Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Six Feet Under (2001–2005)
good, but perhaps not quite great
16 July 2002
It's good, but not 'genius' by any stretch of the imagination (as has been the reception here by fans and in the press generally). Like American Beauty, it's essentially a mix-and-match box of platitudes couched in sentimentality and depending on your viewpoint, great or really naff artistic pretence. The characters are formulaic (the teenage daughter... HOW many glossy American dramas have we seen that character in lately? The Sopranos and 24 to name but two) and the setting in dysfunctional-Suburbia is now a bit of a cliche. The surreal sequences are just sort of Ally Mcbeal with dead people. Beneath the surface (admitedly a really good looking surface - especially the opening credits which are beautiful) and its setting in a funeral home it's not really that original and quite formulaic.

However every week i still find myself watching the series, and enjoying it. There's a couple of great ideas (such as the death at the start of each episode, and channelling David's subconscious through the personality-filter of the recently deceased) as well as the high production values which raise it above the level of most other series on the box today or in the recent past.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jackass (2000–2007)
mixed
6 July 2002
I have a love / hate relationship with Jackass. I know its a load of useless crap thats probably killing thousands of braincells every time I watch it - but at the same time some of it, is frankly damn funny!

Its gutter entertainment for sure, but as gutter entertainment goes its one of the best! Although saying that, once you have seen about 5 or more episodes it starts to get a bit boring and repetitive - the phrase 'one trick pony' springs to mind, unfortunately
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
La haine (1995)
10/10
this concerns everyone
14 February 2002
Moviemakers when filming French based films have traditionally tended to sentimentalise the ‘people' through the celebration of les petits gens, the little people of Pagnol and Clair as well as more recently the fantastical Parisian wonderland environments of Amelie and Moulin Rouge. With La Haine, young director Mathieu Kassovitz took the flipside of this and gave an illustration of the awfulness of life in the depressed blue-collar areas of Paris

La Haine (‘Hate') begins after a night of rioting on a dismal housing estate on the northern outskirts of Paris and focuses on 24 hours in the lives of three close friends aged around 20. They are Vince (Vincent Cassel), an explosive working-class Jew, Hubert (Hubert Kounde), a handsome, soft-spoken black, and Said (Said Taghmaoui), a mercurial streetwise Arab. With little hopes or prospect of regular employment due to where they come from, the trio drift aimlessly, engaging in petty theft, and seething with aggressive resentment against an uncaring world. L'Avenir c'est nous (We Are the Future) is the ironic slogan on the estate's playground, but this is a film about people who believe they have no future.

The quality of the performances from the 3 main actors, their conviction, the way they interact with one another and the vigour and fluency of Kassovitz's script and direction make this a very special movie indeed. Its full of action, detail, unexpected incidents and quirky humour. For instance, the boys have a bizarre encounter in a public lavatory in central Paris with a diminutive survivor of the Gulag that is as puzzling to them as it is to us. Does the story the Gulag survivor tells them have a deeper meaning than on the surface? Of course it does, and importantly this film makes you think as to what the metaphor means. Throughout violence is always on the point of erupting. There are constant confrontations with a brutal, racist police force, and Vince has a 44 Magnum revolver that a plainclothes cop lost during the riots, which we know will eventually be used on someone. However none of this ever descends into mere gratuitous violence like so many Hollywood films

La Haine presents a state of affairs of the alienation faced by many young people in the ‘projects' in France, and all over the world. It doesn't offer any solutions, though the point is forcibly made that in France, as elsewhere, parts of the police force are part of the problem rather than the solution. Of course, much of what we are shown is familiar to us from British and American films .

The strength of the film is that it neither glamorises nor patronises its characters. They hate their life because it's boring, and they despise the society that's created it for them, together with parks, football fields and a few mod cons with which to comfort them. In particular, they hate the police, who hate them right back. The film's other major achievement is to show in a tangible and very expressive way how a cycle of distrust and anger is created on both sides of this awful divide, so that there is very little anyone can do about it. In other words violence and hate breeds more violence and hate.

A criticism that could be levelled is that in the US / UK versions the sub-titles don't help, pushing what is very authentic dialogue into something more like cliché, as well as pointless miss-translations that occur. However this is just a minor thing, and does not and should not reflect at all on the film itself.

This certainly is one of the greatest films of the 1990s. Its one of those rare films that you will think about for the days and weeks after – not solely about the film itself, but on wider issues such as society, poverty and racism.
89 out of 141 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
High Fidelity (2000)
8/10
good movie with great soundtrack
9 February 2002
John Cusack stars as Rob, the owner of Championship Vinyl, which is a record store. It's where he and his two employees, Dick and Barry, hang out during the day. Rob has recently been dumped by his girlfriend, Laura while Dick and Barry seem never to have had one - prefering records over girls. On the surface the film is a romantic comedy of Rob getting back with Laura, but really at heart its a glimpse into the male pysche through a love of music. I'm sure we are all familiar (and may indeed see ourselves) with guys retreating into their world of music snobbery, attacking each others' "top five" music lists of all-time, etc!

Involved in this project from the outset, and credited as co-producer and co-writer, Cusack spends much of the time doing speeches direct to camera, talking to us in his lonely apartment, on the way down the stairs, out on the street and all the way up to the shopfront - speeches taken almost word for word from Nick Hornby's book. Some might see this coming off a bit uneasy, a self-conconscious gimmick that director Stephen Frears could have done without, but I dont think it diminishes from the film much (actually as the film progresses and the action gets more complicated, this narration gets toned down a bit)

As for the other main characters , Iben Hjelje shines as the very likeable Laura, Robs nice, accessible and down-to-to-earth girlfriend, Jack Black starring as Barry is simply superb and Todd Louiso is good as Dick - a character who fits the stereotype of a fan of relatively obscure (in the US at least) Glasgow indie band 'Belle and Sebastian'. Such musical 'in-jokes' are littered throughout the film - such as like the advert for some "hip young gunslingers" - a reference to a semi-famous advert placed for new writers in the New Musical Express in its heyday in the late 1970s and Punk and later New Wave was breaking. Its obvious the makers of this film care deeply about their music! If you are also a music fan, then there are parts of this film that you will simply love and the soundtrack is great also. However for those not so interested in music, the film may drag a bit and you wont be able to relate to the characters so well.

However to me its definitely in my top 5 films of 1990s books
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
DONT BELIEVE THE HYPE
20 January 2002
I thought I'd better give this film (and book) a go, given that there's such a fanatical cult surrounding it. However I really should have done this as a child if I was going to enjoy it, because like Star Wars it's absolutely terrible unless you grew up with it.

For the book itself there is undoubted scope to Tolkien's vision, but the writing is just horrible. It lurches between twee and portentous. What surprised me about the book was the lack of chacterisation- there are a lot (and i mean alot) of descriptive pieces about places and events in the past, but I felt a lack of empathy with the characters.

As for the film, my major criticism is that the dialogue is abyssmal - Leading me keep to think of it as one huge Monty Python sketch, and I was just waiting for the gags to arrive. The characterisation is also poor. I would say these criticisms can also be made of the written version of Lord Of the Rings, so perhaps I shouldn't judge Jacksons adaption too harshly.

To me it tries so hard to be all deep, meaningful and serious but it just ends up being pretty dull. That goes for both the dialogue and storyline. Someone will probably say that I have "missed the point" of the book but there never seems to be a point! A point where I stop and re-assess my opinions, a point where I am moved, a point where I even become at all intereseted in what is going to happen next to the one dimensional characters.

Its not a BAD film as such.The director, Peter Jackson has used to magical effect the New Zealand landscape - its snow-capped mountains, idyllic farmland and often exotic flora. The sets and special effects are near flawless. However this alone does not make a good movie, never mind a great one - certainly not the greatest film of all time (as the vote on this site currently has it). My only explanation for this high placing is that either an awful lot of people have never seen great cinema (or even slightly above average!) OR that a group of Tolkien fans are multi-voting and rigging the results. Perhaps a bit of both.

It's already getting to the point where critique of this film is seen as blasphemy and it's only been out a few weeks!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed