Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
BBC Electric Proms: Paul McCartney (2008)
Season Unknown, Episode Unknown
8/10
Okay presentation of a living legend possibly past his prime...
26 February 2009
I just saw this on VH1 Classics and am happy that they are playing more and more live shows like this from the BBC (they still document these things somewhat pretty well). I like VH1 Classic but there's been a logically inexplicable amount of Eddie Trunk/Metal showcased on the channel as of late (I can't seem to figure it out either). I hope they make live concert broadcasts like these less rare.

Paul McCartney and Brian Wilson are two artists who - regardless of how off-key they may be singing, how lacking in intensity their playing is (if such things are even relevant), or how low the register they are singing in (which isn't inherently bad by the way) is compared to the original released studio versions recorded some thirty-to-forty years ago - I can always enjoy simply in the knowledge that they wrote all these amazing songs and are still here today to perform them and can forgive comparatively minor gripes in their live performances. Having said that, this performance is pretty okay. Paul's into it and his youngish band is too (how could they not be). I'm not very familiar with them but they are "okay" although they look like someone else's band. And you can never get used to those vocals being done by anyone besides who sang them initially - but they sort of pull it off. Paul looks good for his age (66) and still plays great (again, considering his age).

The big flaw here is in the editing. There are constant shots of the audience seemingly every few seconds. I understand that this is just formulaic editing at it's worst but no one cares how some random guy responded to a particular intro of a song. I'll never understand these shots (or the decision to use them). There should be establishing shots of the crowd but that's it. It's as if the editor thought the music was lacking and that constant editing would attract attention away from the music (if need be). Whatever the case it does the viewer, who is going to ultimately watch this, hence being called the viewer, no favors.

If you are a Mac fan surely you'll eat this up as the song selection is pretty sweet.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
If one American band is deserving of a multi-DVD Anthology-like documentary it's The Beach Boys
16 December 2008
This is the VH1 special (now on DVD) that formally introduced me to The Beach Boys (beyond the handful of early hits that we all know). Needless to say it made quite an impression on me, just by musical content alone. Brian Wilson is a special (okay brilliant) composer and the Beach Boys are an unassumingly great band. However since viewing this documentary after becoming familiar with the bands' history it's fairly obvious that there is some revisionism at work here, namely from Mike Love.

If there is only one American band deserving of a documentary done in the same exact way as The Beatles Anthology with the same detail, length, affection and use of footage it's The Beach Boys. With the bands complete chronological history represented and full interviews from all parties associated with the band about the good, bad, ugly and embarrassing (they have quite a varied history). Not just the band according to Mike Love.

However this is not that documentary. Far from it. Whereas The Beatles Anthology itself is not too deep and rarely delves into any personal affairs. Surprisingly this documentary does a handful of times but only briefly and very selectively. However the whole Blondie Chaplin, Ricky Fataar-era is barely mentioned, the Landlocked album, The 1975 Beachago Tour, Jack Rieley, Bruce Johnston's firing/quitting, The 1976 NBC SNL-produced 'It's OK' special, The troubled 1977 Largo, MD show after which caused Mike Love to fly to Switzerland and meditate for six months, Eugene Landy, the bombastic 1978 Australia tour, the Adult Child album, the 1980s nostalgia/self-parody contemporary hit-seeking Beach Boys, the solo albums...none of these things and nor are several other substantial items mentioned.

This is basically an updated (but barely) version of 'An American Band' (snippets of footage - some rare - with overlapping interviews, repeat). The DVD special features are pretty nice as they contain a few songs undisturbed in their entirety. All-in-all this is fine for a casual, very-loose overview. Otherwise if you are familiar with the band and it's history, it'll just make you wish for a substantial, detailed history - the amazing, good, bad, ugly and embarrassing (because this band has it all) - just as The Beatles have available in their multi-disc Anthology.

Until that happens, you'll have to chew on this superficial item.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Barely okay as a children's show...laughable for adults
6 November 2008
I saw the film (of which there was all of five people in the theater - a first for a SW film) and was prepared for the worst. As that film was frighteningly aimed squarely at the eleven-year old (there are far better things for younger children to watch and adults are presumably/hopefully not so easily entertained) I was wondering what this show would be like.

Well I've seen all five episodes and, it's basically more of the same in smaller increments and with commercial breaks. First of all why they would consciously base the head/faces of the characters in the animation on Thunderbirds (the unintentionally funny marionette puppet show from the mid-60's) is beyond all comprehension. The characters heads on that show were foolish/creepy looking because that was the best they could do at the time. Not so nowadays, so the inspiration of the look alone is entirely questionable.

As for the show itself there's a constant sameness to it that's a bit unnerving - there's a constant lack of scope, everything blends together visually and there's just a basic flat look to it. It sometimes looks like a PS2 game or an old PC game which were silly looking to begin with. This would lead some to believe that this as far as we've come in terms of computer animation and they wouldn't be too far off the mark. The writing is campy, embarrassing and leaves zero elements of surprise. The narration at the start of each show is pretty unnecessary and should be perhaps replaced with a mini-title crawl. The dialog is also a shade campy, pretty cringe-worthy (i.e. virtually anything the Battle Droids - "Roger Roger" and Ahsoka Tano (aka Snips) - "Sky Guy", "Artooey" happen to say) and sometimes the dialog is just moronic. The somnambulist-like story lines are generally pretty rote.

Cartoon Channel has a lot to gain from this show. The ratings will be good as it already has a zombie-like built-in audience of SW fans/blind followers (or clones if you will). But you have to wonder/realize the real point of something like this. This is not something anyone can truly rave about as it being the second coming or any such nonsense as it is barely, if at all, entertaining. Seeing how basically empty the stories are all you can really see this as is a rather transparent exercise in merchandising opportunities. Hasbro has unleashed an entire line of action figures, toys and play sets. Penguin has just released a series of books (children and adult). DVD releases are just around the corner. That's a fairly good, in not just an honest summation of the series: merchandising (and what do you know just in time for the Holidays).
28 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fine presentation of a once-great band clearly past it's peak
27 October 2008
I've been a fan of this band for about twenty-years now so I was pleasantly surprised to find out about this 60 minute segment on HDNet TV of a Cure show from June of this past year. The presentation of the band was for all intents and purposes very nice. It was not 'The Cure In Orange' (their amazing feature-length filmed concert by Tim Pope - which is sobbing to be released on DVD) but few films are. No fast editing and all four band members gets a decent amount of screen time which was nice.

I've have personally found The Cure's past few releases to be slightly lacking (in inspiration perhaps) and haven't seen them live in many years. In any case the main problem with The Cure's performance was that songs that themselves that were once nearly mid-tempo are now very slow and fast numbers are now nearly mid-tempo (to be generous). I've seen several older bands of late (Gang Of Four, The Police, The Fleshtones) and something I've learned from them is that being older in age doesn't necessarily mean slowing down the arrangements of your songs because you are few years older (case in point "The Walk" and "Primary"). I don't know if drummer Jason Cooper has much to do with slowing down the arrangements but they are, in turn a different band than before with little distinction in different tempos. This was not the case when old drummer Boris Williams was in the fold. Use of keyboards are also sorely lacking (always a constant in the past - now all keyboard parts are done on guitar).

Another unfortunate is Robert Smith's voice. He's always been one with a distinctive voice, although not a very big voice at that. It's now limp, whiny and fully-exposed in a live setting. This doesn't help their cause for a great live show.

And not to kick a band when they are obviously down (so to speak) but I was actually embarrassed watching two (nearly) fifty-year old men (Robert Smith and Porl Thompson) wearing eye make-up and (in Smith's case) the silly haircut. These are things that probably should have been in been eased out of the image in the mid-nineties. All one has to do is look at picture-perfect bassist Simon Gallup and wonder what Robert and Porl are (or not in this case) thinking. Image is not important (especially in terms of what makes music such as The Cures' successful)and it's just embarrassing and unfortunate when the band leader doesn't realize that himself and insists on wearing the silly make-up. It would be easy for someone unfamiliar with the band to view the make-up motif as style over substance. And to think that this band was at one time supposedly "anti-image".

However if you are a fan that believes The Cure can do no wrong - obviously you'll eat this performance up.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Porky's (1981)
1/10
Below average at best or Dull, misogynistic "comedy" for those the lowest common denominator.
14 July 2006
For years I've passed up the chance to rent Porky's although it had a reputation of being the mutha of all teen comedies (i.e.immature sex romps). However I'm truly surprised I didn't fall asleep watching this dud. The plot is dull and seemingly obligatory that just loosely ties a bunch of tired and unfunny "gags" and a few mean-spirited pranks together. And don't even start me on the shower scene by saying "wow, nudity." Big deal. Just because someone is well-endowed that does not make him any good in the sack. If you catch my drift. I've seen nudity in several teen sex comedies. This all done in a very not-sexy, not-funny (or fun for that matter) generic way.

There are other films of the same time that were not misogynistic, one dimensional and mean-spirited (see The Last American Virgin, Fast Times At Ridgemount High and The Party Animal). And even more so - those films are actually funny and have characters that you remember. Porky's main cast are pretty faceless, generic "guys". There's no depth or real personality to any of the characters to speak of.

They are a group of friends who don't even seem to like each other. Pee-wee is perhaps ill-suited with these guys and then there's a rather tacked-on sub-plot of anti-Semitism involving Tim who is abused by his Father. Are we supposed to not feel sorry for Tim for being abused because he's an anti-Semite?

Very pedestrian film-making aspiring to be a bit more indeed. Perhaps the film-makers are trying to tell us that prejudice, abuse and misogyny apparently were very much a thing that only existed in the 1950's? Actually I don't think they gave it any thought.

If you are emotionally-stunted to that of a 9 year-old you may like this (because you don't know any better) and for those who believe that everything made in Canada is funny (If SCTV is a 10 then this is -8).
17 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Found out why there's no Urgh! A Music War DVD yet...(read on)
26 March 2006
Because of an exclusive contract to publish this movie on a now dead format (CED), the contracts for the individual artists are missing. Because you can't renegotiate a contract without the original to amend, no one can touch this. Its currently owned by its original producer, Miles Copeland (founder of IRS records), and he has the film of THREE songs from each band in storage, but because of the legal land lock he cannot release it. If he does some day, we can look forward to a 6 hour 2 DVD special edition.

Pretty sad to say the very least. We can only hope one day (soon) that the original contracts will be found as this will make a MAJOR DVD release!! Oh, human error!!
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amazing compilation film of the Police's 1980-81 World Tour!!!
3 March 2006
The Police were very good at documenting themselves. This video is proof of that! Filmed over a 11-month period this documents the Regatta De Blanc tour and then picks up on the Zenyatta Mondatta Tour. It all starts on February 15th 1980 at the Sun Plaza Hall in Tokyo, then in Australia, Cairo and Bombay (two very unusual places for a pop group to tour then or now). Then it picks up in August of 1980 in Spain (where they seem a bit under the influence) and lots of footage from the same show in France as seen in Urgh! A Music War. This particular show has an extremely angry Sting cursing and baiting a member of the audience for throwing mud and stones at him - which prompts Sting to give the audience the finger. All this takes place during the song "De,Do,Do,Do,De,Da,Da,Da" which creates kind of an unusual, surreal contrast to the song. Sting yelling for a roadie to pull this guy out of the audience over the piped-in background vocals of the bridge. All this undoubtedly pumped up Sting and they proceed into a rip-roaring version "Truth Hits Everybody". The film ends with a January 1981 show at The Variety Arts Theatre in LA where the audience had to be blonde (wig/spray/dye/natural) to attend the show. Preceded by silly-would-be interviews of the band with the then-just-departed from Squeeze Jools Holland.

The video is interspersed with the band making a video for "Next To You" with a bunch of sheep and videos for Voices Inside My Head, Canary In A Coalmine and When The World Is Running Down... all unissued on their 'Every Breath You Take: The Videos" collections for some reason.

Hopefully a revised Special Edition DVD will be released with even more footage of songs (and full songs instead of the snippet of song - dialog - back to song sloppy editing job that you get here). In fact if it is ever "properly released" on DVD it could use with a nice edit job showcasing one thing at a time. Along with much more footage considering The Police have miles and miles of live footage that they're just sitting on...probably collecting dust somewhere...that the Copelands are not making any money on.

The DVD would benefit with a lot of extras like The Police In The East BBC special and the Florida show that was broadcast on the BBC.

If you can find it, pick it up. If you already have it then you know that this the best released footage of the Police in their prime!
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Frustratingly short snippets and selective subject matter erase any credibility.
23 February 2006
The Clash may have been one of the most interesting, important and best rock bands to have ever existed. And this documentary does in fact support that theory. However, the selectiveness of the subjects leaves much to be desired. Hindsight, as they say, is 20/20 - and in the case of the people responsible for this documentary - it's also very selective. There's absolutely no mention of the post-Mick Jones Clash that existed from 1983-1986. Four years of a bands history is an awful lot of time to simply not feel like mentioning. Sure the album this band produced (1985's Cut The Cr*p) may not have been on par with say London Calling but few albums are. To completely fail to not mention it makes me wonder why the filmmakers would simply choose to re-write history as if it never existed. All this does is support the fact that documentaries edit history any way they want. The unmentioned band (Simonon/Stummer/Pete Howard/Vince White/Nick Sheppard) toured the US in 1984 and also did a busking tour of England in 1985. By not mentioning them at all does no favors for any new young fan who actually wants to know about The Clash's history (and not just what was graciously selected for them).

Then there is the issue of obtaining great rare footage only to have seconds of it peppered throughout the documentary! This seems to be the biggest complaint from everyone I know who has seen it. To not add any of this footage (i.e The Clash playing both songs on SNL/Their appearance on Friday's/Tom Snyder/US festive footage/etc) is simply not caring about the band or it's fans. All this does is give bootleggers even more viable footage to sell. Real smart.

Having said all that it is a welcome documentary. And there is the bonus footage of all the existing footage for The Clash On Broadway. Footage that I should add the reason why so little exists is because Topper took out an injunction so that film never be released. Since it was never finished (because of the injunction) most of it was thrown away or deteriorated since it would never see the light of day anyway. Gee thanks Topper, now we really see you in a positive light!
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pedestrian, witless "personalities" commenting on quality kitsch.
10 February 2006
In fact they are greatly unfunny and just because they say much in dry tones does not mean that there has to be any inherent wit to speak of.

They have this dull, unattractive (in terms of "personality") and puzzlingly snobby take on what they comment on (sporting events that are already easy targets to begin with). Their commentary in fact is rather terribly pedestrian, obvious and heavy handed which is a shame because the content of the show is something, somewhat dear to my heart - kitschy Americana.

If they don't write their own lines (I don't know who's responsible for such trite) they certainly haven't the charm or witty delivery that such a show calls for (E!'s The Soup's Joel McHale would do just fine).

The one-dimensional, one-note, mono-toned "personalities" of the hosts are actually doubled considering that they're identical twins (two neurotic dudes with glasses, great - they must be "funny").

Twice the unappealing unfunny-ness.
3 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Daisy Does America (2005–2006)
Served by and for the lowest common denominator
19 December 2005
Daisy does America.

Hmmm, let's get a random English woman, send her to various middle-America locations where she'll obviously be out of her element and have her exploit these simple folks who have been exploited before (Daily Show, etc) and are inherently easy to make fun of anyway.

The joke(s) must be in the presentation. Yeah, right.

The forced attempt at humor is painful to sit through. Yet another "reality" show (read : who needs writers) that misses the mark. Donovan is painfully unfunny as...herself(?). Cox and Arquette produced this tripe. Which goes to show if you have the money...you will be indulged.

More low humor served by and for the lowest common denominator.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Higgins Boys and Gruber (1990–1991)
10/10
The Best show to ever air on basic cable!
21 September 2005
The Higgins Boys And Gruber were three dudes (Steve Higgens, Dave Higgins and Dave "The Gruber" Allen) who would sit around, smoke cigarettes, drink coffee, tease each other and play clips from films and television shows that they would then comment on. They would also do these little skits but not in the traditional sense but more like kids playing with toys and letting their imaginations run wild. They'd have faux shows like "Gruber After Dark" where Gruber would be a talk show host and interview the Higgins Boys in various costumes. They would sometimes play songs like on their Christmas episode (which also had a bunch of hilarious skits) and did songs like "Funky Christmas" and "Funky Little Drummer Boy" where they had an faux fourth member of the group Jerry, the tambourine player, who left the group mid-song. Their songs were usually very funny. They'd occasionally have guests like Penn Gillette and The Kids In The Hall. They later used to play shows like Clutch Cargo, Supercar and films like Cheech & Chong's Nice Dreams and pretend not to get any of the drug references. This show was on from late 1989 - mid 1991 - virtually the entire existence of The Comedy Channel. I used to tape it all the time. Steve Higgins is now a writer/producer for SNL and frequently pops up as an audience member during hosts monologues. Dave Higgins went on to be on Ellen and Malcom (whom their other brother Alan writes for). And The Gruber has had bit parts in lots of great comedies (Mr. Show, Arrested Development). In a perfect world the best bits from the show (like when Steve was quarantined to a small part of the set) would all come out on DVD. A great show from a channel full of great interesting programming. The Comedy Channel went on to be The Comedy Network (i.e. The great HA! merge) and then Comedy Central.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Play at Home (1984)
10/10
Very Entertaining Program Of Mummer Era XTC
9 September 2005
"Play At Home" was a program that featured acts performing live in their hometowns. Other notable acts to be featured on the program were Echo And The Bunnymen. So it's odd that XTC is the only band accounted for here. However it's safe to say that XTC was the most costly production (instead of setting up a camera and playing live they produced five music videos). For any XTC fan this is amazing. The videos are all good and it even includes an acoustic version of a then unreleased song (a superior version of "Train Running Low On Soul Coal" which would not see release for another fifteen months) performed by Dave and Andy. It features interviews of the band in Pegs's Pantry (a now defunct café in Swindon) and individually as the band discusses their hobbies (Daves' is home recording, Colins' is fresh-water fishing, Andys' is making board games). It shows the band as they had just finished recording Mummer and a surprisingly non-so-timid Andy considering he had just had a nervous breakdown. Great program!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
XTC at the Manor (1980 TV Special)
10/10
Fascinating look at XTC in their prime. A true rarity!
7 September 2005
Although fans know that XTC are not actually recording the version presented here for release, but simply re-creating the actual process of achieving a sound in the studio - this is all in all pretty entertaining. So what do you get to see? Terry recording his single hi-hat parts to the backing track. Colin overdubbing a bass line to half a verse. Dave adding the acoustic guitar part to give the track a warmer feel. Andy adding his electric guitar to flesh out the track. Andy adding his vocal parts and a synthesizer wood block effect. Terry striking a fire extinguisher to get the desired anvil effect. Ollie Halsall and Brian Setzer at a garden party on The Manor estate. Richard Branson (who is quite the loony English eccentric) attempting to throw a bucket of water on the band as he sits on the roof. A seemingly stoned Andy talking about his influences. Colin drunk on a swing discussing his old bass tutor. Dave with shades on drinking beer and comparing his "rather old fashion" (his words) guitar style with Andy's. A very mellow Terry (also drinking beer) talks about the benefits of not taking drum lessons. Steve Lillywhite talks about getting a good "feel" as opposed to just making sure everything is in tune and in time. The filming of the "Generals & Majors" video involving go-cart racing and Richard Branson's neighbors dressed as old army types. A loose live-in-the-studio version on "Respectable Street" (in which Andy wears The English Beat shirt that Sting made famous in the "Don't Stand So Close To Me" video). A very cool opening sequence of shots while "The Somnabulist" plays. All in all this will be pretty uninteresting to anyone who does not love XTC or has no interest in Steve Lillywhite's/XTC's recording technique circa 1980. Interesting to see the influential XTC in their prime of their very (creatively) successful career.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Neighbors (1981)
10/10
The Best Absurdist Comedy Ever And Belushi's Best!
7 September 2005
Most fans of comedy are pretty much used to the same conflicts, misunderstandings, and generally waiting for the same old expected wackiness to ensue. Fans of the obvious comedies should steer clear of Neighbors. It's just not for linear thinkers. Belushi plays Earl, your average mundane suburban milquetoast with a brash wife and rebellious college student daughter. Aykroyd plays Vic who has just moved in next door with his wife (a stunning twenty-year old Cathy Moriarity) Ramona. Needless to say, wackiness ensues as do the misunderstandings. But - not the in way most people are used to. Apparently, there were tense times on the set as Belushi and Aykroyd openly criticized director Avildsen in the press during the shoot. They even decided to switch roles (Aykroyd playing the brash one as opposed to Belushi) and rewrite and rewrite it again. And it really works. This may be Aykroyd and Belushi finest moment. In terms of Black Comedies it does not get any better than this. The film has a cozy, yet unsettling atmosphere which perfectly suits the inhibited complacency that is Suburbian America. The score is great (like in the scene where Vic slams the Hitler book shut and says "Are You Calling Me A Liar?" and the end sequence as well) and humorously dramatic. Weird camera angles, suspiciously odd dialogue and Aykroyd's blonde hair and blue eyes are in and of themselves pretty funny and yes, seemingly out of place. Makes you wonder what they were smoking off (and on) set. The dialogue is deadpan serious, laugh out loud, subtle and purposeful (all in a very absurdist way). The point of the story is if you're repressed and complacent you CAN turn it around and be happy. Even when they're all laughing at the end of the film you can't help but wonder (with help from the score) if what you just saw was the work of brilliant madmen. That's a good thing.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bottom (1991–1995)
The best Britcom of the 1990's. Easily.
24 January 2000
Insane toilet humor filled with double entendres. Starring Christopher Ryan, Ade Edmondson and Rik Mayall of The Young Ones team. Two down and outs living together and hitting each other as much as possible. The violence is cartoonish and the scripts are beautifully well done. A must-see for all with a pulse.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A brilliant satire on celebrity and the state of it
24 January 2000
This series, which by the way is a brilliant satire on celebrity and the state of it, stars 1/3 of The Young Ones and was filmed in between that series and Bottom. This is not very (or at all) well known in the U.S. sadly. Although all Young Ones Fans would love it. Imagine BOTTOM and THE YOUNG ONES combined, shake em up a bit and FILTHY, RICH AND CATFLAP is what you'd get. The shows get better upon repeat viewings and the jokes don't beat you over the head (as on BOTTOM). Highly recommended for all fans of any comedy at all.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed