French dancers gather in a remote, empty school building to rehearse on a wintry night. The all-night celebration morphs into a hallucinatory nightmare when they learn their sangria is laced... Read allFrench dancers gather in a remote, empty school building to rehearse on a wintry night. The all-night celebration morphs into a hallucinatory nightmare when they learn their sangria is laced with LSD.French dancers gather in a remote, empty school building to rehearse on a wintry night. The all-night celebration morphs into a hallucinatory nightmare when they learn their sangria is laced with LSD.
- Awards
- 8 wins & 15 nominations
Claude-Emmanuelle Gajan-Maull
- Emmanuelle
- (as Claude Gajan Maull)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaShot with a 5-page script.
- GoofsWhile the movie is supposed to be set in 1996, which is confirmed by the clothes, the music and the lack of smartphones, the French spoken in the film is very much 2010s, with many anglicisms or other recent verbal tics heard throughout the movie. This is due to the improvised dialogue from the cast working off of a five-page script.
- Crazy creditsThe title of the film is the last thing to appear on screen.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: 2019 Movie Catch-Up! (part 1 of 2) (2019)
- SoundtracksTrois Gymnopedies (First Movement)
Composed by Erik Satie
Performed by Gary Numan
(c) Published by Numan Music USA LLC
Administered by Kobalt Music Publishing Ltd
Courtesy of Beggars Banquet Records Limited
By arrangement with Beggars Group Media and Kobalt Music Publishing Ltd
Featured review
An earnestly disturbing, finely executed second half is worth the wait
I've seen enough movies from A24 to place great trust in any films they're involved in producing or distributing. To date I've seen only a couple of filmmaker Gaspar Noé's other movies; I thought 'Irreversible' was good, if broadly too unremarkable and specifically too sadistic, while I found 'Enter the void' to be dull overindulgence - a good idea for a short film that was erroneously expanded to almost three hours. I'll watch almost anything, however, and I strive to find the value that anyone has to offer, so given an enticing premise for 'Climax,' how could I refuse? It takes awhile for its worth to present itself, but when all is said and done, the profit here as a viewer is well worth the price of admission, and this is easily the best of Noé's films I've seen so far.
It's worth observing that as the picture first begins, the first impression it makes is unfortunately a bad one. Whoever was responsible for designing the subtitles in 'Climax' should reexamine their choice in careers, for the text built into the feature is so ridiculously small that I think only those with eyesight that's far better than average have a real chance of catching every word. In fairness, this stylistic decision may have been deliberate, for ultimately the characters and dialogue are mostly superfluous. This is a movie that is, specifically, very visual in nature, and the details of who characters are or what they're saying to one another don't matter a whole lot. On the other hand, given that these two aspects were accordingly improvised by the largely non-professional cast, given free reign to create as they would, it seems a disservice to them to have so heavily deemphasized the work they put in. I don't necessarily like the choices they made as such, but I admire the approach and the effort all the same, and it's a pity all this was downplayed so much. To speak off the cuff, right away, about the subtitles may superficially seem like nitpicking, but in this instance I feel like it's surprisingly revealing, one way or another.
Put these revelations aside, and there's a great deal to like about 'Climax.' At its best Benoît Debie's cinematography, and Noé's direction from a standpoint of arranging shots and scenes, is utterly brilliant and inspired. The long shots, tracking shots, freely moving cameras, and unconventional angles are all fantastic. I love the art direction, the costume design, the hair and makeup work, and the use of lighting. Not least with an ensemble predominantly comprised of dancers, the artistry and physical prowess the cast demonstrates with their improvised moves is extraordinary - a real treat; would that we'd gotten still more. Moreover, as the course of events takes a turn, the cast demonstrate a marvelous fierceness in their acting that's delicious; Sofia Boutella is the one person here who is at all familiar to me, but as fine an actor as she is, in 'Climax' she's hardly alone. Even the manner in which the credits are displayed are unorthodox, but inventive and enticing in its own right. And it should be said - the music assembled for the soundtrack is fabulous, rich and invigorating, adding tremendously to the somewhat delirious viewing experience.
With all this having been said, there's a decided lack of narrative in the feature, but nor does it especially need any. The premise quite speaks for itself - a dance rehearsal that devolves into a nightmare with the addition of spiked drinks - and all the details that round out the content appear to have been conjured on the spot between Noé and his cast. My commendations to them all, for while the film is split into discrete halves, and the first is troubled from a standpoint of attaining and sustaining viewer engagement, the second half handily compensates for it. As 'Climax' takes a turn, and the characters all experience meltdowns, the resulting portraiture is pointedly unsettling if not altogether disturbing. The cast spiritedly embrace the madness, and those fundamental elements of film-making that already impressed in their own right are likewise employed to ever more imaginative ends, amplifying the genuine sense of horror that arises from the grim tableau. This neatly fits the bill as psychological horror, only, it's atypically unbothered about how the breakdown is depicted.
The greatest fault of Noé's movie is the considerable imbalance. That the full second half of 'Climax' is so good is wonderful; that it is necessary to pick up so much slack from the first half is frustrating. The poorly designed subtitles are especially notable given the wealth of early dialogue and character development that is later dispensed with entirely. The dancers get their time to shine both as non-professional actors and with their chief skill set; would that we'd have gotten more of the latter, and less of those bits which are all but entirely discounted. The first 45 minutes or so come off as a bit of a slog, requiring patience, and not particularly demanding active engagement (or even discouraging it). Again - all congratulations for what is done well here, but the unevenness is a glaring flaw that nonetheless detracts from the whole.
Still, much more so than not, I find myself thoroughly entertained and invested, and the payoff is worthwhile. Where 'Irreversible' and 'Enter the void' both failed to earn my favor in various ways, with 'Climax' Noé unquestionably illustrates the ingenuity as a filmmaker and a storyteller that in my mind at last makes him worthy of his reputation. Hereafter I hope to watch more of his pictures, and I hope he impresses elsewhere in his oeuvre. Even if not, though, this one title already feels like a diamond mined from less than shimmery environs. Characterized by stupendous camerawork, superb contributions from the cast, and a sincerely disquieting prolonged "narrative" peak, 'Climax' is an excellent, absorbing slice of underhanded horror that deserves more recognition.
It's worth observing that as the picture first begins, the first impression it makes is unfortunately a bad one. Whoever was responsible for designing the subtitles in 'Climax' should reexamine their choice in careers, for the text built into the feature is so ridiculously small that I think only those with eyesight that's far better than average have a real chance of catching every word. In fairness, this stylistic decision may have been deliberate, for ultimately the characters and dialogue are mostly superfluous. This is a movie that is, specifically, very visual in nature, and the details of who characters are or what they're saying to one another don't matter a whole lot. On the other hand, given that these two aspects were accordingly improvised by the largely non-professional cast, given free reign to create as they would, it seems a disservice to them to have so heavily deemphasized the work they put in. I don't necessarily like the choices they made as such, but I admire the approach and the effort all the same, and it's a pity all this was downplayed so much. To speak off the cuff, right away, about the subtitles may superficially seem like nitpicking, but in this instance I feel like it's surprisingly revealing, one way or another.
Put these revelations aside, and there's a great deal to like about 'Climax.' At its best Benoît Debie's cinematography, and Noé's direction from a standpoint of arranging shots and scenes, is utterly brilliant and inspired. The long shots, tracking shots, freely moving cameras, and unconventional angles are all fantastic. I love the art direction, the costume design, the hair and makeup work, and the use of lighting. Not least with an ensemble predominantly comprised of dancers, the artistry and physical prowess the cast demonstrates with their improvised moves is extraordinary - a real treat; would that we'd gotten still more. Moreover, as the course of events takes a turn, the cast demonstrate a marvelous fierceness in their acting that's delicious; Sofia Boutella is the one person here who is at all familiar to me, but as fine an actor as she is, in 'Climax' she's hardly alone. Even the manner in which the credits are displayed are unorthodox, but inventive and enticing in its own right. And it should be said - the music assembled for the soundtrack is fabulous, rich and invigorating, adding tremendously to the somewhat delirious viewing experience.
With all this having been said, there's a decided lack of narrative in the feature, but nor does it especially need any. The premise quite speaks for itself - a dance rehearsal that devolves into a nightmare with the addition of spiked drinks - and all the details that round out the content appear to have been conjured on the spot between Noé and his cast. My commendations to them all, for while the film is split into discrete halves, and the first is troubled from a standpoint of attaining and sustaining viewer engagement, the second half handily compensates for it. As 'Climax' takes a turn, and the characters all experience meltdowns, the resulting portraiture is pointedly unsettling if not altogether disturbing. The cast spiritedly embrace the madness, and those fundamental elements of film-making that already impressed in their own right are likewise employed to ever more imaginative ends, amplifying the genuine sense of horror that arises from the grim tableau. This neatly fits the bill as psychological horror, only, it's atypically unbothered about how the breakdown is depicted.
The greatest fault of Noé's movie is the considerable imbalance. That the full second half of 'Climax' is so good is wonderful; that it is necessary to pick up so much slack from the first half is frustrating. The poorly designed subtitles are especially notable given the wealth of early dialogue and character development that is later dispensed with entirely. The dancers get their time to shine both as non-professional actors and with their chief skill set; would that we'd have gotten more of the latter, and less of those bits which are all but entirely discounted. The first 45 minutes or so come off as a bit of a slog, requiring patience, and not particularly demanding active engagement (or even discouraging it). Again - all congratulations for what is done well here, but the unevenness is a glaring flaw that nonetheless detracts from the whole.
Still, much more so than not, I find myself thoroughly entertained and invested, and the payoff is worthwhile. Where 'Irreversible' and 'Enter the void' both failed to earn my favor in various ways, with 'Climax' Noé unquestionably illustrates the ingenuity as a filmmaker and a storyteller that in my mind at last makes him worthy of his reputation. Hereafter I hope to watch more of his pictures, and I hope he impresses elsewhere in his oeuvre. Even if not, though, this one title already feels like a diamond mined from less than shimmery environs. Characterized by stupendous camerawork, superb contributions from the cast, and a sincerely disquieting prolonged "narrative" peak, 'Climax' is an excellent, absorbing slice of underhanded horror that deserves more recognition.
helpful•82
- I_Ailurophile
- Oct 1, 2022
Every A24 Horror Movie, Ranked by IMDb Rating
Every A24 Horror Movie, Ranked by IMDb Rating
A24 has produced some of the most memorable horror films of the 21st century. See which films ranked highest on IMDb.
- How long is Climax?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Buổi Tiệc Kinh Hoàng
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- €2,600,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $817,339
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $119,423
- Mar 3, 2019
- Gross worldwide
- $1,696,269
- Runtime1 hour 37 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content