Reviews

19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
This film is a miserable failure
23 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a miserable failure.

The movie opens with Ted and Marion Cole (Jeff Bridges and Kim Basinger) and their 4 year old daughter, Ruth, living in a beautiful seaside setting. We learn that Ted and Marion had two teenage sons, Thomas and Timothy, who died tragically. It is their deaths that overshadow the whole movie. Ruth was born after the boys died. Ted loves Ruth; however, Marion is sorry that she gave birth to her.

To earn a living Ted writes and illustrates abstract children's books. For his private pleasure and to satisfy his private demons he draws and then beds all the women that he can find: mothers, daughters and matrons. During the course of the movie he draws a 50 year woman with ponderous breasts. The woman is played by Mimi Rogers. The audience never really sees any of his drawings except for one: the lips of her vagina. Weird? Yes!

Ted and Marion's marriage is on the rocks.

Ted hires 20 year old Eddie O'Hare to be his "literary assistant" for the summer. Eddie is an aspiring writer and hopes to improve his craft by having Ted critique his writings. In fact, Ted has hired Eddie to drive him around and to sleep with his wife, Marion.

One day Marion catches Eddie masterbating. It's an embarrassing scene; however, Marion saves the day. Eddie confesses how much Marion attracts him and Marion decides to end his virginity and becomes his mistress. Marion's objective is to punish her husband, Ted. This becomes clear when she gets noisy while having sex. The noise attracts the attention of her 4 year old daughter in the next room who enters the bedroom through the "conveniently-unlocked-door" and catches the naked couple in the act. Ruth tells her father, Ted, who confronts Eddie; however he is not angry with Eddie for sleeping with his wife. What does miff him is the fact that Marion let Ruth watch them doing it "doggy style".

Marion is played by Kim Basinger. Basinger is over 50; however, in fairness, she looks good. That said, how would feel if you saw a 20 year old boy having repeated intercourse with a women who is almost old enough to be his grandmother. It borders on the obscene and that's the feeling that the whole movie engenders.

In the end Marion leaves Ted and abandons her 4 year old daughter. When she leaves she takes all the photos of the dead boys including the negatives. She has humiliated Ted by sleeping with Eddie all summer and now she's punishing him further by leaving him with nothing by which to remember the boys. But why is she being so vicious?

Finally, at the end of the movie, we finally learn that Marion blames Ted for the deaths of the boys, Timothy and Thomas. The boys died in a fatal car accident and Ted may have contributed to the accident. Ted tells the story but, amazingly, he shows almost no feelings of guilt while telling the story.

That's it. That's the whole movie and the final outcome: Marion has gone away. Eddie has gone home and Ted continues raising his 4 year old daughter.

The movie is two dimensional. The winner is Eddie. He had great sex. I was jealous.

The book may be better but I won't waste my time reading it.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Man on Fire (2004)
5/10
Too raw for my taste
10 March 2006
You really need a strong stomach to see this movie. Many movies have violence but this one has it in "spades". Normal human beings feel revulsion over killing and everything in this movie is focused to make you feel that revulsion and that's my point: The director has gone too far in emphasizing the killing. There were at least 16 people killed including one particularly gruesome scene where several fingers and an ear were amputated.

The plot is simple: Denzel Washington is hired to protect a 10 year old girl, Dakota Fanning, from kidnapping. Despite his best efforts, the little girl is kidnapped. Washington takes his revenge by killing all the kidnappers.

Any adult, but especially parents, immediately understand Washington's rage over the kidnapping and his obsessive desire for revenge: Washington tracks down and eliminates all the kidnappers, one by one. His methods however, are brutal beyond description and that's what is so hard to stomach, at least for me.

The acting is acceptable. Dakota Fanning is charming as a 10 year old. I would have liked to see Washington emote just a bit more. He shows his natural warmth only in scenes with Fanning. The two actors who play the parents, Marc Anthony and Radha Mitchell, are deserving of special mention. Their roles were not large but they filled them admirably.

I didn't feel that I could give this movie more than a 5 because of the excess and florid violence.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie is pornographic and disgusting. Avoid it!
24 November 2005
AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL COSTS! IT IS GARBAGE. IT IS PORNOGRAPHIC IN THE TRUE SENSE OF THE WORD.

Killing Bill is about blood and guts and killing. My repeated reaction while watching the movie was unmitigated disgust.

Killing Bill is pornographic. This is the most accurate description. The movie is offensive to people with normative values.

Killing Bill has no plot, no character development and what little dialogue there is, is completely forgettable.

The movie opens with Thurman killing another woman while the victim's 6 year daughter watches. Unbelievably, from that point onwards, it actually gets worse.

Killing Bill was thought up by Uma Thurman and Quentin Tarantino while they were making Pulp Fiction in 1994. Pulp Fiction is a violent movie. Killing Bill is a thousand times worse.

Thurman clearly enjoys her sadistic role in Killing Bill which leads me to think that she needs professional help. Tarantino should join her. I keep asking myself: What prompted these two people to invest so much of themselves in a movie that glorifies death by decapitation and the cutting off of limbs.

I won't go to another movie in which Uma Thurman appears or that Tarantino directs!

The public and the reviewers liked Killing Bill and its box office success is indicative of the "herd mentality" of American film goers. No matter how bad, how revolting, how repulsive or how disgusting a movie is, American film goers will flock to see it if the movie is properly marketed; they are totally undiscriminating. Tell them that watching someone get disemboweled is "good entertainment" and they will flock to the theaters.

Avoid this movie. I expect that the sequel, Killing Bill 2, is the same.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Wishing Tree (2000 TV Movie)
5/10
Maudlin and utterly forgettable
5 November 2005
MAUDLIN AND UTTERLY FORGETTABLE

This is a Hallmark-made "family" movie which means that it's maudlin to the point of being almost nauseating.

Clara is a single, successful, black, female attorney living in Savannah, Georgia. When her mother dies Clara returns to her childhood home and searches for closure. Her mother was an uneducated woman with a talent was telling fantasy stories. Clara saw her mother as a poor, ignorant and superstitious black woman. The remainder of the movie is the journey whereby Clara comes to understand that even ignorant and superstitious mothers have value! (I'm being sarcastic!)

The movie is "uber" (overly) politically correct. Clara is black. Her mother lived with a white family who loved her. The victim in the film is a black man who is accused of attacking a young white boy but who, it turns out, actually saved the child's life, All this allows Clara to achieve closure and everyone else to live happily ever after.

It's a mindless way to spend 90 minutes.
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Weekend (1999)
1/10
"The Weekend" is awful. I haven't a good word to say about it.
26 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"The Weekend" is awful. I haven't a good word to say about it.

The plot is contrived and both the acting and the dialogue are wooden and uninteresting.

The movie is an adaptation of a book by Peter Cameron . Brian Skeet directed The Weekend and should not be allowed to make any more movies!

Here's a brief plot summary. Warning: Spoilers!

Tony (D.B. Sweeney) dies of AIDS while living with his brother,John, and sister- in-law, Marian (Jared Harris and Deborah Kara Unger), in their country home. One year later John and Marion invite Tony's former lover, Lyle (David Conrad), to visit their home on the first anniversary of Tony's death. Lyle surprises them by showing up with his current lover, Robert (James Duval). Surprised? Confused? I was totally confused.

Would you take your current lover to a memorial weekend for your former lover who died of AIDS? What was Lyle thinking when he invited his current lover, David, to accompany him? Perhaps he thought that it would be "cool" to eulogize Tony and then go upstairs with David and assuage his sadness with mutual oral sex? Were the screen writers, Cameron and Skeet, trying for new records in grossness and weirdness?

What was truly weird was that neither of the hosts, neither Marion nor John, seem surprised by the appearance of Lyle's new lover. They just took it in stride and remained nonplussed. All this happened at the beginning of the movie. From here the movie actually got worse as unbelievable as that may sound.

Next, the movie shifts to a neighbor's palatial house where the women get into eye-gouging and being super-bitches. The owner of the house is a 60ish women named Laura Ponti (Gina Rowlands) who has a surprise visit by her actress daughter Nina (Brooke Shields). Laura has been divorced 4 times and, Nina, the daughter, is an actress in grade B movies who shows up for the weekend with her married boy friend, Thierry (Gary Dourdan), who is supposed to be French. Dourdan disappoints with a sometimes-you-hear-it-sometimes- you-don't French accent.

Nina's whole objective is to aggravate her mother in any and all ways possible. For example, she and Thierry have passionate sex in the swimming pool while her mother watches. Then Nina banishes Thierry from the movie when she hears him talking with his wife. Neither Rowlands nor Shields nor Dourdan contribute anything to the movie. At this point I didn't think things could get worse. I was wrong.

Lyle, Tony's ex-lover, feels guilt at having started a new relationship after Tony's death and his guilt leads to a physical fight with David, his new lover. The result is that David leaves for Italy to restore Gina Rolands' frescoes in her Italian villa while Lyle goes back to the city. Did I say the plot was contrived?

The movie makes use of flashbacks to fill in the background. In one particularly weird flashback Marion and Tony lie on the pier after swimming. The water is cold and Marion's nipples are poking up like little soldiers and then… Tony the gay brother-in-law and Marion are kissing passionately! Was he the father of Marion's baby notwithstanding his AIDS?

Tony's death is not shown. If the TV documentaries are accurate then dying from AIDS is a terrible ordeal. The body whithers away with more and more diseases attacking it. In "The Weekend" Tony's suffering is absent. There is also no mention of who infected him. Instead, there is a maudlin flashback where Tony and Lyle express their undying love for each other. It made me want to puke.

I'm not a great fan of movies about gays although there is one that I would recommend, even highly recommend. I'm referring to "Flawless" with Phillip Seymor Hoffman. See it!

DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME WATCHING "THE WEEKEND"!
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Killer Image (1992)
4/10
Why are Canadian-made movies so wooden?
9 November 2004
Why is it that Canadian-made movies are so wooden?

The script of this movie has potential but it just doesn't work. I think it may be the editing. There is no pacing. The scenes just move along without any buildup of tension.

The movie includes two experienced actors, Michael Ironside and M. Emmet Walsh, with Ironside taking the lead as the anti hero.

Nothing really happens to make the movie interesting. The hero, John Pyer- Ferguson is unimpressive; the dialogue is boring and the plot is predictable and moves like molasses. Even the color was washed out.

I started to watch this movie on the late show and got so bored that I ended up surfing the Internet at the same time and felt that I missed nothing.
4 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Double Take (2001)
1/10
Waste of Time
1 November 2004
Frenetic, silly and a waste of time. This movie has nothing to recommend it. Clearly, someone had some extra money and time and decided that it would be charitable to give some B-movie actors some work. The result is a perfectly forgettable effort.

The plot is most convoluted mix of relationships, back-stabbings and shootings imaginable. It's like a RoadRunner cartoon. Remember those? The endings were always predictable. The same is true of this movie. There is absolutely nothing to make it interesting.

If you have any other way of spending 90 minutes then don't choose this movie. I suggest either studying your navel or thumb twiddling. Both are more exciting.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
ENTIRELY ENJOYABLE. SEE IT WITH KIDS. BE IN THE MOOD AND LAUGH!
30 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING: VERY SMALL SPOILER

Sue me but I really enjoyed Krippendorf's Tribe. Expect to come away smiling and with a good feeling. For me that makes this movie memorable. I would see it again without hesitation.

I looked up the IMDb.com file on the movie while watching it and was disappointed to see that it had just a 4.7 rating. This low rating and the comment on the opening page that the movie should be classed as a "miss" almost made me change the channel. I'm glad I didn't. I don't remember when I laughed so hard.

I think that you need to be in the mood for this sort of movie. I suggest that you watch it with kids. I did and their enthusiasm was contagious.

Both Richard Dreyfuss and Jenna Elfman are "frenetic" actors and perfectly suited for their parts. The other actors were equally good.

The director, Todd Holland, deserves special kudos for small touches. For example, there is a dinner at the end of the movie for octogenarians and he has most of them sitting around in catatonic states and being fed by caregivers. It's a small thing but the kind of thing that, IMHO, separates an average director from a good one.

Expect to come away smiling and with a good feeling. For me that makes this movie memorable. I would see it again without hesitation.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Order (2001)
This movie is worse than awful. It is a complete disgrace.
12 June 2004
First, you should know that this movie was shot in Israel and that I

live in Israel. It was, therefore, an interesting sidelight to recognize

many of the locations.

If you think that because I live in Israel and that because the movie

is set and shot in Israel that I would immediately like this movie,

then you are wrong. This movie is terrible!

I can think of nothing in this movie that could serve as a saving

grace. The plot is puerile; the acting is 4th rate: even the

cinematography is shoddy.

It would be a blessing if all the copies of this movie to suddenly

burst into flames and destroyed beyond recovery.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie is absolute crap. It is not entertainment.
28 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING! SPOILER! This movie is absolute crap. It is not entertainment. I haven't the words to describe the disgust that I felt at the end.

This is a badly made movie about the scum of society. During the whole movie I kept waiting for it to get better. It didn't. Instead, it just kept getting worse and worse.

When I see a movie that is as bad as this one I always try to find at least one good thing to say about it. In this case it proved impossible. I have not one good thing to say about it. How bad did it get? Well, here's an example: Towards the end Dan Akroyd smothers and kills Vincent D'Onofrio while Reeves and Diaz watch! This is not entertainment!
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No plot, good computer graphics - miss it
25 November 2003
This is a "pot boiler" production.

Had I not seen the first Matrix movie I would have had no idea what was going on!!

If you must see this movie then do see it in a movie theater. The computer generated graphics are good and must be seen full- size to be properly appreciated. Nothing else about this movie is

good.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chicago (2002)
2/10
The most over-rated movie of 2002
11 October 2003
This must be the most over-rated movie of 2002. I saw Chicago

and Chorus Line, another musical, back-to-back. There was no

comparison. Chorus Line is professional and artistic. Chicago is

a fraud, plain and simple. Don't waste your time!

I gave Chicago a "1". I've never given a "1" before and I hope I never

have to again. There was nothing about Chicago that I liked. It

was violent, dark, and cruel. If it wasn't for the massive marketing

effort that accompanied Chicago I don't think anyone would have

bothered going to see it.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Rubbish! Total waste of time!
8 August 2003
I was really looking forward to seeing Terminator 3 and I was

disappointed in the extreme with what I saw. This movie is

terrible! It would be a blessing if someone would destroy all the

copies.

There is no plot. The first 45 minutes are just one long chase with

massive destruction and nothing special. The next 45 minutes are

equally forgettable. Schwartzenegger is wooden beyond words,

John Connor (Nick Stahl) is a weak-chinned-wimp with none of the

brash charm that he had in Terminator 2 and the woman T-X

terminator (Kristanna Loken) looks like a Barbie Doll. The other

female lead, Claire Danes, is transparent.

The movie cost $170,000,000.00 and given this incredible sum

and the number of supposedly talented people who worked on the

film, I expected much more.

At this moment Schwartzenegger has thrown his hat into the ring

for the California recall vote. I suspect he did this in a desperate

attempt to boost ticket sales!

Do yourself a favor and miss this movie!
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Steve Martin is terrific; Latifah is miscast.
5 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Slight spoilers!

I'm a Steve Martin fan. I like his brand of comedy and he didn't

disappoint me in this movie. There is a scene which will, on day,

in my humble opinion, be recognized as a classic: To wit, Steve

Martin is the only white man in a black night club and he mimics all

the mannerisms and slang associated with blacks including their

dress, their manner of walking and, of course, their slang. In a

word, the scene is outstanding for its comedy.

Queen Latifah is a brassy, bossy, loud-mouth and obnoxious

black. She's a rapper with an attitude. She is definitely NOT a

comedienne and should never have been allowed to act in this

movie.

Joan Plowright and Betty White should have exchanged parts.

White is a much better comedienne but was given a very minor

part with barely 50 words. Plowright was ineffectual as the racist

and rich client.

I was not pleased that the movie relied so much on racism for its

humor. The white people are shown as racist and small minded

while the blacks are shown as only being able to converse in their

own brand of "pidgin English" which is commonly called "ebonics".

I'm white, but if I were black I would have been embarrassed by

this movie. Hollywood needs to deal with racism and political

correctness but this movie was not successful as addressing the

associated problems and conflicts.

Notwithstanding my criticisms I would see this movie again in

order to enjoy Steve Martin's performance once again. I gave it a 6.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sophomoric and over-rated
10 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
"Good Will Hunting" was written by and stars Matt Damon and Ben Affleck in 1997. At the time, Matt was 26 and Affleck, 25. Their young ages are reflected in the movie which is "sophomoric" and totally lacking in depth.

WARNING: THERE MAY BE SMALL SPOILERS

Will Hunting is a twenty year old mathematics genius who works as a janitor at M.I.T. in Boston and has severe psychological problems as a result of abusive adoptive parents. In one scene at the beginning of the movie he almost beats a former high school student colleague to death. At this point I wanted to stop watching the movie. The beating was disgusting.

Will solves mathematical problems with the same ease that the average guy solves crossword puzzles but his psychological problems are an obstacle to utilizing his genius. I shall say no more about the plot except that, as expected from a sophomoric project, the ending is predictable and even banal.

The movie won a number of awards including the Oscar for Best Screenplay (Ben Affleck and Matt Damon) and the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor (Robin Williams). In my humble opinion, the awards were a reflection of the appreciation by the movie industry that two inexperienced guys, Damon and Affleck, could pull off a full-length feature film and were not a reflection of any inherent quality in the movie. Robin Williams was much better in "Dead Poets Society" and in "Fischer King" but didn't win any oscar for these performances.

Further evidence of the immaturity that so typifies this movie is the fact that the supporting cast were all chosen from family and friends: Skylar, Will Hunting's girl friend, is played by Minnie Driver who he was dating at the time. Furthermore, Hunting's screen-friends are played by Casey Affleck, Ben Affleck's brother, and by a personal friend, Cole Hauser. Neither of these screen-friends add anything to the movie.

The production crew of Will Hunting is professional and the final product is slick. If you need to spend a quiet afternoon or evening watching a thoroughly forgettable movie then this is for you.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
K-PAX (2001)
8/10
Good movie. If thinking about a movie 24 hours after it ends is any indication, then this is a good movie!
2 January 2002
Good movie. If thinking about a movie 24 hours after it ends is any indication, then this is a good movie!

Kevin Spacey is Prot, a visitor from another planet called K-PAX, and Jeff Bridges is Dr. Mark Powell, his psychiatrist in a Manhattan Medical facility. Is Prot really a K-PAXian? Does Prot have a special alien talent for curing the mentally deranged? These questions and others are dealt with in a way that keeps the viewer guessing till the very end. There is a modicum of violence; however, it's not your normal BIFF-BOOM-BANG type of action and is handled in such a way as to make it tolerable.

If I have any complaints about this movie, it's about the camera work and the ending. 1. The camera does close-ups 80% of the time and I find this annoying.

2. I can live with the present ending but would have liked something different. I'll say no more in order not to spoil it.

I recommend seeing the movie.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kids found it to be uninspiring. It's a 2nd rate movie.
30 December 2001
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING: SPOILER

I enjoy "movies for kids"; however I did not enjoy this Harry Potter film. If I do see the next Harry Potter films, it'll be on video. No, I didn't leave in the middle of the movie but after about 30 minutes I did start looking at my watch. The movie is 2nd rate and that's not just my opinion but the opinion of the kids who watched it.

I quite purposely attended the matinee showing when I knew that the theater would be chock-a-block full with kids. I often attend movies when children make up the majority of the audience; if the movie is good then the kids get caught up in the plot and in the action and cheer when the good guys win and this adds to my overall enjoyment. There was no such ebullience during Harry Potter. In fact there was not one spontaneous cheer when Harry Potter bested Voldemort; not a sound!

I watched the movie in English in Tel Aviv and thought that maybe the kids, who speak Hebrew most of the time, didn't understand the dialogue. This wasn't the case: As I was leaving the cinema I heard an American family of 4, mother + 3 children (between 8 and 14 years old), discussing the movie: "It was OK." "Nothing special." "Let's get some ice cream." Translation: It was boring.

What this movie proved is that American marketing methods are so sophisticated that it is now possible to turn a second-rate movie into a "blockbuster".
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not one actor has a sense of comedy. Miss this movie!
9 December 2000
The best thing about this movie is that it ended! Don't see this movie! It is not a comedy; it is a tragedy: Not one of the main characters has a sense of comedy. In addition, the jokes are contrived and the dialogue is embarrassingly poor.

Robert De Niro is not a comedian. He plays violent parts, e.g., Goodfellas, Godfather, Cape Fear, etc. If De Niro's next meal depended on making people laugh he would die of starvation. So why was he cast in a main role? The answer is simple: De Niro is one of the producers! (Always look for the role that 'filthy lucre" plays in a movie.)

Ben Stiller has ambitions to be a comedian. Sorry, Ben, your talent lies elsewhere. This movie is a continuation of another mediocre performance that Stiller gave in the comedy "Keeping the Faith". Ben, try drama; comedies are not for you.

The only bright moment in the whole movie was the actress Kali Rocha who appeared as a flight attendant for a few minutes towards the end of the movie. I hope she gets another opportunity to act in a comedy. She seems to have that special gift of comic timing but her role was too short to tell for sure. Certainly no other actor in "Meet the Parents" had any sense of comic timing.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lost for Words (1999 TV Movie)
Singularly nice movie
21 August 1999
This is a very "British" movie in that everything is understated. Thoroughly enjoyable. High praise for Dame Thora Hird and Pete Postlethwaite. I recommend the movie and especially for anyone with aging parents.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed