Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Stuck the Landing, Which Redeems is Slightly
2 July 2013
Oh, Pixar, where have you gone? The best of Pixar films represent some of the best children's and family films of the last twenty years, films that will be cherished for generations to come, and will join or replace the classic Disney pantheon of Snow White, Bambi and others as the standard for family fare in the future. At it's best Pixar was creative, innovative, found a unique way to tell a clever story, and always managed to infuse the movies with characters with great heart and a story that causes them to learn much about themselves along the way.

Monsters University, while enjoyable enough, fails to find these attributes of Pixar's modern classics. Instead, Pixar has here produced a familiar story with familiar characters that fails to do anything original which really captures the imagination.

Here, we meet Mike and Sully much as we would have imagined them in their youth - Mike as a nerd and Sully as a popular party animal. Since there would be no story if Mike and Sully were instant friends, they begin the movie as rivals and then embark on a plot line straight out of Animal House or Revenge of the Nerds, trying to stave off expulsion from the menacing Dean while hopefully leading a group of underdogs to victory in a university competition.

Through this first three-quarters of the film, all we get is this generic story. Of course, the visuals are wonderful - the Monster world explodes with color and variety. Of course there are laughs (but fewer and less potent than in most Pixar comedies). But the only lasting characters are Mike and Sully - the ones we already knew. The other students at the University make little impression, and will not make any lists of favorite Pixar characters. Only the college dean (a very creepy combination of a dragon and a centipede) in memorable, and here more for her appearance than her character or voice work.

Fortunately, Pixar still knows how to stick the landings. Despite being presented with two or three opportunities to end the film in shallow and conventional ways, they keep going, keep probing Mike's quest to be a scarer, the reality that he will ultimately become a sidekick to Sully in the future, and the ways in which he and Sully need each other to be successful, and how their partnership is essential to their enduring friendship. Relationships - whether good, bad, strained, temporary, or lasting - is what Pixar does best, and in the last act here, they develop the relationship that we knew from Monsters Inc. must inevitably result.

The kids will enjoy it. There are some laughs. The last 20 minutes after the "Scaring Games" end spared this movie from a harsher review. But instead of Pixar genius, this is Pixar mediocrity, ultimately making a movie not much better than any number of family films out there.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated.
24 June 2010
I am shocked to come to IMDb and see this movie with a rating under 5/10. Certainly the film is not art, but it a nice family film, a fun film, a good time film. Kids (and adults) will enjoy Bruce's contraptions, and the film solidly encourages kids to do the right thing and stand up for what they believe in. Best of all, they do not clutter the movie with useless subplots. Any romance between the characters is a minor strand, there are no false arguments to heighten tension. The plot stays focused and the kids (and even adults) will have a good time.

I *HATE* dogs, and I liked this movie. That has to say something.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
After 20 Years...
8 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched this movie for the first time in at least 20 years, and to my pleasant surprise, it lived up to my fondest memories of it.

To be sure, there are flaws in the movie. I doubt that an autistic person with as severe a case of that disease as Eric would show so much response ... but then I suspect he was not truly autistic, but traumatized. A couple of scenes are cheesy or out of place (the dream sequence or the drinking scene in particular).

Still, it is a touching film. Outside of Eric, the characters are very real and you feel for them. You feel the Louie's frustration, and the mother's fear, and Milly's uncertainty, and Uncle Hugo's disappointment in himself.

Beyond that, the emotional touchstone is NOT Eric, and NOT the mystery surrounding him, but rather the struggle of the Michaelson's, and Milly in particular. Even before the dramatic conclusion, Milly has found hope through her relationship with Eric, and tries to share this the rest of her family. As the movie reaches it's (somewhat cheesy) conclusion, it feels good to see all the happy endings, but mostly feels good to see the characters with hope and optimism, regardless of the end result.

As a child I remembered having a mini-crush on Milly. As an adult, I totally understand why. She is a beautiful character, not just her looks (where she is very pretty in a girl-next-door sort of way), but her care for her brother, her mother, her neighbor. The strength she shows in trying to keep everything together when she feels like its falling apart. Her kindness. Her gentleness. Her love. What a wonderful character, and what a character so deserving of being saved.

Ultimately, the movie is very uplifting. It reaches beyond plausibility, but while the ending may have been necessary for some characters (Uncle Hugo), Milly had already grown into her happy ending, and I could feel her turning the tide for her mother and brother regardless. And much like the Shawshank Redemption delivers it's best line at the close, (MINOR SPOILER HERE)when Colleen Dewhurst says "Maybe if you dream hard enough and love long enough, anything is possible."
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ratatouille (2007)
5/10
Shockingly Ordinary
5 August 2009
Just watched this last night. I was shocked at how ... ordinary ... it was. Every other Pixar film I've seen (haven't yet caught Cars) has been special in some way. Toy Story was different. Monsters, Inc. incredibly original. The Incredibles was aimed at a slightly older crowd, but somehow made a surprisingly adult film for 8 or 10 year olds. WallE was brilliant.

This was not brilliant. The mouse able to read and communicate with humans seemed straight out the cliché book for animated movies. In an attempt to maintain some realism they do not allow the mouse to talk to humans, but forced to work around this the mouse can use the main character like a marionette, a far less plausible and more ridiculous invention. The morality of Remy's desire to "make something" instead of "taking" even falls short, as down to the end of the movie the rats continue to be on the taking end, with only Remy rising slightly above that. The main human character is dull-witted and undeveloped, and the movie fails to connect with the viewer on any emotional level -- exactly what makes the other Pixar films so wonderful.

Not to completely trash the film, it is amusing and worth a few laughs. Compared to many kids movies it is passable. Kids will be entertained and will laugh, but ultimately I felt the film was standard fare, far far FAR short of any other Pixar film I've seen.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed