Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Carmilla (2019)
1/10
If you're looking for a faithful adaptation, keep looking
29 December 2022
If like myself you are a fan of Joseph Sheridan often forgotten or misrepresented Carmilla novel and character, and saw this thinking that at last you had found a movie that understands that Carmilla is not Elizabeth Bathory, or some crazed blood thirsty nymphomaniac who kills constantly and acts like a petulant child. But instead remembers and seeks to bring forth her complex and more tragic personality as she struggles with the need to kill in order to sustain her life, her caring and loving obsession with Laura even as she slowly turns her into a vampire like herself and builds upon the novella to expand her character, her backstory and her relationship with Laura in a well made movie. Keep looking my friends because this will do nothing but aggravate you at every turn. From simple things like changing Laura's name to lara, to much larger things like changing the reason behind Carmilla's very name. Even Carmilla's vampiric nature is dubious at best in this slog of a film. This movie has no respect for the Joseph Sheridan's novel or its characters.

Even as a film this in mind numbing, with frequent long drawn out scenes of nothing that can go on anywhere from 20 seconds to an entire minute. The characters are uninteresting and given no time to develop personalities, nothing is set up about the family or why we should care. The idea that Carmilla is a vampire is only introduced in the last five or so minutes and is never even truly confirmed. This film is so slow it could be used as a sleep aid. More time is spent reciting poetry or looking at rotting fruit than establishing anything about these characters save for the religious fanatic antagonist who feels out of place.

As a romance it fails with absolutely no chemistry or development between Lara and Carmilla in favor of insentient "eroticisms", the two have almost no interactions that don't involve making out. Most of the time instead of being spent building up our leads is instead spent with some obnoxious religious zealot antagonist made for the movie. Lara and Carmilla have no time to become a couple, the months spanned in the book is condensed into less than a week within the film and the two almost never sit and talk, nor interact in any of the ways they did in the book. As a result we end up with two bland chunks of wood making out. If you are desperate for some lesbian action, I suggest you just go watch porn. It will be shorter, get to the part you want faster and will no doubt be both better written and acted.

As a horror, I don't even think this could be called a horror. There is nothing scary about this movie. All the slow creeping unease of the novel is replaced with lesbian kissing and the annoying antagonist. There are no moments of the slow "plague" spreading slowly through the nearby town as Carmilla sates her hunger. No nightmare of Carmilla and Laura's first meeting. No moments of Carmilla vanishing from a locked room for a day. Instead we get two out of nowhere nightmares more interested in sub par gore and lesbian kissing than on horror or character development. As a vampire movie it isn't. The fact that it's entirely possible that Carmilla in this is not a vampire and Laura just happened to get sick on her own is infuriating for any who go into this expecting a horror or vampire movie.

And as an adaptation of an underrated book that could and should be adapted quite easily with interesting characters and a twisted sense of love with the lesbian nature being subtext. The Karnstein family is never mentioned. The significance of Carmilla's name is tossed aside in favor of it just being given to her randomly. Everything that made the book so good is absent or insulted by this film.

For those who have never read the book, I highly suggest it. I assure you it is much shorter and far better than this boring movie.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I hope you don't like Bram Stoker's Novel
16 October 2021
While I could slam the acting and directing, that's obvious and appalling. But what I feel deserves some special hate is the utter contempt for Bram stoker's novel that seems to ooze from this rubbish that would be an insult to student films. From small changes like making Van Helsing english again rather than being dutch like in the book or who owns the manner the film takes place at to large things like Lucy's destruction, the removal of Quincy Morris completely. The kind caring Van Helsing that would bend over backwards for his friends of the book is replaced with a poorly acting twitchy weirdo who jumps at the idea that it's vampires literal seconds after meeting Lucy. Lucy is made a selfish social climber who chose to marry Arthur for his money while trying to jump Seward's bones. Arthur a man of caring and compassion who was a good man thrown into a horrible circumstance with the loss of both his father and fiancée in the same week is now replaced with a raging unlikeable piece of human garbage who hates Van Helsing before even meeting him. The fact they had the gall to drag Bram Stoker's name into this dung heap is applying given it seems to have nothing but contempt for it's source material.

While it is only an hour an twentyish minutes it ill feel like an eternity. Do yourself a favor and avoid this dreck. It's not worth your time if your a vampire fan, a fan of Bram Stoker, a fan of horror or just of movies. It fails on every front. Spare yourself the boredom and annoyance.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doctor Who: The Haunting of Villa Diodati (2020)
Season 12, Episode 8
8/10
Are we watching doctor who again?
2 March 2020
I have considered doctor who dead or at least on life support since the departure of Peter Capaldi but for the first time in two years I felt like I was watching doctor who again. The atmosphere is wonderfully done, the story new and inventive, the camera work well, the villain engaging and kept wonderfully in the shadows so we know he looks wrong but are never quite sure just how much so and the horror element is used to good effect. the writer and or director must have experience with or love for horror as it feels like it belongs unlike some other doctor who horror episodes. The companions are even in time accurate clothing so they don't stick out, sadly the doctor didn't seem to take that advice. But perhaps strangest of all is that for the first time Jodie Whittaker feels like the doctor and not some random woman who stole his Tardis, she feels smart, shows actual emotion and just a bit intimating. But her good performance here leaves me asking where the hell was it until now?

the episode does have flaws though, first is the sonic screwdriver, 13 couldn't solve a white spot maze without the damn thing and waves it around in front of people who still find the landline phone new technology. second is the doctor's outfit, she stands out as the only one not seemingly dressed for the time making her stand out in a way she's allegedly trying to avoid. third the historical figures play little to no real role in the episode which defeats the point of having them there at all. fourth maybe this ones just me but the costumes bar the monster looked oddly cheap. lastly the historical figures are dressed to similarly to the other of their gender to really tell them apart not helped by the lack of screen time to develop them
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed