Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Bully (2001)
9/10
Frighting and believable, must see for parents
30 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is a interesting and frightening film, worth a viewing by every parent of teenage children. Whether they know it or not, their children at least know children like these; they are living in a world that includes this reality. Some of the best insights are in the portrayals of the parents.

Every one of them believes that their child has fallen in with the wrong crowd, and they are all right. What they don't seem to be able to conceive of is that their child IS part of the wrong crowd and why it is wrong. None if then could be described as a good kid being lead astray, but all of them, except the psychologically monstrous Bobby, do have some appealing, or at least pathetic qualities, and might have been saved by adult intervention. But there is none and they are lost from the beginning. These parents can't see their children, don't know their children, seem to be afraid of them, afraid of confronting them either because they fear losing them or pushing them into even more destructive behavior. They seem to care, but not enough to risk embarking on a messy intervention. They only want to relate to them as the accessible children they used to be.

So the children (even though are 16-22, they are emotionally 8-10) are so addled by drugs and alcohol and sex that have no concept of the reality and consequences of actions. They do seem to have a good grasp of the one fact that their lives are essentially hopeless, what they are doing is unsustainable and can not lead to anything but self-destruction. They know it, but it is no more real to them than a video game. Nothing is real; you just hit the replay button and do it over. And there seems to be no one in their world, but other teenagers just like themselves. This includes the "hit man" they have mistaken for an adult, more competent than themselves, able to lead them in safely freeing themselves from the sociopath who main interest in life is controlling them, torturing them, convincing them they are worthless and helpless. It is gut wrenching to watch them deteriorate, individually and as a group, in the face of the actual murder and its aftermath.

Watching them is like watching school children hijack their own school bus and accelerate toward a brick wall: watching the crash in slow motion, fascinated and helpless, seeing the expressions on their faces change, seeing them looking at one another, saying "it wasn't my idea, I didn't do it, I didn't mean it" as the gap closes. The conclusion, the prison sentences, is devastating.
81 out of 114 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
21 Grams (2003)
1/10
Can't believe anyone took this seriously
3 April 2004
After what seemed like much more than two hours of plodding (and heavily foreshadowed)plot twists and wooden performances, we began to wonder if this was a very bad spoof of pretentious artsy films (made by directors who expect us to take them as seriously as they take themselves), instead of just a very bad movie. Sean Penn gave an economical performance, limiting himself to two expressions, one showing how serious and miserable his character was, and the other how devastatingly attractive to women he could be. Naomi Watts was about as unsympathetic a little self indulgent, drug popping white bread yupster as one could hope to find, and her sex scenes, particulary her idea of passionate kissing, were enough to make you swear off. The only interesting characters and performances in this improbable mismash, were the Jordans, played credibly by Bencio Del Toro and Melissa Leo. Look forward to seeing them again.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
21 Grams (2003)
1/10
Can't believe anyone is taking this seriously
3 April 2004
After what seemed like much more than two hours of plodding (and heavily foreshadowed)plot twists and wooden performances, we began to wonder if this was a very bad spoof of pretentious artsy films (made by directors who expect us to take them as seriously as they take themselves), instead of just a very bad movie. Sean Penn gave an economical performance, limiting himself to two expressions, one showing how serious and miserable his character was, and the other how devastatingly attractive to women he could be. Naomi Watts was about as unsympathetic as possible as a self indulgent, drug popping white bread yupster, and her sex scenes, particularly her idea of passionate kissing, were enough to make you swear off. The only interesting characters and performances in this improbable dreary mismash, were the Jordans, played credibly by Bencio Del Toro and Melissa Leo. Look forward to seeing them again.

P.S. Greek tragedy requires a hero of great statue to bring about his own fall by virtue of a tragic flaw.
15 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why isn't this B&W classic available on VHS!!!
2 October 2001
It has been probably 30 years since I've seen this movie, but some scenes are still vivid in my memory and imagination. It is a beautifully photographed and understated movie; the acting is subtle and quiet and the story poignantly but economically told. It is the kind of small movie about the pleasures and sorrows of real people that should be remembered, honored and enjoyed, the caliber of "Last Picture Show" that so beautifully invoked it.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Satire of human self deception and yearning for the glamor of theater
6 January 2001
An excruciating funny and painfully revealing study of the hope and self deception that make life possible. Any accurate observer of himself and other people in the act of deceiving themselves into believing in the glamor and interest and validity of their own lives will have that sense of painful recognition while watching this movie that is the essence of really memorable humor. An absolute must see, which should be seen before Best of Show to make you properly appreciate the accomplishment of both the cast and director.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sybil (1976)
10/10
Split personality as a metaphor for what we must all do to survive intense pain
6 January 2001
This movie isn't actually about the actual case or even the best selling novel. It is a metaphor for childhood and the plight of children (and other human beings). Stunning performance by Sally Fields, quite likely her best (though certainly not her only stunning performance. She is a vastly underrated actress.) Some very fine writing and many memorable lines. I saw this movie over twenty years ago and I will never get it out of my mind, "what that monster did to her in the green kitchen." Joanne Woodward is as fine as silk, as she always is. I could watch her just breathe in and out for the foreseeable future, and she does it wonderfully here, and makes great acting look just that easy. Like the Godfather, this movie completely transcends all the source material it is based on, a serious kind of "mockumentary" revealing rather than mocking the human condition.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tuvalu (1999)
A delightful black and white "silent" comedy acknowledging a debt to Chaplin and Buster Keaton
19 September 2000
The film is a beautifully photographed and outrageously funny example of visual story telling at its very best. Performances by all the leading characters are breathtakingly good and never for a moment overdone. I saw this film at the Taos Film Festival 2000 and it was by far the most memorable of the 10 or 12 I saw. I recommend it to anyone who is serious about the art and history of film making.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed