WARNING: Spoilers
'Superman: The Movie' is a grand, superb and spectacular masterpiece. It has been one of my favorite movies since I first saw it when I was only six. It is one of those movies that will sink you in and capture your imagination no matter what your age is.
STORY: This version of the Superman legend starts where it should, from the beginning. It shows the final days of Krypton and the reasons for why Jor-El (Superman's father) sending his infant son Kal-El (Superman's given name on Krypton) to Earth. Then we see Kal-El grow up on Earth in the rural town of Smallville Kansas where he is raised up an Clark Kent but discovers that he has abilities that are far beyond belief until the time has come where he is guided up to the arctic so his Fortress Of Solitude will form and young Clark will discover who and what he really is. Then he moves to the great city of Metropolis and has to live two identities, Clark Kent, a mild mannered reporter working for the Daily Planet newspaper and.......come on, you know, Superman, a man with the capabilities of flight, super strength, super speed, super hearing, X-ray vision and many other great powers which he must use to serve for truth, justice and for the very good of humanity in which he made his first appearance rescuing Lois Lane, another Daily Planet reporter who becomes close friends with both his identities, from a helicopter accident. Yet, a big challenge was yet to come when Lex Luthor, a criminal mastermind, plans to challenge Superman so he can commit the crime of the century. It was an excellent screenplay by Mario Puzo (Godfather).
CAST: Christopher Reeve was excellent as the man of steel. He was an unknown actor when he was casted for the part because director Richard Donner felt that an unknown actor will be the best for the part. He wanted the audience to see this character as Superman so people will believe that he can fly. A much better idea then casting a big name/big face because if a famous actor played the part, it would just be a familiar face in tights therefor it wouldn't have the magic. Also, there was an amazing different look from Reeve as Clark Kent and Superman. I think that disguise actually can fool a few people. Christopher Reeve was one of the least famous leading actors in this movie. Marlon Brando as Jor-El was well done. Notice that he had the curl in his hair too. Gene Hackman as Lex Luthor was very well done. He was very funny and not to cheesy. I like how his hair was different in every scene then in the end, we see that he's bald. I really got a kick out of his sidekick Otis, played by Ned Beatty. Margot Kidder did a good performance as Lois Lane, especially in the flying scene with the 'Can You Read My Mind' poem. However, I thought Glenn Ford as Jonathon Kent was the best. Everyone else was great too. I wasn't disappointed with anyone.
CINEMATOGRAPHY, PROPS AND VISUAL EFFECTS: Cinematography was amazing. This film has the best opening credits ever. What can be better then blue 3-D letters coming out of the screen while seeing stars coming out at you and tripy colors shooting everywhere? It's a true Superman movie trademark. The sets were pretty cool, especially the planet Krypton and the Fortress of Solitude. The visual effects were very good. Not as advanced as today's visual effects but still satisfying. Remember, this was the first movie that tried to make a man look like he can really fly.
MUSIC: When it comes to musical scores for movies, John Williams is the best. Of all his scores he wrote such as Jaws, Indiana Jones, Star Wars, E.T., I think his Superman score was his best and I seem to remember hearing somewhere that it was his favorite too.
SEQUELS: Superman II was a pretty good movie. It would have been far better if the producers didn't fire director Richard Donner 3/4 through the making of the movie and replaced him with Richard Lester (who carried on with Superman III). That's where the movie suffered really bad. Brando quit and wouldn't allow any footage of him shown. Hackman quit and they just had to do with the footage of him they already have. However it was the best Superman sequel and still worth watching only because it still had a lot of that Richard Donner touch in it and because the story was still by Mario Puzo and the thing with the Kryptonian villains payed off the opening Krypton scene in the first Superman. Stay away from Superman III and Superman IV. I won't even get into those terrible follow-ups. It seems that sequels go downhill when they change writers and directors. Therefor (just like the Batman movies) only the first two Supermans are worth watching.
'Superman: The Movie' is a grand, superb and spectacular masterpiece. It has been one of my favorite movies since I first saw it when I was only six. It is one of those movies that will sink you in and capture your imagination no matter what your age is.
STORY: This version of the Superman legend starts where it should, from the beginning. It shows the final days of Krypton and the reasons for why Jor-El (Superman's father) sending his infant son Kal-El (Superman's given name on Krypton) to Earth. Then we see Kal-El grow up on Earth in the rural town of Smallville Kansas where he is raised up an Clark Kent but discovers that he has abilities that are far beyond belief until the time has come where he is guided up to the arctic so his Fortress Of Solitude will form and young Clark will discover who and what he really is. Then he moves to the great city of Metropolis and has to live two identities, Clark Kent, a mild mannered reporter working for the Daily Planet newspaper and.......come on, you know, Superman, a man with the capabilities of flight, super strength, super speed, super hearing, X-ray vision and many other great powers which he must use to serve for truth, justice and for the very good of humanity in which he made his first appearance rescuing Lois Lane, another Daily Planet reporter who becomes close friends with both his identities, from a helicopter accident. Yet, a big challenge was yet to come when Lex Luthor, a criminal mastermind, plans to challenge Superman so he can commit the crime of the century. It was an excellent screenplay by Mario Puzo (Godfather).
CAST: Christopher Reeve was excellent as the man of steel. He was an unknown actor when he was casted for the part because director Richard Donner felt that an unknown actor will be the best for the part. He wanted the audience to see this character as Superman so people will believe that he can fly. A much better idea then casting a big name/big face because if a famous actor played the part, it would just be a familiar face in tights therefor it wouldn't have the magic. Also, there was an amazing different look from Reeve as Clark Kent and Superman. I think that disguise actually can fool a few people. Christopher Reeve was one of the least famous leading actors in this movie. Marlon Brando as Jor-El was well done. Notice that he had the curl in his hair too. Gene Hackman as Lex Luthor was very well done. He was very funny and not to cheesy. I like how his hair was different in every scene then in the end, we see that he's bald. I really got a kick out of his sidekick Otis, played by Ned Beatty. Margot Kidder did a good performance as Lois Lane, especially in the flying scene with the 'Can You Read My Mind' poem. However, I thought Glenn Ford as Jonathon Kent was the best. Everyone else was great too. I wasn't disappointed with anyone.
CINEMATOGRAPHY, PROPS AND VISUAL EFFECTS: Cinematography was amazing. This film has the best opening credits ever. What can be better then blue 3-D letters coming out of the screen while seeing stars coming out at you and tripy colors shooting everywhere? It's a true Superman movie trademark. The sets were pretty cool, especially the planet Krypton and the Fortress of Solitude. The visual effects were very good. Not as advanced as today's visual effects but still satisfying. Remember, this was the first movie that tried to make a man look like he can really fly.
MUSIC: When it comes to musical scores for movies, John Williams is the best. Of all his scores he wrote such as Jaws, Indiana Jones, Star Wars, E.T., I think his Superman score was his best and I seem to remember hearing somewhere that it was his favorite too.
SEQUELS: Superman II was a pretty good movie. It would have been far better if the producers didn't fire director Richard Donner 3/4 through the making of the movie and replaced him with Richard Lester (who carried on with Superman III). That's where the movie suffered really bad. Brando quit and wouldn't allow any footage of him shown. Hackman quit and they just had to do with the footage of him they already have. However it was the best Superman sequel and still worth watching only because it still had a lot of that Richard Donner touch in it and because the story was still by Mario Puzo and the thing with the Kryptonian villains payed off the opening Krypton scene in the first Superman. Stay away from Superman III and Superman IV. I won't even get into those terrible follow-ups. It seems that sequels go downhill when they change writers and directors. Therefor (just like the Batman movies) only the first two Supermans are worth watching.
Tell Your Friends