While not the worst movie ever made (see Wild World of Batwoman for a *real* contender for that title), it's surely not a good movie. And yet, it's still watchable, at least if you're a fan of MST3K. Manos is goofily bad in an Ed Wood kind of way -- the kind of bad that you somehow can't help but watch.
I have, and have watched, Manos in its uncut and unMSTed format, and despite this nervous tic I've developed in the aftermath, it's actually not as horrible as one might be led to believe. The film's shortcomings are obvious: it was shot on a hand-cranked camera, so not only did *all* sound have to be added in post-production, but no shot could be longer than some 30 seconds. The plot is non-existent, and in almost all cases, the acting is sufficiently wooden to construct a treehouse out of.
But like an Ed Wood movie, the film has something that keeps you watching it. Here, it's John Reynolds, who I can't help but think could have been a good actor if given a chance. He certainly seemed to enjoy acting, and I have to wonder what his delivery was like (no way of knowing, since all male voices were dubbed in later by Hal Warren). Torgo is creepy, weird, and disturbing, but still compelling in a strange way.
Apparently, Torgo was supposed to be a satyr; it was hard to tell whether he had hooves in the MST3K episode of Manos. I have seen the movie unMSTed and can reliably report that Torgo indeed had hooves -- assuming hooves are shaped like ratty brown loafers. :)
No, I'm not going to say that Manos isn't a bad movie. But with small budget contenders like 'Wild World of Batwoman,' 'Chance: Trail of the Apache' and 'Apache Blood' out there (not to mention big-budget flicks like 'Ishtar,' 'North' and 'Battlefield Earth'), it's not as bad as all that. It certainly could have been worse, but admittedly not by much.
ikaros says this is a must-have if you're a z-movie fan.
0 out of 0 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends