There is certainly room for some confusion here. Although it kept the series interesting, it seems to me that there were just too many plotlines on the go. Further, while Shepard and Cortez remain pretty much loyal to the Captain throughout the thirteen episodes, the same cannot be said of C. O. B. And especially the XO whose loyalties continue to bounce back and forth. Sorry, just had to get that out there. Now, for my real confusion. At no point in this series did I see or hear any reason why in blue-blazes that the President of the United States initiated an evidently unprovoked and also definitely premeditated and apparently devastating nuclear attack of Pakistan.
2 Reviews
It became unrealistic
kennethbarry-210-58764025 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
After careful review of this show. However, good it was and enjoyed by most strategic enthusiast everyone that watched this. realistically a lot of the choices made by the commander show little true strength as a real leader of a submarine vessel. The mutiny plot was very stupid? Leaders were very stupid till the last 3 shows. How can they be so smart enough to run a sub-boat till just a short few minutes of the show? Sophisticated well equipped are just a few words. Hint: Auto pilot control with lock outs inserted by the Leader or Officer of the vessel that is in complete control. Ship. Not Missiles. Beaching a sub or even letting that to even happen because they were on a island was foolish. Don't let more than 10 people at a time off the boat would have been my decision every 2 days. Yes commandeer the island and control the thugs would have been easy.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
