Holy hell. This is my 4th Gaspar Noe film, and I am never disappointed. Each one had its own prevailing style, but a common thread links them making each one attributable only to this director.
He has this unique vision including that he does not care to adhere to what works (though that approach has yielded great films as those by Nolan and Scorsese for example).
The fact that Noe introduces you to characters you will just hate, does not deter me. What is good is a film for if it does not at least provide unsettling emotions?
The film offers us a sense of comfort in the familiar in the first half of the movie, then it suddenly veers off, elegantly but shockingly. From this moment on i am pumped, even moreso with the credits in Gaspar fashion. I had missed that.
This film frames long-debated subjects in simplified visuals:
Below are the notable moments for me in the film, which deliver a heavy subtext, not always explicitly though, as the meaning can be wrestled with among the audience. Take from it as you will:
-Things stopped being funny again when the kid got "fried". Then I had to remind myself this is what he does in movies
-The music continues "from the Ghetto player" because its soulless rhythm is what carries the movie through to the end
What makes this even more astounding is the fact which I derived from the wiki:
"The film is notable for its unorthodox production, having been conceived and pre-produced in four weeks and shot in chronological order in only 15 days: although Noé conceived the premise, the bulk of the film was unrehearsed on-the-spot improvisation by the cast, who were provided no lines of dialogue beforehand and had almost complete liberty as to where to take the story and characters. Climax features unusual editing and cinematography choices, and includes several long takes, including one lasting over 42 minutes. The cast of the film consists almost exclusively of dancers who, aside from Boutella and Souheila Yacoub, had no previous acting experience."
After every film, I have this sentiment, which I hold only for a few filmmakers - I wish he made more films, and that he was immortal for the purpose of that. A grand statement I know! And an unpopular opinion, but if one must be reminded, the purpose of auteur cinema is not to give the audience what they want but for the creators to express one or multiple messages either explicitly or subliminally, which may or may not appeal to certain audiences.
He has this unique vision including that he does not care to adhere to what works (though that approach has yielded great films as those by Nolan and Scorsese for example).
The fact that Noe introduces you to characters you will just hate, does not deter me. What is good is a film for if it does not at least provide unsettling emotions?
The film offers us a sense of comfort in the familiar in the first half of the movie, then it suddenly veers off, elegantly but shockingly. From this moment on i am pumped, even moreso with the credits in Gaspar fashion. I had missed that.
This film frames long-debated subjects in simplified visuals:
- snappy moves of the dancers - almost as if like puppets
- top down angle as if you were looking at playthings, or a simulation
Below are the notable moments for me in the film, which deliver a heavy subtext, not always explicitly though, as the meaning can be wrestled with among the audience. Take from it as you will:
- "Do you want to see my anaconda?" threw me off and i burst out laughing (in relation to the earlier conversation between this character and another)
- I stopped laughing when the pregnant woman started hurting herself. This scene was heavy; the group goading her into questioning her self worth, her decision to keep the child, how she got into that situation in the first place, and into killing herself even. The message here is almost too obvious.
- The woman feeling trapped from putting her hands in her own stockings. Then breaks free and tries to wash her hands and head vigourously
- The camera starts spinning while a guy is still throwing his limbs around, dancing alone in the hallway, contorting his body, and this continues later in the film, in the backdrop, meant to remind us of the absurdity of the state everyone was supposed to be in, with the purpose of excusing the extremes being committed
- the woman suffering from the kids' screaming, a mental torture from the drug's reckoning on this poor child
- the men of african descent spreading white cream onto their bodies, in the midst of the blind aggression coming from this group
-Things stopped being funny again when the kid got "fried". Then I had to remind myself this is what he does in movies
-The music continues "from the Ghetto player" because its soulless rhythm is what carries the movie through to the end
- A woman leading another woman, distressed, into a dark room and starts her sexual advance. I was starting to see it as harassment, until the other eventually reciprocates? The man in Adidas sweats, who in the beginning had wanted to bone everyone, arrives weeping, and sees the door shut in his face. He is told, in passing, "leave the girls be"
- He stumbles on to see the brother, persistently under the guise of protection, before and after he tries to have sex with his sister
- That same man who had wanted to bone everybody, seems to have been suffering from something, as he continues to wail, never becoming intimate with anyone, since the drug hit
- the final shot, upside down, represents the reality in relation to the events that took place in that room
- and the most poignant of all - why, it seems, that all casualties were those who least deserved it?
- In the end we see the culprit revealed (i felt this was no longer necessary) and also exposing slyly - a book titled "LSD Psychotherapy" which explains for us exactly why that person did that. It all starts to make sense then. This is what a hero dose of psychedelic will do, albeit being therapeutic in the end, when it's not taken in a proper setting, inside and outside of yourself.
What makes this even more astounding is the fact which I derived from the wiki:
"The film is notable for its unorthodox production, having been conceived and pre-produced in four weeks and shot in chronological order in only 15 days: although Noé conceived the premise, the bulk of the film was unrehearsed on-the-spot improvisation by the cast, who were provided no lines of dialogue beforehand and had almost complete liberty as to where to take the story and characters. Climax features unusual editing and cinematography choices, and includes several long takes, including one lasting over 42 minutes. The cast of the film consists almost exclusively of dancers who, aside from Boutella and Souheila Yacoub, had no previous acting experience."
After every film, I have this sentiment, which I hold only for a few filmmakers - I wish he made more films, and that he was immortal for the purpose of that. A grand statement I know! And an unpopular opinion, but if one must be reminded, the purpose of auteur cinema is not to give the audience what they want but for the creators to express one or multiple messages either explicitly or subliminally, which may or may not appeal to certain audiences.
Tell Your Friends