I have Dunkirk quite a few times and it is a gripping, stunningly shot movie. The movies directorial set-pieces are a courtesy of the one, who just might the best director of the 21st century, Christopher Nolan and his exceptional team. On a directorial standpoint, this is as good as it gets.
Coming on to the movie itself, the source material used to depict the evacuation of Dunkirk and the stakes of it has been put together to give an excellent script. The movie conveniently shifts from character to character without any sense of disconnection. The script goes deep showing 6 different charactorial representations - a soldier who wants to go home by any means, another soldier (pilot) who couldn't stand war trauma, another pilot who just wants to protect those 300000 from air strikes, 2 civilians with a sense of patriotism and service and a man who just wanted to be meaningful. The plot depth is excellent.
The opening sequence established the sense of urgency. The air strike sequence, with its spontaneous nature, maintained that urgency. The cinematography and direction is brilliant. It can be a bit confusing how it changes sequences between Dunkirk and the Sea, and also between Day 1 and Day 2. The ship sequence from in between can be confusing, as it was night but throughout the movie it was day, but that sequence was a giveaway to how this movie spans over a period of 2 days.
It is bloodless, yes. The direction may just a tad bit difficult to understand, yes. The actors may have been under-utilized but none of them could take away what it was, a stunning war-thriller. It is criminally underrated because it compares right with the best.
PS: I am not British. So, I may not be taking the significance of this event seriously. So pardon.
Coming on to the movie itself, the source material used to depict the evacuation of Dunkirk and the stakes of it has been put together to give an excellent script. The movie conveniently shifts from character to character without any sense of disconnection. The script goes deep showing 6 different charactorial representations - a soldier who wants to go home by any means, another soldier (pilot) who couldn't stand war trauma, another pilot who just wants to protect those 300000 from air strikes, 2 civilians with a sense of patriotism and service and a man who just wanted to be meaningful. The plot depth is excellent.
The opening sequence established the sense of urgency. The air strike sequence, with its spontaneous nature, maintained that urgency. The cinematography and direction is brilliant. It can be a bit confusing how it changes sequences between Dunkirk and the Sea, and also between Day 1 and Day 2. The ship sequence from in between can be confusing, as it was night but throughout the movie it was day, but that sequence was a giveaway to how this movie spans over a period of 2 days.
It is bloodless, yes. The direction may just a tad bit difficult to understand, yes. The actors may have been under-utilized but none of them could take away what it was, a stunning war-thriller. It is criminally underrated because it compares right with the best.
PS: I am not British. So, I may not be taking the significance of this event seriously. So pardon.
Tell Your Friends