mother-daughter relationship conveyed between Paddy and her strictly Irish mother, even as I appreciate it too was in the original writing.

The acting was mostly good, Jayd Johnson making a good central character, although she could have done, I think with being fatter and less attractive as befits her description in the book, the better support acting coming from those south of the border (David Morrissey & an almost unrecognisable Jonas "Robin Hood" Armstrong). It was however strange and off-putting for me at any case to see well known Scottish comedy actors from the likes of "Still Game" in prominent roles which lessened realism for me, Ford Kiernan in particular seeming both miscast and out of his depth. Outshining them all though was Peter Capaldi as the newspaper's doomed, veteran reporter, Dr Pete, declaiming Dylan Thomas' and dying where many a Glaswegian would like to, in a pub, with whom Meehan strikes up a mutual respect and the paternal relationship lacking in her own life.

The depiction of Thatcher-era Glasgow was well done, from fashion to language with a decent post punk soundtrack (Gang of Four, Elvis Costello etc) to boot. There are one or two scenes of extreme violence, although thankfully none involving minors. More of Mina's mordant humour could perhaps have been employed but on the whole this was an above-average production which will hopefully beget more adaptations of this writer's work.
45 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Miners and newspapers
Prismark1011 August 2013
The second series of The Field of Blood returns to Glasgow and again blends politics, intrigue and the changing newspaper industry.

Once again we follow novice female reporter Paddy Meehan as she tries to make a career for herself. She is working the night shift on the call car with a tough reporter and she is soon following up a murder mystery.

The main backdrop is the Miners strike and the dirty tricks campaign against it.

However, we are also looking at new, tougher executives entering the newspaper industry, less principled and happy to do the dirty work for the government in a propaganda war.

There is no doubt the story takes place with the benefit of hindsight. With or without media help, the Miners strike was very unpopular in some quarters and most media outlets were very happy to be negative against the Miners Union with very little persuasion.

There is an element of looking back with rose tinted spectacles. It is a decent enough second series, we see Paddy's ongoing difficult relationship with her parents but nothing too special.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another above-the-average British miniseries
BeneCumb26 August 2016
This millennium has seen a big blooming of solid (mini-)series, often at the expense of films focusing on topics and audiences not to my taste any more. New angles and approaches have been developed or deepened, and distinct performers employed. Being a vast country with numerous distinct folks and regions, the UK has an endless potential to "fit in" crimes into dozens of places where local and tourists can have their joy of recognition.

The Field of Blooda takes us into the 1980ies Glasgow, when the biggest technical facilitators for both the police and journalism were pagers and then unconnected PCs... On the other hand, you could smoke and drink almost everywhere and a lot :) The crimes were still severe, and journalists have always had to "be creative" for obtaining information, but the world in those days was rather reserved than open.

Apparently the atmosphere is well created and the characters realistic, but the leading performance (Jayd Johnson as Paddy Meehan) fell down on two smaller performances - David Morrissey as Murray Devlin and Peter Capaldi as Dr. Pete Walker, particularly in dialogues. Thus "only" 7 points from me, as I have recently seen UK crime series more versatile and interesting, e.g. Shetland, What Remains, Luther, and others.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice thriller, with a thick Glasgow accent on the side
siderite6 October 2011
This is a good movie, with a well acting female lead as the newspaper copy-girl Patricia who dreams of becoming a reporter and stumbles upon clues on a child murder in the area. However it is not great, and the thick Glasgow accent of all involved makes it even less accessible to non English audiences.

I don't know why they called it a series, either, as it is really a two parter film. Maybe they intended to continue it with the adventures of this tiny girl in this tiny community of uber-Catholic tiny minded people, but what would have been the point?

Bottom line: a nice watch, with convincing acting and script, some thrills and a true glimpse of Glasgow in the 70-80's. Subtitles don't hurt, either. Peter Capaldi plays in this one, as a secondary character.
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Where is series 2 ??
allwman22 May 2021
Why are there these great mini series made years without another season leaving us hanging? Good acting and interesting stories just wasted for some other tripe that's on I don't get it?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why did this end?
colinrogers117 March 2020
Arghhh! I only just discovered this by trawling through BBC Scotland and was intrigued as I love crime drama. This was absolutely brilliant over four episodes and finishes to give us ample plot lines to continue. Why oh why oh why do we have no more as relationships are just building? The main characters are superbly profiled and the tension and subversive battles during the miners strike of the 80's and beyond is brilliantly portrayed. Shock of the new overlaps with the old tradition and like two juggernauts collide. It's fantastic stuff but so, so brief. I suppose the argument could be that it's fitting as it exploded with so much verve and power that it needed no more. I'd not read any of the books this is based on but will search them out as I'm completely hooked. Just sorry this was all done on TV eight years ago and I missed it. Well done to all involved and to BBC Scotland for reshooting. Pure class!
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
At Least Season 1 Was Worthwhile
mcjensen-0592415 November 2020
Not many problems with Season 1, other than the male co-workers calling an obviously smart, fit and gorgeous young woman fat ugly and stupid. There was no preaching and no unecessary PC additions that always crop up in these dramas. The plot was dark, tragic and horrible. Acting was superb and the story unfolded in a timely and believable manner. 9 for Season 1. Five for Season 2, because sadly Season 2 didn't come close to sustaining this. The writers got in way over their heads with plot, involving government agencies and trade unions. Fell flat and didn't fly at all. Characters doing things so incredible stupid nobody would swallow their actions. Throw in some man bashing/hating and a main character revealing his preference for men and you have a typically cliche European drama. Still a solid offering and extremely watchable.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
good but why the plot changes?
suzyr-90-66193325 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is a well executed mini series for the most part, and I liked the casting.

But the Denise Mina novels, on which it's based, had better plots, in my opinion.

In Field of Blood, the novel, there is in fact a much more understandable motive for the shocking murder of little Brian. the plot in the script was understandably simplified, but the writer really shouldn't have left out that part of the backstory--it answers the question of how a seemingly normal person commits an unthinkable crime.

And in the second "season," the grittiness of the original story was severely undercut in what seems to be a mistaken attempt at highmindedness.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent storytelling, it's a very good series.
Sleepin_Dragon2 August 2022
Paddy Meehan lands a job as a journalist, and quickly gets entangled in a murder. In a man's world, she battles against sexism and misogyny.

It's a real shame that this wasn't further developed, this show definitely had some mileage. The first episode, The Field of Blood, was terrific, it has so much content. The second two parter isn't the same standard I think, but it's still very good, it was great to see the show return.

Jayd Johnson is excellent throughout as Paddy, I am stunned that she hasn't had a prolific career since, I think she's excellent.

There was some terrific acting, David Morrissey and Peter Capaldi in particular were terrific. I also really liked Bronagh Gallagher as Paddy's mum.

It's very well produced, it looks marvellous, they really capture the visuals of the 1980's, and okay some cracking music too.

I wish there were more if them, 8/10.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Was it Really Like This?
jonsquire27 October 2023
I've just finished watching the first series and enjoyed it. However, I don't really understand why the lead actress is called out for being fat etc and generally being spoken to like muck. I was a young man out and about town during the depicted era and working in a factory at that time and nobody spoke to people like that - ever! I know - I was there. If anyone had spoken to a female (or male) on the shop floor the way they do in this programme, they would have been sent to Coventry by the entire factory, or sacked! Life as I remember it was not like this. And I'm not looking back through rose-tinted glasses. Perhaps attitudes were different in Glasgow but I find it annoying that script writers do this.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
(Season 1) Dreadful script yet somehow engaging ...
ronalamont-9147221 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not sure if I stuck with it because I am originally from Glasgow and grew up in the 60s and 70s or if it had some merit that kept me engaged. It bore an atmospheric resemblance to his later work, Shetland, which I love, but was sadly embarrassing in comparison. If they called the lead "fat" one more time I was going to scream.

Obviously, there was something seriously wrong with the casting and I couldn't get past that. Give her a fat suit if nothing else but to cast a fit, attractive and seemingly intelligent young women in the part was crazy. I haven't read the novel it was based on so I've no idea if the character was supposed to be fat or if this was purely the script writer's invention. I pondered if it was supposed to be a running "gag" but it was delivered so vehemently and nastily by so many different people, including herself and her hopelessly love-lorne colleague when he first saw her in the bar... it just didn't make any sense and was definitely not funny. There are certainly many "heavy" highly competent actresses out there who would have been perfect for the part. Did the producers want to play it safe and not appear to offend an actual fat person? And it was insulting to the character of Glaswegians to have everyone make rude and insulting comments about it throughout.

The script was appalling and much of the dialogue was embarrassing to any Glaswegian. Certain classic "catch phrases" were so over-worked and certainly had lost a lot of their popularity and charm by the 80s. Reminiscent of watching and episode of THE VITAL SPARK. It's true there was a tradition of misogyny in Glasgow (the Men's Union at Glasgow University, the bars that relegated women to the "Lounge" etc. ) but that was pretty much phasing itself out by the late 70s. The newspaper was staffed by educated Scots and Brits, my father amongst them, so it certainly wasn't representative of reality.

Nothing felt authentic to me and the one-dimensional characters made so many ignorant and stupid choices and comments they jerked me out of the momentum of the drama. Glasgow was made to look run down, drab and unappealing, inhabited by a bunch of ignorant yahoos with out-of-date kitchens!!

I had concerns regarding the believability of the show from the opening. The appalling direction and editing of the passage of time gave the impression that Brian was kidnapped within minutes in the middle of an expansive open park in bright daylight. We even got a crane shot emphasizing the openness of the area. The fact that none of the boys kicking a ball right beside him saw anything and that the mother couldn't see anyone traversing the massive, wide open park with the child within minutes of noticing his disappearance, set the stage for much of the stupidity and flaws that followed.

It would take too long to point out all the problems and flaws but the mother tipping a bucket of "pish" out of her window over her rival colleague sticks in my mind. Did she keep a bucket ready in case any annoying reporters showed up? Or are we to believe Glaswegians were still living without indoor plumbing in the 80s? Was this the director's attempt to convey the clever, "particularly Glaswegian" sense of humour?

The lead up to the dramatic denouement was ruined for me as soon as the co-worker naively wrote down the phone message from the curt anonymous caller telling her to meet him in a deserted parking lot at 11pm. Really? She sauntered off without even telling anyone (supposedly to keep the scoop to herself) without any apparent concerns. Really? Perhaps she envisioned herself meeting "Deep Throat" in an episode of the X-Files. And why did the killer bother to move the body from the empty lot? Setting himself up to DNA evidence possibilities.

The two-part mini series was riddled with similar, glaringly stupid plot points, dialogue and behaviors.

It was all so heavy handed and I thought the acting acceptable rather than remarkable. (The fact that the lead actress gained an award for her acting in this leaves me stunned).

An interesting moment that didn't go by me was a quick flash of two other background women walking through the office ...presumably visitors since they were attractive and well dressed so surely couldn't work in the same "male dominated" office oblivious to the mistreatment of the "copy boy".

In spite of all the flaws and serious irritations, I did enjoy the basic story and wanted to know how it was going to end. The ridiculous wimp of a colleague who attached himself to her (and was later coldly rejected) nearly prevented me from my goal as I suddenly thought I was watching an episode of The Nancy Drew Mysteries.

I tried to give the second "season" a go but since our cold hearted and selfish lead still felt it was her job to solve the mysteries that the police were incapable of doing, it simply wasn't worth it so I gave up half-way through the noisy and boring Part One.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Inconsistent
crumpytv10 May 2021
In the first series (2 episodes), as an entertainment I found the offensive language and misogynous attitude towards the lead character gratuitous and unnecessary.

Realising the error of their ways there was a complete change in David Morrisey's character for the second series of 2, but the damage was done.

Overall it was largely uninteresting and the female lead's character wish of being a proper journalist, not like "them" in in the press room (the males, that is), did not come to fruition as she was as bad as them in the end. Nothing gets in the way of a story and the lengths one will go to to get it.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
just plain bad i would have rated this a negative if we had the option
olaflauck120 December 2017
I don't know what BBC Scotland was thinking here. Great story which was ruined by the bad directing and era clichés. the heavy breathing victim , and the lead with the emotional dribble and of course we have to add the tough female editor, Damn! what did me in was the car not starting crap! after that I just wanted to shoot myself in the head! not even worthwhile renting from a library. for free!
6 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
good but flawed- spoiler alert- watched Amazon Prime
braquecubism19 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I didn't read the book and I think I would like this less if I had, But than some of the plot was a bit obtuse and I had trouble following the action & plot. Especially since Season 1 is about 2 real murders and Season 2 about real miners strike. it is clearly flawed. BUT I found myself engrossed. And I liked the characters. Key Female Lead, young reporter, David as Sr Editor & Peter, &others. I liked Glasgow. There was a bit of this flip flop that I hate and see often, he's good, he's bad - no wait...... and I am not sure why she went with the married cop knowing he was married, and wanted to continue, knowing he was a hustler. A bit hard to swallow. She's off in the back of a car with someone she can't trust- hardly knows. She's not that stupid. And haven't they heard of birth control, even if it's Glasgow in the 80s. as another remarked- the car stalling- not starting up right away- I don't care how broke these reporters are- you need a car that you can rely on to start quickly when chasing or being chased by bad guys -- get it fixed. While it was used as a plot point to create tension, several times, it was rather poor. AND more importantly, it sounded like the starter- really couldn't have been anything else, bad battery, would aggravate the starter, it's turning over, so it's firing. Well, having run into a bad starter- let me tell you, the cellunoids go, and it over heats-on restarts- so it will NOT start up on the 3 or 8th try. Grinding the starter, makes it worse. you have to open the hood and let it breathe (5-10 min) So this was technically impossible- and they barely got away from the bad guys, with the rescue at the end. if it had a carburetor which was flooding, (not auto ejection) gunning the engine would also have made it worse. Some Foley guy knew to make the bad starter sound. I have a problem when a major plot point is just wrong. so for these reasons I would give it a 2- but because I liked the characters, and found I was engaged, if not also lost at times, I came up to a 5- esp. since at the end of the 4th episode, I wanted to see a season 3.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed