Reviews

298 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Amazing performances and narrative arc
21 December 2021
Snap Crackle Boom Sorkin Filmmaking. He's becoming stronger as a director. The editing is some of the swiftest. Being the Ricardos charmed me off my feet. The Sorkin dialogue matches with this highly specific story about the recognizable American entities. Sorkin's background is keenly fit for telling a behind-the-scenes production of a TV show. The movie thrives when it flexes its muscle in this venue. Although the impetus of the film - Lucy being a communist - does feel forgotten at times, it references something relevant today.

Kidman and Bardem are sensations. The way Kidman comes alive during the B&W recreations is something for which I was unprepared. She did it, she pulled it off. She pulls off an uncanny Lucy, and exercise a deep introspection and deep, ballsy business savvy and laborious creativity. I cannot imagine anyone other than Nicole playing Lucille. Bardem is a breath a breath of fresh air and overcomes his fair share of obstacles. I was not prepared for how strong of an intertwined character and story arc this film possessed for Lucille, nor the payoff for the couple's fate.

Destined from pre-production to fail the purity test by cool Film Twitter, Being the Ricardo's is the filmmaking establishment at its best.
20 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alien³ (1992)
Most Flawed Ripley Story, but Still Worthy
19 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
So, after careful consideration, I prefer the originally released version to the directors cut/assembly version.

The ox/dog change was good; the condensed opening let the film get to business better; the lack of subplots with prison members strengthened the pacing; and I love the chest burst at the end.

The end of Act 2 was a bit more jagged than in the longer version, and I didn't feel the emotional impact, themes about toxic relationships and religion, and the existential hopelessness as heavily in this version, but it is overall an easier film to watch.

There are many qualities that allow this to have a solid place in the series. However, the movie never achieves a next-level quality with its themes the way the first two films do, or even as the fourth film does.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Grudge 2 (2006)
a lazy, poorly executed sequel
24 April 2021
Okay, no. Simply Irresistible is not the worst SMG movie. It's this.

The Grudge 2 encapsulates everything people tried to inaccurately say the 2004 film was.

The new color pallet and cinematography cheapen the sequel so much. On top of that, the plot and dialogue are horribly written and matched with a grossly melodramatic tone. It's such a lazy effort all around.

This sucks because having three parallel storylines could have been terrific way to tell the next chapter in the franchise. Even Karen's two scenes are half-assed, and the conclusion to her story early on could have been something terrific as well.

It's a giant a step down from the remake to this sequel.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Grudge (2004)
One of the Best 2000's Remakes
24 April 2021
I was always genuinely scared by The Grudge. The environment, set pieces, and vibe finds a very specific prism, and it's unnerving and all-consuming.

As far as remakes goes, The Grudge one of the best ones for three reasons: 1) it actually revitalizes the story for American audiences, and I would argue makes itself more focused as a result. Takashi Shimizu is brilliant in this regard; 2) the use of a disjointed timeline is one of the best I've seen in a horror film, and The Grudge tells the story in a non-linear fashion in order to create a greater dramatic effect; 3) the proverb at the heart of this series is timeless, and this film unfolds it so well.

It achieves its aims, knows to attract and appease its audience, and creates/maintains its unique aesthetic. People are ridiculously hard on The Grudge. It's quite good.

I miss the days SMG ruled the box office.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Possession (I) (2009)
Middle-Tier SMG But Still Solid
19 April 2021
This is middle-tier SMG film, but I must say, it has really grown on me over the years. It's gorgeously shot, the story is pretty twisted which keeps you guessing, and Sarah has total command over the emotion of the film. She's pretty fantastic; she's always been one of the best criers in Hollywood, and here she manages a certain emotional state consistently as Jess collects these experiences and weighs the possibilities. Lee Pace is rather good, too.

The directors have a strong sense and a compelling approach to the material that is not stylish and clicks with the audience. The script is the most flawed aspect but serves the basis for a solid thriller. It's quite impressive that they filmed an entire alternative third act. I do prefer the alternative ending to the more Hollywood-ized final version. However, the producers made the right call. American audiences wouldn't have gone along with Jess's final motivations and conclusion in the alternative ending. I find the psychology so interesting.

I wish it would have had a proper wide theatrical release. It would've made $bank$ had it been released early February or mid-April.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Indescribable and Extraordinary
13 April 2021
Whenever I was a gay SMG fan and this came out, I found it impossible to understand. After another viewing or two, one can get the plot under control. But there is so much going on here, it's not for the general audience. The complicated nature of the film on top of the sometimes unbecoming presentation and style made people load this film.

However, upon watching it now that I'm older and my understanding of the political landscape is much more informed and nuanced, this movie blows my mind. To say it's brilliant and extraordinary are understatements. Southland Tales is the type of movie with which you must get on its wavelength, rather than the movie getting on your wavelength.

The commentary - on politics, war, Biblical tellings of the apocalypse, elitism, fringe movements - is indescribable.

The production is faultless and always innovative. The cast ensemble is comprised probably probably over 30 recognizable actors, all with a prominent specific role in this alternate universe or a liberal's worst fears about the continuation of the Bush era. Sarah Michelle Gellar is my personal MVP in this one-of-a-kind comedic relief character, but just about every actors kills it.

There is more detail in this movie than in 10 movies in any given year combined. It's a miracle that 1) Southland Tales was made in the first place, 2) Richard Kelly pulled it off. This is perhaps one of the defining pieces of art to come out of the Bush era of culture.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Prom (2020)
A Strong 8/10
11 December 2020
I must've teared up a dozen times during The Prom, but when Kerry Washington enters the finale, I literally sobbed - ugly, audible crying. I can fully endorse this movie for its energy, cleverness, and talent. It's better than I was expecting.

Meryl Streep blew me away. I was expecting her to be great, but never expected the depth & commitment. Of course I loved the heck out of Nicole Kidman, too. Kerry Washington was excellent in her playing against type, again more effective than I expected. JoEllen Pellman couldn't have been better as Emma.

I've seen a lot of criticism for the cinematography, and call me tacky idc, I love the use of lighting and some of the framing. Also the way the original song is featured at the end is cute.

My two issues with it: 1) offensive casting aside, Corden is plainly bad in the role; 2) the overly perfected Murphyesque ensemble numbers feel more wooden at times than everything else which is infused with heart and emotion.

A strong 8 for me.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mank (2020)
Disappointing Plot, Amazing Direction and Crafts
4 December 2020
As a pretty big fan of David Fincher, I'm disappointed to say that I'm mixed on Mank overall. Fincher's work deserves to win the Oscar for Best Director, but the film is less than the sum of its parts for my taste.

The craft and filmmaking is sensational. Fincher strikes dynamite with an approach that blends imitating and homaging this specific early moment in time of Hollywood. It goes without saying, the photography, production, score and sound are undeniably sublime. The cast ensemble gels with the created style as perfectly as possible.

All the while, I respect Mank more than I love or even enjoy it.

The screenplay boasts cleverness and surprisingly funny humor, which, when meant with Fincher's execution create a nice bouncing momentum. The screenplay has more creativity and better, snappier dialogue than Trial of Chicago 7, but I care so much less about the plot in Mank. There could have been a better plot or a different focus to tell this story.

Oldman's work holds up to the hype, Seyfried less so.

More Citizen Kane and Charles Dance, less Communism v. Socialism.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Howard fails a good cast and crew
24 November 2020
A lot of things hit close to home for me: thematically, culturally, behavior of characters, interactions between the characters, the Condescension!! by the urban characters. The film doesn't portray my experience but I recognize a lot of the emotional beats in the film, that Howard gets right. But there are more moments than not that are just laughably bad and cringeworthy.

Glenn Close is really good, and my girl, Amy Adams is all over the place with quality highs and lows. The trinity of the score, cinematography, and film editing are quite strong. The problem with this film lies entirely with the writing and directing from Howard. I would attribute most all the failures to him.

It was a smart choice to not focus on his politics, rather on the characters in a situation such as this. Do they investigate this situation to the fullest extent? Probably not. Focusing on the human element allows, at least, some things get through.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Outstanding Premiere
9 April 2020
The Good Fight came back with a bang -- I loved the premiere. It's probably one of the top 5 best Diane-centric episodes ever, but I can see it being controversial and divisive. It's very high concept like "Mind's Eye" from Wife, with the political spin of Fight season 3.

They made me hate the cliffhanger from season 3 a lot less with how they resolved it. The script is flawless; Brooke Kennedy's directing, which is usually hit or miss, is perfectly on key; and it's one of Christine Baranski's very best acting showcases from all 11 seasons.

"The Gang Deals with an Alternate Reality" is clever, poignant, and funny. It's hard to imagine they will be able to top this in the rest of season four. It reminds me of the type of outstanding quality they achieved in the pilot, "Inauguration."
39 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shortlisted for The Worst Film Ever Made
2 October 2018
I would put this film on the shortlist for the worst film ever made. "Halloween 6" provides credible, objective evidence for the camp of critics who argue against continuing horror series with unnecessary longevity. In another world, where this same movie is presented without the name of "Halloween" attached to it, nor the iconic serial killer Michael Myers, one would describe this is a straight-to-VHS fodder.

"Halloween 6" is a film of ridiculously appalling caliber, suspending the reality that was used as the glue holding these same characters together in the other, better movies. The slasher formula is replaced with witchcraft rituals and a supernatural spin on medical practices, made worse by perniciously stylized directing and a reprehensible musical score. I wouldn't dignify the film as a viewing option for even the most vigilant fans of Michael Myers to sit through. Paul Rudd is often noticed as a reason to see the film. Don't buy it, he's performs just as horridly as everyone and everything else involved in the project.

The most unforgivable aspect of "Halloween 6" is the strange direction the filmmakers chose when settling the Jamie Lloyd's storyline, after two relatively strong outings for her character in "Halloween 4" and "Halloween 5." Perhaps, in order to get the superb "Halloween H20," we had to suffer "Halloween 6," as the worst before the best.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hold A Grudge Against Halloween's Resurrection
2 October 2018
After what should've been the series' lasting and binding ending of "Halloween H20," "Halloween Resurrection" unnecessarily revives Michael Myers using the most cowardly and disbelieving tactics to continue the story.

The only reason to give the movie the time of day is to witness the opening chapter which cheaply concludes the Laurie Strode's storyline. Jamie Lee Curtis deserves better than this backwash of a contractually obligated chase and death scene. What follows the opening 20 minutes is mostly made of cheesy moments, silly plot advancements, and bad acting. No matter how hard it tries to be creative, modern, and self-referential, the movie self-combusts.

"Halloween Resurrection" bankrupted the "Halloween" franchise of creativity so much so that Dimension Films' only recourse was to reboot the series in remakes in order to continue collecting money from Michael Myers' profitability. You can apologize for a lot of things in the horror genre, but being obnoxious and betraying mogul heroines is not among them. Therefore, I commence a grudge against Halloween's resurrection.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (2007)
Unbecoming and Trashy
2 October 2018
The remake of "Halloween" is not the type of movie you would be inclined to boast about being a fan of or even watching in the first place. Rob Zombie's re-imagining is unbecoming, specializing in noisy audio, obnoxious dialogue, and unattractive visuals.

He attempts to accurately characterize the story's socioeconomic realities of the small town of Haddonfield, though the original never quite hinted at the extremes Zombie exercises. The uncharted territory, exploring Michael Myers the child, is interesting in theory, it not in practice due to Zombie's classless execution.

You can tell Zombie is a huge fan of the original by some distinctive choices, in particular the way he shows the transition from boy to man and Michael Myers as a human in addition to a murderer. The best thing I can say about "Halloween" (2007) is, Zombie does well with making film scary and constructing suspense and payoff. But that doesn't compensate for the poor taste of just about every artistic choice otherwise. He does his best work in the last act, but even that is ruined by the pile of false endings.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Intentions But Not Discipline
2 October 2018
"Halloween 4" reestablishes the Michael Myers tone and environment absent from "Halloween III: Season of the Witch." The premise of the film is well set up, but "Halloween 4" falls victim/perpetrator to common horror clichés of the 1980s. Just when you think it's taking the high road, avoiding the Freddy and Jason trademarks, and is trying to be something really special, "Halloween 4" veers into the lowest, easy route in its development of action, death scenes, and suspense. It has good intentions but not good discipline.

Of any film of the series, it's the most seduced by Hollywood's influence, which ends up undermining its own credibility. Danielle Harris steals the show, emphasizing the victim hood of the protagonist, Jamie Lloyd. The twist of focus in the characters and plot from the first two films may sound convoluted, existing as a way to write around Jamie Lee Curtis's lack of involvement in the project, and it is totally that.

However, the film uses the new story to create a chilling arc, and due to that, "Halloween 4" boasts the strongest ending of the ten films. It's smart, sadistic, and perfectly rooted in the series' trademark familial story. On its best day, the conclusion of "Halloween 4" compensates for its flaws.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween II (1981)
A Shaggily Good Continuation
2 October 2018
"Halloween II" is a shaggily good continuation of a story set in motion by the original masterpiece. It's a film where each of its three acts are defined by a different quality. The first third meanders between perspectives, committing a sin the original never did: it focuses on a large amount of different characters without producing any meaningful result. It's excessive in the worst way and frankly, boring. This is a flaw that carries into the second act, which is slightly better due to some creative death scenes.

But the movie as a whole until the climax lacks the fine-tuned focus of the original. Much of the action and scenes of dialogue are redundant and exist to pad the running-time. Jamie Lee Curtis' performance doesn't even make an impact on the viewer, but then again, she's not afforded much of an opportunity from the screenplay, either.

The last third, by zeroing in on Laurie and Dr. Loomis, allows the story from the original to march forward in a highly acceptable and satisfying way. The blocking and suspense improve from the earlier in the film, and the classic twist of Michael and Laurie being siblings injects needed energy, direction, and purpose into the plot. Overall, perhaps a leaner version of the film would have been more effective as an epilogue to the original rather than it being a standalone movie demanding its own storyline.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween II (2009)
Impressive Psychology with an Art-House Twist
2 October 2018
Rob Zombie began taking the story of Michael Myers into his own hands in the original remake, which rendered mostly negative results. In "H2," he goes even farther to mark his own artistic territory, disregarding many specifics for the original "Halloween II." At a certain point, about 20 minutes into the film, Zombie begins his own plot entirely and, thankfully, this unlocks a freedom for him to be a more effective storyteller.

"H2" has its own spirit that's darker and moodier than Zombie's original. Even the death scenes have a more sophisticated directional approach while remaining unnerving and uncompromising. To my surprise, it's a dramatically and emotionally susceptible film, even if it still has Zombie's dirtiness and lacking stature, which cripples portions and aspects of the film.

In addition, "H2" has an impressive interest in the psychology of its characters and exploring that with an art-house twist. Also, Zombie sets up this film with competent technicalities, in particular some notably handsome cinematography and neat editing tricks/transitions.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Solid Horror Film From the 1980s
2 October 2018
John Carpenter's original intention with "Halloween" (1978) was to create a holiday anthology series, and that vision is exercised in "Halloween III: Season of the Witch," which does not feature the iconic serial killer. That being said, "Season of the Witch" is a well-written and well-told story that has the unfortunate luck of being a "Halloween" movie without Michael Myers, thus an inferior reputation.

If it were viewed separate from the series, as a 1980s horror movie of its own identity, I imagine it would be decently admired for its themes of consumerism, class, and the hypnotism of media. "Season of the Witch" is solid: the movie has strong directing, visuals, makeup, and constructs a storyline that is unpredictable and original. It stretches a bit beyond the realm of reality into science-fiction instead of realistic horror (unlike Carpenter was aiming for and accomplished in the original film), but it's a worthy movie that shouldn't be burdened as a member of this franchise.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining and Highly Watcahable
2 October 2018
"Halloween 5" does not commit to the brilliant ending of its predecessor, which is a disappointment, but it makes up for that cowardice by creating genuinely fascinating and captivating threads of stories. This film is more watchable and entertaining than "Halloween 4," or basically any of the sequels that came before it.

"Halloween 5" does not shortchange Jamie's exploration after reinterpreting the ending of the previous film, and Danielle Harris is once again marvelous in what I would argue is a more challenging performance than the previous film.

The worst aspect is, ironically, the ending, which endorses the perennial fight against an inhuman evil rather than wrapping up a smart, character-driven plot. Bowing out on a cliffhanger doesn't make the artistic sense, but the buildup and creativity put forth before the conclusion makes the film worthy of such a high ranking on the list.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Best Sequel of the Series
2 October 2018
"Halloween H20" is the most accomplished sequel of the "Halloween" series, and a film that would deserve a "10" for its potency, conviction, and intelligence if it weren't for a few non-Laurie scenes earlier in the film that feel less than what other films achieved at the time.

You can't talk about "Halloween H20" without discussing the impact the "Scream" trilogy had on this era in horror cinema. The post-modern references, thrilling and modern style, sexy stars, and heightened feminist protagonists that made the three "Scream" films so successful are borrowed by "Halloween H20" and are used to the film's triumph.

The single best aspect of "Halloween H20" is Laurie Strode's character development. Though it's a bit more heavy-handed than Sidney in "Scream," it's effective, thorough, and aided by Jamie Lee Curtis' phenomenal, unforgettable portrayal. The last 20 minutes are first-rate 1990s horror.

"Halloween H20" feels as scary and fresh today as it did in 1998.
46 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (1978)
One of the Greatest Depictions of the Horror Genre
2 October 2018
The original film of the series, "Halloween" (1978), is one of the greatest depiction of the horror genre in cinematic history. John Carpenter's artful and patient direction is what sets it apart from other cash-grabbing slashers of the 1970s and 1980s. It's about pace and visual style as much as it is beautiful simplistic storytelling.

Jamie Lee Curtis is a revelation as Laurie Strode, who is a female protagonist explored with an enormous amount of depth. Curtis puts forth one of the most notable breakout performances from any actor graced with the responsibility of playing a protagonist their first time out of the gate. Her co-star, Donald Pleasance's haunting, ineradicable presence as Dr. Samuel Loomis is also irreplaceable. If I would have been an Oscar voter in 1978, I would have voted for Curtis and Pleasance in the leading actor and actress races over Jane Fonda and Jon Voight in "Coming Home."

They're aided by perfectly crafted dialogue and a balance storylines. Some scenes are told through Laurie's eyes, others Dr. Loomis', and some Michael's; these three distinctive perspectives coalesce cogently into one streamline plot, which is astutely executed astutely through the screenplay and direction. Perhaps the greatest single aspect of "Halloween" is the film score, assured to strike fear into the most stoic of us all. "Halloween" is balanced, focused, scary, and communicates an idea into a fable.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than its rotten buzz suggests, but a bit graceless.
12 June 2015
As this year's Cannes Film Festival adjourns its two-week celebration of new crops in the international film industry, the United States mainstream audience is finally being allotted a chance to see the film that opened the 2014 Cannes Film Festival, "Grace of Monaco." Though originally intended for a theatrical release, "Grace of Monaco" was broadcasted on television instead of a appearing in movie theaters. It aired on the Lifetime channel on Memorial Day and May 30. "Grace of Monaco" is now available to stream on Netflix as well.

Nicole Kidman illuminates every frame of "Grace of Monaco" as Grace Kelly, the actress who became known for starring in Alfred Hitchcock films in the 1950s. Kelly married Prince Rainier III (portrayed in the film by Tim Roth), the monarch who ruled the sovereign nation of Monaco. After marrying him, she ended her successful film career to assume her most challenging role yet, the princess of Monaco. "Grace of Monaco" uses this crucial time in Kelly's life to tell a story about her crisis of confidence and identity. The film blends the drier facts with colorful fiction in attempts to give the audience an opportunity to explore Kelly's inner struggle surrounding her marriage and future career.

Set in 1961, Prince Rainier III is engaged in a hostile political dispute with France's president, Charles de Gaulle, about his imposing of taxes on Monaco, while Alfred Hitchcock offers Grace the lead role in his next project, "Marnie." Grace has a desire to return to the film business, especially seeing the role of Marnie as something only a foolish actress would pass up. The film develops Grace's decision to pursue the film, or stay by her husband's side at the throne and aid Monaco through humanitarian efforts.

Kidman is such an accomplished thespian; she deserves her place as one of the top actresses in the film industry. And with opportunities for female actors decreasing every day, Kidman seems starved to leave her next mark on Hollywood's acting landscape. Her hunger for a great role is seen in her emotive portrayal of Grace, a character that was tailor-made for the actress playing her to prosper. In 2002, Kidman rendered author Virginia Woolf in "The Hours" and it won her an Academy Award. Like that performance, she does not imitate the real-life woman but forms her own version of the character in this fictional retelling of a real-life situation.

I had the privilege of reading the script for "Grace of Monaco" over a year before seeing it, and imagined it had the possibility to get under Grace Kelly's skin the way "My Week with Marilyn" calculated Marilyn Monroe's deeper feelings about being a celebrity. The film was expected to be a hit for Kidman, enough so to earn her a second Academy Award. But the high expectations of many were met with a dismal reaction from fastidious critics at Cannes, one of the most prestigious film events of the year.

Instead of being seen on the big screen, "Grace of Monaco" now has the jurisdiction of Lifetime television. Though the exhibition change may make you cautious about devoting two hours of your time to the movie, you may find the finished product to overcome some of the rotten buzz surrounding it. The film undeniably has some vapid shortcomings that needed ironed out—the middle of the film loses its grasp on the narrative focus and many viewers may find is French director Olivier Dahan's artsy approach to be disorienting for this more conventional story. But the truth is, emerging to the general public on broadcast television is a more appropriate fit for the tone of "Grace of Monaco."

Premiering to America through a more accessible medium could open up more possibilities than the original hesitation first imposed from those who saw it at Cannes last year. Television has emerged as adult territory and the cinema as more of a teenage boy's playground full of superheroes flying through the air and explosions detonating. Moving to a television broadcast allows the people "Grace of Monaco" was made for, adults, to watch it (for free). When has this opportunity ever presented itself before: Nicole Kidman playing Grace Kelly in a film that is dosed in dazzling splendor. It may be the only time a movie on Lifetime will ever look this aesthetically ravishing. You could mute the television and just stare for days at golden photography, marvelous costumes, and magnificent sets.

* * .5 / * * * *

Grade: C+
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Good Wife: Wanna Partner? (2015)
Season 6, Episode 22
Exceptional In Its Own Right
29 May 2015
"Wanna Partner" is the season six finale, and though it doesn't measure up to most of the past finales, it's exceptional in its own right, mainly for the way Robert King brings his and Michelle King's script to life with his personal directing touches. King, who is known in Good Wife fan circles as the intrepid mind behind the characters and the story, has emerged as the most fascinating director of the season. He directed three eventful episodes this past year, "The Line," "Mind's Eye," and now, "Wanna Partner." King has established his filmmaking trademarks, such as the narrow framing, aerial shots, and a polished vision of the writing on the page. And what's on the page is equally laudable. The opening scene reminds me of the effect "Oppo Research" attained in its opening: all of the action occurring in a a long, continuous, one-act, 10-minute scene. The teleplay tightly fits the groundwork for the finale into its opening scene, and juggles the multiple story lines for the rest of the episode with brevity.

If the Kings followup on Peter running for President next season, knowing them, they will want to utilize information in the political sphere at the moment, which is Hillary Clinton's bid for the Oval Office. Alicia is often used as an artistic reflection of Clinton, so if Peter runs on the ticket of another Hillary Clinton-type figure, that could be one of the most profound feminist messages "The Good Wife" has ever presented. Feminist wallops were everywhere in "Wanna Partner," more obviously with Lester's "demure" line to Kalinda before she leaves Chicago and the unfair firing of Louis Canning's wife from Lockhart Agos Lee, but the most rewarding source of female empowerment came when Alicia stood up to Eli about his patronizing notes about Alicia's memoir. The man who once branded her "Saint Alicia" now wants to rehabilitate her broken image as a submissive housewife. And the Alicia we saw stand up to Eli, the brains of the Florrick empire, in this moment is the not the same Alicia we first met in 2009. Julianna Margulies kills it this scene in particular, but what's captivating about Margulies's work in "Wanna Partner" is how natural and effortless her riveting portrayal is, even when she's not attacking exciting showcase moments.

The winning aspect of "Wanna Partner" is Kalinda's final appearance and the conclusion of her character. Though she more formally left "The Good Wife's" universe in episode 20, the Kings have called her presence in episodes 21 and 22 "encores," and these encores have made Kalinda's departure fascinating, satisfying and distinctive from that of Will Gardner's exit package. Not only does Archie Panjabi have lively chemistry with Wallace Shawn in this epilogue to Kalinda's actions that incriminated Bishop, but the Kings provide justice for Kalinda as a character in "Wanna Partner," from her badass entrance, to the heartfelt scene with Alicia. Her last scene, in particular, is one for the record books. As a fan of Kalinda's since I first saw her sitting in Alicia's office in the pilot, I couldn't be happier with the way the Kings took what could have been a sorrowful moment and turned it into a triumphant one. It stayed true to the Kalinda we knew and loved. Goodbye, Archie Panjabi. Thank you for leaving an indelible mark on "The Good Wife" (and TV's pop culture) in bringing Kalinda Sharma to life. Your sensational work will never be forgotten.

Alicia's lamented what she learned in season six to Kalinda (by her image being destroyed, Alicia felt liberated to conduct her life the way she wanted to, without restraints of public opinion), which is enough by itself to justify the existence of the scene, and should be enough to satisfy fans of their friendship from earlier seasons.

"The Good Wife" likes to leave its fans with, as Michelle King described it in an interview with NPR, "a question mark and an exclamation point" before shutting down production for summer hiatus. Unfortunately, the ending statement/question of season six was their weakest one yet. After Louis Canning's wife was devastated for being let go from LAL, Canning asks Alicia to partner with him. Though the way the Kings built this "C plot" involving Canning's wife was extremely neat and tidy, this ending could lead to disastrous results next year. Alicia learned at the end of the season she wants to take on cases that matter, cases she believes in. If she partners with Canning, does she expect to find those kinds of cases with him? If they do end up being a dynamic duo who fight injustices for underprivileged people, will Alicia just magically forget Canning has been screwing with her for years now, and almost cost her the election back in "Open Source?" (Canning's plot where he tried tricking Alicia to give money to Hamas in "Open Source" was by far the worst thing season six offered. The more I see of him, the more I wish he would have passed in his sleep during "Mind's Eye.") To be fair, I didn't believe in the State's Attorney's storyline when it was presented in "A Weird Year" and the Kings proved me wrong. I became one of the biggest supporters of it as it was executed, so I have faith they know how to approach the seventh (and final?) season.

'Wanna Partner' Grade: A-
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Good Wife: Don't Fail (2015)
Season 6, Episode 21
A Beautiful Episode
10 May 2015
BY RYAN C. SHOWERS

Season six has been a year of change for "The Good Wife" in narrative choices, such as writing for a serialized arc instead of week-to-week standalone episodes, to the constantly changing state of who belongs to which firm, and a handful of life redirections for Alicia. The most daunting changes of the season came in the last two entries, "Winning Ugly" and "The Deconstruction," episodes that tore down the public image of "St. Alicia" and turned "Alicia Florrick" into a the slutty wife who cheats in her professional life to get ahead. The most recent episode, "Don't Fail," shows us how Alicia has actually changed, not in the way the public views her.

"Don't Fail" represents the best possible followup to the irrevocable developments in the series' narrative. It allows for Alicia to search her soul and decide what really matters to her. Her past life has been shattered, and in this episode she decides which of those broken pieces she wants to pick up and use in her new career. Alicia found legal success by defending some of Chicago's more wealthy demographic, some of whom were presumably guilty. She has become inoculated to how gross it is to ethically stretch of the truth for Chicago's criminal elite. That's never the type of law she has wanted to practice, but it's the kind that made her a rich businesswoman. She was not arguing those cases for the sake of justice, but for the sake of power. What she realizes in "Don't Fail" is that she wants to help real people fight impacting, unjust legal problems. Though she wants to use cleaner methods this time around, she can also utilize the types of "grey area" skills she acquired working for people like Colin Sweeney, Lemond Bishop, and the Palsey group. Alicia wants to make a difference now.

Robert and Michelle King wrote this episode, and I'm so thankful for their decision to personally guide the series as it ventures down its new path. The events that occur in "Don't Fail" are necessary to see for the show to move forward, even if watching Alicia struggle to get back on her feet isn't as eventful as some of the more recent story lines. The shift in the quality of writing from "The Deconstruction" to "Don't Fail" is glaring, with the latter being at a significant higher quality than the former because the King's script is practically perfect, assembled with detailed symbolism, a perfect velocity for the story's action, and expert character work (of Alicia). A sizable part of "Don't Fail" is Alicia's introspection, using (newly filmed) flashbacks to her time as a first-year associate in season one, showing the evident change in Alicia's practice of the law. "The Good Wife" is once again creative in the way it positions the audience to bounce back and forth from Alicia's mind/memory to present day, this time using the tape recordings from the past and having Alicia envision the memory as she listens to the audio. (This is the third venture into Alicia's mind in less than two years without feeling like this approach is redundant, the other two being "A Few Words" and "Mind's Eye.")

"Don't Fail" is a beautiful episode, and contains the basic nuts and bolts which made the series flourish so easily in its earlier years. And because "The Good Wife" has adjusted to the more modern ways of cable-TV storytelling, the original formula is now used in an even more accomplished, simpler way. It's focused solely on Alicia, her trying to make sense of her professional fall, and finding the inspiration for her to keep fighting. There's a sense of quiet movement in "Don't Fail," as if Alicia's world stopped spinning so fast, and it's one of the most valuable aspects of the episode. In fact, my favorite scenes in "Don't Fail" are the ones where Alicia is watching the clock tick, going to the store dressed down (so no one recognizes her), and doing the odds and ends she has not been able to do because of her pressing career schedule. It's a credit to Julianna Margulies and the directing for making these more mundane chores such captivating television.

Grade: A
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Good Wife: The Deconstruction (2015)
Season 6, Episode 20
At Times Very Good, But Regrettably Could Have Been Cleaner
3 May 2015
Ted Humphrey has been around at "The Good Wife" since the early years. He has stalwartly written many episodes, and was trusted by Robert and Micelle King, who were covering season six's 21st and 22nd episodes, to write and direct "The Deconstruction," a pivotal moment in the series' history. So, how does he do? Mostly well, but Humphrey's inexperience maybe seeps through the surface at points. There's no doubting the power and precision behind some of the sequences in this episode, such as the immaculate opening scene, which mirrors the first scene in the Pilot. Season six boils down to this moment of symbolism between Alicia and Peter, which bonds them in a new way, they both have been in one another's shoes and now are able to lean on each other for support.

The life that used to be her's and everything she built over the last six years has ended, and she now has to move on and start from the bottom once again. This is why I believe Alicia shattered in the final seconds of "The Deconstruction" after reading Kalinda's obscure note to her. Not because of what it said, but a cumulation of all of the events that transpired in the past two weeks. Kalinda was her first friend after the scandal, and although their close tie was severed in season two, Alicia saw Kalinda leaving as the "cherry on top" of her old life being dismantled, which triggered her vulnerable release.

As strongly as a feel about aspects of "The Deconstruction," I cannot in good conscious rank it at the top as one of the season's best episodes. A reoccurring criticism of this episode was the feeling of time being wasted on Alicia's storyline with leaving the firm. Though I acknowledge the intentions behind the story and laud it to some extents, I agree with the criticism at points. The question "The Deconstruction" wanted to answer was, "Why can't Alicia come back to Lockhart, Agos and Lee?" The answer to that question is because the professional trust she used to have with Cary and Diane is long gone. Even though Alicia wants to come back and even though Diane and Cary want her to come back, they could never work together like they did before. Alicia running for State's Attorney was not necessarily was not a betrayal, but it still felt like a betrayal to the firm. Even though Cary was partnered with Alicia in to quit Lockhart Gardner and start this firm, there's a lingering, unceasing paranoia that will follow these characters in future dealings.

How this is approached in the teleplay begins well, but as it grows and focuses less on Alicia and more on Davis Lee, it becomes less compelling. Many viewers have asked, "Is that it? It was all just a misunderstanding? Yes, in a shallow sense, but also yes in a bigger sense. Too much has happened for them to return to the way things used to be. Alicia will always remain friends with Diane and Cary, as shown in Alicia's meeting with Diane in the later part of the episode, but working together is not as much of an option as the characters want it to be. And regardless, Alicia's name is not good for business (as shown with RD concluding the storyline), showing there are too many strikes against Alicia to return to her old life. Even though the analytics are behind the episode for sure, when minutes of "The Deconstruction" are being consumed by David Lee's conniving phone calls, part of it does feel pointless. One of my favorite scenes in this episode is Diane and Alicia confronting one another. It's a brief encounter, but one that is staggeringly well acted by Margulies and Christine Baranski.

The bulk of Kalinda's final story took place in this episode, and after months of every fan throwing in a sensational guess of how she would leave the show for good, her exit is concise and simple. She retrieves evidence against Bishop, she saves Diane from facing changes for faking evidence, and she leaves. The build-up of collecting evidence from Bishop's computer and framing Dexter Roja was exciting and thankfully straightforward, but the memorable part of "The Deconstruction" came after Bishop's storyline ended. Everything involved in the final scenes of this episode were exactly how I imagined they would be. Knowing Kalinda, I knew she would not be handing out melodramatic goodbyes, and the way she ended her relationships Cary and Diane (Cary by gently kissing him and Diane by hinting that she is leaving town) properly fitted the character we have gotten to know over the last six years. A round of applause for Archie Panjabi for her performance in "The Deconstruction," particularly for her last scene with Cary. How the tears steadily form in her eyes when she says, "Why did you do that, Cary?" was the emotional breaking point of the episode.

The sequence at Alicia's apartment and the mystery of the note were well done. In that scene, so much of Kalinda's relationship with Alicia is communicated (even without Alicia having to be there). The roots of their friendship--when Alicia first began at Lockhart Gardner--will always be important to Kalinda, even if the mistake of sleeping with Peter halted that connection. After her pronounced "Goodbye", everything indicating Kalinda's disappearance to Cary was especially great: the dead phone line, her wrecked apartment (the set design was chilling), the hole in the wall where she kept extra firearms and her money. Kalinda's final major storyline and her withdrawal from her life was sudden, but it stayed true to who she was and sent her off with an emotional, incisive wave. Adding to the strength of the episode's conclusion, the song that underscored Alicia's breakdown and Cary's confronting Kalinda's rough departure, "I Think It's Going to Rain Today," helped to perfectly evoke the emotional tone of the ending.

Grade: B+
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Good Wife: Winning Ugly (2015)
Season 6, Episode 19
The Most Polarizing Post-Election Episode, But The One With The Most Impact
3 May 2015
The last of the The Good Wife's three post-election outings is the one that polarized me the most, but the episode that stayed with me the longest. "Winning Ugly" has been lauded by audiences, not necessarily critics, but regular television viewers as one of the best episodes the series has ever produced. It's easy to understand why; the point of the episode is for you to feel as if you have been beaten by the time the 43 minutes are up. I certainly felt that way. Everything begins to fall apart in "Winning Ugly," placing the characters in the most vulnerable positions we have ever seen them trapped in.

Christine Baranski was given another sensational showcase this week, this one allowing her to transform Diane be a storm of anger, disdain, hurt, and fear. Julianna Margulies knocks Alicia's scenes out-of-the-park, especially the final three minutes. If you feel indignant after watching "Winning Ugly," it's probably because of Margulies's devastating portrayal of Alicia's wounds. Alicia had her whole world tore from under her--her professional life, her reputation, the public's opinion of her, her daughter's faith in her; all that seemed to be left on her side is the one force she has been fighting all season: Peter. "Winning Ugly" is the first episode where the narrative pieces that have been up in the air since January--or even September--finally begin to fully crystalize.

"Winning Ugly" aired the night Hillary Clinton announced her candidacy in the 2016 presidential election. Eerie timing considering the episode's mission to critique the critical system and, frankly, how hard it is to be a woman running for office. The criticism of the political system cannot be dismissed; the plot advancements are so brutally memorable that I retold the major points of the episode to people in my life as I saw them all week last week, even people who have never seen a single episode of the show. A problem that many people had with the season was the idea of Alicia ejecting herself from the courtroom to become a politician. It never bothered me; I was always along for the ride Robert and Michelle King wanted to take me on, but "Winning Ugly" finally accentuated how this journey has changed Alicia.

Some directorial choices (such as the awkward pan as when Ron Riftkin gives his "protector" monologue at the end of the second act) played atrociously upon the initial viewing of "Winning Ugly." It is an episode that required a few viewings to answer my questions about certain (what I initially thought were) plot holes and those odd, disjointing filming techniques. But there is so much good in "Winning Ugly," least of which is the visceral reaction it grabs from viewer through the startling narrative and character developments. Some photography is breathtaking, such as Alicia standing outside the hearing after being sacrificed; it captured how small of a fish she is in the big, cutthroat pond of politics.

Grade: A-
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed